MD Teacher Acquitted of Child Sex Abuse Charges Reassigned

Posted on August 22, 2025August 22, 2025 by Loni Liss

Former Severna Park Teacher Matthew Schlegel Reassigned to Student-Free Location

In Maryland, a case involving former Severna Park Elementary teacher Matthew Schlegel has drawn widespread attention and deep concern among families. In June 2025, Schlegel was acquitted of 18 counts of sexual abuse and related offenses.

The jury deadlocked on three remaining assault charges, which prosecutors later dismissed.

Now, just two months later, Schlegel has been reassigned to a district job location with no students while Anne Arundel County Public Schools conducts its own internal review.

The Child Victims Act of 2023: A Lifeline for Maryland Survivors

For survivors, parents, and community members, the outcome raises painful questions. How could so many charges result in so few legal consequences?

What role does the school system play in protecting children even after a criminal acquittal? And what avenues remain open for survivors who feel the system failed them?

If you or someone you know is the survivor of childhood sexual abuse committed by an employee of a Maryland school district, the new Child Victims Act of 2023 has expanded your statute of limitations. This means you may have a case, which could entitle you to justice in the form of monetary compensation.

Unfortunately, we cannot take back or undo the trauma you have experienced. Still, the experienced teacher sex abuse lawyers at The Yost Legal Group can help you seek the justice you deserve. Call or text us today at 410-659-6800.

Please remember: It was not your fault. You are not alone. Contact our legal team today for a free and confidential consultation and for an explanation of your rights. We are here to help.

The Trial and Acquittal of Severna Park Teacher Matthew Schlegel

In June 2025, after weeks of testimony, a jury found Schlegel not guilty on 18 counts that alleged sexual abuse and related sex offenses involving students at Severna Park Elementary.

Jurors later spoke to local media, explaining that the state had not proven its case beyond a reasonable doubt.

This legal standard is critical to understand. In criminal court, the burden on prosecutors is deliberately high, requiring jurors to find guilt “beyond a reasonable doubt.”

In cases involving child victims, this expectation can be especially challenging.

Children may struggle to testify consistently, recall events clearly, or withstand aggressive cross-examination. As Anne Arundel County State’s Attorney Anne Colt Leitess explained after the verdict:

“This is certainly not the outcome that we had hoped for in this case. One thing that strikes me is the criminal justice system expects a lot from child victims, and this case is no exception. While our office cannot guarantee verdicts in difficult cases, what we can guarantee is that we will always stand up for children and sexual assault victims, which we did in this case.”

Though the jury acquitted Schlegel on 18 counts, they could not reach an agreement on the three remaining second-degree assault charges.

Days later, prosecutors announced they would not retry the case, effectively ending the criminal proceedings.

Release and Conditions of Severna Park Teacher Matthew Schlegel

After 13 months in prison, the judge ordered Schlegel’s immediate release on his own recognizance following the acquittal. However, conditions were imposed:

No unsupervised contact with minors, except his own children.
No contact with alleged victims or their families.

These restrictions reflect a reality survivors know well. The legal system may not convict, yet courts still acknowledge the need for limits on behavior to protect children.

As for the school district, Anne Arundel County Public Schools had placed Schlegel on administrative leave during the criminal trial.

After the acquittal and dismissal of charges, the district restored him to paid employment.

However, he has not been reassigned to a classroom. Instead, as of August 2025, he is working in a district facility where no students are present, pending the outcome of the district’s internal review.

After the Verdict: What Survivors and Communities Can Do Next

For many parents, the decision to reinstate Schlegel—even in a non-teaching role—feels like a betrayal. Families argue that schools carry responsibilities separate from criminal courts.

A “not guilty” verdict does not automatically mean an individual is fit to return to the classroom. Internal reviews, guided by state education law, may apply different standards focused on safety and professional conduct.

The school district has stated that its investigation is ongoing and that it will determine final employment status based on its policies and findings.

If you or a loved one experienced childhood sexual abuse in a Maryland public school, facility, or school-sanctioned event, you may have a case and be entitled to significant compensation.

Contact the compassionate sexual abuse survivor lawyers at The Yost Legal Group today for a free and confidential consultation: 410-659-6800.

Looking Out for Survivors of Childhood Sexual Abuse

For survivors and family members, the Schlegel verdict is not just about one teacher. It represents the broader challenge of speaking truth in a system built around high burdens of proof. When jurors say, “The case was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt,” survivors may hear, “We don’t believe you.”

But legal outcomes do not erase survivor experiences. Survivors deserve to be heard, believed, and supported.

Civil cases, community advocacy, and trauma-informed legal support all provide ways to reclaim voice and agency when the criminal system falls short.

Cases like Schlegel’s reveal gaps in the system. While prosecutors must meet the criminal burden of proof, schools and communities can act under broader principles of child protection.

Moving forward, Maryland families are asking hard questions:

Should school employees acquitted of abuse ever be reassigned to teaching roles?
How can districts strengthen their internal investigative processes?
What reforms are needed to support children who testify in abuse trials?

These are not abstract questions. They shape how safe children feel walking into classrooms every day. Survivor stories should drive policy reform, ensuring that schools prioritize child safety over employment technicalities.

Protecting Our Children: The Legal Realities Every Parent Should Know

Matthew Schlegel’s acquittal does not end the conversation. It challenges us to examine how we protect children, how we hold institutions accountable, and how we stand with survivors when the legal system cannot deliver the closure they deserve.

It also raises questions about whether school districts need to re-evaluate their teachers’ union contracts that currently stipulate the reassignment of teachers within their incumbent districts should they beat charges brought against them.

The Yost Legal Group, A Lifeline for Maryland Survivors

The strength of the children who testified and the strength of the community to come together in support of the little girls are deserving of commendation and recognition.

The Yost Legal Group stands with survivors. Your experiences are to be believed, and your voices should be heard. You are not alone.

If you are a survivor of sexual abuse or know someone who is a survivor, please contact The Yost Legal Group today for a free and confidential consultation.

If you are ready to talk, we are ready to listen. Our experienced and compassionate sexual abuse survivor attorneys are here to help you and provide the legal guidance you deserve. When you are ready, call or text us a 410-659-6800.

Survivors Rights – School Molestation Claims – Teacher Abuse Claims

Child Sex Abuse Lawyer – Institutional Sexual Abuse Claims – Daycare Abuse Lawyer

Neonatal Resuscitation and Birth Injuries: What Parents Need to Know

Posted on August 4, 2025 by Loni Liss

Most babies make the transition from being in utero to being able to breathe room air on their own as soon as they are born. However, about 10% of newborns require some assistance with breathing, and of that 10%, fewer than 1% require extensive neonatal resuscitation measures.

The equipment and the medical team members trained to resuscitate newborns are required in every hospital’s labor and delivery department.

Although only 10% of newborn babies require neonatal resuscitation, meaning only 10% of parents have this experience, it is worth describing here in some detail, because it is quite common that parents are not given an explanation of the medical procedures their baby has received if newborn resuscitation was performed.

When does a newborn need neonatal resuscitation?

If a newborn baby is having any difficulty breathing or has a heart rate that is too low, emergency steps are immediately taken. The intention is to stabilize the infant so that the baby receives enough oxygen and has a strong and regular heartbeat.

Medical professionals want to reduce the risk of hypoxic (oxygen deficiency) injury to the baby’s brain.

Resuscitation of a newborn occurs in several steps, from least to most invasive, and typically begins within the first minute of life. Less than 1% of babies who need resuscitation need the most invasive procedures.

What are the first steps taken to resuscitate a newborn?

The first steps taken to treat a baby who needs help breathing are focused on:

Keeping the baby warm
Opening the baby’s airway
If necessary, advancing to the equivalent of CPR by providing positive pressure ventilation (PPV) to help the baby breathe and performing chest compressions if the heart rate remains too low (under 60 beats per minute).

Warmth: The baby is placed on a heated surface or under a radiant warmer to prevent an uncontrolled drop in body temperature (hypothermia) that might further slow the baby’s heart rate and breathing.

Positioning: Once on a warm surface, the baby’s head and neck are positioned to open the baby’s airway to optimize full respiration.

Suctioning: Clearing the baby’s mouth and nose with a bulb syringe or a suction catheter may be needed to remove fluid blocking the baby’s airway.

Breathing: Providing positive pressure ventilation (PPV) – with a bag and mask or CPAP device, for example – inflates the lungs to help with breathing if the baby is still struggling to breathe after suctioning.

Chest compressions: If the heart rate remains below 60 beats per minute after PPV ventilation is established, chest compressions are administered.

What are the advanced steps taken to resuscitate a newborn?

In less than 1% of newborns who do not respond to the initial resuscitation procedures, advanced interventions are undertaken:

Intubation: An endotracheal tube may be inserted to establish a secure and reliable airway.

Epinephrine: If the heart rate remains low despite ventilation and chest compressions, epinephrine or a similar medication may be administered through an IV.

