Loni Liss, Author at Injury Lawyers

Roblox Lawsuits Seek Justice for Exploited Children

Posted on February 13, 2026February 13, 2026 by Loni Liss

Tennessee Has Joined Growing Number of States Suing Roblox Corp.

For years, parents were told that Roblox was a safe, creative space for children: a digital playground for them to build, explore, and connect. But for many families, that promise collapsed after darker contacts emerged. Children, through no fault of their own, met adults on Roblox. Some of those online predators later groomed, sexually exploited, and abused innocent minors.

The Yost Legal Group is reviewing Roblox Abuse Claims on behalf of children who were sexually abused after meeting adults through Roblox. These cases are not about hypothetical risks or parental fears. They are about real children who were harmed in ways that were foreseeable, preventable, and devastating.

If a loved one was sexually abused as a minor after meeting an adult on Roblox, you may have a case. Please call the experienced sexual abuse survivor attorneys at The Yost Legal Group today for a free and confidential consultation. You owe us nothing unless we recover for you: 1-800-YOST-LAW (967-8529).

At the same time, government officials across the country are echoing what survivors and families have said for years. And now, Tennessee has joined a growing list of states.

These include Texas, Ohio, Kentucky, and Louisiana.

They have filed lawsuits against the Roblox maker, alleging serious failures to protect children.

They also claim the company made misleading safety statements.

This moment matters. It confirms that the harm was not isolated and the danger was known.

When Children Meet Adults on Roblox, the Risk Is Real

Many of the childhood sexual abuse cases around Roblox follow a similar pattern:

1. A child creates or uses a Roblox account.

2. An adult initiates contact through in-game chat, private messaging, or linked platforms.

3. Over time, that contact escalates into grooming. It normalizes sexual talk, trades lewd images, and moves chats off-platform.

4. In many cases, the contact becomes physical when adults arrange in-person meetings with minors and abuse them.

Per Roblox’s own disclosure, there were 13,000 incidents of exploitation in 2023 alone.

But the trauma does not end when the contact stops. Survivors often struggle with shame, fear, anxiety, and long-term psychological harm. Families are left asking the same painful question: How did this happen on a platform marketed as safe for kids?

Roblox’s Alleged Failures Are Now Being Challenged Nationwide

Tennessee’s lawsuit against Roblox is not an outlier. It is part of a clear and growing pattern. Attorneys general in multiple states have now accused Roblox of creating and maintaining an environment that exposes children to sexual predators while simultaneously reassuring parents that the platform is safe.

According to these lawsuits, Roblox allegedly knew, or should have known, that predators were using the platform to identify, groom, and exploit minors. Yet the company continued to promote its safety features in ways states say were misleading.

Tennessee’s action follows similar lawsuits from Texas, Ohio, Kentucky, and Louisiana. These cases raise serious concerns about child safety, platform design, and deceptive practices.

States do not file lawsuits like these casually. When multiple attorneys general, across different regions and political landscapes, reach similar conclusions, it signals something systemic. These cases allege that Roblox’s safety failures were not random or unforeseeable.

They were built into the platform’s operations.

Civil Lawsuits by Families Serve a Different, Critical Purpose

While state lawsuits focus on consumer protection and regulatory enforcement, civil sexual abuse lawsuits focus on survivors. Families come forward not only to seek compensation, but to demand accountability for the harm their children endured.

Civil cases will ask tough questions of the defendant (Roblox Corporation): Did Roblox implement reasonable safeguards? Did it ignore warning signs? Did it prioritize growth and engagement over child safety? And did its public assurances about safety prevent parents from understanding the true risks?

For families, these cases are about answers and recognition. They aim to force a powerful company to face the results of its decisions.

They also seek changes to practices that still put children at risk. Supporting survivors, the misled, and the injured is what The Yost Legal Group has done for over 30 years.

If you or a loved one was targeted as a minor by an adult on the Roblox platform and later sexually abused or exploited, call or text The Yost Legal Group today at 410-659-6800. Our compassionate sexual abuse survivor lawyers can help you understand your rights and seek justice.

Why Families Are Coming Forward Now

Many parents did not immediately connect their child’s abuse to Roblox. Grooming is designed to be hidden. Children are manipulated into secrecy.

Adults exploit trust, curiosity, and vulnerability. When the truth comes out, families often feel guilt or confusion.

But responsibility lies with those who created the environment. They also failed to control it, allowing predators to operate.

The wave of state lawsuits has helped many families realize they are not alone. What happened to their child was not a fluke. It fits a broader pattern that is now being acknowledged at the highest levels of government.

The Yost Legal Group Is Representing Exploited Children

The Yost Legal Group represents survivors of sexual abuse and their families with compassion, seriousness, and resolve. We are accepting cases involving children who were sexually abused after meeting adults on Roblox, and we approach these cases with the understanding that every survivor’s story is deeply personal.

Our focus is on holding companies accountable when their failures contribute to sexual exploitation. That includes investigating how Roblox’s design, moderation systems, and safety representations may have enabled abuse or prevented parents from making informed decisions.

These cases are handled with care. Conversations are confidential. Survivors and families are treated with respect and dignity at every stage. If you are ready to talk, we are here to listen.

Roblox Accountability Is About More Than One Case

Holding Roblox accountable is not just about individual lawsuits. It is about protecting other children from experiencing the same harm. Civil litigation can expose internal practices, drive change, and create safer environments in which children are not treated as collateral damage.

The growing number of state lawsuits makes one thing clear: Concerns about Roblox are no longer being dismissed. New safety measures introduced reactively by Roblox suggest the company is feeling pressure to act.

But the damage is already done. The questions now are whether survivors will be heard and whether further meaningful change will follow.

Was Your Child Harmed Because of the Roblox App? You Are Not Alone!

If your child has been abused or exploited after meeting an adult on Roblox, what happened is not your fault. And it is certainly not your child’s fault. You deserve answers, support, and the opportunity to seek justice for your child with a Roblox lawyer.

For over 30 years, The Yost Legal Group has offered free, confidential consultations to families exploring their legal options in a wide range of personal injury cases. First and foremost, we are here to listen and support. If you want to continue, we are here to inform you.

Speaking with an attorney does not obligate you to file a lawsuit. It simply helps you understand your rights and decide what comes next on your terms.

For many families, coming forward is not easy. But accountability starts when people believe survivors. It also starts when those who failed to protect children must answer for the harm they allowed.

If you or a loved one was a minor and met an adult on Roblox before that adult groomed, exploited, or sexually abused you, we are so sorry for the harm you have endured. If you are ready to talk, we are here to help. We will explain how we can file a Roblox sexual abuse lawsuit to protect your rights.

Contact the experienced sexual abuse lawyers at The Yost Legal Group today for a free and confidential consultation: 410-659-6800.

Roblox Suicide – Parental Controls – Child Sexual Exploitation

Financial Compensation – Gaming Platforms – Online Platforms

Archdiocese of Washington Sexual Abuse Lawsuits: 2026 Legal Updates & Survivor Rights

Posted on February 3, 2026 by Loni Liss

Catholic Church Concessions in New York pave the way for Financial Compensation in Washington, D.C.

For decades, survivors of childhood sexual abuse within the Catholic Church were told that too much time had passed and that nothing could be done.

That message is no longer true.

The Yost Legal Group provides legal representation for survivors of childhood sexual abuse within the Archdiocese of Washington, navigating new Maryland laws that allow for claims previously barred by time.

Across the United States, Catholic dioceses are being forced to confront long-hidden abuse through civil litigation. In recent months, national and international reporting has confirmed that survivors are coming forward in large numbers and that courts are finally opening their doors.

These developments matter deeply to survivors in Maryland and the Washington, D.C. region.

The Yost Legal Group is currently accepting cases from individuals who were sexually abused as minors in Archdiocese of Washington churches. Maryland law now allows survivors to pursue justice even if the abuse occurred decades ago.

If you or a loved one was sexually abused as a minor in an Archdiocese of Washington church or by a member of the clergy, the experienced sexual abuse survivor attorneys at The Yost Legal Group are here to listen and here to help. Call or text us today for a free and confidential consultation at 410-659-6800.

For many survivors, this is the first time the legal system has acknowledged what they endured.

Why Catholic Church Sexual Abuse Cases Are in the News Again in 2026

In late 2025 and early 2026, major news organizations reported that the Archdiocese of New York agreed to mediate approximately 1,300 childhood sexual abuse claims. Church officials also announced the creation of a proposed compensation fund totaling roughly $300 million for survivors.

These reports did not emerge in isolation. They followed years of survivor advocacy and changes in state law that allowed victims to file previously barred claims.

National outlets, including Reuters, ABC News New York, and Ms. Magazine, have all covered the growing pressure facing Catholic institutions worldwide. Their reporting highlights a reality survivors have long understood.

These events are not limited to New York. They reflect a national pattern that now includes Maryland and the Archdiocese of Washington.

When laws change, and survivors are allowed into court, institutional accountability follows.

What the New York Catholic Church Settlements Mean for Maryland Survivors

The New York mediation process shows what happens when survivors are finally given a legal voice.

More than a thousand individuals came forward. Their claims forced one of the largest Catholic dioceses in the country to negotiate publicly and acknowledge the scope of past abuse.

For survivors in Maryland, this moment carries an important message. The Catholic Church abuse crisis was never limited to one city or one generation. It followed the same institutional structure across dioceses worldwide.

Allegations nationwide describe similar failures. Complaints were ignored. Clergy were reassigned. Parishioners were not warned. Children remained at risk.

These are the same issues now being examined in lawsuits involving the Archdiocese of Washington.

