childhood sexual abuse Archives

HB 462 and HB 464 Bills Stalled in PA Senate Again

Posted on November 25, 2025 by Loni Liss

A Detailed Update on Pennsylvania’s Stalled Lookback Window Legislation

Survivors of childhood sexual abuse in Pennsylvania have been fighting for something important. Many other states already recognize its significance. A chance to seek justice regardless of how long it took them to come forward. The Senate has stalled HB 462 and HB 464 bills again, and no vote has been scheduled.

More than 20 states have changed their civil statutes of limitations (SOLs) in the last decade. Many have set up “lookback windows.” These allow sexual assault survivors to file civil lawsuits, even if their claims expired years ago. Others, like our home state of Maryland in 2023, have removed their civil statute of limitations altogether.

Pennsylvania has not.

The 2018 grand jury report revealed years of sexual abuse in the Catholic Church. Despite this, the Pennsylvania Senate has not passed reform for the statute of limitations (SOL). Survivors who were molested watched as the same bills passed the House. They stalled in the Senate, expired, and then started over again.

Today, that cycle continues.

As of November 2025, House Bills 462 (HB 462) and 464 (HB 464) remain stalled. They both passed the Pennsylvania House of Representatives in June 2025. Both bills are now stuck in a Senate Committee. There is no scheduled vote, no public timeline, and no sign of progress.

Here at The Yost Legal Group, we believe CSA survivors deserve transparency. There is no new progress on the law to share. We want to make sure that child rape survivors and their families stay informed and supported.

Our sexual assault lawyers are actively monitoring these bills. We will continue to do so without making promises lawmakers have not earned.

Survivors of childhood sexual abuse in Pennsylvania have until their 55th birthday under the current law to file a civil lawsuit against their abuser. The experienced sexual abuse attorneys at The Yost Legal Group will help you understand your rights.

As a survivor, it is important to seek the justice you deserve. Call for a free consultation today. We will answer any questions you have.

What the Two Pennsylvania Bills Would Do

House Bill 462: A Lookback Window Through Statutory Law

HB 462 would create a civil “lookback window.” This would allow survivors whose claims are currently blocked by the statute of limitations to file lawsuits. They could sue their abusers and the institutions that helped them. This is the same type of legislation survivors’ groups have championed for years.

When HB 462 passed the House, it did so with a vote of 122–80.

House Bill 464: Moving a Constitutional Amendment Toward a Future Ballot Vote

HB 464 passed with even wider support at 138 to 64. It would advance the process of placing a constitutional amendment before Pennsylvania voters. This option requires three additional legislative votes before any proposal could actually appear on a statewide ballot.

Both bills take different paths to reach the same goal. They aim to give survivors a fair chance to seek justice, no matter when they decide to come forward.

This distinction matters because one route, statutory change, can be accomplished quickly if lawmakers agree. It is also less ironclad as it is open to constitutional challenges. That is why it is important for lawmakers to amend the Constitution itself. That route, however, can take years.

Why These Bills Stalled: A Pattern of Inaction in the Pennsylvania Senate

This is not the first time these proposals have passed the House only to die in the Senate.

Over two years ago, the same combination passed with strong support from both parties. This included a statutory lookback window and a constitutional amendment. Still, the amendments did not make it to the ballot in 2023.

Today, we are watching history repeat itself. The Senate Judiciary Committee has not scheduled hearings or votes. There is no public commitment to debate. There is no timeline, and no indication that action is coming soon.

Meanwhile, Governor Josh Shapiro, who served as Attorney General during the 2018 grand jury investigation, has been publicly critical of the Senate’s repeated refusal to act. As he said recently:

“It’s shameful … that the Senate of Pennsylvania has failed to act, has been unwilling to look these survivors in the eye and pass a statute of limitations window to allow those who’ve been abused to confront their abusers in a court of law.”

Survivors of sexual abuse deserve far better than political stalemates. That said, our child abuse lawyers will continue to monitor both bills.

If you are a victim of sexual abuse in Pennsylvania or Maryland, contact an experienced sexual assault attorney. The Yost Legal Group provides a free and confidential consultation. Call 1-800-967-8529 for guidance.

Why SOL Reform Matters: The 2018 Grand Jury Report Still Echoes Today

The push for SOL reform in Pennsylvania did not come out of nowhere. Its momentum grew directly from the 2018 statewide grand jury report. That exposed one of the largest institutional cover-ups of child sexual abuse in American history.

The grand jury found:

More than 1,000 children were abused by over 300 Catholic priests across six dioceses.
The “real number” was likely in the thousands, due to lost records and survivors who feared coming forward.
Senior church officials, including individuals who later rose to national leadership, covered up the abuse.
Police and prosecutors, at times, deferred to church leaders instead of investigating abuse.

The grand jury’s message was unflinching: “We are sick over all the crimes that will go unpunished and uncompensated.”

Because most of these cases were decades old, the criminal and civil statutes of limitations had expired. The church’s cover-up worked. Sexually exploited survivors could not sue. And the public outcry that followed led to the renewed push for SOL reform.

That movement continues to this day. The state needs its lawmakers to meet the moment.

Understanding Why Survivors Need More Time: The Reality of Delayed Disclosure

Some Pennsylvanians still argue that giving survivors until age 55 is “long enough.” But research shows this belief is deeply disconnected from the lived experience of surviving childhood sexual abuse.

According to Child USA, the national think tank for child protection:

The average age at which a survivor first reports childhood sexual abuse is 52 years old.
51% of survivors first disclose between ages 50 and 69.
Nearly half of sexual victimization survivors need more time than Pennsylvania currently provides.

Trauma, shame, fear, grooming, institutional pressure, and decades of silence can delay disclosure for a lifetime. When survivors are finally ready to speak, the law should meet them with dignity. Instead, they have been met with a figurative locked courthouse door.

This is why lookback windows have been enacted across the country. This is why survivors continue advocating. And this is why Pennsylvania’s ongoing inaction remains deeply painful for so many families.

Where Things Stand Now and Why We Are Still Watching Closely

As of today:

HB 462 and HB 464 have passed the Pennsylvania House.
Both bills are now in a Senate Committee, stalled without action.
There is no vote scheduled.
The Senate leadership has not announced debate or hearings.
There is no certainty that the legislature will move forward.

We are watching. We are waiting. And we are prepared to do our job to help survivors the moment lawmakers do theirs.

Your Rights Today And How We Can Help

Under current Pennsylvania law, survivors of childhood sexual abuse may file civil lawsuits until age 55. That remains true today. If these laws change in the future, we will move immediately to help survivors understand their expanded rights.

But you do not need to wait for a lookback window to explore your legal options now. Our trauma-informed team is here to:

Listen to your story safely.
Explain your current legal rights.
Help you understand potential claims against institutions like the church, schools, hospitals, and government agencies that are supposed to protect children in their care.
Guide you through each step at your own pace.

Call The Yost Legal Group at 1-800-967-8529 for a free, confidential consultation with a compassionate survivor-advocacy attorney.

