Maryland Public School Sexual Abuse Lawsuits

Often, public attention around school sexual abuse lawsuits in Maryland has focused on historical cases. Survivors who were hurt long ago, usually silenced by shame, fear, or power, finally found a way forward.

The Maryland Child Victims Act (CVA) reopened the courthouse doors. It did this by removing the time limit for childhood sexual abuse survivors. The Yost Legal Group is dedicated to helping survivors of childhood sexual abuse.

But it is critical to say this clearly: sexual abuse of children (whether in a place of worship, recreation, or education) is not just a historical problem. It remains a present-day crisis.

According to RAINN, every nine minutes, a child in the United States is made the victim of a sexual assault.

Children are still being abused today. Survivors are still being created today. And the institutions charged with protecting children, which include Maryland public schools, are still capable of failing them in devastating ways.

Maryland Public School Sexual Abuse Lawsuit against John McAleer of Frederick County

Recent Allegations Against John McAleer of Frederick County Highlight a Modern Sexual Abuse Crisis

Consider the claims against John McAleer. He was a Special Education Instructional Assistant at Oakdale Middle School in Frederick County. This case serves as a clear reminder of this reality. His case is not about distant decades or expired records.

This situation involves recent harm, vulnerable students, and a school system that people entrusted with care, supervision, and safety.

If you or a loved one was molested by a Maryland public school employee, you may be able to file a school sexual abuse lawsuit. The Yost Legal Group has years of experience pursuing litigation against public institutions that have harbored abusers and disregarded survivors. But enough is enough.

You deserve to be heard. If you are ready to talk, we are here to listen. Call 1-800-967-8529 for a free and confidential consultation with an experienced child sexual abuse attorney or legal team member. We are here to help.

The Negative Impact of Childhood Sexual Assault

The Negative Impact of Childhood Sexual Assault

Are you a survivor of childhood sexual abuse or statutory rape? Are you carrying around anger, confusion, fear, and shame? The long-term effects of surviving a sexual assault go far beyond the physical harm it can cause.

Many survivors question whether what happened to them “counts” as sexual abuse. Others worry that too much time had passed, that no one would believe them, or that speaking out will cause more harm. You are not alone.

Those fears are not accidental. They are the product of systems that historically protected institutions instead of children.

Sexual abuse survivors often develop post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). And though we think of PTSD as an emotional response, it is actually a stress-related brain injury.

According to Brainline.org, extreme stress can cause the amygdala to enlarge. The amygdala is the part of the brain that handles emotions. It also shrinks the central cortex. The central cortex controls logical thinking.

This can lead to anger, depression, and hypervigilance. At The Yost Legal Group, we represent survivors of sexual abuse with one guiding principle: accountability matters. Not only for individual perpetrators, but for the institutions that enabled access, ignored warning signs, or failed to act when children were at risk.

You are not responsible for what happened to you. You are not alone. And you have the right to ask whether the school system that employed your abuser can be held legally responsible.

Our firm is currently representing a survivor harmed by John McAleer. We take that responsibility seriously, and we approach these cases with care, discretion, and resolve.

If you have any questions or concerns about a school sexual abuse lawsuit, contact us at your earliest convenience.

The Yost Legal Group experienced childhood sexual abuse lawyers in Maryland

Who Is John McAleer—and Why His Role Matters

John McAleer is 22 years old. He used to work as a Special Education Instructional Assistant at Oakdale Middle School. This school is in Ijamsville, Frederick County, Maryland.

According to charging documents and media reports, McAleer is accused of sexually abusing multiple students. Some of the alleged victims were cognitively impaired or particularly vulnerable due to their disabilities.

The allegations include extreme acts that go far beyond mere boundary or decorum violations. These are textbook criminal sexual abuse allegations.

Special education instructional assistants are not casual observers. They are granted authority, proximity, and trust. They often work one-on-one with students who may have difficulty communicating, such as those who are nonverbal.

These conditions make it nearly impossible to report abuse or even recognize that what is happening to them is wrong. McAleer’s role created an opportunity for care, a way to uplift a young and vulnerable person’s life. Instead, he is alleged to have used his access for exploitation.

As there are multiple allegations spanning several months, safeguards within the school system failed to protect multiple students.

The Allegations Against McAleer Are Deeply Disturbing

Prosecutors allege that McAleer used his position within Oakdale Middle School to gain access to students and sexually abuse them. Reports indicate that the alleged conduct occurred on school grounds and during school-related activities.

These were not isolated encounters between strangers. These were interactions facilitated by employment, access, and institutional trust.

Law enforcement has described the accusations as involving repeated abuse, including sexual assault and rape of minors. The victims, according to reports, include children with special needs, the most vulnerable of students who relied on adults for advocacy and protection.

When abuse occurs under these circumstances, the legal inquiry does not stop with the individual accused. We must expand the scope of the investigation and fault.

Institutional Responsibility Does Not End with an Arrest

When a public school employee is accused of sexually abusing students, the question is not only “What did they do?” It is also “How were they allowed to do it?”