While each case is unique, the underlying question remains the same: Did Church leadership fail to protect children when it had the ability to act?

Maryland courts are now empowered to examine that question.

Can I File a Lawsuit Against the Archdiocese of Washington for Childhood Sexual Abuse

Yes. Survivors of childhood sexual abuse can file civil lawsuits against the Archdiocese of Washington under the Maryland Child Victims Act.

The law removed time limits that previously prevented survivors from seeking justice. It allows individuals who were sexually abused as children to file claims regardless of when the abuse occurred. This includes abuse that took place decades ago.

At present, there is no CVA equivalent in Washington, D.C.’s jurisdiction. However, over 100 parishes among five “territories” are within Maryland’s border. That means Maryland law applies to those situations.

You can find a list of the Archdiocese of Washington territories and parishes here.

Many survivors assume they no longer have legal options because of their age or the passage of time. Maryland law now says otherwise.

If you or a loved one was sexually abused as a minor in an Archdiocese of Washington church, you may be eligible to pursue a civil claim today. The compassionate attorneys at The Yost Legal Group are here to listen if you are ready to talk. All communication is confidential. All data is private and secure. Call or text today for a free consultation to help you understand your rights: 410-659-6800.

Why the Maryland Child Victims Act Changed Everything

Before the Maryland Child Victims Act, most survivors were legally silenced. They had until their 35th birthday to pursue a legal claim under the previous statute of limitations.

This created an inescapable legal roadblock for survivors. For childhood survivors of sexual abuse, there is a phenomenon called “delayed disclosure.”

Child USA defines it as such:

“[T]he phenomenon common to survivors of child sex abuse where individuals wait for years, often well into adulthood, before telling anyone they were abused.”

Studies have shown that the average age of a discloser is between 40 and 52 years old. With a statute of limitations capped at 35 years of age, the previous law left thousands of survivors with no recourse.

But the new law created a long overdue opportunity for accountability.

It recognizes that childhood sexual abuse often prevents survivors from speaking out for many years. Trauma does not operate on legal deadlines.

By removing those barriers, Maryland lawmakers acknowledged what survivors and experts have long understood. Justice delayed should not mean justice denied.

This legal change is why survivors are now coming forward across the state. It is also why litigation involving the Archdiocese of Washington is actively moving forward.

Institutional Responsibility and the Role of Civil Litigation

These lawsuits are not about attacking faith. They are about examining institutional conduct.

Civil litigation allows survivors to ask critical questions. What did church leaders know? When did they know it? What actions were taken? What warnings were withheld?

In many Catholic Church abuse cases nationwide, survivors allege that leadership failed to remove known offenders and prioritized reputation over child safety.

Now, Maryland courts have the authority to evaluate those claims.

For many survivors, the goal is not only compensation but also an acknowledgment. It is about accountability, and it is a permanent record that the abuse happened and that survivors’ claims are not meant to be swept under the proverbial rug.

A Worldwide Reckoning Within the Catholic Church

Recent international reporting confirms that the Catholic Church abuse crisis is not confined to the United States.

Around the world, survivors continue to demand accountability through criminal investigations, civil lawsuits, public inquiries, and global media coverage. These developments reinforce a central truth.

The abuse was systemic. The silence was institutional.

As this reckoning unfolds globally, survivors in Maryland are part of that same movement toward truth and justice.

The difference now is that Maryland law finally gives them the legal tools to act.

The Yost Legal Group Is Accepting Archdiocese of Washington Abuse Cases

The Yost Legal Group is currently accepting cases involving childhood sexual abuse in Archdiocese of Washington churches.

Our firm represents survivors with care, discretion, and respect. We understand how difficult it can be to speak about abuse, especially when it occurred within a trusted religious environment.

– You do not need documentation to contact us.

– You do not need to have reported the abuse previously.
– You do not need to be certain about your legal options.

A confidential consultation can help you understand your rights under Maryland law.

Speaking with an attorney does not obligate you to take legal action. It simply gives you information and support. If you are ready to talk, the experienced legal team at The Yost Legal Group is here to listen.

It Is Not Too Late to Seek Justice

Many survivors carry guilt or shame that never belonged to them. Responsibility lies with abusers and the institutions that knowingly harbor them and fail to protect children.

The recent Catholic Church settlements reported nationwide show that survivors are finally being heard. They also show that accountability is possible when the legal system allows it.

If you were sexually abused as a minor in an Archdiocese of Washington church, you have rights today that did not exist for most of your life.

<div>You deserve answers. You deserve dignity. You deserve the opportunity to be heard. A national reckoning is underway. For survivors in Maryland and the Washington, D.C. region, that moment has arrived.

If you or a loved one was sexually abused as a minor in an Archdiocese of Washington church or by a clergy member, you may have a case and be entitled to significant compensation. The experienced attorneys at The Yost Legal Group are pursuing serious litigation against the Catholic Church on behalf of survivors. All consultations are free and confidential. Call or text today at 410-659-6800.

Frequently Asked Questions: Archdiocese of Washington Claims

1. Is it too late to file a lawsuit for abuse that happened decades ago?

No. Under the Maryland Child Victims Act, the statute of limitations for childhood sexual abuse has been eliminated. This means survivors can file a civil claim regardless of how long ago the abuse occurred, even if the window was previously closed.

2. What is the “Revival Window” in Maryland?

The law created a permanent revival of claims. If you were previously told you were “too old” to sue (the old limit was age 38), that barrier no longer exists. You have the legal right to seek justice against the Archdiocese and individual perpetrators now.

3. Are there caps on the compensation I can receive?

As of June 1, 2025, Maryland law updated the damages caps. For cases filed against private institutions (like the Catholic Church) after this date, non-economic damages (pain and suffering) are capped at $700,000. However, there is typically no cap on economic damages, such as medical bills or lost wages.

4. Can I keep my identity private during the legal process?

Yes. Experienced sexual abuse attorneys can file “Doe” lawsuits to protect your privacy and use protective orders to ensure sensitive information remains confidential throughout the litigation.

5. Who can be held liable besides the individual abuser?

Under the CVA, you can hold the institution accountable. This includes the Archdiocese of Washington if they knowingly allowed, ignored, or concealed the abuse. Claims often focus on negligent hiring, failure to supervise, and failure to report.

Allergan Breast Implant Lawsuit Update

Posted on January 28, 2026January 28, 2026 by Loni Liss

What You Need to Know About BIA-ALCL Risks

If You Were Diagnosed with BIA-ALCL After Receiving Allergan BIOCELL Implants, You May Be Entitled to Significant Compensation.

For years, women across the country trusted Allergan textured breast implants for reconstructive and cosmetic surgeries. Many believed these implants were safe. Some were told they were more stable and more advanced than other options.

These women had no way of knowing these products would be linked to a rare and dangerous cancer known as breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL).

BIA-ALCL is not breast cancer. It is a form of non-Hodgkin’s T-cell lymphoma that develops in the scar tissue and fluid surrounding a breast implant. Medical researchers now agree that this cancer is overwhelmingly associated with textured implants.

Among them, Allergan’s BIOCELL products have been identified as carrying the highest risk.

Despite years of warning signs, many women were not informed of this danger until after a global recall in 2019. Even now, new diagnoses continue to emerge, which is why The Yost Legal Group continues to accept clients who have been diagnosed with BIA-ALCL.

If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with BIA-ALCL after receiving Allergan textured breast implants, you may qualify to file an Allergan Biocell Lawsuit. You may be entitled to significant compensation under the growing multidistrict litigation. Call or text our experienced breast implant lawyers today for a free consultation: 410-659-6800.

In this latest Allergan litigation BIA ALCL blog post, we discuss how the cancer develops, why Allergan implants became the center of national litigation, and what women should know if they received textured breast implants.

Understanding your health is key to understanding your rights.

What You Need to Know About BIA-ALCL

Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma is a cancer of the immune system. It does not form in the breast itself. Instead, it develops within the fibrous capsule the body forms around a breast implant. This distinction between the two types of cancer is critical.

According to the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, BIA-ALCL is a rare type of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma that has been found primarily in patients with textured surface breast implants.

This detail matters. The disease is not linked to whether the implant has a saline or silicone filling. It is linked to the implant’s textured surface.

In many cases, symptoms do not appear for years. The average time between implantation and diagnosis is often reported as seven to ten years. Because of this delay, many women do not connect their symptoms to one of the implants they received years ago.

Common warning signs of BIA-ALCL include:

Persistent swelling

Fluid accumulation

Breast or chest pain

Asymmetry

Lump in the breast or underarm

When caught early, BIA-ALCL may be treated surgically. When diagnosis is delayed, treatment can involve chemotherapy, radiation, or additional surgeries.

Why Textured Implants Pose a Higher Risk

Textured implants were designed to adhere more firmly to surrounding tissue. Manufacturers promoted them as less likely to shift and more anatomically stable, both of which may be true.

However, the rough surface created deep grooves that allowed bacteria and debris to collect. Over time, this environment can lead to chronic inflammation and immune system activation.

Researchers began noticing a pattern. Nearly all confirmed cases of BIA-ALCL involved textured implants. Smooth implants were rarely implicated.

As more global data emerged, Allergan’s BIOCELL implants repeatedly appeared at the center of reported cases. International regulators began to reach the same conclusion. These implants carried a significantly higher cancer risk than competing products.

The 2019 Allergan Breast Implant Recall

In July 2019, Allergan recalled its BIOCELL textured breast implants and tissue expanders worldwide following action by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). By that point, regulators had been evaluating the connection between implants and lymphoma for nearly a decade.