What care does a baby receive after neonatal resuscitation?

Monitoring – A baby who has been resuscitated at the time of birth will have their heart rate, breathing, and oxygen saturation rate closely monitored, once they are transferred from the delivery room to the nursery or the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).
Body temperature control – The baby will be regularly checked to confirm that their body temperature is normal and that they are not experiencing any trouble maintaining a normal body temperature. Any baby having trouble regulating their body temperature will need immediate additional medical care to stabilize their temperature.
Further evaluation – After resuscitation, it may be necessary for the baby to undergo additional observation, testing, and monitoring to find the primary cause of the baby’s breathing difficulty and any other complications at the time of birth.

Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy and Newborn Resuscitation

Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy is not diagnosed because the baby required resuscitation at the time of birth. Still, neonatal resuscitation can be an early indication that a baby suffered a hypoxic brain injury from a lack of oxygen during labor and delivery.

HIE newborns may experience difficulty breathing, a slow heart rate, and a dusky, bluish color, all of which can result in the need for immediate resuscitation.

A need for newborn resuscitation does not mean that a baby has suffered brain damage or that medical malpractice has occurred.

But neonatal resuscitation, followed by an HIE or cerebral palsy diagnosis, does mean the baby’s labor and delivery history should be examined to determine whether medical mistakes were made.

If your child was diagnosed with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, let our birth injury attorneys help you find answers.

We invite you to reach out for a Free Consultation to discuss your unique situation in a caring, confidential environment. Call The Yost Legal Group at 1-800-YOST-LAW (1-800-967-8529) today.

Should I contact a birth injury law firm if my child needed to be resuscitated at birth?

You should consider contacting a birth injury attorney as soon as possible if:

Your baby had signs of distress or injury (like seizures, difficulty breathing, or needed to be resuscitated in the delivery room).
Your baby had low Apgar scores.
You suspect that something went wrong during labor or delivery, or you have concerns about the medical care you or your baby received.
Your baby has been diagnosed with a condition like hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), cerebral palsy, or another birth-related injury.

How The Yost Legal Group Birth Injury Lawyers Can Help.

Free Consultation: We offer a complimentary case review to discuss your concerns, review your potential case, and address any questions you may have about your baby’s resuscitation at the time of birth.
Medical Record Review: Our team will carefully review the medical records and help determine whether a medical mistake occurred during labor and delivery.
Expert Insights: We collaborate with medical experts to assess whether the care provided met accepted standards of care and if any preventable factors were involved.
No Upfront Fees: The Yost Legal Group works on a contingency fee basis, so you pay nothing unless they recover compensation for you.

If a medical mistake was made, our HIE lawyers will work to secure a lifetime of care for your child.

You can reach The Yost Legal Group by calling (800)-YOST-LAW for more information. If we file a birth injury claim on your behalf, we will fight to seek the justice and compensation you deserve.

If your infant was diagnosed with HIE or cerebral palsy and you want answers, contact The Yost Legal Group at (800)-YOST-LAW.

Birth Injury Lawsuit – HIE Injury – Neonatal Brain Injury

DC Cardinal Accused of Sexual Abuse Passes Away

Posted on July 14, 2025July 14, 2025 by Loni Liss

Theodore McCarrick, Removed in 2019, Never Faced a Criminal Trial

Ex-cardinal Theodore McCarrick faced serious sexual abuse claims from at least 12 minors. This information comes from sources before the Vatican removed him from the clergy.

Before Pope Francis removed McCarrick from the ministry in 2019, he was one of America’s most powerful Catholic cardinals. He led the Archdiocese of Washington from 2000 to 2006, during which time multiple survivors came forward.

His fame and status hid a long history of sexual abuse against minors that started in the 1970s.

The Yost Legal Group believes survivors. Our compassionate sexual assault lawyers and legal team are here to listen.

If you are a sexual abuse survivor and were sexually molested by a priest in Maryland, contact our clergy abuse lawyers.

Standing Up For Survivors of Church Sexual Abuse Against Minors

In February 2025, the Maryland Supreme Court upheld the Child Victims Act. The Yost Legal Group continues to fight for justice for those who have faced institutional sexual abuse.

We are currently representing hundreds of survivors. They all have credible claims against various institutions, including the Archdiocese of Washington.

Call us for a free and confidential consultation with a sexual abuse lawyer. Call or text The Yost Legal Group at 410-659-6800 today.

We will listen to you and provide support. An attorney for sexual abuse will hold the Archdiocese of Washington accountable. You may seek justice for the harm caused by the clergy.

Maryland vs. DC: How Child Victims Laws Differ for Abuse Survivors

The District of Columbia does not have a Maryland Child Victims Act. This act removed the time limit for childhood sexual abuse survivors. The 2018 amendment to DC’s Sexual Abuse Statute of Limitations changed the rules. Now, victims can file civil claims until they are 40 years old.

DC Law 22-311, § 12–301. Limitation of time for bringing actions, [(a)]: “(11) for the recovery of damages arising out of sexual abuse that occurred when the victim was less than 35 years of age— the date the victim attains the age of 40 years…”

Survivors of childhood sexual abuse in the District of Columbia have a deadline. They must file their claims before they turn 40. This is important to avoid losing their right to sue.

The Archdiocese of Washington operates 144 parishes across six territories. Five of those territories are within southern Maryland counties: Calvert, Charles, Montgomery, Prince George’s, and St. Mary’s.

Anyone harmed by a member of the Archdiocese of Washington as a minor, within Maryland, qualifies under Maryland’s laws and statutes.

If you were sexually abused as a minor in Maryland by a member of the Archdiocese of Washington, it does not matter how old you are now. You still have time to bring a civil case against the Church. You are not alone.

According to the most recent data from Catholic-Hierarchy.org, the Archdiocese of Washington oversees more than 680,000 worshipers. As such, given the position of power and trust, the archdiocese has a duty to protect every one of its parishioners. Especially from its own abusive clergy members.

Unfortunately, the sad reality is that the Archdiocese of Washington was negligent in its duty. They have exhibited a pattern of child sex abuse, not just with this archdiocese but with the Catholic Church in general.

Late Ex-Cardinal Theodore “Uncle Ted” McCarrick

James became a victim of sexual abuse by Father Theodore McCarrick. The sexual assault of a minor causes post-traumatic stress disorder. As a victim of sexual assault, James took legal action and filed an abuse case. Priest molestation is sexual violence and child sexual abuse.

According to James, he called himself “Uncle Ted.” His family had been close friends with Father McCarrick before James was even born.

In the spring of 1958, Father McCarrick, nearly 28 years old and just two weeks ordained, baptized James at Our Lady of Mount Carmel in Tenafly, NJ.

Eleven years later, after James had moved to California with his family, the grooming began. Father McCarrick visited often. James was struggling in school and with the move. The family thought McCarrick could help.

James said the physical sexual abuse began when he was 13 years old, when the priest first touched his penis.

James would not tell anyone of his abuse by Father Theodore McCarrick until decades later. At one point, he did tell his biological uncle, who, according to James, told him “to take the secret to his grave.” His uncle and “Uncle Ted” were friends. Both are now deceased.

James may have been the first, but he was not the last. Sexual abuse in the church causes sexual assault survivors years of PTSD.

He Told His Young Victims to Call Him Uncle Ted

1969 New York Appointment. In 1969, Cardinal Terence Cooke recalled McCarrick to New York after a multi-year stint in Puerto Rico.

In the winter of 1971, John Doe was 16 years old. At that time, McCarrick was a priest in the Archdiocese of New York. Doe was a student at Cathedral Prep Seminary, wanting to become a priest.

In the sacristy at the Manhattan seminary’s cathedral, McCarrick sexually abused Doe for the first time. According to Doe’s lawyer, whenever McCarrick saw the teen, he would tell him how good-looking he was.

Then, in the winter of 1972, McCarrick cornered the boy in a bathroom: “He just came in, grabbed him, shoved his hand into his pants, and tried to get his hand into his underwear. The kid had to struggle and push him away,’ the lawyer said.”

1981 New Jersey Appointment: From there, McCarrick continued to rise through the ranks of the Catholic Church quickly. In the winter of 1981, the Church made him the first bishop of the new Diocese of Metuchen in New Jersey.

Those who knew him and observed his behavior said he was friendly with all of the seminarians he was in charge of. Still, he did play favorites:

From Newark to New York: The Dark Legacy of Archbishop McCarrick

Beach House Visits: “[McCarrick] would invite a few he especially favored to overnight stays at a beach house in Sea Girt, NJ”

Mr. Ciolek, a young seminarian who got those beach house invites, told The New York Times in 2018. He explained how McCarrick would “assign sleeping arrangements.” He would choose one guest each night to share his room, which had one large bed.

Ciolek also detailed how McCarrick would initiate contact with the young men’s lower backs or thighs, much to some people’s disgust.

Another seminarian from the Sea Girt trips shared more details about McCarrick’s abuses in the 1980s. This person asked to remain unnamed. This was during his rapid rise to power.

