Maryland Public School Sexual Abuse Lawsuits

Posted on December 29, 2025December 29, 2025 by Loni Liss

Often, public attention around school sexual abuse lawsuits in Maryland has focused on historical cases. Survivors who were hurt long ago, usually silenced by shame, fear, or power, finally found a way forward.

The Maryland Child Victims Act (CVA) reopened the courthouse doors. It did this by removing the time limit for childhood sexual abuse survivors. The Yost Legal Group is dedicated to helping survivors of childhood sexual abuse.

But it is critical to say this clearly: sexual abuse of children (whether in a place of worship, recreation, or education) is not just a historical problem. It remains a present-day crisis.

According to RAINN, every nine minutes, a child in the United States is made the victim of a sexual assault.

Children are still being abused today. Survivors are still being created today. And the institutions charged with protecting children, which include Maryland public schools, are still capable of failing them in devastating ways.

Recent Allegations Against John McAleer of Frederick County Highlight a Modern Sexual Abuse Crisis

Consider the claims against John McAleer. He was a Special Education Instructional Assistant at Oakdale Middle School in Frederick County. This case serves as a clear reminder of this reality. His case is not about distant decades or expired records.

This situation involves recent harm, vulnerable students, and a school system that people entrusted with care, supervision, and safety.

If you or a loved one was molested by a Maryland public school employee, you may be able to file a school sexual abuse lawsuit. The Yost Legal Group has years of experience pursuing litigation against public institutions that have harbored abusers and disregarded survivors. But enough is enough.

You deserve to be heard. If you are ready to talk, we are here to listen. Call 1-800-967-8529 for a free and confidential consultation with an experienced child sexual abuse attorney or legal team member. We are here to help.

The Negative Impact of Childhood Sexual Assault

Are you a survivor of childhood sexual abuse or statutory rape? Are you carrying around anger, confusion, fear, and shame? The long-term effects of surviving a sexual assault go far beyond the physical harm it can cause.

Many survivors question whether what happened to them “counts” as sexual abuse. Others worry that too much time had passed, that no one would believe them, or that speaking out will cause more harm. You are not alone.

Those fears are not accidental. They are the product of systems that historically protected institutions instead of children.

Sexual abuse survivors often develop post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). And though we think of PTSD as an emotional response, it is actually a stress-related brain injury.

According to Brainline.org, extreme stress can cause the amygdala to enlarge. The amygdala is the part of the brain that handles emotions. It also shrinks the central cortex. The central cortex controls logical thinking.

This can lead to anger, depression, and hypervigilance. At The Yost Legal Group, we represent survivors of sexual abuse with one guiding principle: accountability matters. Not only for individual perpetrators, but for the institutions that enabled access, ignored warning signs, or failed to act when children were at risk.

You are not responsible for what happened to you. You are not alone. And you have the right to ask whether the school system that employed your abuser can be held legally responsible.

Our firm is currently representing a survivor harmed by John McAleer. We take that responsibility seriously, and we approach these cases with care, discretion, and resolve.

If you have any questions or concerns about a school sexual abuse lawsuit, contact us at your earliest convenience.

Who Is John McAleer—and Why His Role Matters

John McAleer is 22 years old. He used to work as a Special Education Instructional Assistant at Oakdale Middle School. This school is in Ijamsville, Frederick County, Maryland.

According to charging documents and media reports, McAleer is accused of sexually abusing multiple students. Some of the alleged victims were cognitively impaired or particularly vulnerable due to their disabilities.

The allegations include extreme acts that go far beyond mere boundary or decorum violations. These are textbook criminal sexual abuse allegations.

Special education instructional assistants are not casual observers. They are granted authority, proximity, and trust. They often work one-on-one with students who may have difficulty communicating, such as those who are nonverbal.

These conditions make it nearly impossible to report abuse or even recognize that what is happening to them is wrong. McAleer’s role created an opportunity for care, a way to uplift a young and vulnerable person’s life. Instead, he is alleged to have used his access for exploitation.

As there are multiple allegations spanning several months, safeguards within the school system failed to protect multiple students.

The Allegations Against McAleer Are Deeply Disturbing

Prosecutors allege that McAleer used his position within Oakdale Middle School to gain access to students and sexually abuse them. Reports indicate that the alleged conduct occurred on school grounds and during school-related activities.

These were not isolated encounters between strangers. These were interactions facilitated by employment, access, and institutional trust.