The FDA first identified a potential association in 2011. Then, in 2016, the World Health Organization (WHO) formally recognized BIA-ALCL as a distinct disease entity.

Despite this history, many women were never warned of a cancer risk when they consented to surgery.

The recall did not require automatic implant removal. As a result, thousands of women continued living with recalled devices inside their bodies without clear guidance or long-term monitoring plans.

If you or a loved one was diagnosed with BIA-ALCL after receiving an Allergan textured breast implant, call the compassionate Allergan implant lawyers at The Yost Legal Group today. We will help you understand your rights and seek the justice you deserve. Call or text us for a free consultation: 410-659-6800.

BIA-ALCL: A (Years) Delayed Disease

One of the most troubling aspects of BIA-ALCL is its delayed onset. Women are often diagnosed many years after implantation. Some develop symptoms long after routine surgical follow-ups have ended. Others receive a diagnosis only after unexplained swelling or fluid buildup prompts further testing.

In some cases, BIA-ALCL has been diagnosed even after implants were removed.

This latency is one reason litigation remains active today. The recall did not end the danger. It simply confirmed that the danger existed.

The Federal Litigation Against Allergan

Claims involving Allergan BIOCELL textured breast implants have been consolidated in federal court in New Jersey under Multidistrict Litigation No. 2921.

As of early 2026, approximately 1,480 cases are pending in the federal MDL. That number continues to rise gradually as more women are diagnosed or undergo implant-related surgeries years after the recall.

These figures reflect federal cases only. Additional lawsuits are pending in state courts and are not included in the MDL total.

The continued growth of the litigation underscores an important point. BIA-ALCL is not a historical issue. It remains a present-day medical and legal crisis.

What the Allergan Implant Lawsuit Alleges

The lawsuits against Allergan focus primarily on failure to warn and defective design. Plaintiffs allege that the company knew or should have known that its textured implants carried a heightened cancer risk.

Despite mounting scientific evidence, Allergan continued to market these textured products as safe.

Women undergoing breast reconstruction or cosmetic surgery were not given meaningful information about lymphoma risk. Many say they would have chosen a different implant or declined surgery altogether if properly warned.

These cases are not about cosmetic dissatisfaction. They involve cancer diagnoses, invasive treatment, permanent scarring, emotional trauma, and long-term medical surveillance.

The Physical and Emotional Cost of the Defective Allergan Breast Implants

Treatment for BIA-ALCL frequently begins with the removal of the implant and the surrounding capsule. In advanced cases, lymph node removal, chemotherapy, or radiation may be required.

Medical expenses can be significant. Many women also lose income during treatment and recovery as they must take time off work or lose their jobs entirely.

Beyond the financial burden, survivors face fear, uncertainty, and the psychological impact of learning that a medical device placed in their body caused cancer.

For women who had previously survived breast cancer, this diagnosis can be especially devastating.

What Women With Allergan Textured Breast Implants Should Know

Women who received textured breast implants should not panic, but they should remain informed. Symptoms such as persistent swelling, late-onset fluid buildup, or unexplained breast changes should be evaluated by a medical professional familiar with BIA-ALCL.

A formal diagnosis is required for certain legal claims, but early evaluation can be critical to health outcomes.

Many women do not know which type of implant they received. Surgical records or a plastic surgeon’s office can often provide that information

However, if you think you may have received an Allergan textured breast implant, an experienced product liability attorney can help you request the medical records you require.

Legal Help for Women Harmed by Defective Breast Implants

Medical device manufacturers have a duty to warn patients of known risks. When that duty is breached, the consequences can be life-altering.

At The Yost Legal Group, our product liability lawyers represent individuals harmed by dangerous medical devices and pharmaceutical products. We understand the complexity of breast implant litigation and the medical science behind these cases.

If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with BIA-ALCL after undergoing surgery that involved recalled Allergan textured implants, you may have legal options. And we can help you understand your rights.

A conversation costs nothing. There are no upfront legal fees. Contact an experienced defective product lawyer to learn about filing a product liability claim. If you developed bia alcl due to a manufacturing defect or design defect, consulting a defective product law firm can help.

You deserved the truth before your surgery. If that truth was withheld, accountability matters. Call or text us today at 410-659-6800.

Allergan Lawsuit – Allergan Breast Implant Recall Attorney – BIA ALCL Lawsuit

Allergan Lawsuit Update – Allergan Breast Lawsuit – Product Injury Attorney

Uber Sexual Assault Trial Puts Safety Under Scrutiny

Posted on January 21, 2026 by Loni Liss

Exploring the Legal Battle Over Uber’s Background Checks, Ignored Complaints, and the Fight for Corporate Accountability in Rideshare Assault Cases

For years, survivors of Uber sexual assault by Uber drivers have come forward with eerily similar stories. They have talked about trusting the app. They believed Uber’s claims of thorough background checks. And also trusted Uber’s promises of safety.

Sadly, they were harmed by the very drivers Uber hired and kept on the road. Now, that long-running pattern of failing to protect its customers is headed for a courtroom reckoning.

In Arizona, Uber is facing a sexual assault trial that places its safety record squarely under judicial scrutiny. This is not just one case of a sexual assault claim about one driver. It is a bellwether trial tied to thousands of lawsuits across the country alleging that Uber knew riders were being sexually assaulted by drivers and failed to act.

For victims of sexual assault, this trial represents something rare: corporate accountability.

If you or someone you know was sexually assaulted while using a ride share app like Lyft or Uber, please reach out. You can contact the caring sexual assault lawyers at The Yost Legal Group for help. You will receive a free and confidential consultation today by calling 1-800-YOST-LAW (967-8529). We will help you understand your rights and seek the justice you deserve.

A Trial That Could Expose Uber’s Internal Safety Failures

The Arizona case centers on allegations that an Uber driver sexually assaulted a female passenger after she booked a ride through the app. Uber’s defense follows a familiar script.

The company argues that drivers are independent contractors, so the company cannot be held responsible for their crimes. Uber claims the assaults are tragic, but isolated. Plaintiffs argue otherwise.

They allege Uber had years of notice that sexual assaults by drivers were not rare accidents, but a predictable outcome of weak screening, lax oversight, and corporate decisions that prioritized growth over passenger safety.

The Arizona trial will allow jurors to examine Uber’s internal practices, safety data, and choices in a way that few cases ever reach.

The stakes are enormous. This trial is widely viewed as a test case for more than 3,000 similar lawsuits consolidated in federal court. What happens in Arizona could shape the future of rideshare sexual assault litigation nationwide.

The Uber & Lyft sexual assault lawyers at The Yost Legal Group are watching closely as we continue to accept cases for survivors.

Uber’s Sexual Assault Problem Was Never a Secret

Uber’s own data tells a disturbing story. Uber received many reports of sexual assault and misconduct. These reports came from internal records related to lawsuits and investigations. The number of reports reached hundreds of thousands over several years.

At one point, reports were coming in at nearly one every 8 minutes in the United States alone, according to The New York Times.

Yet publicly, Uber released far narrower “safety reports” that dramatically understated the scope of the problem. Survivors say those reports gave the impression that assaults were rare, while internal systems tracked a far broader and more troubling reality.

This gap matters. When a company knows of a danger and downplays it, the issue is no longer bad luck. It becomes negligence.

Negligent Hiring: Background Checks Built to Miss Red Flags

One of the central allegations in rideshare sexual assault cases is negligent hiring. Uber advertises background checks as a safety feature. But reporting and court filings show those checks are often name-based, limited in geographic scope, and constrained by short lookback periods.

“Uber customized the rules that Check [the background check company] uses to review and report criminal records, including how far back to check for offenses, according to Uber’s agreement with Checkr.”

In many states, violent felony convictions older than seven years do not automatically disqualify a driver in Uber’s ruleset despite research showing prior violent conduct is a strong predictor of future harm.

Uber does not require in-person interviews. It does not conduct reference checks. It does not mandate psychological screening. And, until 2018, it did not consistently re-screen drivers as they continued working on the platform.

As a result, drivers with histories of assault, child abuse, stalking, or domestic violence were allowed to transport passengers. In some cases, those drivers later went on to commit sexual assaults during Uber rides.

From a legal perspective, this is critical. Companies have a duty to use reasonable care when placing people in positions of trust. Especially when those positions involve isolating passengers in vehicles late at night, often under the influence of alcohol, with no witnesses present.

If you were sexually abused during a Lyft or Uber ride, you may be entitled to significant compensation. In sexual assault cases, there is no time to delay. After you seek medical attention, The Yost Legal Group will be here to help you take the next step to get the justice you deserve. Call or text today at 410-659-6800.

Ignored Complaints and Drivers Kept on the Road

Negligent hiring is only part of the picture. Survivors, lawsuits, and a recent comprehensive report from The New York Times all allege negligent retention.

Investigations have shown that Uber often kept drivers active on the platform even after receiving complaints of sexual misconduct. Some drivers were accused of inappropriate touching, sexual comments, or predatory behavior.

They were allowed to continue driving after receiving warnings or “education,” rather than being suspended or removed.

In several cases highlighted in litigation, early complaints escalated into later assaults. Red flags were logged. Patterns were visible. But decisive action was delayed or never taken.

Uber has said it requires corroboration before permanently removing drivers. Survivors argue this standard ignores the reality of sexual assault.

Most assaults occur without witnesses. Many survivors are traumatized, fearful, or unsure how to report. Demanding proof at the earliest warning stage leaves riders exposed.

From a survivor-centric lens, this failure is devastating. It sends a clear message to survivors that their allegations and concerns are not credible.

As a result, Uber has allowed harm to continue, with dangerous drivers remaining behind the wheel and on the roads while operating on its platform.