Frederick County Public Schools, like all Maryland public school systems, has a legal and moral duty to protect students. That duty includes proper hiring, background checks, training, supervision, and swift intervention when concerns arise. When that system breaks down, the consequences are measured in trauma.

In these cases, investigators and civil lawyers look for warning signs. They check if complaints were handled poorly and if supervision was weak. They must also determine whether policies to prevent such occurrences had existed on paper but ultimately failed in practice.

Institutions often claim shock after abuse is uncovered. Abuse and sexual coercion rarely occur in a vacuum. It thrives in silence, in gaps in oversight, and in environments where vulnerable children are not adequately protected.

Why Special Education Students Face Heightened Risk

National data and decades of survivor testimony confirm that children with disabilities face a significantly higher risk of sexual abuse. They are more likely to depend on adults for personal care. More likely to be isolated from peers. More likely to be disbelieved when they report harm.

That reality imposes an even higher duty on schools.

When a school assigns staff to work closely with special education students, it must ensure that safeguards are real, enforced, and continuously monitored. Anything less is negligence.

If Frederick County Public Schools failed to protect these students, that failure deserves full legal scrutiny.

Civil Lawsuits Are About Accountability, Not Just Compensation

Survivors often hesitate to pursue civil claims because they worry about their motives being questioned. That hesitation is understandable. It is a lot to ask a person to come forward about something so traumatic, so damaging to the psyche.

However, when sexual assault survivors are able to report their abusers, there is a net-positive outcome on the world beyond an individual’s monetary gain.

Civil lawsuits serve multiple purposes. They provide financial resources for therapy and long-term care. They force institutions to answer questions under oath. They uncover documents that would otherwise remain hidden. And they deter future abuse by exposing systemic failures.

For survivors abused in schools, civil cases are often the only mechanism that compels change.

Speak with a Law Firm That Understands These Cases

At The Yost Legal Group, we approach school sexual abuse cases with the utmost care and discretion. We are a trauma-informed, client-first law firm here to help you understand and seek whatever healing you need.

We investigate perpetrators. We investigate institutions. And we center survivors at every stage of the process. If you are ready to talk, we are here to listen.

If you or someone you love was harmed by John McAleer or by any Maryland public school employee, you need an experienced sexual abuse lawyer. You deserve accountability and justice. And you deserve to know that your voice matters now, not decades from now.

The experienced childhood sexual abuse lawyers at The Yost Legal Group are here to help. Seek justice, answers, and compensation. Call today for a free and confidential trauma-informed consultation: 1-800-YOST-LAW (967-8529).

Institutional Sexual Abuse – Sexual Assault Lawyer – Abused as a Child – School Sexual Abuse Lawsuits

HB 462 and HB 464 Bills Stalled in PA Senate Again

A Detailed Update on Pennsylvania’s Stalled Lookback Window Legislation

Survivors of childhood sexual abuse in Pennsylvania have been fighting for something important. Many other states already recognize its significance. A chance to seek justice regardless of how long it took them to come forward. The Senate has stalled HB 462 and HB 464 bills again, and no vote has been scheduled.

More than 20 states have changed their civil statutes of limitations (SOLs) in the last decade. Many have set up “lookback windows.” These allow sexual assault survivors to file civil lawsuits, even if their claims expired years ago. Others, like our home state of Maryland in 2023, have removed their civil statute of limitations altogether.

Pennsylvania has not.

The 2018 grand jury report revealed years of sexual abuse in the Catholic Church. Despite this, the Pennsylvania Senate has not passed reform for the statute of limitations (SOL). Survivors who were molested watched as the same bills passed the House. They stalled in the Senate, expired, and then started over again.

Today, that cycle continues.

As of November 2025, House Bills 462 (HB 462) and 464 (HB 464) remain stalled. They both passed the Pennsylvania House of Representatives in June 2025. Both bills are now stuck in a Senate Committee. There is no scheduled vote, no public timeline, and no sign of progress.

Here at The Yost Legal Group, we believe CSA survivors deserve transparency. There is no new progress on the law to share. We want to make sure that child rape survivors and their families stay informed and supported.

Our sexual assault lawyers are actively monitoring these bills. We will continue to do so without making promises lawmakers have not earned.

Survivors of childhood sexual abuse in Pennsylvania have until their 55th birthday under the current law to file a civil lawsuit against their abuser. The experienced sexual abuse attorneys at The Yost Legal Group will help you understand your rights.

As a survivor, it is important to seek the justice you deserve. Call for a free consultation today. We will answer any questions you have.

Updates on HB 462 and HB 464 bills on Statute of Limitations on child sexual abuse crimes

What the Two Pennsylvania Bills Would Do

House Bill 462: A Lookback Window Through Statutory Law

HB 462 would create a civil “lookback window.” This would allow survivors whose claims are currently blocked by the statute of limitations to file lawsuits. They could sue their abusers and the institutions that helped them. This is the same type of legislation survivors’ groups have championed for years.

When HB 462 passed the House, it did so with a vote of 122–80.