1986 Newark NJ: In the spring of 1986, Pope John Paul II made Bishop McCarrick the Archbishop of Newark. This diocese was one of the largest in the country, with over one million Catholic parishioners.

The “Beach House Doe,” however, would be sexually abused by McCarrick in 1987 in a small New York City apartment above a hospital, according to reporting by The Times in 2018:

“There, Archbishop McCarrick asked the seminarian to change into a striped sailor shirt and a pair of shorts he had on hand, and joined him in bed, according to the seminarian’s written account. ‘He put his arms around me and wrapped his legs between mine,.”

“He also wrote that he once saw Archbishop McCarrick having sex with a young priest in a cabin … and that the archbishop invited him to be ‘next.'”

The “Beach House Doe’s” former priest’s file also included handwritten notes from McCarrick, which he signed “Uncle Ted” or “Uncle T.”

With Warnings Ignored, McCarrick Continues Ascent

Mr. Ciolek was a young seminarian. McCarrick made him share a bed during beach house visits. Ciolek “trusted … confided in … [and] admired” McCarrick. McCarrick used his power to take advantage of young, impressionable, and vulnerable boys and young men like Ciolek.

McCarrick also used the intimate knowledge he had gained from Ciolek to keep him further under his thumb. Ciolek revealed to McCarrick that he was a survivor of sexual abuse by a teacher in his Catholic high school.

Instead of giving the vulnerable young person advice and guidance, McCarrick retraumatized him repeatedly.

The handwritten letters in Ciolek’s former priest’s file also revealed that “Uncle Ted” referred to the members of his young beach house overnight trips as “nephew.” Per one letter, McCarrick wrote to Ciolek in the late ’80s:

“I just wanted to tell you how glad I am that we had the chance to get together this summer. It wasn’t as often as I would have liked, but I know how ‘social’ my nephew is!”

It is not illogical to surmise that even if Ciolek had come forward back then, the Church would have ignored him.

Your Voice Matters: Confidential Support for Survivors of Abuse

“Beach House Doe” filed the first documented complaint against McCarrick, giving his confession in the process.

He wrote a letter to the new bishop at Metuchen, the one who succeeded McCarrick, revealing that the archbishop had “inappropriately touched him and other seminarians in the 1980s.”

“Beach House Doe” went on to reveal that the instances of sexual abuse he survived and the trauma they caused “triggered him to touch two 15-year-old boys inappropriately.” He did something wrong. He needed to confess.

For his troubles, the Church put the then-priest in therapy and transferred him to a new parish—standard practice. There is little evidence to suggest they spoke with McCarrick after receiving “Beach House Doe’s” complaint.

Empowering Survivors to Seek Justice, One Story at a Time

In this case, there was no accountability. Instead, in 1995, the Church gave McCarrick the honor of hosting Pope John Paul II during his visit to Newark. The archbishop was also responsible for leading a large public mass for the pope’s visit.

A few years later, Mr. Ciolek received a surprise call. It was from the office of the Metuchen diocese. McCarrick’s former secretary from Metuchen wanted to meet with Ciolek.

At this meeting, the former secretary asked Ciolek directly if he had any plans to sue the diocese. He even mentioned McCarrick by name.

“‘ And I literally laughed, and I said, no,’ Mr. Ciolek said, adding that the monsignor responded with a sigh of relief.”

Within a year, Pope John Paul II promoted Archbishop McCarrick. He left his station in Newark to lead the Archdiocese of Washington. Three months after that, they appointed McCarrick as a cardinal.

All of this happened despite a warning from a priest in New Jersey. The NJ priest had heard several first-hand accounts from seminarians about the sexual abuses by McCarrick. Many committed against underage boys at his beach house.

Despite a direct phone call with the pope’s representative and a written letter submitted to the Vatican, the priest never received a response.

If you or a loved one is the survivor of sexual abuse by a member of the Archdiocese of Washington, you may have a case. The experienced clergy sexual abuse lawyers at The Yost Legal Group are here to help you seek the justice you deserve. Contact us today for a free and confidential consultation: 1-800-YOST-LAW.

Warnings Dismissed: McCarrick’s Presence at the Heart of the Vatican

In 2002, the pope, who would pass away just three years later, summoned McCarrick and other cardinals to help manage the Church’s PR crisis as reports of sexual abuse within the Church reached a fever pitch.

He was a voting member of the papal conclave that elected Pope Benedict XVI after John Paul II’s passing in 2005.

In 2006, McCarrick retired as the archbishop of Washington. He was 75, the traditional retirement age for bishops. He remained a highly regarded cardinal.

In 2013, he participated in the cardinals’ meetings held before the conclave that elected Pope Francis.

Though he was active in major Vatican events and served as a leader in many high-profile funerals in DC, McCarrick seemed to have receded from the public eye.

As an “unofficial ambassador,” the Vatican sent him around the world to East Asian and the Middle East, regions where the Church couldn’t necessarily send “official ambassadors.”

A quiet life of travel and meetings could not last forever for McCarrick. His past and the renewed focus on the Catholic Church’s crimes in the 2010s made that impossible.

The Price of Silence: McCarrick’s Influence in the Catholic Church

In the spring of 2018, McCarrick (then 87) released a statement announcing his retirement from the College of Cardinals after advice from the Church.

Months prior, the Church had received another credible claim from a John Doe. The claim stated that McCarrick committed sexual abuse. John Doe said he was 16 in 1971 at Cathedral Prep Seminary in New York.

In July 2018, the pope accepted McCarrick’s resignation. He ordered him to commit to “a life of prayer and penance in seclusion.”

Seven months later, in February 2019, the Vatican defrocked McCarrick. To date, he is still the highest-ranking member of the Catholic Church expelled for sexual abuse.

McCarrick was found guilty by a church tribunal. The Vatican’s official statement read that the former cardinal was guilty of the following:

“solicitation in the Sacrament of Confession and sins against the Sixth Commandment with minors and with adults, with the aggravating factor of the abuse of power.”

The Catholic Church made its full 461-page report on ex-Cardinal Theodore McCarrick public in November 2020. This occurred nearly two years after they removed him from the ministry.

Somehow, despite over 30 years of allegations, rumors, and whispers, the Church found the pervasiveness of McCarrick’s abuses surprising.

“I have blown the whistle for 30 years and got nowhere,” said the New Jersey priest. He contacted the Vatican before McCarrick became a cardinal. The justice system failed so many young boys against sexual harassment and physical injury.

Confidential Support for Survivors of Clergy Abuse—We’re Here for You

Theodor McCarrick died on April 3, 2025. He was 94 years old. McCarrick has a long history of sexually abusing minors and adults for over 30 years in the Catholic Church. Yet, he never faced any criminal charges.

We know this is a sensitive and challenging matter. Our sexual assault attorneys understand that many survivors may never want to come forward. However, at The Yost Legal Group, we want you to know that we are here for you.

Our sexual abuse attorneys are here to listen whenever you are ready to share your story. All consultations with our experienced lawyers for sexual abuse are free and confidential. Your traumatic experiences have caused significant pain and suffering in your life.

If you have allegations of sexual abuse and are ready to talk, we are here to listen. Call or text The Yost Legal Group at 410-659-6800.

The caring legal team at The Yost Legal Group has successfully sued the Archdiocese of Baltimore. They are helping survivors get settlements. If you or a loved one is a survivor, it is important to speak with a legal professional soon. Call or text The Yost Legal Group today at 410-659-6800.

Priest Sexual Abuse – Maryland Church Sexual Abuse – Catholic Church Abuse Claims

Sexual Trauma Therapy – Sexual Abuse Therapy – Lawyers for Survivors

Local Teacher Found Not Guilty of Child Sexual Abuse

Posted on June 25, 2025August 18, 2025 by Loni Liss

Teacher Found Not Guilty of Child Sexual Abuse

In March of 2024, a courageous 8-year-old girl came forward to report the sexual abuse she was experiencing at the hands of her third-grade teacher.

That brave act led to many other girls coming forward, alleging that the same 45-year-old male teacher molested them. The sexual abuse of these young girls was investigated through hours of forensic interviews by trained professionals.

After numerous evaluations and therapy sessions with highly trained psychologists and detectives, authorities concluded that the young girls’ stories were true and factual.

During the trial, several of those elementary school girls testified that their teacher touched them inappropriately on a number of different occasions. However, in the end, the jury was deadlocked on several counts and their teacher was ultimately was found not guilty on the others.

The Criminal Justice System Does Not Always Work

The Anne Arundel County State’s Attorney’s Office charged Matthew Schlegel with dozens of counts of childhood sex abuse crimes against several young girls who came forward to report their harrowing experiences. He was arrested in May 2024, and the trial took place in May and June of 2025.

Defendant Matthew Schlegel hired two defense firms to represent him, and an Anne Arundel County jury found him not guilty on 18 of the 21 charges.