Law enforcement has described the accusations as involving repeated abuse, including sexual assault and rape of minors. The victims, according to reports, include children with special needs, the most vulnerable of students who relied on adults for advocacy and protection.

When abuse occurs under these circumstances, the legal inquiry does not stop with the individual accused. We must expand the scope of the investigation and fault.

Institutional Responsibility Does Not End with an Arrest

When a public school employee is accused of sexually abusing students, the question is not only “What did they do?” It is also “How were they allowed to do it?”

Frederick County Public Schools, like all Maryland public school systems, has a legal and moral duty to protect students. That duty includes proper hiring, background checks, training, supervision, and swift intervention when concerns arise. When that system breaks down, the consequences are measured in trauma.

In these cases, investigators and civil lawyers look for warning signs. They check if complaints were handled poorly and if supervision was weak. They must also determine whether policies to prevent such occurrences had existed on paper but ultimately failed in practice.

Institutions often claim shock after abuse is uncovered. Abuse and sexual coercion rarely occur in a vacuum. It thrives in silence, in gaps in oversight, and in environments where vulnerable children are not adequately protected.

Why Special Education Students Face Heightened Risk

National data and decades of survivor testimony confirm that children with disabilities face a significantly higher risk of sexual abuse. They are more likely to depend on adults for personal care. More likely to be isolated from peers. More likely to be disbelieved when they report harm.

That reality imposes an even higher duty on schools.

When a school assigns staff to work closely with special education students, it must ensure that safeguards are real, enforced, and continuously monitored. Anything less is negligence.

If Frederick County Public Schools failed to protect these students, that failure deserves full legal scrutiny.

Civil Lawsuits Are About Accountability, Not Just Compensation

Survivors often hesitate to pursue civil claims because they worry about their motives being questioned. That hesitation is understandable. It is a lot to ask a person to come forward about something so traumatic, so damaging to the psyche.

However, when sexual assault survivors are able to report their abusers, there is a net-positive outcome on the world beyond an individual’s monetary gain.

Civil lawsuits serve multiple purposes. They provide financial resources for therapy and long-term care. They force institutions to answer questions under oath. They uncover documents that would otherwise remain hidden. And they deter future abuse by exposing systemic failures.

For survivors abused in schools, civil cases are often the only mechanism that compels change.

Speak with a Law Firm That Understands These Cases

At The Yost Legal Group, we approach school sexual abuse cases with the utmost care and discretion. We are a trauma-informed, client-first law firm here to help you understand and seek whatever healing you need.

We investigate perpetrators. We investigate institutions. And we center survivors at every stage of the process. If you are ready to talk, we are here to listen.

If you or someone you love was harmed by John McAleer or by any Maryland public school employee, you need an experienced sexual abuse lawyer. You deserve accountability and justice. And you deserve to know that your voice matters now, not decades from now.

The experienced childhood sexual abuse lawyers at The Yost Legal Group are here to help. Seek justice, answers, and compensation. Call today for a free and confidential trauma-informed consultation: 1-800-YOST-LAW (967-8529).

Institutional Sexual Abuse – Sexual Assault Lawyer – Abused as a Child – School Sexual Abuse Lawsuits

Neonatal Resuscitation and Birth Injuries

Posted on December 17, 2025 by Loni Liss

Most babies transition from being in utero to breathing room air on their own as soon as they are born. However, about 10% of newborns require some assistance with breathing, and of that 10%, fewer than 1% require extensive neonatal resuscitation measures.

The equipment and the medical team members trained to resuscitate newborns are required in every hospital’s labor and delivery department.

Although only 10% of newborn babies require neonatal resuscitation, meaning only 10% of parents have this experience, it is worth describing here in some detail.

It is quite common that parents are not given an explanation of the medical procedures their baby has received if newborn resuscitation was performed.

When does a newborn need neonatal resuscitation?

If a newborn baby is having any difficulty breathing or has a heart rate that is too low, emergency steps are immediately taken. The intention is to stabilize the infant so that the baby receives sufficient oxygen and has a strong, regular heartbeat.

Medical professionals want to reduce the risk of hypoxic (oxygen deficiency) injury to the baby’s brain.

Resuscitation of a newborn occurs in several steps, from least to most invasive, and typically begins within the first minute of life. Less than 1% of babies who need resuscitation need the most invasive procedures.

What are the first steps taken to resuscitate a newborn?