Our sexual abuse lawyers will explain the legal process. This is for cases involving sexual offenses that occurred when you were a minor.

Sexual Abuse Definition – Child Sexual Coercion Claims

Statutory Rape Claims – Lawyers For Sexual Abuse

Former Dundalk Pastor Arrested on Child Sex Abuse Charges

Posted on September 22, 2025 by Loni Liss

Baltimore County officials just announced the arrest of former Dundalk pastor Walter Sevillano on charges related to child sex abuse. According to publicly available online court records cited in local reporting, Sevillano faces two counts of fourth-degree sex offense and one count of sex abuse of a minor.

Police say the alleged conduct occurred between 2023 and 2025 at both his Baltimore County residence and at the church where he previously served as pastor.

Baltimore County Police identified the congregation as Iglesia Cristiana Sanidad Divina — translated as Divine Healing Christian Church — a bilingual ministry that has offered services online and at a physical location in Dundalk.

As reports note, church representatives declined to comment, and Sevillano did not respond to requests for comment.

At the time of the article in the Baltimore Banner, no defense attorney was listed in the court docket. Records indicate he was being held at the Harford County Detention Center before posting a $10,000 bond and being released on Friday. The investigation remains ongoing.

Baltimore County Arrest Highlights Ongoing Institutional Abuse Risks

The arrest adds to a broader trend Baltimore County authorities have observed in recent years: allegations of child sexual abuse involving religious leaders, educators, and youth sports personnel.

While each case must be adjudicated on its own facts and the accused is presumed innocent unless proven guilty in a court of law, the pattern underscores a painful reality — institutional settings that serve children can be exploited by those who intend harm.

For survivors and families in Maryland, it is essential to understand the legal options available today, including the powerful protections afforded by the Maryland Child Victims Act.

Who is Walter Sevillano, and what do we know from public reports?

Role: Former pastor of Iglesia Cristiana Sanidad Divina in Dundalk, a bilingual Christian ministry with in-person and online services.

Allegations and charges: Online court records reflect charges of sex abuse of a minor and two counts of fourth-degree sex offense tied to incidents alleged to have taken place between 2023 and 2025, both at the church and at a Baltimore County home.

Current status: Records indicate Sevillano now lives in Abingdon, Maryland. He was held at the Harford County Detention Center before release on a $10,000 bond. At the time of the news report, no attorney was listed for him, and the church provided no comment.

As the case proceeds, additional information may become available about the timeline, any prior complaints, institutional responses, and investigative findings.

For now, what is clear is that Maryland law recognizes the unique dynamics of sexual abuse, including the complex, often delayed process of disclosure.

A troubling trend: Religious, academic, and youth sports child molestation cases surface across Baltimore County

Delayed disclosure is common and a big reason why the laws changed. Survivors of child sexual abuse frequently delay disclosure well into adulthood.

Shame, fear of not being believed, grooming by a trusted authority figure, religious or cultural pressure, and trauma-related memory processes can prevent a survivor from coming forward for years or even decades.

Recognizing these realities, Maryland enacted the Child Victims Act, removing the civil statute of limitations for survivors of childhood sexual abuse.

Put simply, adults of any age who were abused as children in Maryland can bring civil claims against the institutions that enabled or failed to prevent the abuse, and where appropriate, their abusers.

How prevalent is institutional child sexual abuse in the Catholic Church?

Investigations across the United States and in Maryland have documented widespread abuse. There have been systemic institutional failures in the Catholic Church for many decades.

Public reporting in Maryland has identified thousands of victims and numerous credibly accused clergy associated with church institutions.

Multiple newsrooms and governmental bodies have published databases and reports that detail the scope and patterns of abuse, transfers of clergy, and institutional responses.

While the present arrest involves a pastor of a Christian congregation not identified as part of the Catholic Church, the broader discussion of institutional abuse is relevant.

Survivors from many faith traditions and institutional settings — Catholic, Protestant, non-denominational, schools, camps, and youth sports — have reported similar grooming tactics, breaches of trust, and long-term trauma.

This is not an issue confined to a single denomination. It is a public safety and public health crisis that demands transparency, accountability, and survivor-centered justice.

What the Maryland Child Victims Act means for survivors of Child Sex Abuse

No civil time limit: The law allows adults of any age to file civil lawsuits for child sexual abuse that occurred in Maryland. Claims that were previously “time-barred” may now proceed.

Institutional accountability: In addition to claims against the individual perpetrator, survivors may have claims against institutions that employed or supervised the abuser, or that failed to take reasonable steps to protect children once they knew or should have known about risks.

Your voice matters, regardless of criminal charges: Civil cases can proceed even if criminal charges are never filed or cannot be brought due to different standards of proof or prosecutorial discretion.

Trauma-informed process: The civil system can provide monetary compensation for harms as well as the discovery process that may uncover how and why institutional failures occurred. For many survivors, accountability and validation are as important as compensation.

Next steps for Maryland survivors considering legal action

Document your memories and evidence.

Write down what you recall: Names, locations, approximate dates, people you told at the time. Any details about the environment or grooming tactics. Keep any journals, emails, letters, photographs, yearbooks, or program rosters that may corroborate access and opportunity.

Consider counseling. A trauma-informed therapist can offer support during disclosure and during the legal decision-making process.

Speak with an experienced legal team. A law firm that regularly handles institutional child sexual abuse cases in Maryland can assess the facts. They can explain legal options under the Child Victims Act and protect your privacy.

You are in control. Talking to a lawyer does not obligate you to file a case. You decide if, when, and how to proceed. Your safety and well-being come first.

A note on presumption of innocence and survivor support

In any criminal matter, the accused is presumed innocent unless proven guilty. That legal principle coexists with a survivor-centered approach that treats those who report abuse with dignity, seriousness, and support.

The courts resolve criminal guilt, while civil law and trauma-informed care give survivors avenues to seek justice and healing.

The Yost Legal Group’s commitment to Maryland survivors of Child Sex Abuse

The Yost Legal Group has long represented survivors of institutional child sexual abuse in Maryland. Our team understands the courage it takes to come forward and the need for privacy, respect, and steady guidance.

We conduct sensitive investigations, collaborate with trauma-informed professionals, and pursue accountability from both individuals and institutions responsible for harm.

We offer free, confidential consultations and work on a contingency fee basis. There are no fees unless we recover compensation for you.

Were you abused as a child in Maryland? You can come forward at any age under the Maryland Child Victims Act. You have options, and you have support. Whether the abuse occurred in a church, school, youth program, or other setting, you can seek justice.

Contact The Yost Legal Group today for a confidential consultation:

Phone: (800)-YOST-LAW or (800-967-8529)

Text: 1-410-659-6800

Website: https://www.yostlaw.com/

You are not alone. Your story matters. In Maryland, the law now provides a path for you to be heard and seek justice.