The families feel incredibly defeated. The courageous young girls who came forward are heartbroken that the jurors did not find the accounts of their molestation to be credible and criminal.

Despite this outcome, we want to affirm and applaud the heroic actions of both the children and their supportive parents for having the strength to come forward and fight.

Attempting To Hold Accused Childhood Sexual Predators Criminally Accountable Is Very Difficult For Childhood Abuse Survivors

During the year between Schlegel’s arrest and the trial, many people’s lives were put on hold.

The young girls, who should have been spending their fourth-grade year with friends, enjoying school, playing sports, and simply being kids, instead faced an entirely different reality.

Their days were filled with therapy sessions, battles with panic attacks and anxiety, and other mental health challenges. They struggled to balance the return to school and extracurricular activities with the investigative process that was underway, which included numerous interactions with detectives, attorneys, and the judicial system.

Meanwhile, Matthew Schlegel hired multiple private defense attorneys to put up a defense that called into doubt the testimony of multiple 9- and 10-year-old victims and witnesses.

The accused sex offender’s attorneys argued to the jury that the families of these little girls colluded to influence their children to report their abuse.

The Yost Legal Group’s Cara O’Brien believes that this type of defense encourages an abuse-centered culture where children will be hesitant to come forward for fear of not being believed. Studies have found that only one in five children discloses sexual abuse during their childhood, and many do not disclose for fear of not being believed.

These Brave Girls May Have Saved Future Young Girls from Abuse

Survivors of sexual abuse do not all come forward to publicly report their childhood sexual abuse at the same time, and rarely do so while still a child and/or while still being abused. The average age at which a survivor of child sex abuse comes forward is 52. As such, childhood predators often escape scrutiny for years.

But when a brave survivor goes public, it is not unusual for many more survivors to come forward with reports of earlier sexual abuse.

These girls should be praised for their remarkable bravery, strength, and resilience as they came forward to report abuse at the ages of 8 and 9 years old, which subsequently put Severna Park Elementary school administrative officials on notice about the potential for harm to other children by their math teacher, Matthew Schlegel.

Although Matthew Schlegel was found not guilty, we applaud these children for acting selflessly and responsibly, knowing the path to going public would be hard and uncertain.

Upon information, Mr. Schlegel is not believed to be teaching third grade at Severna Park Elementary School for the 2025-2026 school year.

The Yost Legal Group Is Pursuing Holding Severna Park Elementary School Accountable to The Girls Who Were Sexually Abused at School

We believe that the criminal justice system failed these little girls and that the State’s Attorney for Anne Arundel County missed another opportunity to hold Schlegel accountable.

More victims may come forward to report that they were abused years earlier by their third-grade math teacher, Schlegel.

The determination of whether and when a child should pursue a civil claim as a result of childhood sexual abuse is very personal. The determining factor is what is in the child’s best interest. These decisions should be made after consultation with mental health professionals.

It is also advisable to speak with an experienced sex abuse attorney who is trauma-informed and trained. They can answer questions and set expectations to help the child and her parents decide if filing a civil case makes sense for them. Under the Maryland Child Victims Act, there is no time limit to file a civil claim. Families can explore Title IX proceedings, which ensure the federal right to an education free from sexual harassment.

It is essential to understand that there are other legal avenues for holding individuals accountable. Our legal system doesn’t always achieve justice on the first attempt.

Survivors of Abuse Come Forward, Your Voice Matters

If you or anyone you know suffered from childhood sexual abuse, come forward. Reclaim the power you lost as a child by confronting and holding your abusers and enablers accountable.

There Are Other Legal Remedies to Seek Justice

The Yost Legal Group is a Maryland law firm representing survivors of institutional childhood sexual abuse.

Institutional sexual abuse is when a minor is under the care and supervision of an institution, religious, government, or corporate-run entity, and is abused. Many institutions fail to protect the minors in their care.

The following is a list of institutional environments where child sex abuse claims happen frequently.

– Clergy sexual abuse claims

– Juvenile detention center sexual abuse claims

– Foster care sexual abuse claims

– Private and public school sexual abuse claims

– Athletic coach sexual abuse claims

– Doctor sexual abuse claims

Legally, no minor can consent to a sexual relationship with an adult. The Yost Legal Group’s child sexual abuse lawyers are committed to protecting the rights of child victims.

Standing Up for Justice for Child Abuse Survivors

If you’re a survivor of child sexual abuse in a Maryland institution, we will file a lawsuit on your behalf. The Maryland Child Victims Act allows victims of childhood abuse to seek justice, no matter how long ago the abuse happened.

To learn about your rights or discuss the possibility of making a sx, contact us for a free and confidential consultation. We accept cases on a no-win, no-fee, or expense basis.

Maryland Sex Abuse Law Firm – Juvenile Detention Sexual Abuse Claims – Childhood Sexual Abuse Lawyer

Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Bellwether Trial Process

Posted on June 5, 2025June 5, 2025 by Loni Liss

Over the past two years, women have been filing hair relaxer lawsuits against manufacturers of chemical hair straightener products. They used hair relaxers and developed uterine, endometrial, or ovarian cancer. They are suing the companies that made these dangerous products linked to their cancer diagnosis.

To date, over 10,000 lawsuits for hair relaxers are currently pending in the federal court system. The litigation continues to grow as more and more women come forward with potential claims.

Understanding Bellwether Trials: The Test Cases That Shape Mass Litigation

Currently, the “bellwether trial process” is underway, whereby a pool of test cases is selected to represent the larger group filed in the MDL.

A bellwether trial is a test case selected from a large group of similar lawsuits, often in a multi-district litigation (MDL) or mass tort setting.

It’s used to gauge how a jury might react to the evidence and arguments presented in the broader pool of cases, helping lawyers and the court assess the potential outcomes and value of the litigation.

These bellwether cases are then tried as sample jury trials to gauge how jurors would respond to the legal arguments, scientific evidence, and expert testimony presented by both plaintiffs and defendants.

A common MDL tactic, bellwether trials provide litigants with a preview of the strengths and weaknesses of both sides’ evidence. While not binding decisions, they often influence the initiation of settlement negotiations.

32 Bellwether Cases Selected in Hair Relaxer Cancer Litigation as Fact Discovery Begins

The honorable U.S. District Judge Mary Rowland, the federal judge presiding over the hair relaxer federal multidistrict litigation (MDL), ordered Plaintiffs and Defendants to each select 20 cases by April 30, 2025, for a total of 40 bellwether test cases, with trial dates scheduled to begin late 2026 or early 2027.

After both sides were given the opportunity to strike four cases, the total pool number is currently 32. Importantly, Judge Rowland ordered that the cases selected only include plaintiffs whose diagnoses are uterine, endometrial, or ovarian cancer.

With the selection of the bellwether pool complete, case-specific fact discovery and deadlines have begun for each of the bellwether cases.

Understanding Daubert Hearings: Challenging the Admissibility and Reliability of Expert Testimony in Pre-Trial Proceedings

The process will include general causation expert deadlines, reports, as well as pre-trial motions, including but not limited to a Daubert motion and a Daubert hearing.

In a Daubert hearing, the admissibility of expert witness testimony is contested. One side argues that the expert’s testimony, often scientifically related, is not relevant or reliable in the case.

Examples of unreliability include:

Whether or not the basis of the expert’s testimony or theory has been published in credible journals
Whether the methodology upon which the expert rests his or her theory is accepted in the scientific community
Whether or not the methodology can be replicated and tested.

If the Court finds that the science and research do not support the litigation premise, the litigation can be “thrown out on Daubert,” meaning the case can be dismissed prior to trial.

Hair Relaxer Lawsuits Advance: Special Master to Guide Settlements as Research Confirms Cancer Risks

In the hair relaxer MDL, research indicates a strong association between hair relaxers and certain types of cancer in African American women. These cancers include uterine, endometrial, and ovarian cancer.

The latest study on this topic was published in October 2022 in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

While the bellwether test trials will undoubtedly influence settlement discussions, the appointment of a settlement special master will also expedite the discussions.

A special master will help facilitate a structured settlement for these cases, and Plaintiffs and Defendants have proposed an individual for the Judge’s approval.

During the settlement process, the cases will be assessed individually based on several factors:

The type of cancer
Severity of the disease
The permanent impact on one’s health and overall well-being.

The litigation is two years in, but it is still possible to file a claim in the MDL.

The Yost Legal Group: Advocating for Women Diagnosed with Cancer After Hair Relaxer Use

At The Yost Legal Group, we are committed to standing up for women who have developed cancer after years of using hair relaxer products.

Recent scientific studies, including a pivotal October 2022 publication in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, have confirmed a strong link between long-term hair relaxer use and an increased risk of endocrine-related cancers such as uterine, endometrial, and ovarian cancer.

Fighting for Justice and Accountability

Women who trusted these products deserve answers, justice, and support. The Yost Legal Group is actively representing women from across the country in the ongoing multidistrict litigation (MDL) involving hair relaxers.