Challenging the “Independent Contractor” Defense

Uber’s legal strategy relies heavily on the classification of drivers as “independent contractors.” The company argues it cannot be held vicariously liable for criminal acts committed by drivers.

This defense has worked in at least one case when, in October 2025, a California jury cleared Uber of liability for a driver’s sexual assault of a passenger.

But the lawsuits in the Arizona trial and the broader MDL do not hinge solely on vicarious liability. They focus on Uber’s own conduct.

Plaintiffs argue Uber designed the system. Uber controlled access to riders and dictated who could drive, how rides were assigned, and how complaints were handled.

Uber allegedly knew about the dangers posed by its negligent hiring and retention practices and failed to implement reasonable safeguards.

When a company creates a foreseeable risk and fails to address it, labeling workers as “contractors” does not absolve the company of its responsibility.

That legal question about how far Uber’s duty extends will be front and center in the Arizona trial.

Why This Trial Matters to Survivors Everywhere

For survivors, this trial is about more than damages. It is about truth. Additionally, it’s about forcing a powerful corporation to explain why safety measures were delayed, optional, or abandoned.

It will force Uber to answer why internal data painted a far darker picture than public reports and why drivers accused of assault were allowed to keep driving. Courtroom scrutiny can do what internal policies did not: force change.

Every survivor who steps forward helps expose patterns that companies prefer to keep hidden. And every trial chips away at the narrative that these assaults are unavoidable or unforeseeable when it is clear that they are not.

Legal Options for Uber Sexual Assault Survivors

Survivors of sexual assault involving Uber drivers may have the right to pursue civil claims against the company even if criminal charges were never filed or did not result in a conviction.

Civil cases focus on accountability and safety failures, not proof beyond a reasonable doubt.

Claims may involve negligent hiring, negligent supervision, failure to warn, and failure to protect passengers from known risks. Many cases are now part of coordinated federal litigation aimed at addressing systemic wrongdoing.

Time limits apply, and evidence matters. Preserving ride data, communications, medical records, and witness information can be critical.

Speaking with a trauma-informed attorney who understands rideshare litigation can help survivors make informed decisions without pressure.

Contact The Yost Legal Group Today

At The Yost Legal Group law firm, we represent survivors of sexual abuse with care, respect, and dignity. We understand how difficult it is to stand up and speak up. Our rideshare sexual assault attorneys understand how large corporations use silence and complexity to avoid accountability.

They’ll use their vast reserves of influence, money, and power to squash anyone who might dare to oppose them. A rideshare sexual assault lawyer will explain the legal process and how to file a claim for seeking compensation.

The Arizona trial underscores what survivors have been saying for years: this was not a series of isolated incidents. It was a systemic failure. Let us continue to expose Lyft, Uber, and any other ride-sharing company’s wrongful negligence.

If you were sexually assaulted by an Uber driver, seek legal help. You are not alone. If you are ready to speak to an experienced Uber sexual assault attorney, we are here to listen. Your voice deserves to be heard.

Justice begins by telling the truth. We are here. We believe you, and we will fight for you. Call or text the experienced sexual assault survivor lawyers at The Yost Legal Group today: 410-659-6800.

Personal Injury Lawyer Sexual Assault – How To Report Uber Sexual Assault

Sexual Assault Lawyer Near Me – Sexual Assault Attorney Maryland – Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit

Depo Provera Alert: FDA Responds to Brain Tumor Risks

Posted on January 21, 2026 by Loni Liss

New Research Links Depo Provera to Meningioma. If You Were Diagnosed After Using This Birth Control, Learn Your Legal Rights and How To Join The Growing Litigation

Depo-Provera was pitched as a simple and effective solution for birth control. “Convenience” was the word most often associated with it. One injection every few months. No daily pill, no invasive device, and no ongoing hassle. Then, years later, a Depo Provera alert came out about brain tumor risks.

For decades, it was marketed as safe, reliable birth control that doctors trusted and one that millions of women have relied upon. That trust is now at the center of a growing legal reckoning.

Across the country, women who used Depo-Provera for extended periods and were later diagnosed with brain tumors are stepping forward. These lawsuits are not isolated. They are building quickly, in numbers large enough to begin forcing real change.

The Yost Legal Group believes the science. We believe the women who are bravely speaking up about their meningioma diagnoses after using Depo-Provera. The link between Depo-Provera use and the development of meningioma is strong. Even the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has formally responded.

The litigation is moving fast and only gaining steam.

If you or a loved one was diagnosed with a brain tumor or meningioma after taking the Depo shot, you may have a case. Call or text the experienced Depo Provera lawyers at The Yost Legal Group. You will receive a free, confidential consultation at 410-659-6800. You may qualify to file a depo provera pfizer lawsuit.

A Brief Refresher on the Depo Provera Lawsuit

Depo-Provera is the brand name for an injectable drug made with medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), a synthetic progestogen. It has been widely prescribed as a long-acting contraceptive and used by millions of women, often for years at a time.

In 2024, peer-reviewed research published in The British Medical Journal identified a statistically significant link between prolonged exposure to certain progestogens—including medroxyprogesterone acetate—and an increased risk of intracranial meningioma, a type of brain tumor.

The findings were later peer-reviewed with subsequent analysis by The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).

What followed was not just a scientific concern, but legal action. Women across the country began filing claims alleging that Pfizer, the manufacturer of Depo Provera birth control, failed to adequately warn patients and providers about this serious risk.

Those cases are no longer scattered. They are being consolidated in a Depo Provera MDL. And the size of that litigation is sending a message.

Depo Provera Lawsuits Increasing in Number

As of January 2026, public filings indicate more than 1,700 Depo Provera cases have been filed and centralized in a federal multidistrict proceeding. That number continues to grow.

For women navigating brain tumor diagnoses, that matters. Women who are suffering through no fault of their own now realize that others share their injuries and struggles.

There is no comfort in another’s pain, but there is in acceptance, community, and understanding. It matters to these women that these claims are taken seriously.

Large pharmaceutical companies such as Pfizer are no strangers to lawsuits. When cases multiply this quickly and across jurisdictions, involving the same alleged injury and drug, regulators and manufacturers must take notice.

FDA Approves New Depo Provera Brain Tumor Warning Label

In December 2025, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved a new warning label for Depo-Provera. The updated label requires Pfizer to warn that use of the drug may be associated with meningioma, a brain tumor that forms in the membranes surrounding the brain.

This is a major development for users of the injectable contraceptive.

Drug companies and the FDA do not add warning labels casually. They change when evidence reaches a point regulators can no longer ignore. They change when risk information is deemed significant enough that patients and doctors must be told plainly and directly.

And the timing matters. For years, women received Depo Provera injections without any warning about brain tumor potential risk, even as evidence mounted overseas and in the medical literature. Now, only after litigation has grown nationwide, the FDA has stepped in and required stronger language.

There is currently no publicly announced date for when all Depo-Provera packaging with the new warning will be in circulation. As is typical with FDA label changes, the rollout is expected to be gradual. It will occur in waves as manufacturing updates take effect and existing inventory is depleted.

Some clinics may continue administering Depo-Provera packaged under the old label for a period of time.

But the regulatory shift itself is unmistakable. And the warning is clear.

If you used the Depo Provera birth control injection for years, without being warned about brain tumor risks, and were later diagnosed with a meningioma or another serious brain tumor, you need a Depo lawyer. Contact the experienced defective drug attorneys at The Yost Legal Group for a free consultation.

The Yost Legal Group has over 30 years of experience. We help people harmed by negligence. Call or text today at 410-659-6800.

Prescribed Depo Provera? Diagnosed with Brain Tumor?

The FDA’s decision has different implications depending on when a person received their Depo-Provera injections.

Women who start using Depo Provera after the new warning is in place may have trouble joining lawsuits. Once a risk is clearly disclosed, manufacturers often say that patients were warned. They can claim patients knew about the labeled side effects.

But that does not apply to the countless women who used long term Depo Provera before this change.

For decades, Depo-Provera was prescribed without any warning about meningioma risk. Many women got injection after injection, year after year. They trusted that if there were serious long-term dangers, they would have been informed.

There are still tens of thousands (possibly hundreds of thousands) of people who fall into that category. They used Depo Provera before the label change, then were later diagnosed with meningioma after using Depo.

Now, these women are left to deal with surgery, neurological symptoms, life disruption, and unanswered questions.

The growing number of cases and the FDA’s label decision do not close the door on accountability. They open it wider.

Depo Provera Lawsuit Momentum

When people think of success in mass tort litigation (MDL), they often think only of settlements or verdicts. They are, no doubt, important. But real momentum starts way earlier than settlements.

It starts when Depo lawsuit claims grow too numerous for Big Pharma drug corporations to dismiss. It grows when scientific evidence is validated. And it accelerates when regulators act.

The Depo Provera litigation is at that stage. And The Yost Legal Group is here to help you understand your rights and seek the justice you deserve.

Over 1,700 women have already stepped forward to file Depo Provera meningioma lawsuits. We are already representing many of them. The FDA has now required a brain tumor warning for Depo-Provera’s packaging. And the legal process is continuing to move ahead.

For women who have been living with the consequences of a brain tumor diagnosis after Depo-Provera use, this is not just news. It is validation.

Do Not Navigate Brain Tumor Diagnosis Alone—The Yost Legal Group Is Here to Help

Brain tumors, benign or malignant, can be life-altering. Even meningiomas, often labeled “non-cancerous,” can require invasive surgery, cause seizures, affect cognition, and permanently change a person’s life.

People who trusted a prescription drug deserve answers. They deserve transparency. And when warnings come too late, they deserve accountability, compensation, and justice.