The first steps taken to treat a baby who needs help breathing are focused on:

Keeping the baby warm
Opening the baby’s airway
If necessary, advancing to the equivalent of CPR by providing positive pressure ventilation (PPV) to help the baby breathe and performing chest compressions if the heart rate remains too low (under 60 beats per minute).

Warmth: The baby is placed on a heated surface or under a radiant warmer to prevent an uncontrolled drop in body temperature (hypothermia) that might further slow the baby’s heart rate and breathing.

Positioning: Once on a warm surface, the baby’s head and neck are positioned to open the baby’s airway to optimize full respiration.

Suctioning: Clearing the baby’s mouth and nose with a bulb syringe or a suction catheter may be needed to remove fluid blocking the baby’s airway.

Breathing: Providing positive pressure ventilation (PPV) with a bag and mask or a CPAP device, for example, inflates the lungs to help breathing if the baby is still struggling after suctioning.

Chest compressions: If the heart rate remains below 60 beats per minute after PPV ventilation is established, chest compressions are administered.

What are the advanced steps taken to resuscitate a newborn?

In less than 1% of newborns who do not respond to the initial resuscitation procedures, advanced interventions are undertaken:

Intubation: An endotracheal tube may be inserted to establish a secure and reliable airway.

Epinephrine: If the heart rate remains low despite ventilation and chest compressions, epinephrine or a similar medication may be administered through an IV.

What care does a baby receive after neonatal resuscitation?

Monitoring – A baby who has been resuscitated at the time of birth will have their heart rate, breathing, and oxygen saturation rate closely monitored, once they are transferred from the delivery room to the nursery or the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).
Body temperature control – The baby will be regularly checked to confirm that their body temperature is normal and that they are not having difficulty maintaining it. Any baby having trouble regulating body temperature will need immediate additional medical care to stabilize it.
Further evaluation – After resuscitation, it may be necessary for the baby to undergo additional observation, testing, and monitoring to find the primary cause of the baby’s breathing difficulty and any other complications at the time of birth.

Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy and Newborn Resuscitation

Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy is not diagnosed because the baby required resuscitation at the time of birth. Still, neonatal resuscitation can be an early indication that a baby suffered a hypoxic brain injury from a lack of oxygen during labor and delivery.

HIE newborns may experience difficulty breathing, a slow heart rate, and a dusky, bluish color, all of which can result in the need for immediate resuscitation.

A need for newborn resuscitation does not mean that a baby has suffered brain damage or that medical malpractice has occurred.

Neonatal resuscitation, followed by an HIE or cerebral palsy diagnosis, does mean the baby’s labor and delivery history should be examined to determine whether medical mistakes were made.

If your child was diagnosed with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, let our birth injury attorneys help you find answers.

We invite you to reach out for a Free Consultation to discuss your unique situation in a caring, confidential environment. Call The Yost Legal Group at 1-800-YOST-LAW (1-800-967-8529) today.

Should I contact a birth injury law firm if my child needed to be resuscitated at birth?

You should consider contacting a birth injury attorney as soon as possible if:

Your baby had signs of distress or injury (like seizures, difficulty breathing, or needing to be resuscitated in the delivery room).
Your baby had low Apgar scores.
You suspect that something went wrong during labor or delivery, or you have concerns about the medical care you or your baby received.
Your baby has been diagnosed with a condition like hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), cerebral palsy, or another birth-related injury.

How The Yost Legal Group Birth Injury Lawyers Can Help.

Free Consultation: We offer a complimentary case review to discuss your concerns, review your potential case, and address any questions you may have about your baby’s resuscitation at the time of birth.
Medical Record Review: Our team will carefully review the medical records and help determine whether a medical mistake occurred during labor and delivery.
Expert Insights: We collaborate with medical experts to assess whether the care provided met accepted standards of care and if any preventable factors were involved.
No Upfront Fees: The Yost Legal Group works on a contingency fee basis, so you pay nothing unless they recover compensation for you.

If a medical mistake was made, our HIE lawyers will work to secure a lifetime of care for your child.

You can reach The Yost Legal Group by calling (800)-YOST-LAW for more information. If we file a birth injury claim on your behalf, we will fight to seek the justice and compensation you deserve.

Talk to Experienced Birth Injury Lawyers at The Yost Legal Group

If your baby needed neonatal resuscitation, it’s normal to have questions about what happened in the delivery room—and what it could mean for your child’s future.