Our experienced legal team is dedicated to holding manufacturers accountable for failing to warn consumers about these serious health risks.

Compassionate Advocacy, Powerful Results

Let us file your hair relaxer cancer lawsuit today. Time may be limited depending on when you first learned about the hair relaxer litigation.

We understand the emotional and physical toll a cancer diagnosis brings—not just to you, but to your loved ones as well. Our hair relaxer attorneys handle every case with care and professionalism.

We dedicate ourselves to achieving the best results for our clients. Every woman deserves to have her voice heard and her rights protected.

Time is Limited to File Your Hair Relaxer Litigation Claim

There are strict deadlines for filing a hair-straightener lawsuit in the multidistrict litigation (MDL). If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with uterine cancer, endometrial, or ovarian cancer after using hair relaxer products, don’t wait.

Acting now is the best way to protect your rights. It gives you the chance to seek the justice and compensation you deserve.

Contact The Yost Legal Group Today

We offer free, confidential consultations to discuss your situation and help you understand your legal options. There are no upfront costs, and we only get paid if you win your case.

Reach out today—our team is here to support you every step of the way. Call us at 1-800-YOST-LAW (1-800-967-8529) or text us at 1-410-659-6800.

Your story matters. Let The Yost Legal Group help you fight for the justice you deserve.

If you developed uterine cancer, ovarian cancer, or endometrial cancer after long-term use of hair straightener products, call us. You can also fill out the Free Consultation form on our website, and we will contact you shortly.

We will be in touch with you shortly to conduct your “Free Case Review.” It is important to know your legal options.

Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Update – Chemical Hair Straightener Lawsuit – Hair Straightener Cancer

Dark and Lovely Relaxer Lawsuit – Olive Oil Relaxer Lawsuit – Chemical Hair Relaxer Lawsuit

Tractor-Trailer Crash Statistics in Maryland

Posted on May 30, 2025 by Loni Liss

.Tractor-trailer crash accidents are a significant concern on Maryland’s roadways, contributing to a notable percentage of traffic-related fatalities and injuries. The state has made progress in improving highway safety. However, the number and severity of these incidents indicate that we must remain vigilant.

If you or someone you care about is injured by a careless truck driver or trucking company, you need a highly experienced truck accident attorney. They can help you navigate the legal process.

What are Maryland’s Tractor-Trailer Crash Statistics?

According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA):

Maryland reported 891 truck accidents in 2023
Resulting in 19 fatalities
257 injuries

These figures highlight the disproportionate impact of large truck collisions, given the state’s extensive network of highways and its role as a major transportation hub on the East Coast.

What are the Contributing Factors to Tractor-Trailer Accidents?

Several key factors contribute to the occurrence of tractor-trailer accidents in Maryland:

Distracted Driving: Engaging in activities such as texting or using in-cab technology can divert a driver’s attention from the road, increasing the risk of collisions.

Impaired Driving: Driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs impairs reaction times and judgment, leading to accidents.

Given the long hours and unreasonable expectations set for truck drivers by their employers, truck drivers have a heightened risk of turning to alcohol and drugs while operating commercial vehicles on the roadway.

According to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), roughly 33% of truck drivers killed in trucking fatalities tested positive for drugs or alcohol.

Speeding: Exceeding speed limits reduces a driver’s ability to stop in time, especially when operating large vehicles that require longer stopping distances.

Aggressive Driving: Behaviors like tailgating and abrupt lane changes can provoke dangerous situations, particularly when truck drivers are under pressure to meet tight delivery schedules.

Adverse Weather Conditions: Rain, snow, and fog can reduce visibility and road traction, making it challenging for truck drivers to maintain control of their vehicles.

Blind Spots: Tractor-trailers have large blind spots, increasing the risk of accidents during lane changes if other vehicles are not visible to the driver. While truck drivers are trained to properly adjust their mirrors and check for their blind spots before changing lanes, many drivers fail to take the time to ensure that the lane next to them is clear of traffic.

Vehicle Maintenance: Neglecting regular maintenance can lead to mechanical failures, such as brake malfunctions, which can contribute to accidents.

What Makes I-95 High Risk for Tractor Trailer Accidents in Maryland

Certain highways in Maryland are more prone to tractor-trailer accidents due to factors such as high traffic volume, poor road design, and infrastructure limitations.

Interstate 95 (I-95), for example, is a central trucking corridor that has experienced a higher incidence of rear-end collisions, particularly in areas with narrow or nonexistent shoulders.

With major shippers transporting freight along the East Coast between major metropolitan areas, I-95 is a high-volume corridor for regular large truck travel.

Safety Measures and Legal Considerations

To enhance safety and reduce the occurrence of tractor-trailer accidents, several measures have been put in place:

Rear Underride Guards/Mansfield Bars: These are steel guards installed on the rear of trailers to prevent smaller vehicles from sliding underneath in the event of a collision. Maryland law mandates their installation on certain commercial vehicles.

Unfortunately, the law does not require the installation of side underride guards, and many serious injuries and fatalities occur when small vehicles slide under a trailer from the sides in scenarios such as unsafe lane changes by truck drivers.

Despite legislative efforts to prevent side underride fatalities, the trucking lobby has prevented a legislative mandate requiring side underride devices that could reduce or prevent unnecessary deaths and injuries.

Driver Regulations: The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) enforces regulations limiting driving hours to combat fatigue, a leading cause of truck accidents.

Vehicle Inspections: Regular inspections and maintenance are required to ensure that trucks are in safe operating condition, reducing the risk of mechanical failures.

Legal Recourse: Victims of tractor-trailer accidents in Maryland have legal avenues to seek compensation for injuries and damages, often involving complex litigation due to the involvement of commercial entities.

Why The Yost Legal Group Is Maryland’s Go-To Law Firm for Truck Accident Claims

When it comes to handling truck accident claims in Maryland, The Yost Legal Group stands out as a trusted advocate for victims and their families.

With decades of experience in personal injury law and a deep understanding of Maryland’s tractor-trailer crash statistics, our attorneys are uniquely equipped to navigate the complexities of truck accident litigation.

We have successfully represented clients in cases involving serious injuries and wrongful death. Our experienced personal injury lawyers hold negligent truck drivers and trucking companies accountable for their actions.

Our commitment to client advocacy, combined with our comprehensive knowledge of federal and state trucking regulations. This makes us a leading choice for those seeking justice after a devastating tractor-trailer accident.

Maximize Your Truck Accident Compensation with The Yost Legal Group

Choosing The Yost Legal Group means partnering with a team that prioritizes your recovery and financial security.

We offer free consultations and work on a contingency fee basis. Commercial truck accident victims in Maryland have access to high-quality legal representation without upfront costs.

Let us file your truck accident case. Our semi truck wreck attorneys will fight to recover damages for property damage, all medical treatment, and more.

A serious tractor-trailer accident can lead to a traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury, and other catastrophic injuries. Filing a lawsuit with an experienced legal team will help you seek the compensation you deserve.

Our firm has a strong history of winning large settlements for truck crash victims. This shows our commitment to getting the best compensation.

Medical expenses
Lost wages
Physical and emotional therapy
Necessary home construction and buildouts
Future lost earning capacity
Pain and suffering

Seriously hurt in a tractor-trailer accident? Trust the best lawyers for truck accidents at The Yost Legal Group. We provide:

Experienced guidance
Unlimited resources
Relentless advocacy to achieve the best possible outcome
Fully integrated support team

How to Protect Your Rights After a Tractor Trailer Crash in Maryland

Tractor-trailer accidents in Maryland pose significant challenges to road safety, with various factors contributing to their occurrence.

Legislative measures and safety protocols have been implemented to address these issues. However, we still need ongoing efforts to further reduce these accidents.

Investing in infrastructure is essential. Enforcing safety rules is also crucial. Running public awareness campaigns helps too. These actions are all part of a plan to make roads safer for everyone.

Did you or a loved one suffer a serious injury in an accident with a big truck? Was the accident caused by a negligent truck driver or trucking company? Call the trusted truck accident lawyers at The Yost Legal Group today.

Call us at 1-800-Yost-Law (1-800-967-8529) for a free legal consultation.

Personal Injury Law Firm Near Me – Personal Injury Attorney Lawyer – Lawyer Truck Accident

Truck Accident Lawyers Near Me – Truck Crash Lawyer Near Me – Best Personal Injury Firms

MD Law Reduces Compensation for Juvenile Sexual Abuse Claims

Posted on April 8, 2025April 8, 2025 by Loni Liss

The Maryland General Assembly stealthily passed House Bill 1378, rescinding the rights of some sexual abuse survivors if they do not file their claims in court by June 1, 2025. The bill was not supported by a single member of the government other than an obligatory bill sponsor.

No one stood up to testify in favor of the bill publicly. House Bill 1378, which takes away the amount of compensation available to survivors, was not made public until the final week of the legislative session.

Legislative leaders rushed it through both houses without following the normal procedures to avoid scrutiny by the public and the press. The bill was passed on Saturday, April 5, 2025.