Child Sex Abuse – Maryland Child Victims Act – Institutional Child Sexual Abuse

Teacher Christopher Bendann Found Guilty of Child Sex Abuse

Posted on August 16, 2025August 16, 2025 by Loni Liss

,Under Project Safe Childhood, a federal jury returned a guilty verdict against Christopher Kenji Bendann, age 40, of Baltimore. He was found guilty of child sex abuse on:

– five counts of sexual exploitation of a minor to produce child pornography

– one count of cyberstalking

– three counts of possession of child pornography, all relating to his sexual exploitation of a minor male victim.

Project Safe Childhood

Project Safe Childhood (PSC) is a nationwide initiative to combat the growing epidemic of child sexual exploitation and abuse launched in May 2006 by the Department of Justice. [2]

The goal of this project is to reduce the number of children who face childhood sexual exploitation. Prosecution of childhood sexual exploitation has increased every year since the launch of Project Safe Childhood.

For more information on Project Safe Childhood, please visit the U.S. Department of Justice website.

Bendann Forced Boys to Exercise Naked While Recording for his Own Benefit

Bendann was a teacher at Gilman School, an all-boys private independent school in Roland Park, from 2007 to 2023.

Between September 2017 and February 2019, Bendann produced multiple sexually explicit videos of a child aged 16 and 17. Bendann met the child when he was in eighth grade. That year, Bendann served as the child’s teacher, coach, and adviser.

He was placed in a position of trust, a sacred trust that teachers will not sexually abuse their students.

Bendann broke this trust when he drove the child and his friends to Meadowood Regional Park or nearby to a hill at the St. Paul’s Schools campus to run laps naked as repayment for trips to McDonald’s or rides home.[3]

These perverse exercises were recorded, and Bendann can even be heard and seen in some of the video footage recovered by the FBI.

The abuse did not stop once the child became an adult and moved on from Gilman School. Teacher Christopher Bendann continued to harass the child online and demanded contact and explicit images.

Bendann Threatened to Release Sexually Explicit Images

Bendann threatened to publicly release the sexually explicit images of the minor if he did not submit to Bendann’s demands.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Colleen McGuinn said that Bendann “used his image as a pillar of the Gilman community to access these children.”[4] In 2023, Bendann was fired by Gillman School and two weeks later was arrested by Baltimore County Police.

U.S. Senior District Judge James K. Bredar sentenced Bendann to serve 35 years in federal prison in addition to a lifetime of supervised release.[5] Bendann earned this lengthy prison sentence due to his lack of remorse and refusal to admit his guilt.

After being found guilty by a jury of his peers, Bendann turned around and mouthed the words “I forgive you.”[6]

The student’s parents spoke about how Bendann’s abuse has permanently affected their son and shamed Bendann for his refusal to accept responsibility for his actions.[7]

Maryland Legislative Strips the Statute of Limitations for Civil Claims of Child Sex Abuse

In October of 2023, the Maryland Legislature significantly expanded the civil remedies for survivors of child sexual abuse. The prior law allowed survivors to come forward up to twenty years after they reached the age of majority.

However, the average age of disclosure for survivors of childhood sexual abuse is 52. The current law allows for claims to proceed no matter how long ago the abuse occurred.

This allows survivors a greater opportunity to get justice for crimes committed against them, as well as holding abusers accountable by not allowing their repercussions to disappear by hiding behind a statute of limitations.

Civil Remedies Offer Justice for Survivors of Institutional Childhood Sexual Abuse

Criminal prosecution is not the only avenue to seek justice. The Yost Legal Group is a Maryland law firm that represents survivors of childhood sexual abuse.

Institutional childhood sexual abuse occurs when a minor is sexually abused by someone who has a duty to supervise and care for the minor.

Legally, no minor can have a consensual sexual relationship with an adult. Survivors are encouraged to come forward because their voice matters. The Yost Legal Group is dedicated to seeking justice and financial compensation for survivors.

Seeking Justice for Survivors of Child Sex Abuse

If you are a survivor of child sexual abuse in a Maryland school system or state-run facility, contact our childhood sexual abuse lawyers for help. We will file a child abuse lawsuit on your behalf.

The Yost Legal Group is committed to ending childhood sexual abuse in Maryland. We are a committed team of child abuse lawyers dedicated to protecting the rights of survivors.

To learn about your rights or discuss the possibility of legal action, please contact the Yost Legal Group at 1-800-967-8529 for a free and confidential consultation.

All teacher sexual abuse claims are handled on a contingent fee basis. You never have to pay anything up front. After we settle your case, that’s when we get paid. If there is no recovery, there are no fees or expenses due.

[2] Project Safe Childhood | Project Safe Childhood

[3] https://www.thebaltimorebanner.com/community/criminal-justice/chris-bendann-gilman-school-sentencing-sex-abuse-TR2JVYRL2VE6FGD4BLT4IB4KW4/

[4] Chris Bendann, ex-Gilman School teacher, sentenced to 35 years in prison – The Baltimore Banner

[5] https://www.thebaltimorebanner.com/community/criminal-justice/chris-bendann-gilman-school-sentencing-sex-abuse-TR2JVYRL2VE6FGD4BLT4IB4KW4/

[6] Chris Bendann, ex-Gilman School teacher, sentenced to 35 years in prison – The Baltimore Banner

[7] Chris Bendann, ex-Gilman School teacher, sentenced to 35 years in prison – The Baltimore Banner

Sexual Assault Attorneys – Lawyers for Sexual Abuse – Maryland Abuse Lawyers

Recognizing the Signs of Childhood Sexual Abuse

Posted on August 5, 2025 by Loni Liss

It is difficult to determine the prevalence of childhood sexual abuse because it is not often reported. Current statistics show that one in four girls and one in six boys are survivors of childhood sexual abuse.[1]

Maryland has defined childhood sexual abuse as an act that involves the sexual molestation or exploitation of a minor, whether physical injuries are sustained or not.

This includes incest, rape, sexual offenses in any degree, and any other sexual conduct that is a crime.[2]

Maryland has expanded the legal options for survivors of childhood sexual abuse. They did so by passing the Maryland Child Victims Act of 2023, which gives survivors the right to file lawsuits related to the abuse, no matter how long ago the abuse occurred.[3]

When Children ‘Act Out’ or ‘Act In’: Understanding Behavioral Changes After Abuse

It can be challenging for survivors to come forward, and difficult for parents or guardians to recognize the signs of sexual abuse in girls and boys. Some children may begin to “act out” after their sexual abuse. This may include behavior problems, such as running away or cruelty towards others.

Some children may begin to “act in” after their sexual abuse. This may include becoming depressed and withdrawing from friends and family.

Some children may show signs of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), including agitated behavior, nightmares, and repetitive play. PTSD from sexual assault is very common in survivors.

Some children may also lose developmental skills and show regressive behavior. This can include bed-wetting and thumb-sucking.[4]

Without proper intervention, long-term symptoms may persist in adulthood. It is crucial for parents and guardians to offer non-judgmental support.