In some situations, complications tied to oxygen deprivation can lead to an HIE diagnosis, and families may later notice developmental delays that impact child development over time.

If you’re worried that mistakes during labor, delivery, or newborn care played a role, you don’t have to sort through the medical details alone.

The Yost Legal Group has experienced birth injury lawyers who can answer your questions, review your records, and explain your options.

Every birth injury case is different, but getting clarity early can be an important first step—whether you’re simply seeking information or considering a birth injury lawsuit.

If you’re ready to talk, contact The Yost Legal Group for a free case review to discuss your concerns and learn how they may be able to help.

If your infant was diagnosed with HIE or cerebral palsy and you want answers, contact The Yost Legal Group at (800)-YOST-LAW.

Birth Asphyxia – Therapeutic Hypothermia For HIE – Neonatal Brain Injury

Baltimore’s St. Mary’s Seminary Abuse Lawsuits

Posted on December 17, 2025December 17, 2025 by Loni Liss

A Deep Look at the History, Patterns, and Institutional Failures Tied to St. Mary’s Seminary

For decades, Baltimore’s St. Mary’s Seminary and University, the country’s oldest seminary, stood as one of the most influential Catholic formation centers in the United States. Now, reports are emerging about lawsuits involving St. Mary’s Seminary, alleging the abuse of minors by clergy members.

Behind its reputation for producing generations of clergy lies a long-standing pattern of abuse, cover-ups, and institutional failure that Maryland survivors are only now beginning to publicly confront.

While allegations connected to St. Mary’s span multiple eras, many survivors did not feel safe coming forward until recently in the wake of the Maryland Attorney General’s sweeping, multi-year investigation that detailed how the Archdiocese of Baltimore concealed sexual abuse across its institutions.

Were you sexually abused at St. Mary’s Seminary? Are you ready to share your story? Contact the clergy sexual abuse attorneys at The Yost Legal Group today for a free and confidential consultation.

Our compassionate catholic church sexual abuse lawyers are representing hundreds of survivors. You are not alone. Call or text today at 410-659-6800.

A Legacy Shaped by Silence at St. Mary’s Seminary

Though St. Mary’s was not named as a primary target of the report, individuals trained there, housed there, or supervised through the seminary appear throughout the broader historical narrative.

Then, in 2024, a new lawsuit surfaced, alleging that seminarians and clergy connected to the institution repeatedly abused children over long periods of time.

For survivors in Maryland, these reports confirm something they have always known: the abuse was not isolated, accidental, or misunderstood.

It followed identifiable patterns. It was preventable. And it was enabled by systemic neglect and institutional protection of abusers.

Unfortunately, this pattern is not new.

A Disturbing Pattern of Abuse Emerges at St. Mary’s Seminary

As the oldest seminary in the United States, St. Mary’s is also one of the most powerful. For years, allegations regarding seminarians, priests-in-training, and clergy living or teaching at St. Mary’s have surfaced in lawsuits, news investigations, and survivor accounts.

While each survivor’s experience is deeply personal, the pattern that emerges across decades is strikingly similar. Survivors of clergy sexual abuse consistently describe grooming that began with trust.

Many were boys recruited through religious education, church functions, or community outreach. They described being offered mentorship, academic help, or a spiritual connection with a seminarian who seemed caring, attentive, and interested in their development.

Predators in the church then weaponized that trust.

Survivors of childhood sexual abuse detailed moments when priests or seminarians isolated them in vehicles, private rooms, or during off-campus outings.

Abusers with seminary ties also had access to children through programs that were lightly supervised or not supervised at all.

And once the abuse began, survivors often describe being told they were chosen, special, or loved. Meanwhile, institutional actors either missed red flags or chose not to intervene, allowing the cycle to continue.

Church Leaders Knew About The Child Sexual Abuse and Did Nothing

One of the most painful themes in these accounts is the consistent allegation that church leaders knew or should have known about the behavior of certain seminarians and clergy. This is not speculation.

The Maryland Attorney General’s report outlined decades of internal memos, reassignment records, and administrative decisions that prioritized protecting the institution over protecting children.

While each case tied to St. Mary’s is unique, survivors repeatedly describe similar structural failures:

Unexplained transfers of seminarians or priests without warning to families
Church leaders who dismissed concerns or discouraged reporting
A culture that viewed scandal as a greater threat than abuse
A system where supervisors ignored or minimized patterns of inappropriate conduct.