The bill reduces the maximum amount of compensation for claims against the State of Maryland and local government from $890,00 to $400,000.

It will reduce the amount of non-economic damages available to survivors from $1,500,00 to $700,000.

THESE CHANGES WILL APPLY TO ANYONE WHO DOES NOT FILE THEIR LAWSUIT BEFORE JUNE 1, 2025.

Further, the bill changes the potential maximum amount of recovery from $890,000 (government claims) or $1,500,000 (non-government defendants) per each incident of abuse suffered to a maximum per person.

So if a juvenile were sexually abused repeatedly in a detention center that had notice of the abuse, they would only be able to recover $400,000 if their case is filed after June 1, 2025.

Retroactive Aspect of the New Law is Attempt to Limit the Government’s Fiscal Obligation to Help Survivors

A controversial provision of the new law is that it makes the per-person cap on damages retroactive. The legislature can usually change laws that will impact people’s rights in the future but not take away rights that exist now.

The new law would limit the maximum amount of compensation to a per person amount, even for people who file before June 1, 2025. Whether this change in the law is Constitutional is expected to be challenged in court.

Even a senator who voted for the new law admitted a Constitutional challenge would have to happen. However, it did not stop the legislature from passing the bill without considering the Constitutional implications.

Reportedly, over 5000 juvenile sexual abuse survivors have come forward, placing the state on notice of their intention to make a claim. The state of Maryland allowed thousands of instances of institutional sexual abuse to occur over decades.

This created a fiscal concern for the state due to the potential size of its financial responsibility to survivors.

The state, in turn, attempted to limit its fiscal exposure by revising the law. The real societal problem is that thousands of juveniles were raped and abused while the guards were permitted to do so year after year with impunity.

House Bill 1378 Limits Fiancial Exposure From Thousands of Sexual Abuse Claims

After becoming aware of 5000 claims, only one guard has been criminally charged, Mr. Neverdon, who is currently being prosecuted in Baltimore County.

It has been alleged that he repeatedly raped over 80 children who have come forward so far.

The new law disproportionately hurts the survivors who were the most vulnerable and injured members of society.

If someone was sexually groped one time, their claim may not be affected by the new $400,000 cap on damages. But someone who was repeatedly raped would be treated unfairly under the new law. Further, these survivors are disproportionally African American.

Under the new law, a survivor of sexual abuse for a non-government defendant who was abused regularly over years would be limited to a $700,000 cap on non-economic damages.

The legislature should never create arbitrary limits on the values of people’s suffering and should trust the courts to handle these matters. Juries must be permitted to decide the impact of abuse on each survivor.

Maryland is one of only 10 states where the legislature gives a break to wrongdoers and their insurance companies by placing arbitrary caps.

Essentially, the State of Maryland is trying to balance its budget on the backs of the people it harmed the most. The real issue here is the outrageous incidence of sexual abuse for decades in juvenile detention centers and the foster care system.

Survivor Advocacy and Institutional Accountability

Survivors and their advocates have expressed disappointment and frustration over the revisions.

Frank Schindler, a survivor of clergy sexual abuse in Baltimore, pointed out that the financial burden stems from the actions of abusers and the institutions that enabled them. “If these individuals and institutions did not rape children, the Child Victims Act would be irrelevant to them,” Schindler asserted.

David Lorenz, leader of the Maryland chapter of the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests, lamented the lack of focus on the survivors’ experiences in both the House and Senate. “We’re not addressing what happened to those children,” Lorenz said, criticizing the debate’s emphasis on financial considerations over justice and accountability.

Inadequate Notice of Law Change Will Harm Those Who Delay in Coming Forward with Their Claims

The legislature is permitted to change the amount of compensation people have a right to claim under an existing law, but only if it provides reasonable notice to people who may choose to proceed under the then-existing law.

House Bill 1378 will take effect in maybe seven weeks from when it becomes law. This is not enough notice. The median age that survivors of sexual abuse tell others is 52 years of age.

The law that existed in Maryland before the Child Victims Act (CVA) permitted people to come forward to make a claim for childhood sexual abuse up to age 38.

The CVA made the time limitless. The new law keeps that promise, yet reduces the potential recovery to a lower arbitrary amount.

Attorneys at The Yost Legal Group representing survivors have raised alarms about the constitutionality of the revisions. One major point of contention is the bill’s provision that limits survivors to a single claim, regardless of the number of times they were abused.

The decision has sparked outrage among survivors, attorneys, and advocates, who argue that the changes undermine justice and may not withstand constitutional scrutiny.

Notice of the Short Deadline Will Liley Create a Rush to File Claims

In a recent article in The Baltimore Sun, Attorney Tom Yost emphasized the potential backlash, predicting a surge in claims before the June 1 deadline.

“Everybody who is on the fence about making a claim is going to find a lawyer,” Yost stated.

He also noted that the financial burden of settling these cases may be far less than lawmakers fear, as many claims are likely to settle for amounts below the cap.

The Maryland juvenile justice system has been wracked with controversy. Thousands of child sexual abuse cases are being filed by victims of sexual assault. Staff members at juvenile detention facilities, including guards, have abused the minors in their care.

Your Voice Matters. Seek Justice Today.

Most survivors of childhood sexual abuse are torn between never disclosing what happened to them and coming forward to make a claim. You are not alone.

When the legislature or courts create deadlines, survivors are often triggered emotionally about coming forward. Many of our clients describe losing sleep and reliving memories of their abuser while they consider their options.

A large number of our clients tell us we are the first person they ever told about their abuse.

If you are ready to come forward, call the Yost Legal Group to learn more about your rights.

Your call is confidential. We have compassionate, trauma-informed staff and attorneys who can speak with you and answer your questions. Your claim can be filed under a pseudonym (John Doe) so you maintain your anonymity.

If you call and then decide not to make a Sexual Abuse Claim, the consultation is free. If you decide to make a claim, and we take your case, there is no fee or expense unless you recover.

Maryland Survivors Need to File Their Sexual Abuse Claims by June 1, 2025

If you are a victim of sexual abuse in a Maryland institution, call us today at (800)-YOST-LAW, (800)-967-8529. You can also text us at 1-410-659-6800 for a Free and confidential consultation.

The Yost Legal Group’s sexual abuse lawyers have been a voice for the injured and vulnerable in Maryland for over 35 years. We are focused on protecting the rights of survivors of childhood sexual abuse.

We understand the courage it takes to come forward and want Maryland sexual abuse survivors to know they are not alone. File your sexual abuse claim today to seek maximum compensation before it’s too late.

Call our sexual assault attorneys at (800)-YOST-LAW, (800)-967-8529, or text us at 1-410-659-6800. To learn more, visit https://www.yostlaw.com/practice-areas/sexual-abuse-claims-attorney/sexual-abuse-in-government-institutions/.

Your voice matters. Your story matters. Let us help you seek full and fair justice. The time to come forward is now.

Written by Attorney Ellen Flynn, The Yost Legal Group

Sexual Abuse in Foster Care – Juvenile Detention Sexual Abuse Claims – Catholic School Sex Abuse Claims

Sexual Abuse Lawsuit – Sexual Assault Lawsuit – Sexual Abuse Attorney

Attorney for Juveniles – Sexual Assault Lawyer – Victims Rights Maryland – CPS Claims

Child Sexual Abuse Claims at Charles H. Hickey Jr. School

Posted on March 30, 2025June 5, 2025 by Loni Liss

In a groundbreaking development, justice is near for survivors filing child sexual abuse claims from the Charles H. Hickey Jr. School in Maryland. Ronald Neverdon, a former staff member at the juvenile detention center, has been arrested on multiple counts of sexual abuse of a minor and third-degree sexual offense.

The charges stem from allegations of sexual assaults that occurred between 1976 and 1988, marking a decades-long fight for accountability and justice for the survivors.

The arrest of Neverdon, now 78, has reignited discussions about the systemic failures that allowed such abuse to occur and persist. Survivors and advocates are shedding light on the dark history of the juvenile detention center.

The Yost Legal Group represents those whose lives have been forever altered by these heinous crimes.

If you or a loved one was abused as a minor while at the Charles H. Hickey Jr. School in Maryland, contact The Yost Legal Group at 1-800-967-8549.

We are committed to seeking justice and financial compensation for survivors of child sexual abuse, no matter how long ago the abuse occurred. Our mission is to provide compassionate, dedicated legal representation to help those reclaim their voices and lives.

The History of Abuse at Charles H. Hickey Jr. School

The Charles H. Hickey Jr. School, once a juvenile detention center in Maryland, was intended to rehabilitate and guide troubled youth. Instead, for many, it became a place of unimaginable suffering.

Reports of abuse at the school date back decades. Many survivors recount harrowing experiences of physical, emotional, and sexual abuse at the hands of staff members who were entrusted with their care.

The recent arrest of Ronald Neverdon has brought these painful memories back to the forefront. Investigators revealed they began receiving reports in April 2024 about sexual assaults that occurred over a span of 12 years, from 1976 to 1988.