Breaking the Silence: Helping Children Heal After Sexual Abuse

The first step in offering a supportive healing process after childhood sexual abuse is to believe a survivor when they disclose that something happened to them. Not everyone processes trauma in the same way.

Some survivors may be calm when they disclose what happened to them, while some survivors may be highly emotional. Neither response is an indication of the severity of sexual abuse or how sexual abuse affected the survivor.

It is important for parents and guardians to support the survivor and not attempt to interpret the survivor’s emotional response when they disclose.

Saying things such as “I believe you” or “It took a lot of courage to tell me about this”[5] can show a survivor of childhood sexual assault that you are there to assist in their healing journey.

The Power of Reassurance: Supporting Survivors Through Their Journey

Another important step is to assure the survivor that the sexual abuse was not their fault. Many survivors report feeling a surreal feeling after the sexual abuse. This can cause a survivor to feel separate or isolated from their peers.[6]

This isolation can cause a survivor to blame themselves, or fear that they may be in trouble if the sexual abuse is uncovered.

Parents and guardians can assure a survivor that they are not at fault by reminding the survivor that they did not do anything to deserve what happened to them.[7]

This may have to be reiterated multiple times, as the healing process is not linear.

Additionally, it is key to remind the survivor that they are not alone. This can be done by being there for them and reminding them that you are willing to listen to their story.

It is also helpful to introduce resources and service providers who may be able to help a survivor on a professional level.

This can include doctors, therapists, or social workers who are trained to assist survivors of childhood sexual abuse. Parents and guardians can also acknowledge that the experience has affected the life of the survivor. This communicates empathy and shows that you care about the survivor.

Supporting Survivors: Steps to Help Heal After Sexual Abuse

Lastly, it is important to remember that there is no timeline for healing. While going through the healing process, remember to avoid judgment.

Eliminate phrases or statements that might make the survivor feel as if they are behind on their healing journey, such as “you have been acting like this for a while” or “how much longer will you feel this way?”[8]

Parents and guardians can check in with the survivor periodically to remind them that they are not alone. Remember to know your resources. The healing journey is not one that is meant to be taken alone.

The Yost Legal Group: A Safe Place for Survivors Seeking Justice

At The Yost Legal Group, we know that coming forward about childhood sexual abuse is one of the bravest steps a survivor can take.

Our sexual abuse attorneys are dedicated to providing a safe, supportive space for survivors of institutional childhood sexual abuse across Maryland.

We listen with compassion, and we fight fiercely for justice on your behalf—holding abusers and the institutions that enabled them accountable.

Childhood sexual abuse can happen anywhere children should feel safe and protected. In Maryland, we have seen cases arise in a wide range of institutions, including:

– Public and Private Schools: Abuse can occur in classrooms, locker rooms, or during extracurricular activities, often perpetrated by teachers, coaches, or staff.

– After-School Programs and Youth Organizations: Trusted mentors or volunteers may take advantage of their positions to harm children in clubs, camps, or sports leagues.

– Religious Schools and Programs: Faith-based settings, such as churches, synagogues, religious schools, or youth groups, can be manipulated by abusers who use authority and trust to silence victims.

– Doctors’ Offices and Hospitals: Medical professionals are in positions of trust and authority, and unfortunately, some have exploited this to abuse children during exams or treatments.

– Foster Care and Group Homes: Vulnerable children in foster care or group homes may be targeted by caregivers or older children in the system.

– Other Community Institutions: Libraries, community centers, and even online educational platforms can be settings where abuse occurs.

Would You Like a Free and Confidential Consultation to Seek Justice?

If you or someone you love is a victim of sexual abuse in any of these settings, please know you are not alone. The Yost Legal Group is helping sexual assault victims understand their rights. And guide you through every step of the legal process.

We offer free, confidential consultations, and you can reach us anytime at (800)-YOST-LAW, (800)-967-8529, or by text at 1-410-659-6800.

We will file a sexual abuse claim against the institution that allowed the sexual trauma. Contact our sexual abuse lawyers for guidance.

Your voice matters. You deserve justice, and we are committed to helping you find it.

Let us be your advocates—together, we can hold abusers and negligent institutions accountable and help you move forward with strength and support.

Clergy Sexual Abuse – Sexual Assault Lawyers – Child Abuse Lawyer

Childhood sexual abuse Lawyer – Sexual Abuse Lawsuit – Statutory Rape

[1] Whealin, J., & Barnett, E. (2018, August 20). Va.gov: Veterans Affairs. Child Sexual Abuse. https://www.ptsd.va.gov/professional/treat/type/sexual_abuse_child.asp

[2] Md. Code Ann., Crim. Law § 3-602 (West)

[3] Maryland Child Victims Act: Removing time limitations. Maryland Child Victims Act: Removing Time Limitations. (2025, June 22). https://www.peoples-law.org/maryland-child-victims-act-removing-time-limitations

[4] Whealin, J., & Barnett, E. (2018, August 20). Va.gov: Veterans Affairs. Child Sexual Abuse. https://www.ptsd.va.gov/professional/treat/type/sexual_abuse_child.asp

[5] Tips for Talking with Survivors of Sexual Assault. RAINN. (n.d.). https://rainn.org/articles/tips-talking-survivors-sexual-assault

[6] Common Victim Behaviors of Survivors of Sexual Abuse. Pennsylvania Coalition to Advance Respect. (n.d.). https://pcar.org/blog/common-victim-behaviors-survivors-sexual-abuse

[7] Tips for Talking with Survivors of Sexual Assault. RAINN. (n.d.). https://rainn.org/articles/tips-talking-survivors-sexual-assault

[8] Tips for Talking with Survivors of Sexual Assault. RAINN. (n.d.). https://rainn.org/articles/tips-talking-survivors-sexual-assault

DC Cardinal Accused of Sexual Abuse Passes Away

Posted on July 14, 2025July 14, 2025 by Loni Liss

Theodore McCarrick, Removed in 2019, Never Faced a Criminal Trial

Ex-cardinal Theodore McCarrick faced serious sexual abuse claims from at least 12 minors. This information comes from sources before the Vatican removed him from the clergy.

Before Pope Francis removed McCarrick from the ministry in 2019, he was one of America’s most powerful Catholic cardinals. He led the Archdiocese of Washington from 2000 to 2006, during which time multiple survivors came forward.

His fame and status hid a long history of sexual abuse against minors that started in the 1970s.

The Yost Legal Group believes survivors. Our compassionate sexual assault lawyers and legal team are here to listen.

If you are a sexual abuse survivor and were sexually molested by a priest in Maryland, contact our clergy abuse lawyers.

Standing Up For Survivors of Church Sexual Abuse Against Minors

In February 2025, the Maryland Supreme Court upheld the Child Victims Act. The Yost Legal Group continues to fight for justice for those who have faced institutional sexual abuse.

We are currently representing hundreds of survivors. They all have credible claims against various institutions, including the Archdiocese of Washington.