In some cases, individuals with prior allegations or suspicious behavior were allowed to remain in seminary programs or continue ministerial work, placing children at further risk.

Survivors who attempted to speak up were often met with disbelief or indifference. These are not isolated administrative oversights. They reflect a culture of silence that persisted for generations.

The Human Cost of Survivors of Childhood Sexual Abuse

Survivors of sexual abuse carry lifelong injuries: psychological, emotional, spiritual, and physical. Many describe losing their faith, their sense of safety, their ability to form healthy relationships, and their childhood.

Some have described battling addiction and depression before even understanding that what happened to them was abuse. It was not a misunderstanding or a “special game.” It was criminal exploitation of a minor.

And even once survivors come to terms with their abuse and build successful careers and relationships, some may still struggle with flashbacks, panic attacks, or deep distrust of authority figures. These are trauma responses rooted in what happened at the hands of clergy.

If you have experienced any of these trauma responses, it is okay. You are not alone. And there is hope. Please seek the help of a licensed medical provider for further steps toward emotional and mental healing.

When survivors read the Attorney General’s report or hear of new lawsuits tied to St. Mary’s, it can reopen wounds they have fought for decades to heal. But it can also bring validation. For many, knowing that others are coming forward helps confirm that their suffering was real, systemic, and never their fault.

St. Mary’s Role Within the Archdiocese of Baltimore

It is important to understand that St. Mary’s Seminary did not operate in isolation. As a formation center for priests, it played a significant role in the broader Catholic Church structure.

Many abusive clergy listed in the Attorney General’s report received training through St. Mary’s, lived there, were supervised there, or were deeply influenced by its culture.

The seminary is part of a larger system that historically lacked proper oversight, effective screening, or transparent accountability measures. The Baltimore catholic church sexual abuse scandal has led to thousands of catholic church sexual abuse settlements.

These claims against the Archdiocese of Baltimore prove the allegations of sexual abuse by so many victims.

When abuse occurred, it was not simply the act of one individual. It was the failure of a system that was meant to protect that individual. Survivors describing abuse by seminarians often report that no one monitored those interactions with minors.

Survivors describing abuse by ordained clergy often traced those clergy’s formation back to St. Mary’s.

For survivors, these institutional connections matter. They help explain how patterns of abuse spread and persisted for years without intervention.

How The Yost Legal Group Supports Survivors

Our team approaches every clergy abuse case with deep respect, a trauma-informed process, and the commitment to protect your privacy.

In cases involving St. Mary’s Seminary or, previously, the broader Archdiocese of Baltimore, we:

Conduct thorough factual investigations
Consult historical records
Examine institutional patterns to build the strongest possible case.

We work to hold both individual wrongdoers and the institutions that enabled them accountable. Survivors deserve to be heard.

They deserve answers. And they deserve justice that reflects the severity of the harm they endured.

Filing a Sexual Abuse Claim in Maryland

If a priest or Church employee abused you with ties to St. Mary’s Seminary and University, you may have legal options. It does not matter when the abuse occurred.

A sexual abuse lawsuit cannot undo what has happened or give back one’s childhood innocence. But it can help survivors:

Uncover internal documents
Expose individuals or leaders who enabled abuse
Seek financial compensation to protect against lifelong harm

Beyond the legal remedies, civil action can be a path toward personal accountability and public truth.

Seek Guidance From The Yost Legal Group Today

Survivors of clergy abuse often tell us that filing a clergy sexual abuse lawsuit is not about money. Many feel that coming forward means finally having others acknowledge their experience, hear them, and believe them.

It is about ensuring that institutions that failed them cannot continue to claim ignorance, cannot continue to do harm to minors with impunity. Coming forward is about preventing future harm by forcing transparency on organizations that have historically operated behind closed doors.

If you or a loved one was sexually abused by a seminarian, priest, or faculty member tied to St. Mary’s Seminary and University as a minor, you are not at fault. And, unfortunately, you are not alone.

The pattern is real. The catholic clergy sexual abuse cover-ups were real. What happened to you was not your fault.

Call or text The Yost Legal Group for a confidential, supportive conversation with an experienced clergy sexual abuse lawyer. You may have a clergy sexual abuse case if you are a survivor of clergy child sexual abuse.

Don’t suffer in silence. You do not need to wait. You can take the next step whenever you are ready: 1-800-YOST-LAW (967-8529).