The Depo Provera lawsuits are about more than numbers. Women’s health risks need to be taken seriously and disclosed before harm occurs, not after.

So, if your brain tumor diagnosis is connected to Depo Provera use, now is the time to file a lawsuit.

The Yost Legal Group law firm is reviewing Depo Provera meningioma brain tumor cases nationwide. When your health is at stake, there is no time to delay.

If you or a loved one was diagnosed with a brain tumor after using Depo Provera, call us for help. We are reviewing cases nationwide and fighting to hold powerful pharmaceutical companies accountable.

Call or text today at 410-659-6800. Your case evaluation is free, confidential, and focused on your story.

Continue to check our website for Depo Provera lawsuit updates.

Best Depo Provera Lawyers – Depo Attorney – Depo Provera Lawsuit Lawyer

Depo Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuit – Depo Provera Brain Tumor Risk

Archdiocese of Washington Lawsuits Seek Justice Under CVA

Posted on January 13, 2026January 15, 2026 by Loni Liss

The Maryland Child Victims Act Allows Survivors of Childhood Sexual Abuse to Hold the Archdiocese Accountable

For decades, survivors who suffered sexual abuse at the hands of clergy in the Archdiocese of Washington were told their stories were private, shameful, or too old to matter.

In recent years, however, new laws have made civil litigation possible for people whose claims may have previously exceeded their statute of limitations.

Today, a steady stream of lawsuits and public records maintained by the Archdiocese alleges not isolated incidents of abuse, but a pattern of:

– clergy misconduct

– institutional concealment

– policies that failed to protect the most vulnerable

This is not just about individual pedophile priests. It is about an institution that repeatedly puts reputation before children.

If you or a loved one was sexually abused by a clergy member of the Archdiocese of Washington, you may have a case. The Archdiocese of Washington has many parishes in Maryland where the Child Victims Act is in effect. Call us today for a free and confidential consultation at 1-800-967-8529.

What the Archdiocese of Washington Lawsuits Allege

The civil cases filed against the Archdiocese of Washington typically raise the same core claims. Survivors allege that priests engaged in sexual misconduct with minors and that church officials knowingly ignored, minimized, or concealed credible reports.

Plaintiffs’ complaints commonly assert:

– negligent hiring

– negligent retention

– failure to supervise

– failure to report to civil authorities

– deliberate concealment

This is conduct that plaintiffs say allowed predators to remain in the ministry and, in some cases, move between assignments without meaningful oversight.

That last tactic is so common, there is a Wikipedia page dedicated to it.

These lawsuits are less about relitigating old headlines and more about exposing decision-making. They are about uncovering who knew what, when they knew it, and what they did to prevent future harm.

New Archdiocese of Washington Policy Updates Do Not Erase Past Harm

In December 2024, the Archdiocese of Washington publicized updates to its Safe Environment Policy (link to policy here). Cardinal Wilton Gregory, the archbishop of Washington, said the changes were designed to strengthen background screening, training, and reporting protocols.

Those policy revisions are important to note because they are the public face of institutional reform. However, policy statements do not answer the central questions raised in litigation:

– Were warning signs ignored in the past?

– Were allegations properly investigated?

– And were offending clergy removed from positions of access?

A close review of recent reforms is necessary to determine whether the changes are substantive or merely symbolic in light of evolving laws and public pressure.

Clergy Sexual Abuse Survivor Safety And Privacy Are Now Legal Flashpoints

The legal landscape around clergy abuse cases is not limited to questions of liability and damages.

In the spring of 2025, a major legal issue surfaced when the U.S. Department of Justice disclosed that a data exposure affected information about survivors involved in church abuse cases handled by outside consultants and firms.

That breach underscores a painful reality. Survivors’ confidentiality can be compromised even as they seek redress, creating additional legal and ethical layers for plaintiffs and counsel.

Civil claims now examine whether institutions protected survivors’ data and whether failures in that regard caused additional harm.

Public Lists of Accused Clergy Members

The Archdiocese of Washington maintains a public list of clergy members credibly accused of abuse. We have written about that here, with a description of the allegations against each priest.

Official lists like this one are evidentiary touchstones in civil litigation.

Plaintiffs use these records to show patterns, to identify supervisory failures, and to document the institutional knowledge that should have triggered action.

When combined with internal communications, personnel files, and deposition testimony, public lists help convert scattered allegations into proof of systemic failure.

Why Pattern Clergy Abuse Cases Matter in Court and in Public Policy

Pattern litigation serves several critical functions:

First, it gives individual survivors a path to accountability even when criminal charges are not available or feasible.
Second, it forces discovery: depositions, internal emails, personnel files, and vendor communications that reveal how decisions were made.
Third, pattern lawsuits create public pressure for meaningful reforms, such as enforceable policy changes, not merely declaratory. These cases are not about revenge. They are about exposing the mechanisms that allowed these abuses to continue, and then they help create safeguards to limit or prevent negligent actions from happening again.

Abuses committed by religious institutions of sexual contact of any kind are institutional sexual abuse. An experienced child sexual abuse attorney will guide you through the legal process of filing a church sexual abuse claim.

The Challenges Church Abuse Survivors Face Today

Survivors face a difficult calculus. Many cases involve events that occurred decades ago. Memories have faded. Records may be incomplete. And key witnesses may be more difficult to locate.

At the same time, institutions may have powerful legal teams and significant resources to defend years of policy and practice.

Survivors need trauma-informed counsel who understands both the emotional stakes and the procedural realities, such as:

– statute-of-limitations reforms

– evidentiary burdens

– privacy concerns

– the strategic timing of filings

The work is painstaking, but it is how institutional accountability is built.

The Yost Legal Group’s experienced team of sexual abuse lawyers has won justice for survivors of abuse by the Archdiocese of Baltimore. We are hoping to do the same for survivors of the Archdiocese of Washington.

Were you a victim of sexual abuse by a clergy member in the Archdiocese of Washington? You may have a chance at justice, no matter how long ago the abuse occurred. Contact our experienced clergy sexual abuse attorneys today for a free and confidential consultation at 1-800-967-8529.

What Plaintiffs’ Institutional Abuse Lawyers Are Seeking

In lawsuits against the archdiocese, plaintiffs typically seek the following damages:

– compensatory damages for physical and emotional injuries

– punitive damages for egregious misconduct

– injunctive relief requiring institutional changes, such as independent review boards, transparent reporting mechanisms, mandatory training tied to measurable outcomes, and verified compliance audits.

Many survivors also seek preservation orders to secure evidence and protective orders to shield sensitive information from public exposure. These remedies are about more than money. They are about structural change that reduces future risk.

A catholic church sex abuse lawyer can file a child molestation claim confidentially. If you were abused as a child and are considering filing a priest sexual abuse claim, contact our law firm.

A Note for Maryland Sexual Abuse Survivors Considering Action

If you or a loved one suffered sexual abuse by clergy connected to the Archdiocese of Washington, you do not have to navigate this alone.

The compassionate attorneys and legal team at The Yost Legal Group can help. We can preserve evidence and obtain and review institutional records. Pursuing civil remedies tailored to both emotional and practical needs is important.

Counsel can advise on privacy protections (a particularly salient concern after recent data exposures). We can seek court orders to limit unnecessary public disclosure of sensitive materials. Legal strategy should always be trauma-informed and survivor-led.

Institutional Accountability Prevents Future Harm

Lawsuits do not erase the past, but they are an essential tool for systemic change. Discovery produces the facts. Litigation produces remedies. And public accountability produces reform.

Whether through negotiated settlements that require institutional change or through jury verdicts that hold organizations financially accountable, civil litigation can reduce recidivism and make institutions safer for those under their care.

For survivors, the goal is not only personal justice, but also a safer future for other children.

How The Yost Legal Group Can Help

The Yost Legal Group represents survivors with compassion, discretion, and deep experience in institutional abuse litigation. Our team will:

– Investigate alleged patterns of misconduct

– Pursue claims against organizations that failed to protect children

– Work to secure remedies that recognize both the harm done and the need for systemic reform.

Were you sexually abused or molested by a member of the clergy in Maryland?

Did institutional failures connected to the Archdiocese of Washington allow your abuse as a minor?

We are here to listen, advise, and act on your behalf if you are ready to talk.

Call us for a free and confidential consultation. You deserve a chance at justice. Call 1-800-YOST-LAW (1-800-967-8529).

Molested By A Priest – Archdiocese of Washington Abuse Claims – Child Sexual Abuse Case

Archdiocese of Washington Pedophile Priests – Religious Orders

Wegovy and Ozempic Linked to Vision Loss

Posted on January 6, 2026January 6, 2026 by Loni Liss

Novo Nordisk Failed to Warn Patients of the Risk of NAION and Permanent Blindness

After a thorough investigation into the link between Ozempic and Wegovy use and a unique form of vision loss, The Yost Legal Group has made the careful decision to take cases for individuals who were prescribed Ozempic or Wegovy and then suffered vision loss as a result of taking those medications.

At The Yost Legal Group, we believe people deserve full transparency about the medications they are prescribed by their doctors. Far too many individuals were never warned about a potentially blinding condition called non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION).

Patients were told about the benefits of blood sugar control or weight loss, but not about the devastating impact on their eyesight. It is not their fault. They trusted their doctors and the billion-dollar corporation that manufactured and marketed these drugs, which sold the promise of a healthier life. But users were misled.

If you or a loved one were prescribed Ozempic or Wegovy and experienced sudden vision loss or blindness, you might have NAION. Seek a diagnosis from a medical professional.