Call us for a free and confidential consultation with a sexual abuse lawyer. Call or text The Yost Legal Group at 410-659-6800 today.

We will listen to you and provide support. An attorney for sexual abuse will hold the Archdiocese of Washington accountable. You may seek justice for the harm caused by the clergy.

Maryland vs. DC: How Child Victims Laws Differ for Abuse Survivors

The District of Columbia does not have a Maryland Child Victims Act. This act removed the time limit for childhood sexual abuse survivors. The 2018 amendment to DC’s Sexual Abuse Statute of Limitations changed the rules. Now, victims can file civil claims until they are 40 years old.

DC Law 22-311, § 12–301. Limitation of time for bringing actions, [(a)]: “(11) for the recovery of damages arising out of sexual abuse that occurred when the victim was less than 35 years of age— the date the victim attains the age of 40 years…”

Survivors of childhood sexual abuse in the District of Columbia have a deadline. They must file their claims before they turn 40. This is important to avoid losing their right to sue.

The Archdiocese of Washington operates 144 parishes across six territories. Five of those territories are within southern Maryland counties: Calvert, Charles, Montgomery, Prince George’s, and St. Mary’s.

Anyone harmed by a member of the Archdiocese of Washington as a minor, within Maryland, qualifies under Maryland’s laws and statutes.

If you were sexually abused as a minor in Maryland by a member of the Archdiocese of Washington, it does not matter how old you are now. You still have time to bring a civil case against the Church. You are not alone.

According to the most recent data from Catholic-Hierarchy.org, the Archdiocese of Washington oversees more than 680,000 worshipers. As such, given the position of power and trust, the archdiocese has a duty to protect every one of its parishioners. Especially from its own abusive clergy members.

Unfortunately, the sad reality is that the Archdiocese of Washington was negligent in its duty. They have exhibited a pattern of child sex abuse, not just with this archdiocese but with the Catholic Church in general.

Late Ex-Cardinal Theodore “Uncle Ted” McCarrick

James became a victim of sexual abuse by Father Theodore McCarrick. The sexual assault of a minor causes post-traumatic stress disorder. As a victim of sexual assault, James took legal action and filed an abuse case. Priest molestation is sexual violence and child sexual abuse.

According to James, he called himself “Uncle Ted.” His family had been close friends with Father McCarrick before James was even born.

In the spring of 1958, Father McCarrick, nearly 28 years old and just two weeks ordained, baptized James at Our Lady of Mount Carmel in Tenafly, NJ.

Eleven years later, after James had moved to California with his family, the grooming began. Father McCarrick visited often. James was struggling in school and with the move. The family thought McCarrick could help.

James said the physical sexual abuse began when he was 13 years old, when the priest first touched his penis.

James would not tell anyone of his abuse by Father Theodore McCarrick until decades later. At one point, he did tell his biological uncle, who, according to James, told him “to take the secret to his grave.” His uncle and “Uncle Ted” were friends. Both are now deceased.

James may have been the first, but he was not the last. Sexual abuse in the church causes sexual assault survivors years of PTSD.

He Told His Young Victims to Call Him Uncle Ted

1969 New York Appointment. In 1969, Cardinal Terence Cooke recalled McCarrick to New York after a multi-year stint in Puerto Rico.

In the winter of 1971, John Doe was 16 years old. At that time, McCarrick was a priest in the Archdiocese of New York. Doe was a student at Cathedral Prep Seminary, wanting to become a priest.

In the sacristy at the Manhattan seminary’s cathedral, McCarrick sexually abused Doe for the first time. According to Doe’s lawyer, whenever McCarrick saw the teen, he would tell him how good-looking he was.

Then, in the winter of 1972, McCarrick cornered the boy in a bathroom: “He just came in, grabbed him, shoved his hand into his pants, and tried to get his hand into his underwear. The kid had to struggle and push him away,’ the lawyer said.”

1981 New Jersey Appointment: From there, McCarrick continued to rise through the ranks of the Catholic Church quickly. In the winter of 1981, the Church made him the first bishop of the new Diocese of Metuchen in New Jersey.

Those who knew him and observed his behavior said he was friendly with all of the seminarians he was in charge of. Still, he did play favorites:

From Newark to New York: The Dark Legacy of Archbishop McCarrick

Beach House Visits: “[McCarrick] would invite a few he especially favored to overnight stays at a beach house in Sea Girt, NJ”

Mr. Ciolek, a young seminarian who got those beach house invites, told The New York Times in 2018. He explained how McCarrick would “assign sleeping arrangements.” He would choose one guest each night to share his room, which had one large bed.

Ciolek also detailed how McCarrick would initiate contact with the young men’s lower backs or thighs, much to some people’s disgust.

Another seminarian from the Sea Girt trips shared more details about McCarrick’s abuses in the 1980s. This person asked to remain unnamed. This was during his rapid rise to power.

1986 Newark NJ: In the spring of 1986, Pope John Paul II made Bishop McCarrick the Archbishop of Newark. This diocese was one of the largest in the country, with over one million Catholic parishioners.

The “Beach House Doe,” however, would be sexually abused by McCarrick in 1987 in a small New York City apartment above a hospital, according to reporting by The Times in 2018:

“There, Archbishop McCarrick asked the seminarian to change into a striped sailor shirt and a pair of shorts he had on hand, and joined him in bed, according to the seminarian’s written account. ‘He put his arms around me and wrapped his legs between mine,.”

“He also wrote that he once saw Archbishop McCarrick having sex with a young priest in a cabin … and that the archbishop invited him to be ‘next.'”

The “Beach House Doe’s” former priest’s file also included handwritten notes from McCarrick, which he signed “Uncle Ted” or “Uncle T.”

With Warnings Ignored, McCarrick Continues Ascent

Mr. Ciolek was a young seminarian. McCarrick made him share a bed during beach house visits. Ciolek “trusted … confided in … [and] admired” McCarrick. McCarrick used his power to take advantage of young, impressionable, and vulnerable boys and young men like Ciolek.

McCarrick also used the intimate knowledge he had gained from Ciolek to keep him further under his thumb. Ciolek revealed to McCarrick that he was a survivor of sexual abuse by a teacher in his Catholic high school.

Instead of giving the vulnerable young person advice and guidance, McCarrick retraumatized him repeatedly.

The handwritten letters in Ciolek’s former priest’s file also revealed that “Uncle Ted” referred to the members of his young beach house overnight trips as “nephew.” Per one letter, McCarrick wrote to Ciolek in the late ’80s:

“I just wanted to tell you how glad I am that we had the chance to get together this summer. It wasn’t as often as I would have liked, but I know how ‘social’ my nephew is!”

It is not illogical to surmise that even if Ciolek had come forward back then, the Church would have ignored him.

Your Voice Matters: Confidential Support for Survivors of Abuse

“Beach House Doe” filed the first documented complaint against McCarrick, giving his confession in the process.