These reports are a testament to the resilience of survivors who have carried the weight of their trauma for decades, often in silence.

Attorney Cara O’Brien of The Yost Legal Group expressed her thoughts on the arrest, stating, “Great news! I’ve heard his name so many times when speaking with adult survivors of sexual abuse at Charles Hickey Juvenile Detention Center.

Finally, 78-year-old former Hickey staffer charged with child sex abuse.” Her words underscore the significance of this moment for survivors and their families.

Survivor Stories: Shedding Light on the Darkness

The stories of survivors are both heartbreaking and inspiring. Many of the individuals who endured abuse at the Charles H. Hickey Jr. School were vulnerable children seeking support and guidance. Instead, they were subjected to exploitation and harm by those who were supposed to protect them.

One survivor, who wishes to remain anonymous, shared their experience: “I was just a kid. I thought being sent to the Hickey School would give me a second chance. Instead, it felt like I was being punished for things I didn’t even do. The abuse was constant—physical, emotional, and sexual. I’ve carried this pain with me my whole life.”

Another survivor recounted the long-lasting impact of the abuse: “It’s not just the memories that haunt you; it’s the sense of betrayal.

These adults were supposed to help us; instead, they destroyed our trust. For years, I didn’t think anyone would believe me. But now, seeing someone finally held accountable—it gives me hope.”

These stories are not isolated incidents. They represent a pattern of systemic abuse that went unchecked for far too long. Survivors have shown immense courage in coming forward.

The Role of The Yost Legal Group in Seeking Justice for Survivors in Maryland

The Yost Legal Group, based in Baltimore, Maryland, has long been a champion for survivors of institutional child sexual abuse.

Focusing on cases involving catastrophic injuries, toxic exposures, and personal injury, the firm has earned a reputation for its unwavering commitment to justice and advocacy.

In cases involving institutional child sexual abuse, their mission is clear: to hold perpetrators accountable and to provide survivors with the support and representation they deserve.

Attorney Cara O’Brien and the team at The Yost Legal Group are leading the charge in representing survivors of abuse at the Charles H. Hickey Jr. School.

Their efforts extend beyond legal representation; they are dedicated to creating a safe space for survivors to share their stories and begin the healing process.

“Survivors of abuse deserve to be heard, believed, and supported,” said O’Brien. “We are here to stand by them every step of the way, to ensure their voices are not silenced, and to fight for the justice they have long been denied.”

The Importance of Accountability

The arrest of Ronald Neverdon is a significant step forward, but it is only the beginning. Accountability is a crucial component of justice, not only for sexual assault survivors but also for society as a whole.

Holding individuals like Neverdon accountable for their actions sends a powerful message that rape by a guard will not be tolerated. Those who perpetrate it will face the consequences.

The Yost Legal Group advocates for systemic changes to prevent future abuse. This includes pushing for stricter oversight and accountability measures in juvenile detention centers and other institutions responsible for the care of vulnerable populations.

Did you suffer sexual assault in juvenile detention in Maryland? Were you sexually assaulted by a guard? Our lawyers for sexual abuse will stand by you and protect your rights to seek justice.

Do you have a juvenile detention center abuse claim? If you are a victim of sexual assault in an institution in Maryland call us for help at 1-800-967-8529.

No Upfront Costs – Contingency Fee Basis

Our sexual assault lawyers understand that many survivors may hesitate to seek legal help due to financial concerns. That’s why The Yost Legal Group offers free initial consultations and works on a contingency fee basis.

This means that clients do not pay any legal fees until we successfully recover compensation on their behalf. If there is no recovery, no legal fees or expenses are due. A minor who was sexually victimized can take legal action against the juvenile justice system.

If you’re a victim of sexual abuse as a minor in the state of Maryland, let our sexual assault attorneys fight for you.

How Survivors Can Seek Help

For survivors of abuse at the Charles H. Hickey Jr. School or other institutions, taking the first step toward seeking help can be daunting. Our sexual abuse lawyers offer a compassionate and supportive environment for survivors to explore their legal options.

The firm provides free initial consultations and works on a contingency fee basis, meaning clients do not pay unless the firm successfully recovers compensation on their behalf.

Anyone with information about abuse at the Charles H. Hickey Jr. School or who believes they may be a victim is encouraged to contact The Yost Legal Group at 1-800-967-8529.

The firm’s experienced attorneys are ready to listen and provide guidance on the next steps.

Helping Abuse Survivors Reclaim Their Lives

The arrest of Ronald Neverdon is a reminder that justice, though delayed, is still possible. It is a testament to the courage of survivors who have come forward and the relentless efforts of advocates like The Yost Legal Group. However, there is still much work to be done.

Survivors of abuse deserve more than just justice; they deserve to heal, to reclaim their lives, and to know that their voices matter.

By advocating for systemic change, we can create a future where abuse is no longer hidden in the shadows and where survivors are met with the compassion and justice they deserve.

Supporting Survivors, One Step at a Time

The legacy of abuse at the Charles H. Hickey Jr. School is a dark chapter in Maryland’s history, but it is one that we must confront head-on. The arrest of Ronald Neverdon is a step in the right direction, but it is only the beginning.

Survivors deserve justice, accountability, and the opportunity to heal.

The Yost Legal Group stands with survivors, offering legal representation, unwavering support, and advocacy.

Together, we can ensure that the voices of survivors are heard, that perpetrators are held accountable, and that the cycle of abuse is broken once and for all.

If you or someone you know is a survivor of abuse at the Charles H. Hickey Jr. School, please reach out to The Yost Legal Group at 1-800-967-8529.

Justice is possible, and help is just a phone call away.

Rape at Juvi – Sexual Assault in Jail – Sexual Assault in School

Baltimore Juvenile Detention Center – Sexual Assault Victims – Sexual Abuse Case

Catholic High School of Baltimore Child Sexual Abuse Claims

Posted on March 11, 2025June 16, 2025 by Loni Liss

A Timeline of Sexual Abuse Scandals and Accountability

In recent years, the Catholic High School of Baltimore has faced intense scrutiny due to allegations of sexual abuse spanning decades. The revelations have shaken the community, highlighting systemic failures in protecting students and addressing complaints. This blog explores the timeline of events, the key figures involved, and the legal and social implications of these cases.

If you or someone you love is a survivor of child sexual abuse suffered in a Maryland educational or religious institution, know that you are not alone. The Yost Legal Group will provide the help, guidance, and support you need.

Our experienced and compassionate sexual abuse lawyers are dedicated to standing by survivors to fight for accountability and justice.

With the passage of Maryland’s Child Victims Act, there are no longer time limits to confront the wrongs of the past. Whether the abuse occurred in a school, Church, after-school program, or another institution, we will help you seek justice.

Contact The Yost Legal Group sexual assault lawyers today for a free and confidential consultation. Call us at (800)-YOST-LAW (800-967-8529) or text us at 1-410-659-6800.

A Timeline of Allegations and Complaints at Catholic High School of Baltimore

1960s-1980s: Early Allegations Ignored

The history of abuse allegations at Catholic High School of Baltimore dates back over 60 years. Survivors have come forward with stories of sexual abuse at the hands of priests, nuns, and teachers during this period. Despite complaints being raised, many were dismissed or buried by school administrators and the Archdiocese of Baltimore.

One of the earliest known cases involved Father Joseph Maskell, a priest accused of abusing students in the 1960s and 1970s. Maskell’s actions were brought to light in the Attorney General’s report published decades later, as detailed in WBAL-TV’s coverage. Survivors reported that Maskell preyed on vulnerable students, using his position of authority to silence them.

1990s: The Spotlight on Abuse Intensifies

The 1990s saw an increase in awareness of clergy abuse, with survivors beginning to speak out. However, systemic changes were slow, and many perpetrators remained in positions of power. During this time, the school and the archdiocese continued to face allegations of failing to act on complaints.

2000s: Legal Actions and Public Outcry

The early 2000s marked a turning point as survivors began filing lawsuits against the school and the archdiocese. The cases highlighted not only the abuse but also the institutional cover-ups that allowed it to persist.

Maryland’s Child Victims Act: A New Era of Justice for Survivors

The release of the Maryland Attorney General’s report in 2023 was a watershed moment. The report detailed decades of abuse by clergy members, including those associated with the Catholic High School of Baltimore. It also revealed the extent to which the Archdiocese of Baltimore failed to address complaints, often prioritizing the reputation of the Church over the safety of students.

In October 2023, Maryland took a groundbreaking step in advocating for survivors of childhood sexual abuse by passing the new Child Victims Act. This transformative legislation removes the statute of limitations for filing claims against abusers, providing a pathway to justice for individuals who have suffered in silence for years—even decades.

Under the new law, survivors of abuse can now come forward, regardless of how long ago the abuse occurred, to hold their abusers and the institutions that enabled them accountable.