If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with NAION after using Ozempic or Wegovy, you deserve to know your rights. Call the trusted defective drug lawyers at The Yost Legal Group today for a free consultation: 1-800-967-8529.

Understanding the Risk: What Is NAION?

NAION stands for non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. That is a mouthful (we know), so let us put it into layman’s terms: the front part of the optic nerve in your eye loses its blood supply. When that happens, nerve fibers die, and vision goes dark. The condition works quickly, painlessly, and often in just one eye.

Recovery is often incomplete, and for many people, the vision they lose does not come back. Over time, without proper warning or monitoring, it can lead to permanent blindness.

This is not a mild “blur” side effect. This is a severe, life-altering event. Optic nerve blood flow is compromised, and once damage sets in, there is no guaranteed fix.

Why Are Semaglutides Like Ozempic and Wegovy Under Fire?

Ozempic and Wegovy both rely on the same active ingredient: semaglutide, a GLP-1 receptor agonist. These drugs revolutionized treatment for type 2 diabetes and obesity, but their popularity skyrocketed almost overnight once they were linked to weight loss.

However, not all side effects were positive, and more troubling signs emerged as more people used them for more extended periods.

Scientists in a JAMA Ophthalmology study published in February 2025 reviewed data from over 16,000 patients with type 2 diabetes and found that those on semaglutide had a 32% higher risk of developing NAION compared to those who were not taking the drug.

Semaglutides are also known to change blood sugar levels dramatically, which makes sense as they are diabetes medications. These swings, however, can shift the shape of the eyes’ lenses, which may contribute to blurred vision, retinal stress, or other complications.

For diabetic patients, rapidly dropping blood sugar can paradoxically worsen preexisting diabetic retinopathy. In some people, retinal damage from years of high blood sugar can worsen as glucose levels normalize.

These are not hypothetical risks. They are real, documented, and potentially devastating to vision.

How People Were Misled. And Why That Matters

When millions are prescribed a medication, there is a responsibility to clearly spell out risks. That did not always happen here.

· No Adequate Warning of Permanent Vision Loss: The current drug labels mention vision changes, but very few mention NAION. That is not a simple oversight. In our legally informed opinion, that is a legal and ethical failure.

· Big Pharma Profits vs. Patient Safety: Novo Nordisk, the maker of Ozempic and Wegovy, made billions selling these drugs. But how aggressively did they communicate the full range of risks? Based upon what we are seeing, the answer is “Not nearly enough.” Patients trusted their doctors. Doctors trusted the studies. And patients took the drugs home, never the wiser that, in very rare cases, they were signing on for a potential fight to keep their sight.

· Lawsuits Are Not About Blame. They Are About Accountability: We are not here to shame patients. We are not suing doctors, many of whom were misled themselves. This was never about “You should have known better.” This is about what a billion-dollar Big Pharma company knew about its drug and what it did not disclose to potential users. This is about what patients were never told. This is about the drug maker’s failure to warn its users about a devastating potential adverse side effect. Whether it is a failure to warn claim or a broader product liability case for a defective drug, people who lost their vision deserve their chance at justice.

Who Is at Risk for Developing NAION?

NAION is not random. There are risk factors that seem to make some people more vulnerable. Those at an increased risk are people with the following conditions:

Diabetes
High blood pressure
High cholesterol
Sleep apnea
Crowded optic nerve head

Are living with any of these conditions? Please consult a medical professional before starting semaglutide. If you are living with any of these conditions and have suffered vision loss after using Ozempic or Wegovy, seek medical attention immediately.

Has you or a loved one lost their vision after using Ozempic for weight loss or Wegovy? You may qualify to file an Ozempic lawsuit. Call the experienced product liability lawyers at The Yost Legal Group today at 1-800-967-8529.

Ophthalmologists and Neuro-Ophthalmologists Raise Concerns

Some doctors call the link between semaglutide and non-arthritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) “plausible but not yet proven,” which underscores how urgently we need more data. Others point out that even temporary side effects, such as blurry vision (especially in older people), need to be closely monitored.

As one retina specialist explained, blood sugar control can change the shape of the lens, which can blur vision, but the worst risk is to the optic nerve.

Experts recommend a baseline eye exam before starting semaglutide, followed by ongoing ophthalmologic monitoring during treatment, particularly for patients with eye risk factors or prior diabetic eye disease.

What Ozempic and Wegovy Maker Can Do

When lawsuits are filed, they do more than seek justice for affected individuals. These cases can force a change that protects potential patients in the future. Common industry-wide outcomes from mass tort lawsuits against defective drug manufacturers include:

Better Labeling: We can demand that their medication guides include a clear, bold warning about the risk of NAION and permanent vision loss.

Stronger Monitoring Protocols: Suits can push for mandatory eye exams and closer follow-up for people starting semaglutide.

Reinforced Accountability: When pharmaceutical companies are held to account, it sends a message: prioritizing profits over people’s health is not acceptable.

Adverse Vision Changes After Ozempic/Wegovy? What to Do Now

1. Seek Medical Evaluation Immediately:

If you have noticed vision changes (even slight blurriness or a haze), reach out to an eye doctor. Mention that you have used semaglutide (Ozempic or Wegovy). Ask about the risk of NAION and whether you should be monitored more closely.

2. Document Everything:

Keep notes of when you started the medication, what dose you used, when vision symptoms began, and all your medical records (eye exams, ophthalmologists’ notes, and any vision-related tests).

3. Talk to a Lawyer Who Understands These Cases:

Our experienced product liability law firm handles a wide range of product liability cases. We know how to review your medical timeline, connect the dots, and hold large companies accountable. Ozempic blindness claims and GLP-1 drugs vision loss claims are being reviewed by our legal team.

You took a medication to improve your life, to manage your diabetes or weight and you followed the instructions. You trusted your healthcare providers and the drug manufacturer. But you were not told about the potential risks and side effects, including severe eye conditions.

How The Yost Legal Group Can Help

When drug manufacturers fail to warn people of serious, permanent risks, they put profit over people. They fail in their responsibility to the very individuals who helped them profit.

At The Yost Legal Group, we refuse to let that stand. We will press for accountability. We will demand transparency. And we will fight to make sure no one else has to face the darkness alone.

If you or someone you know was prescribed Ozempic or Wegovy and then suffered sudden vision loss or blindness, contact The Yost Legal Group. Do not wait. There is no time to delay when your vision is at stake. Call 1-800-967-8529 for a free case consultation with a compassionate defective drug attorney.

Semaglutide Lawsuit – Ozempic Lawyer – Wegovy Lawyer

Wegovy Lawsuit – Blindness From Ozempic – Weight Loss Medications

The Hidden Dangers of Gaming Apps: Roblox Lawsuit

Posted on January 5, 2026January 5, 2026 by Loni Liss

Online Predators Are Targeting America’s Children

Roblox is one of the most popular online gaming platforms in the world, with tens of millions of daily users. Many of them are young children and teenagers. On the surface, Roblox looks like harmless fun: kids build worlds, play games with friends, and express their creativity. But under the surface lies a dark element of child predators seeking out innocence.

Behind the bright colors and cartoon avatars lies a much darker reality. Increasingly, parents are discovering that their children have been groomed, sexually exploited, and bullied. Others have been pushed toward self-harm through interactions on Roblox and related platforms like Discord.

Lawsuits and investigations are shining a light on how dangerous these online spaces can be when safety protections fail. The Yost Legal Group is actively investigating and representing victims and families in Roblox child sexual abuse and exploitation cases.

How Online Predators Use Roblox to Target Children

Online predators are skilled at hiding in plain sight. On Roblox, they often pose as other kids or friendly older teens. They use features that are meant for social interaction—like chat, friend requests, private messages, and game invitations—to identify and groom vulnerable children. Some common tactics include:

Building trust over time

Predators may start with innocent small talk: favorite games, school, hobbies. They act supportive and kind, slowly becoming a “trusted friend” in the child’s online world.

Moving conversations off platform

Once a connection is established, predators often encourage children to move to other apps like Discord, Snapchat, or private messaging. This makes it harder for parents to monitor and easier for predators to escalate their behavior.

Introducing sexual content and “secrets.”

After building trust, predators may start sending sexual messages, images, or links. They might pressure the child to send explicit photos or videos, or to perform sexual acts on camera. They often frame this as a “secret” that must be kept from parents.

Coercion, threats, and blackmail (sextortion)

In some cases, predators threaten to share embarrassing images or chat logs with friends and family if the child doesn’t comply. This “sextortion” can trap children in a cycle of fear and silence.

Tell Your Children Never to Arrange In-Person Meetings

The most dangerous cases involve predators convincing children to meet in person. These meetings can lead to sexual assault, kidnapping, and other violent crimes. Law firms and news outlets have documented numerous cases where children were groomed and exploited through Roblox and related platforms.

For example, lawsuits have alleged that Roblox and Discord failed to protect a 15-year-old boy who was groomed online and later died by suicide. The fact is that extremist and predatory groups use these platforms to target vulnerable youth.

Lawsuits claim Roblox’s design and safety failures allow predators to find, groom, and abuse children.

Emotional Harm, Self-Harm, and Suicide Risks of the Roblox App

The harm is not limited to physical and sexual abuse. Children who are groomed, exploited, or relentlessly bullied online can suffer severe emotional trauma, depression, anxiety, and suicidal thoughts.

Recent lawsuits and media reports have described heartbreaking stories of young people who died by suicide after being manipulated, threatened, or humiliated through online platforms, including Roblox and associated chat tools. Parents often had no idea what was happening until it was too late.