He wrote a letter to the new bishop at Metuchen, the one who succeeded McCarrick, revealing that the archbishop had “inappropriately touched him and other seminarians in the 1980s.”

“Beach House Doe” went on to reveal that the instances of sexual abuse he survived and the trauma they caused “triggered him to touch two 15-year-old boys inappropriately.” He did something wrong. He needed to confess.

For his troubles, the Church put the then-priest in therapy and transferred him to a new parish—standard practice. There is little evidence to suggest they spoke with McCarrick after receiving “Beach House Doe’s” complaint.

Empowering Survivors to Seek Justice, One Story at a Time

In this case, there was no accountability. Instead, in 1995, the Church gave McCarrick the honor of hosting Pope John Paul II during his visit to Newark. The archbishop was also responsible for leading a large public mass for the pope’s visit.

A few years later, Mr. Ciolek received a surprise call. It was from the office of the Metuchen diocese. McCarrick’s former secretary from Metuchen wanted to meet with Ciolek.

At this meeting, the former secretary asked Ciolek directly if he had any plans to sue the diocese. He even mentioned McCarrick by name.

“‘ And I literally laughed, and I said, no,’ Mr. Ciolek said, adding that the monsignor responded with a sigh of relief.”

Within a year, Pope John Paul II promoted Archbishop McCarrick. He left his station in Newark to lead the Archdiocese of Washington. Three months after that, they appointed McCarrick as a cardinal.

All of this happened despite a warning from a priest in New Jersey. The NJ priest had heard several first-hand accounts from seminarians about the sexual abuses by McCarrick. Many committed against underage boys at his beach house.

Despite a direct phone call with the pope’s representative and a written letter submitted to the Vatican, the priest never received a response.

If you or a loved one is the survivor of sexual abuse by a member of the Archdiocese of Washington, you may have a case. The experienced clergy sexual abuse lawyers at The Yost Legal Group are here to help you seek the justice you deserve. Contact us today for a free and confidential consultation: 1-800-YOST-LAW.

Warnings Dismissed: McCarrick’s Presence at the Heart of the Vatican

In 2002, the pope, who would pass away just three years later, summoned McCarrick and other cardinals to help manage the Church’s PR crisis as reports of sexual abuse within the Church reached a fever pitch.

He was a voting member of the papal conclave that elected Pope Benedict XVI after John Paul II’s passing in 2005.

In 2006, McCarrick retired as the archbishop of Washington. He was 75, the traditional retirement age for bishops. He remained a highly regarded cardinal.

In 2013, he participated in the cardinals’ meetings held before the conclave that elected Pope Francis.

Though he was active in major Vatican events and served as a leader in many high-profile funerals in DC, McCarrick seemed to have receded from the public eye.

As an “unofficial ambassador,” the Vatican sent him around the world to East Asian and the Middle East, regions where the Church couldn’t necessarily send “official ambassadors.”

A quiet life of travel and meetings could not last forever for McCarrick. His past and the renewed focus on the Catholic Church’s crimes in the 2010s made that impossible.

The Price of Silence: McCarrick’s Influence in the Catholic Church

In the spring of 2018, McCarrick (then 87) released a statement announcing his retirement from the College of Cardinals after advice from the Church.

Months prior, the Church had received another credible claim from a John Doe. The claim stated that McCarrick committed sexual abuse. John Doe said he was 16 in 1971 at Cathedral Prep Seminary in New York.

In July 2018, the pope accepted McCarrick’s resignation. He ordered him to commit to “a life of prayer and penance in seclusion.”

Seven months later, in February 2019, the Vatican defrocked McCarrick. To date, he is still the highest-ranking member of the Catholic Church expelled for sexual abuse.

McCarrick was found guilty by a church tribunal. The Vatican’s official statement read that the former cardinal was guilty of the following:

“solicitation in the Sacrament of Confession and sins against the Sixth Commandment with minors and with adults, with the aggravating factor of the abuse of power.”

The Catholic Church made its full 461-page report on ex-Cardinal Theodore McCarrick public in November 2020. This occurred nearly two years after they removed him from the ministry.

Somehow, despite over 30 years of allegations, rumors, and whispers, the Church found the pervasiveness of McCarrick’s abuses surprising.

“I have blown the whistle for 30 years and got nowhere,” said the New Jersey priest. He contacted the Vatican before McCarrick became a cardinal. The justice system failed so many young boys against sexual harassment and physical injury.

Confidential Support for Survivors of Clergy Abuse—We’re Here for You

Theodor McCarrick died on April 3, 2025. He was 94 years old. McCarrick has a long history of sexually abusing minors and adults for over 30 years in the Catholic Church. Yet, he never faced any criminal charges.

We know this is a sensitive and challenging matter. Our sexual assault attorneys understand that many survivors may never want to come forward. However, at The Yost Legal Group, we want you to know that we are here for you.

Our sexual abuse attorneys are here to listen whenever you are ready to share your story. All consultations with our experienced lawyers for sexual abuse are free and confidential. Your traumatic experiences have caused significant pain and suffering in your life.

If you have allegations of sexual abuse and are ready to talk, we are here to listen. Call or text The Yost Legal Group at 410-659-6800.

The caring legal team at The Yost Legal Group has successfully sued the Archdiocese of Baltimore. They are helping survivors get settlements. If you or a loved one is a survivor, it is important to speak with a legal professional soon. Call or text The Yost Legal Group today at 410-659-6800.

Priest Sexual Abuse – Maryland Church Sexual Abuse – Catholic Church Abuse Claims

Sexual Trauma Therapy – Sexual Abuse Therapy – Lawyers for Survivors

MD Law Reduces Compensation for Juvenile Sexual Abuse Claims

Posted on April 8, 2025April 8, 2025 by Loni Liss

The Maryland General Assembly stealthily passed House Bill 1378, rescinding the rights of some sexual abuse survivors if they do not file their claims in court by June 1, 2025. The bill was not supported by a single member of the government other than an obligatory bill sponsor.

No one stood up to testify in favor of the bill publicly. House Bill 1378, which takes away the amount of compensation available to survivors, was not made public until the final week of the legislative session.

Legislative leaders rushed it through both houses without following the normal procedures to avoid scrutiny by the public and the press. The bill was passed on Saturday, April 5, 2025.

The bill reduces the maximum amount of compensation for claims against the State of Maryland and local government from $890,00 to $400,000.

It will reduce the amount of non-economic damages available to survivors from $1,500,00 to $700,000.

THESE CHANGES WILL APPLY TO ANYONE WHO DOES NOT FILE THEIR LAWSUIT BEFORE JUNE 1, 2025.

Further, the bill changes the potential maximum amount of recovery from $890,000 (government claims) or $1,500,000 (non-government defendants) per each incident of abuse suffered to a maximum per person.

So if a juvenile were sexually abused repeatedly in a detention center that had notice of the abuse, they would only be able to recover $400,000 if their case is filed after June 1, 2025.