This change is monumental for older adults who may have felt that time had run out on their opportunity to seek justice. Many survivors carry the weight of their trauma throughout their lives, often not feeling ready or able to confront their abusers until much later.

The removal of the statute of limitations recognizes the unique challenges survivors face and ensures that their voices can be heard whenever they are ready to come forward.

Key Figures and Allegations About Catholic High School of Baltimore

Father Joseph Maskell

One of the most notorious figures in the molestation of students scandal, Father Maskell, was accused of abusing multiple students during his tenure. Survivors have described how Maskell used his position to intimidate victims into silence.

Teachers and Staff

In addition to clergy members, several teachers and staff at Catholic High School of Baltimore have faced allegations of abuse. A Baltimore Sun article highlighted the case of a teacher accused of sexual solicitation in 2024.

Archdiocese Leadership

The Archdiocese of Baltimore has also been criticized for its role in covering up abuse allegations. Survivors have shared their stories in court, emphasizing the need for accountability at all levels of leadership. This was reported by NBC Washington.

Legal and Social Implications

Survivors’ Stories

The courage of survivors coming forward has been instrumental in exposing the extent of the abuse. Their testimonies have shed light on the long-term impact of abuse, including trauma, mental health challenges, and a loss of trust in institutions.

Legal Actions

The Attorney General’s report has paved the way for legal actions against Catholic High School of Baltimore. Survivors are seeking justice through lawsuits.

Community Response

The revelations have sparked outrage and calls for accountability within the Baltimore community. Parents, alumni, and advocacy groups have demanded transparency and systemic changes to ensure the safety of students.

Moving Forward: Ensuring Accountability and Justice

The Catholic High School of Baltimore scandal is a stark reminder of the importance of vigilance and accountability in protecting vulnerable populations. As survivors continue to seek justice, institutions must prioritize their members’ safety and well-being over reputational concerns.

The courage of those who have come forward cannot be overstated. Their stories have not only exposed the failures of the past but also paved the way for a safer future.

For additional information, readers can explore the following articles:

WYPR: Baltimore City Catholic High School Removing Name of Nun from Auditorium

NBC Washington: Survivors of Church Sex Abuse Share Stories in Court

CNN: Baltimore Catholic Church Priest Abuse

Baltimore Sun: Baltimore County Teacher Sexual Solicitation Report

WBAL-TV: Church Abuse – Father Joseph Maskell Attorney General Report

Educational institutions everywhere must uphold their responsibility to protect and support the students they serve.

It’s Not Too Late: Seek Justice Under Maryland’s New Child Victims Act

If you were sexually abused or molested in a Maryland school, Church, after-school program, or any other institution, this law empowers you to take action. No matter how long ago the abuse occurred, you can now seek justice and accountability.

Our experienced child sexual abuse attorneys are here to support you every step of the way. Our team is deeply committed to providing compassionate, confidential, and professional representation for survivors of childhood sexual abuse.

Contact The Yost Legal Group today at 1-800-967-8529 for a free and confidential consultation. We understand the courage it takes to come forward and are here to listen, advocate, and fight for the justice you deserve. You are not alone; it is never too late to hold those accountable for their actions.

Your story matters. Your voice matters. And we are here to help you find the justice and healing you deserve. Reach out to The Yost Legal Group today—because it’s never too late to hold those responsible accountable.

Athlete Sexual Abuse Lawyer – Childhood Sexual Abuse Lawyer – Lawyer for Sexually Abused

Foster Care Sexual Abuse Lawyer – Clergy Sexual Abuse Lawyers – Catholic Church Sex Abuse Claims

Sexual Abuse Claims at Calvert Hall College High School

Posted on February 15, 2025August 19, 2025 by Loni Liss

Childhood sexual abuse is a profoundly traumatic experience that leaves lasting scars on survivors, affecting every aspect of their lives. Many who attended Calvert Hall College High School in Maryland endured unspeakable violations. There is still time to file sexual abuse claims against Calvert Hall College High School.

The journey towards healing might feel daunting and isolating. However, you are not alone in this fight for justice and recovery.

The Yost Legal Group is committed to supporting survivors of childhood sexual abuse perpetrated by clergy or employees within the Archdiocese of Baltimore.

If you or a loved one were abused as a minor at Calvert Hall College High School—it is not too late to act. Survivors have the right to seek justice, no matter how long ago the abuse occurred. The Yost Legal Group Maryland sex abuse lawyers are here to help.

If you’re a victim of sexual abuse, contact us today. Survivors can still seek justice, access support resources, and reclaim their lives. We will explain how to file a sexual abuse lawsuit in the state of Maryland.

Take Action Against Abuse at Calvert Hall High School

Clear evidence has shown that the Archdiocese of Baltimore allowed systemic abuse to persist for years. Survivors can still file claims against those responsible. Below is a list of known offenders connected to Calvert Hall College High School, Towson, MD:

Brother Geoffrey Xavier Langan

Teacher (1941–1952; 1960–1985), Coach

Father Joseph Davies

Chaplain (1952–1963)

Brother Eugene Morgan

(1966–1977)

Father Laurence Brett

Teacher; Chaplain in Residence (1969–1973)

Father Francis McGrath

Teacher (1974–1976)

Father Jerome “Jeff” Toohey

Chaplain (1982–1993)

Father Donald Dimitroff

Resident (1991–2002)

If you recognize any of these names or were impacted by their actions, know that you are not alone. The experienced sexual abuse attorneys at The Yost Legal Group are dedicated to supporting survivors and holding those in power accountable.

A Maryland sexual abuse lawsuit filed by a survivor of sexual abuse is a positive step toward recovery. The archdiocese failed to protect children from clergy members and teachers. The Maryland Child Victims Act, passed October 1, 2023, allows survivors to come forward to seek justice even if the abuse happened 50 years ago.

Abused at Calvert Hall? We Can Help You Seek Justice

Take the first step today. Call or text The Yost Legal Group at 1-410-659-6800 for a free and confidential consultation. Justice and healing can begin here. A Maryland Sexual Abuse Attorney will listen to your story and provide guidance, compassion, and support.

First and foremost, acknowledging the trauma experienced at Calvert Hall College High is a brave step toward healing. What happened to you was not your fault.

No one should have had to endure such pain during what should have been formative years filled with growth and learning. As a survivor, reaching out for help can be incredibly challenging; however, it’s a vital part of beginning your path to recovery.

Whether through therapy or support groups specifically tailored for survivors of childhood sexual abuse within educational institutions like Calvert Hall College High School, there are resources available designed to provide comfort and empowerment.

Justice for Survivors of Calvert Hall Abuse Starts Here

The Child Victims Act of 2023 has been ruled as constitutional by the Supreme Court. Legal action serves as a powerful avenue through which survivors can pursue accountability from those responsible for their pain. The Yost Legal Group stands ready to assist individuals who suffered at the hands of clergy or school employees.

Our child sexual abuse lawyers in Maryland focus on navigating the complexities involved in these cases while offering compassionate legal guidance tailored specifically to each client’s needs.

By taking legal steps against perpetrators or institutions complicit in covering up abuse, survivors can pave the way toward justice not only for themselves but also prevent future incidents from occurring.

Understanding your rights as a survivor can be empowering amidst feelings of vulnerability and hurt. Maryland’s laws regarding sexual abuse cases have evolved over time to better protect victims seeking justice against perpetrators regardless of when the abuse occurred.

Timeline of Events

Early Reports: Allegations of abuse began to emerge in the early 1970’s, with whispers of misconduct reaching both the school and the archdiocese. Initial reports were often handled internally, reflecting a broader pattern in similar institutions.

Official Investigations: In 2018, amid growing public concern, the Archdiocese of Baltimore launched an official investigation into the allegations at Calvert Hall. This investigation aimed to uncover the truth and provide justice to the victims.

Public Disclosure: By 2020, findings from the investigation were made public, leading to significant media coverage. Survivors came forward with their stories, prompting the archdiocese to take more decisive action in collaboration with the school.

Stand Up Against Calvert Hall Abuse—Free, Confidential Help Awaits

Standing Strong for Survivors: How The Yost Legal Group Fights for Justice and Compensation

At The Yost Legal Group, advocacy is more than just a mission; it’s a promise to fight tirelessly for those who have been wronged. As strong advocates for survivors, we ensure that every case is handled with the utmost care and professionalism.

Our commitment to justice is matched by our dedication to providing hope and reassurance to our clients.

Survivors can rest assured knowing they have a team of Maryland Rape and Sexual Assault Lawyers that genuinely cares and will stand by them every step of the way.

For those seeking help, The Yost Legal Group offers free, confidential consultations. Survivors are encouraged to call 800-967-8529 to begin their journey toward justice and healing.

Rape Lawyer Maryland – Maryland Sexual Abuse Lawyer – Maryland Juvenile Hall Sexual Abuse Attorneys

Clergy Sexual Abuse Lawyer Maryland – Child Molestation Lawyer Maryland – Sexual Abuse Claims