When a child is told they will be exposed, shamed, or that their family will be hurt if they speak up, they may feel trapped and hopeless. This is why early detection, open communication, and strong safety measures are critical.

Why Platforms Like Roblox Must Do More

Roblox and similar gaming platforms know that a huge portion of their user base is under 18. That reality should come with the highest level of responsibility and safety protections.

Yet many lawsuits and investigations allege that these companies:

Failed to adequately screen, monitor, and remove predators
Allowed unsafe or sexually explicit content to remain accessible to minors
Did not provide sufficient parental controls, transparency, or warnings
Put growth and profits ahead of meaningful child protection

Roblox sexual abuse and grooming claims have argued that the platform’s design and moderation systems allowed predators to exploit children through chat, friend features, and user-generated games.

Other legal actions and regulatory investigations have accused the company of downplaying risks and failing to implement robust safeguards, even after repeated warnings.

Children are not just “users” or “players”—they are vulnerable human beings who deserve protection. When companies fail to take reasonable steps to keep kids safe, they should be held accountable.

Age Verification on Roblox Gaming App

On November 18, 2025, Roblox Corp. announced that it would make facial age verification mandatory for users to access its chat features. If one does not intend to communicate on the platform, they do not have to undergo the age check. Upon age verification, users will be able to chat with people in similar age ranges. Roblox argues that this feature will prevent children and adults from interacting in inappropriate ways.

Despite the implementation of this new feature, the platform still contains several loopholes that allow inappropriate content and communication to persist. For instance, there is a “Trusted Connection” feature which allows family members (parents, siblings, etc) and other self-identified trusted members to play together. The implication is that these connections are safe, and thus the feature lacks content filters for inappropriate language, images, etc., when it is activated. However, even those considered “trusted” can interact inappropriately.

Therefore, parents and caregivers should continue to monitor all communications of their child on this platform to prevent harm.

Warning Signs Parents Should Watch For

Parents and caregivers are the first line of defense. While no system is perfect, being alert to changes in your child’s behavior and online habits can make a critical difference.

Warning signs may include:

Sudden secrecy around devices
Your child quickly switches screens, hides their phone, or becomes defensive when you walk into the room.
New “friends” you don’t recognize
Your child talks about online friends you’ve never met, especially older teens or adults, or refuses to share basic information about them.
Changes in mood or behavior
Increased anxiety, depression, irritability, nightmares, or withdrawal from family and offline friends.
Unexplained gifts or money
Your child suddenly has new items, gift cards, or digital purchases they can’t explain.
Sexualized language or knowledge beyond their age
Use of explicit terms, images, or behaviors that seem far beyond what’s age-appropriate.
Fear of consequences if they “tell.”
Statements like “I can’t tell you, something bad will happen,” or visible panic when you mention checking their accounts.

Any one of these signs does not automatically mean your child is being groomed, but they are important red flags that warrant gentle, open conversation and closer monitoring.

How Parents Can Monitor or Block Roblox

If your child uses Roblox—or if you’re concerned they might access it without your knowledge—there are concrete steps you can take:

Use Roblox’s parental controls

Create your own parent account and link it to your child’s account.
Enable Account Restrictions to limit what types of games they can access.
Turn on Privacy settings to restrict who can message, chat, or join games with your child.
Regularly review their friends list, chat history (where available), and game history.

Set device-level controls

Use built-in parental controls on phones, tablets, computers, and gaming consoles to restrict app downloads, set time limits, and block specific apps or websites.
Consider third-party parental control software that can monitor online activity and block dangerous sites.

Block or limit access to Roblox

If you decide that Roblox is not appropriate for your child, you can block the website on your home router or with parental control software.
Remove the app from devices your child uses and ensure app store settings require your approval for new downloads.

Keep devices in shared spaces

Encourage gaming and internet use in common areas of the home rather than behind closed doors.
Avoid allowing young children to have unrestricted internet access late at night.

Talk openly and often

Explain in age-appropriate language that not everyone online is who they say they are.
Make it clear that your child can always come to you, without punishment, if someone online makes them uncomfortable, asks for pictures, or wants to meet in person.
Reinforce that no secret with an online “friend” is more important than their safety.

Has Your Child Been Abused by a Roblox Predator?

In many cases, you may be able to pursue a civil claim against Roblox and other responsible parties for failing to protect your child. An experienced child abuse lawyer will answer your questions about filing a Roblox gaming lawsuit.

How The Yost Legal Group Can Help

The Yost Legal Group is representing victims of Roblox-related child sexual abuse, grooming, and exploitation. Our law firm has a long history of standing up for vulnerable individuals and families harmed by powerful corporations and institutions.

If your child has suffered any of the following, please contact our law firm for help.

The child was coerced into meeting an adult whom they had met online
A minor was sexually assaulted by someone they met through Roblox
Bullied, harassed, or pushed toward self-harm or suicide through online interactions
Pressured to send explicit images or videos, which led to severe trauma

You may have a claim against Roblox and other responsible companies.

We understand how painful and overwhelming these situations are. Our team approaches every case with compassion and privacy to seek justice and accountability.

You can contact The Yost Legal Group for a free, confidential consultation at (800)-YOST-LAW or (800) 967-8529. There are no fees or expenses unless we recover compensation for you.

If you believe Roblox or another gaming platform played a role in your child’s abuse or exploitation, reach out today. Learn about your options and how we can help protect your family and others from similar harm.

Roblox Suicide – Gaming Apps Lawsuit – Filing a Lawsuit

Sexual Abuse of a Minor Lawyer – Gaming Apps Lawyer – Sexual Predation

Maryland Public School Sexual Abuse Lawsuits

Posted on December 29, 2025December 29, 2025 by Loni Liss

Often, public attention around school sexual abuse lawsuits in Maryland has focused on historical cases. Survivors who were hurt long ago, usually silenced by shame, fear, or power, finally found a way forward.

The Maryland Child Victims Act (CVA) reopened the courthouse doors. It did this by removing the time limit for childhood sexual abuse survivors. The Yost Legal Group is dedicated to helping survivors of childhood sexual abuse.

But it is critical to say this clearly: sexual abuse of children (whether in a place of worship, recreation, or education) is not just a historical problem. It remains a present-day crisis.

According to RAINN, every nine minutes, a child in the United States is made the victim of a sexual assault.

Children are still being abused today. Survivors are still being created today. And the institutions charged with protecting children, which include Maryland public schools, are still capable of failing them in devastating ways.

Recent Allegations Against John McAleer of Frederick County Highlight a Modern Sexual Abuse Crisis

Consider the claims against John McAleer. He was a Special Education Instructional Assistant at Oakdale Middle School in Frederick County. This case serves as a clear reminder of this reality. His case is not about distant decades or expired records.

This situation involves recent harm, vulnerable students, and a school system that people entrusted with care, supervision, and safety.

If you or a loved one was molested by a Maryland public school employee, you may be able to file a school sexual abuse lawsuit. The Yost Legal Group has years of experience pursuing litigation against public institutions that have harbored abusers and disregarded survivors. But enough is enough.

You deserve to be heard. If you are ready to talk, we are here to listen. Call 1-800-967-8529 for a free and confidential consultation with an experienced child sexual abuse attorney or legal team member. We are here to help.

The Negative Impact of Childhood Sexual Assault

Are you a survivor of childhood sexual abuse or statutory rape? Are you carrying around anger, confusion, fear, and shame? The long-term effects of surviving a sexual assault go far beyond the physical harm it can cause.

Many survivors question whether what happened to them “counts” as sexual abuse. Others worry that too much time had passed, that no one would believe them, or that speaking out will cause more harm. You are not alone.

Those fears are not accidental. They are the product of systems that historically protected institutions instead of children.

Sexual abuse survivors often develop post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). And though we think of PTSD as an emotional response, it is actually a stress-related brain injury.

According to Brainline.org, extreme stress can cause the amygdala to enlarge. The amygdala is the part of the brain that handles emotions. It also shrinks the central cortex. The central cortex controls logical thinking.

This can lead to anger, depression, and hypervigilance. At The Yost Legal Group, we represent survivors of sexual abuse with one guiding principle: accountability matters. Not only for individual perpetrators, but for the institutions that enabled access, ignored warning signs, or failed to act when children were at risk.

You are not responsible for what happened to you. You are not alone. And you have the right to ask whether the school system that employed your abuser can be held legally responsible.

Our firm is currently representing a survivor harmed by John McAleer. We take that responsibility seriously, and we approach these cases with care, discretion, and resolve.

If you have any questions or concerns about a school sexual abuse lawsuit, contact us at your earliest convenience.

Who Is John McAleer—and Why His Role Matters

John McAleer is 22 years old. He used to work as a Special Education Instructional Assistant at Oakdale Middle School. This school is in Ijamsville, Frederick County, Maryland.

According to charging documents and media reports, McAleer is accused of sexually abusing multiple students. Some of the alleged victims were cognitively impaired or particularly vulnerable due to their disabilities.

The allegations include extreme acts that go far beyond mere boundary or decorum violations. These are textbook criminal sexual abuse allegations.

Special education instructional assistants are not casual observers. They are granted authority, proximity, and trust. They often work one-on-one with students who may have difficulty communicating, such as those who are nonverbal.

These conditions make it nearly impossible to report abuse or even recognize that what is happening to them is wrong. McAleer’s role created an opportunity for care, a way to uplift a young and vulnerable person’s life. Instead, he is alleged to have used his access for exploitation.

As there are multiple allegations spanning several months, safeguards within the school system failed to protect multiple students.

The Allegations Against McAleer Are Deeply Disturbing

Prosecutors allege that McAleer used his position within Oakdale Middle School to gain access to students and sexually abuse them. Reports indicate that the alleged conduct occurred on school grounds and during school-related activities.