Retroactive Aspect of the New Law is Attempt to Limit the Government’s Fiscal Obligation to Help Survivors

A controversial provision of the new law is that it makes the per-person cap on damages retroactive. The legislature can usually change laws that will impact people’s rights in the future but not take away rights that exist now.

The new law would limit the maximum amount of compensation to a per person amount, even for people who file before June 1, 2025. Whether this change in the law is Constitutional is expected to be challenged in court.

Even a senator who voted for the new law admitted a Constitutional challenge would have to happen. However, it did not stop the legislature from passing the bill without considering the Constitutional implications.

Reportedly, over 5000 juvenile sexual abuse survivors have come forward, placing the state on notice of their intention to make a claim. The state of Maryland allowed thousands of instances of institutional sexual abuse to occur over decades.

This created a fiscal concern for the state due to the potential size of its financial responsibility to survivors.

The state, in turn, attempted to limit its fiscal exposure by revising the law. The real societal problem is that thousands of juveniles were raped and abused while the guards were permitted to do so year after year with impunity.

House Bill 1378 Limits Fiancial Exposure From Thousands of Sexual Abuse Claims

After becoming aware of 5000 claims, only one guard has been criminally charged, Mr. Neverdon, who is currently being prosecuted in Baltimore County.

It has been alleged that he repeatedly raped over 80 children who have come forward so far.

The new law disproportionately hurts the survivors who were the most vulnerable and injured members of society.

If someone was sexually groped one time, their claim may not be affected by the new $400,000 cap on damages. But someone who was repeatedly raped would be treated unfairly under the new law. Further, these survivors are disproportionally African American.

Under the new law, a survivor of sexual abuse for a non-government defendant who was abused regularly over years would be limited to a $700,000 cap on non-economic damages.

The legislature should never create arbitrary limits on the values of people’s suffering and should trust the courts to handle these matters. Juries must be permitted to decide the impact of abuse on each survivor.

Maryland is one of only 10 states where the legislature gives a break to wrongdoers and their insurance companies by placing arbitrary caps.

Essentially, the State of Maryland is trying to balance its budget on the backs of the people it harmed the most. The real issue here is the outrageous incidence of sexual abuse for decades in juvenile detention centers and the foster care system.

Survivor Advocacy and Institutional Accountability

Survivors and their advocates have expressed disappointment and frustration over the revisions.

Frank Schindler, a survivor of clergy sexual abuse in Baltimore, pointed out that the financial burden stems from the actions of abusers and the institutions that enabled them. “If these individuals and institutions did not rape children, the Child Victims Act would be irrelevant to them,” Schindler asserted.

David Lorenz, leader of the Maryland chapter of the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests, lamented the lack of focus on the survivors’ experiences in both the House and Senate. “We’re not addressing what happened to those children,” Lorenz said, criticizing the debate’s emphasis on financial considerations over justice and accountability.

Inadequate Notice of Law Change Will Harm Those Who Delay in Coming Forward with Their Claims

The legislature is permitted to change the amount of compensation people have a right to claim under an existing law, but only if it provides reasonable notice to people who may choose to proceed under the then-existing law.

House Bill 1378 will take effect in maybe seven weeks from when it becomes law. This is not enough notice. The median age that survivors of sexual abuse tell others is 52 years of age.

The law that existed in Maryland before the Child Victims Act (CVA) permitted people to come forward to make a claim for childhood sexual abuse up to age 38.

The CVA made the time limitless. The new law keeps that promise, yet reduces the potential recovery to a lower arbitrary amount.

Attorneys at The Yost Legal Group representing survivors have raised alarms about the constitutionality of the revisions. One major point of contention is the bill’s provision that limits survivors to a single claim, regardless of the number of times they were abused.

The decision has sparked outrage among survivors, attorneys, and advocates, who argue that the changes undermine justice and may not withstand constitutional scrutiny.

Notice of the Short Deadline Will Liley Create a Rush to File Claims

In a recent article in The Baltimore Sun, Attorney Tom Yost emphasized the potential backlash, predicting a surge in claims before the June 1 deadline.

“Everybody who is on the fence about making a claim is going to find a lawyer,” Yost stated.

He also noted that the financial burden of settling these cases may be far less than lawmakers fear, as many claims are likely to settle for amounts below the cap.

The Maryland juvenile justice system has been wracked with controversy. Thousands of child sexual abuse cases are being filed by victims of sexual assault. Staff members at juvenile detention facilities, including guards, have abused the minors in their care.

Your Voice Matters. Seek Justice Today.

Most survivors of childhood sexual abuse are torn between never disclosing what happened to them and coming forward to make a claim. You are not alone.

When the legislature or courts create deadlines, survivors are often triggered emotionally about coming forward. Many of our clients describe losing sleep and reliving memories of their abuser while they consider their options.

A large number of our clients tell us we are the first person they ever told about their abuse.

If you are ready to come forward, call the Yost Legal Group to learn more about your rights.

Your call is confidential. We have compassionate, trauma-informed staff and attorneys who can speak with you and answer your questions. Your claim can be filed under a pseudonym (John Doe) so you maintain your anonymity.

If you call and then decide not to make a Sexual Abuse Claim, the consultation is free. If you decide to make a claim, and we take your case, there is no fee or expense unless you recover.

Maryland Survivors Need to File Their Sexual Abuse Claims by June 1, 2025

If you are a victim of sexual abuse in a Maryland institution, call us today at (800)-YOST-LAW, (800)-967-8529. You can also text us at 1-410-659-6800 for a Free and confidential consultation.

The Yost Legal Group’s sexual abuse lawyers have been a voice for the injured and vulnerable in Maryland for over 35 years. We are focused on protecting the rights of survivors of childhood sexual abuse.

We understand the courage it takes to come forward and want Maryland sexual abuse survivors to know they are not alone. File your sexual abuse claim today to seek maximum compensation before it’s too late.

Call our sexual assault attorneys at (800)-YOST-LAW, (800)-967-8529, or text us at 1-410-659-6800. To learn more, visit https://www.yostlaw.com/practice-areas/sexual-abuse-claims-attorney/sexual-abuse-in-government-institutions/.

Your voice matters. Your story matters. Let us help you seek full and fair justice. The time to come forward is now.

Written by Attorney Ellen Flynn, The Yost Legal Group

Sexual Abuse in Foster Care – Juvenile Detention Sexual Abuse Claims – Catholic School Sex Abuse Claims

Sexual Abuse Lawsuit – Sexual Assault Lawsuit – Sexual Abuse Attorney

Attorney for Juveniles – Sexual Assault Lawyer – Victims Rights Maryland – CPS Claims

Child Sexual Abuse Claims at Mount St. Joseph High School

Posted on March 25, 2025 by Loni Liss

Child sexual abuse is an unimaginable violation of trust that leaves lasting scars on survivors and their families.

In recent years, we’ve seen a growing number of allegations emerge, shedding light on the systemic failures that have allowed such abuse to persist in institutions meant to nurture and protect children.