House Bill 464: Moving a Constitutional Amendment Toward a Future Ballot Vote

HB 464 passed with even wider support at 138 to 64. It would advance the process of placing a constitutional amendment before Pennsylvania voters. This option requires three additional legislative votes before any proposal could actually appear on a statewide ballot.

Both bills take different paths to reach the same goal. They aim to give survivors a fair chance to seek justice, no matter when they decide to come forward.

This distinction matters because one route, statutory change, can be accomplished quickly if lawmakers agree. It is also less ironclad as it is open to constitutional challenges. That is why it is important for lawmakers to amend the Constitution itself. That route, however, can take years.

Pennsylvania sexual assault lawyer for adults who were molested as minors

Why These Bills Stalled: A Pattern of Inaction in the Pennsylvania Senate

This is not the first time these proposals have passed the House only to die in the Senate.

Over two years ago, the same combination passed with strong support from both parties. This included a statutory lookback window and a constitutional amendment. Still, the amendments did not make it to the ballot in 2023.

Today, we are watching history repeat itself. The Senate Judiciary Committee has not scheduled hearings or votes. There is no public commitment to debate. There is no timeline, and no indication that action is coming soon.

Meanwhile, Governor Josh Shapiro, who served as Attorney General during the 2018 grand jury investigation, has been publicly critical of the Senate’s repeated refusal to act. As he said recently:

It’s shameful … that the Senate of Pennsylvania has failed to act, has been unwilling to look these survivors in the eye and pass a statute of limitations window to allow those who’ve been abused to confront their abusers in a court of law.”

Survivors of sexual abuse deserve far better than political stalemates. That said, our child abuse lawyers will continue to monitor both bills.

If you are a victim of sexual abuse in Pennsylvania or Maryland, contact an experienced sexual assault attorney. The Yost Legal Group provides a free and confidential consultation. Call 1-800-967-8529 for guidance.

Why SOL Reform Matters: The 2018 Grand Jury Report Still Echoes Today

The push for SOL reform in Pennsylvania did not come out of nowhere. Its momentum grew directly from the 2018 statewide grand jury report. That exposed one of the largest institutional cover-ups of child sexual abuse in American history.

The grand jury found:

  • More than 1,000 children were abused by over 300 Catholic priests across six dioceses.
  • The “real number” was likely in the thousands, due to lost records and survivors who feared coming forward.
  • Senior church officials, including individuals who later rose to national leadership, covered up the abuse.
  • Police and prosecutors, at times, deferred to church leaders instead of investigating abuse.

The grand jury’s message was unflinching: “We are sick over all the crimes that will go unpunished and uncompensated.”

Because most of these cases were decades old, the criminal and civil statutes of limitations had expired. The church’s cover-up worked. Sexually exploited survivors could not sue. And the public outcry that followed led to the renewed push for SOL reform.

That movement continues to this day. The state needs its lawmakers to meet the moment.

survivors of childhood sexual abuse in Pennsylvania

Understanding Why Survivors Need More Time: The Reality of Delayed Disclosure

Some Pennsylvanians still argue that giving survivors until age 55 is “long enough.” But research shows this belief is deeply disconnected from the lived experience of surviving childhood sexual abuse.

According to Child USA, the national think tank for child protection:

  • The average age at which a survivor first reports childhood sexual abuse is 52 years old.
  • 51% of survivors first disclose between ages 50 and 69.
  • Nearly half of sexual victimization survivors need more time than Pennsylvania currently provides.

Trauma, shame, fear, grooming, institutional pressure, and decades of silence can delay disclosure for a lifetime. When survivors are finally ready to speak, the law should meet them with dignity. Instead, they have been met with a figurative locked courthouse door.

This is why lookback windows have been enacted across the country. This is why survivors continue advocating. And this is why Pennsylvania’s ongoing inaction remains deeply painful for so many families.

Where Things Stand Now and Why We Are Still Watching Closely

As of today:

  • HB 462 and HB 464 have passed the Pennsylvania House.
  • Both bills are now in a Senate Committee, stalled without action.
  • There is no vote scheduled.
  • The Senate leadership has not announced debate or hearings.
  • There is no certainty that the legislature will move forward.

We are watching. We are waiting. And we are prepared to do our job to help survivors the moment lawmakers do theirs.

Your Rights Today And How We Can Help

Under current Pennsylvania law, survivors of childhood sexual abuse may file civil lawsuits until age 55. That remains true today. If these laws change in the future, we will move immediately to help survivors understand their expanded rights.

But you do not need to wait for a lookback window to explore your legal options now. Our trauma-informed team is here to:

  • Listen to your story safely.
  • Explain your current legal rights.
  • Help you understand potential claims against institutions like the church, schools, hospitals, and government agencies that are supposed to protect children in their care.
  • Guide you through each step at your own pace.

Call The Yost Legal Group at 1-800-967-8529 for a free, confidential consultation with a compassionate survivor-advocacy attorney.

Our sexual abuse lawyers will explain the legal process. This is for cases involving sexual offenses that occurred when you were a minor.

Sexual Abuse Definition – Child Sexual Coercion Claims

Statutory Rape Claims – Lawyers For Sexual Abuse