These were not isolated encounters between strangers. These were interactions facilitated by employment, access, and institutional trust.

Law enforcement has described the accusations as involving repeated abuse, including sexual assault and rape of minors. The victims, according to reports, include children with special needs, the most vulnerable of students who relied on adults for advocacy and protection.

When abuse occurs under these circumstances, the legal inquiry does not stop with the individual accused. We must expand the scope of the investigation and fault.

Institutional Responsibility Does Not End with an Arrest

When a public school employee is accused of sexually abusing students, the question is not only “What did they do?” It is also “How were they allowed to do it?”

Frederick County Public Schools, like all Maryland public school systems, has a legal and moral duty to protect students. That duty includes proper hiring, background checks, training, supervision, and swift intervention when concerns arise. When that system breaks down, the consequences are measured in trauma.

In these cases, investigators and civil lawyers look for warning signs. They check if complaints were handled poorly and if supervision was weak. They must also determine whether policies to prevent such occurrences had existed on paper but ultimately failed in practice.

Institutions often claim shock after abuse is uncovered. Abuse and sexual coercion rarely occur in a vacuum. It thrives in silence, in gaps in oversight, and in environments where vulnerable children are not adequately protected.

Why Special Education Students Face Heightened Risk

National data and decades of survivor testimony confirm that children with disabilities face a significantly higher risk of sexual abuse. They are more likely to depend on adults for personal care. More likely to be isolated from peers. More likely to be disbelieved when they report harm.

That reality imposes an even higher duty on schools.

When a school assigns staff to work closely with special education students, it must ensure that safeguards are real, enforced, and continuously monitored. Anything less is negligence.

If Frederick County Public Schools failed to protect these students, that failure deserves full legal scrutiny.

Civil Lawsuits Are About Accountability, Not Just Compensation

Survivors often hesitate to pursue civil claims because they worry about their motives being questioned. That hesitation is understandable. It is a lot to ask a person to come forward about something so traumatic, so damaging to the psyche.

However, when sexual assault survivors are able to report their abusers, there is a net-positive outcome on the world beyond an individual’s monetary gain.

Civil lawsuits serve multiple purposes. They provide financial resources for therapy and long-term care. They force institutions to answer questions under oath. They uncover documents that would otherwise remain hidden. And they deter future abuse by exposing systemic failures.

For survivors abused in schools, civil cases are often the only mechanism that compels change.

Speak with a Law Firm That Understands These Cases

At The Yost Legal Group, we approach school sexual abuse cases with the utmost care and discretion. We are a trauma-informed, client-first law firm here to help you understand and seek whatever healing you need.

We investigate perpetrators. We investigate institutions. And we center survivors at every stage of the process. If you are ready to talk, we are here to listen.

If you or someone you love was harmed by John McAleer or by any Maryland public school employee, you need an experienced sexual abuse lawyer. You deserve accountability and justice. And you deserve to know that your voice matters now, not decades from now.

The experienced childhood sexual abuse lawyers at The Yost Legal Group are here to help. Seek justice, answers, and compensation. Call today for a free and confidential trauma-informed consultation: 1-800-YOST-LAW (967-8529).

Institutional Sexual Abuse – Sexual Assault Lawyer – Abused as a Child – School Sexual Abuse Lawsuits

Neonatal Resuscitation and Birth Injuries

Posted on December 17, 2025 by Loni Liss

Most babies transition from being in utero to breathing room air on their own as soon as they are born. However, about 10% of newborns require some assistance with breathing, and of that 10%, fewer than 1% require extensive neonatal resuscitation measures.

The equipment and the medical team members trained to resuscitate newborns are required in every hospital’s labor and delivery department.

Although only 10% of newborn babies require neonatal resuscitation, meaning only 10% of parents have this experience, it is worth describing here in some detail.

It is quite common that parents are not given an explanation of the medical procedures their baby has received if newborn resuscitation was performed.

When does a newborn need neonatal resuscitation?

If a newborn baby is having any difficulty breathing or has a heart rate that is too low, emergency steps are immediately taken. The intention is to stabilize the infant so that the baby receives sufficient oxygen and has a strong, regular heartbeat.

Medical professionals want to reduce the risk of hypoxic (oxygen deficiency) injury to the baby’s brain.

Resuscitation of a newborn occurs in several steps, from least to most invasive, and typically begins within the first minute of life. Less than 1% of babies who need resuscitation need the most invasive procedures.

What are the first steps taken to resuscitate a newborn?

The first steps taken to treat a baby who needs help breathing are focused on:

Keeping the baby warm
Opening the baby’s airway
If necessary, advancing to the equivalent of CPR by providing positive pressure ventilation (PPV) to help the baby breathe and performing chest compressions if the heart rate remains too low (under 60 beats per minute).

Warmth: The baby is placed on a heated surface or under a radiant warmer to prevent an uncontrolled drop in body temperature (hypothermia) that might further slow the baby’s heart rate and breathing.

Positioning: Once on a warm surface, the baby’s head and neck are positioned to open the baby’s airway to optimize full respiration.

Suctioning: Clearing the baby’s mouth and nose with a bulb syringe or a suction catheter may be needed to remove fluid blocking the baby’s airway.

Breathing: Providing positive pressure ventilation (PPV) with a bag and mask or a CPAP device, for example, inflates the lungs to help breathing if the baby is still struggling after suctioning.

Chest compressions: If the heart rate remains below 60 beats per minute after PPV ventilation is established, chest compressions are administered.

What are the advanced steps taken to resuscitate a newborn?

In less than 1% of newborns who do not respond to the initial resuscitation procedures, advanced interventions are undertaken:

Intubation: An endotracheal tube may be inserted to establish a secure and reliable airway.

Epinephrine: If the heart rate remains low despite ventilation and chest compressions, epinephrine or a similar medication may be administered through an IV.

What care does a baby receive after neonatal resuscitation?

Monitoring – A baby who has been resuscitated at the time of birth will have their heart rate, breathing, and oxygen saturation rate closely monitored, once they are transferred from the delivery room to the nursery or the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).
Body temperature control – The baby will be regularly checked to confirm that their body temperature is normal and that they are not having difficulty maintaining it. Any baby having trouble regulating body temperature will need immediate additional medical care to stabilize it.
Further evaluation – After resuscitation, it may be necessary for the baby to undergo additional observation, testing, and monitoring to find the primary cause of the baby’s breathing difficulty and any other complications at the time of birth.

Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy and Newborn Resuscitation

Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy is not diagnosed because the baby required resuscitation at the time of birth. Still, neonatal resuscitation can be an early indication that a baby suffered a hypoxic brain injury from a lack of oxygen during labor and delivery.

HIE newborns may experience difficulty breathing, a slow heart rate, and a dusky, bluish color, all of which can result in the need for immediate resuscitation.

A need for newborn resuscitation does not mean that a baby has suffered brain damage or that medical malpractice has occurred.

Neonatal resuscitation, followed by an HIE or cerebral palsy diagnosis, does mean the baby’s labor and delivery history should be examined to determine whether medical mistakes were made.

If your child was diagnosed with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, let our birth injury attorneys help you find answers.

We invite you to reach out for a Free Consultation to discuss your unique situation in a caring, confidential environment. Call The Yost Legal Group at 1-800-YOST-LAW (1-800-967-8529) today.

Should I contact a birth injury law firm if my child needed to be resuscitated at birth?

You should consider contacting a birth injury attorney as soon as possible if:

Your baby had signs of distress or injury (like seizures, difficulty breathing, or needing to be resuscitated in the delivery room).
Your baby had low Apgar scores.
You suspect that something went wrong during labor or delivery, or you have concerns about the medical care you or your baby received.
Your baby has been diagnosed with a condition like hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), cerebral palsy, or another birth-related injury.

How The Yost Legal Group Birth Injury Lawyers Can Help.

Free Consultation: We offer a complimentary case review to discuss your concerns, review your potential case, and address any questions you may have about your baby’s resuscitation at the time of birth.
Medical Record Review: Our team will carefully review the medical records and help determine whether a medical mistake occurred during labor and delivery.
Expert Insights: We collaborate with medical experts to assess whether the care provided met accepted standards of care and if any preventable factors were involved.
No Upfront Fees: The Yost Legal Group works on a contingency fee basis, so you pay nothing unless they recover compensation for you.

If a medical mistake was made, our HIE lawyers will work to secure a lifetime of care for your child.

You can reach The Yost Legal Group by calling (800)-YOST-LAW for more information. If we file a birth injury claim on your behalf, we will fight to seek the justice and compensation you deserve.

Talk to Experienced Birth Injury Lawyers at The Yost Legal Group

If your baby needed neonatal resuscitation, it’s normal to have questions about what happened in the delivery room—and what it could mean for your child’s future.

In some situations, complications tied to oxygen deprivation can lead to an HIE diagnosis, and families may later notice developmental delays that impact child development over time.

If you’re worried that mistakes during labor, delivery, or newborn care played a role, you don’t have to sort through the medical details alone.

The Yost Legal Group has experienced birth injury lawyers who can answer your questions, review your records, and explain your options.

Every birth injury case is different, but getting clarity early can be an important first step—whether you’re simply seeking information or considering a birth injury lawsuit.

If you’re ready to talk, contact The Yost Legal Group for a free case review to discuss your concerns and learn how they may be able to help.

If your infant was diagnosed with HIE or cerebral palsy and you want answers, contact The Yost Legal Group at (800)-YOST-LAW.

Birth Asphyxia – Therapeutic Hypothermia For HIE – Neonatal Brain Injury