One such troubling case involves allegations against Xaverian Brother Robert Flaherty, a former teacher at Mount St. Joseph High School in Baltimore, Maryland.

The case highlights the importance of accountability, survivor advocacy, and institutional reform in addressing the devastating impact of child sexual abuse.

Brother Robert Flaherty Case Highlights Need for Oversight

Brother Robert Flaherty, a member of the Xaverian Brothers religious order, has been accused of sexually abusing a minor in the mid-1980s.

The allegation, which was revealed in August 2024, has led to his removal from ministry pending an investigation by the Baltimore City police and the State’s Attorney’s Office.

While the allegation does not involve a current or former student of Mount St. Joseph High School, the case raises critical questions about the culture of silence and lack of oversight in institutions where such abuse has occurred.

Coming forward is an act of immense courage for survivors, and their voices must be met with unwavering support and action.

If you are a survivor of child sexual abuse at Mount St. Joseph High School in Baltimore, Maryland, contact The Yost Legal Group. Call our Maryland sex abuse lawyers at 1-800-967-8529 for a free and confidential consultation. A compassionate sexual abuse lawyer will listen to what happened and offer the help you need.

List of Priests and Brothers Accused of Child Sexual Assault

Abuse of a Minor Allegations and Institutional Response

Brother Robert Flaherty joined the Xaverian Brothers in 1979 and began teaching at Mount St. Joseph High School in 1980.

Over the years, he held teaching positions at several other schools across the country, including St. Xavier High School in Kentucky and St. John’s Preparatory School in Massachusetts.

Despite his long tenure in education, no prior allegations of abuse had been reported against him until 2024.

The Xaverian Brothers, in coordination with the State’s Attorney’s Office, have implemented protocols for handling allegations of abuse, including removing Brother Flaherty from ministry while the investigation is ongoing.

The Archdiocese of Baltimore has also reviewed its records and found no prior allegations against Brother Flaherty. However, as Sean Caine, the archdiocese’s communications director, pointed out, high-profile cases often encourage other survivors to come forward.

This case serves as a stark reminder that abuse is often hidden for decades, with survivors silenced by fear, shame, or institutional cover-ups.

The Yost Legal Group is urging anyone who was abused at Mount St. Joseph High School to come forward. If the abuse involves a church representative, a teacher, a guidance counselor, or an athletic coach, a sexual assault lawyer will fight to seek justice.

The Impact on Child Molestation Survivors and the Community

Child sexual abuse has profound and far-reaching consequences for survivors. Many experience long-term psychological, emotional, and physical effects, including:

– Depression

– Anxiety

– post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)

– difficulty forming trusting relationships.

The trauma is often compounded by the betrayal of trust, particularly when the abuser is a respected figure within the community, such as a teacher, coach, or religious leader.

The allegations against Brother Flaherty have undoubtedly sparked feelings of shock, anger, and betrayal in the Mount St. Joseph High School community.

He was a teacher and an athletic coach credited with reviving the school’s ice hockey program. Such cases force communities to grapple with the painful reality that individuals they once admired have caused irreparable harm to others.

There are more likely many other sexual assault survivors out there suffering from the trauma of childhood sexual abuse.

Let a caring lawyer who works with molestation claims help fight for you. Your voice deserves to be heard. This was not your fault. We believe you.

Encouraging Survivors to Come Forward

One of the most critical steps in addressing child sexual abuse is creating an environment where survivors feel safe and supported in coming forward. The courage it takes to report abuse cannot be overstated, as survivors often face significant emotional and social barriers.

Institutions like the Xaverian Brothers and the Archdiocese of Baltimore must prioritize transparency, accountability, and survivor advocacy to ensure that all allegations are thoroughly investigated and addressed.

We encourage other survivors to break their silence.

When you work with The Yost Legal Group, we help survivors access counseling, legal support, and other resources to navigate the healing process.

How Institutions Can Break the Cycle of Silence on Abuse

The case of Brother Robert Flaherty underscores the urgent need for institutional reform to prevent future instances of abuse. This includes:

– implementing comprehensive background checks

– establishing clear reporting protocols

– providing ongoing training for staff and volunteers on recognizing and responding to signs of abuse.

Sadly, many institutions have not provided transparency and accountability. They have not ensured that allegations are handled seriously and that survivors receive the support they need.

The Xaverian Brothers and Mount St. Joseph High School must examine past practices and identify areas for improvement. While Brother Flaherty’s removal from ministry is a necessary step, it is only the beginning.

The institution must rebuild community trust by committing to protect children and holding wrongdoers accountable.

Seeking Justice Through Legal Action

Survivors of child sexual abuse often face significant barriers to seeking justice, including statutes of limitations that prevent them from filing lawsuits after a certain period.

However, recent legal reforms, such as Maryland’s Child Victims Act of 2023, have extended or eliminated these limitations.

Survivors can now come forward and hold their abusers accountable no matter how long ago the abuse happened. This legislative progress is critical in empowering survivors and ensuring that justice will be served.

Filing a Maryland sex abuse lawsuit against an abuser or the institution that enabled the abuse can be an important part of the healing process for survivors.

It allows sexual abuse survivors to reclaim their voices, seek accountability, and secure financial compensation for the harm they have endured.

Legal action also sends a powerful message that abuse will not be tolerated and that institutions must take their responsibility to protect children seriously.

The Role of Legal Advocates at The Yost Legal Group

For abuse survivors considering legal action, working with an experienced legal team can make all the difference. Firms like The Yost Legal Group handle cases of child sexual abuse and are dedicated to providing compassionate support and guidance throughout the legal process.

They understand the unique challenges survivors face and are committed to holding abusers and institutions accountable.

At The Yost Legal Group, survivors can expect a client-focused approach that prioritizes their well-being and seeks justice on their behalf.

The firm works on a contingency fee basis, meaning survivors pay nothing upfront and only owe legal fees if their case is successfully resolved.

This ensures that financial barriers do not prevent survivors from seeking the justice they deserve.

Rising Above Silence: Addressing Abuse in Institutions

The allegations against Brother Robert Flaherty at Mount St. Joseph High School are a painful reminder of the pervasive issue of child sexual abuse and the urgent need for action.

While no amount of legal action or institutional reform can undo the harm caused, it is possible to create a future where children are better protected, survivors are supported, and abusers are held accountable.

For survivors, coming forward is an act of courage that can inspire others to do the same. The emotional distress you have been carrying around as a victim of sexual abuse needs to heal.

By sharing their stories, they play a vital role in breaking the cycle of abuse and driving meaningful change.

Call 1-800-967-8529 to see if we can help you. Seek the justice and the financial compensation you deserve. File your Baltimore sex abuse claim if you are a victim of sexual assault in an institution.

As a society, we must stand with survivors, listen to their voices, and work together to create a safer, more just world for all children.

Church Sexual Abuse – Clergy Sexual Abuse – Doctor Sexual Assault

Child Molestation – Child Sexual Abuse Cases – Sexual Assault at School