Maryland’s Child Victims Act – Sexual Abuse Clergy – Sexual Abuse Catholic Church

Catholic Church Sexual Abuse Cases – Catholic Church Priest Sexual Abuse – Civil Lawsuits

Where Delaware’s HB 75 Stands; Latest on Justice for Child Sexual Abuse Survivors

Posted on December 8, 2025 by Loni Liss

Update on Delaware’s SOL Reform and What HB 75 Could Mean for Survivors Seeking Civil Claims

For many child sexual abuse survivors, time has never worked in their favor. While Delaware was an early national leader in statute of limitations reform through its 2007 Child Victim’s Act, many survivors were unable to participate in that original two-year civil window.

Some were still too young. Others were still trapped in silence. Many were not in an emotional place where they could safely disclose their abuse. Delaware House Bill 75 seeks to address that gap, which left many survivors behind and without recourse.

HB 75 of the 2025-2025 legislative session is a new bill that would expand civil access to justice for survivors of childhood sexual abuse by allowing claims to be brought at any time, regardless of how long ago the abuse occurred.

The bill has passed the Delaware House and is currently sitting with the Senate Judiciary Committee. While this progress is meaningful, it is not yet a guarantee. As of now, there is no scheduled Senate vote and no firm indication of when the committee will take the bill up. This reminds us of what is currently happening in Pennsylvania with CVA House Bills 262 and 264 sitting idle in the State Senate.

Still, the legislation represents an important step in Delaware’s ongoing discussion about accountability, survivor healing, and the responsibility of institutions that allowed abuse to occur.

The Yost Legal Group is closely monitoring this potential law change in Delaware. Our experienced sexual abuse survivor lawyers are here to help you understand your rights. If you are ready to tell your story, we are here to listen. Call us today to set up a free and confidential consultation at 1-800-967-8529.

What HB 75 Would Change for Survivors

At its core, HB 75 would amend Title 10, Section 8145 of the Delaware Code to eliminate the civil statute of limitations for childhood sexual abuse claims, including claims that were previously time-barred. That means a survivor whose abuse occurred decades ago would be able to bring a civil case today, regardless of their age or how much time has passed.

This is significant for several reasons. First, delayed disclosure is common. Survivors often take years to recognize the harm they experienced, name it, and feel safe enough to speak it aloud. The average age of disclosure for childhood sexual abuse often falls well into adulthood, meaning traditional time limits rarely reflect the lived realities of survivors.

Second, institutions that enabled abuse—whether churches, youth programs, schools, or other organizations—have historically relied on statutes of limitations to avoid accountability. HB 75 would shift the legal landscape, ensuring those institutions cannot use the passage of time as a shield.

Furthermore, HB 75 would operate retroactively. Survivors who previously believed they had no legal path forward would have another chance. That is the heart of the bill: restoring access to justice for people who did not have it before.

Delaware’s History of Statute of Limitations Reform

Delaware is not new to this conversation. In 2007, the state enacted one of the nation’s earliest and strongest laws for child sexual abuse survivors. The Child Victim’s Act opened a two-year window for previously time-barred civil claims, and the Delaware Supreme Court upheld the law against constitutional challenges.

Survivors sued schools, institutions, and the Catholic Church, leading to significant settlements and increased public awareness.

But even then, many survivors were left out. Some had not yet processed the abuse. Some were still children at the time. Some lacked support, access to counsel, or the psychological readiness to step forward. A two-year window was groundbreaking at the time, but it was not enough for countless individuals.

HB 75 acknowledges those realities. It reflects both Delaware’s history and the national momentum around expanding survivor rights. States across the country have enacted lookback windows and eliminated civil statutes of limitations because the evidence is overwhelming: survivors need time, and justice systems must account for that.

Where HB 75 Stands Now in the Legislative Process

While HB 75 has cleared the Delaware House of Representatives, its progress in the Senate Judiciary Committee has been paused. The committee holds substantial power over whether the bill advances or remains stalled. As of this writing, there is no public timeline for when a hearing or vote may occur.

This uncertainty is important to acknowledge. Survivors deserve an honest understanding of the process. Although the House vote shows meaningful bipartisan support, nothing is guaranteed. Bills can stall in committee for reasons unrelated to their substance, including competing legislative priorities, procedural disputes, or strategic delays. For now, HB 75 remains pending with no announced movement.

For survivors watching the bill closely, this period of waiting can be emotionally taxing. Many have already endured decades of silence, institutional betrayal, and personal struggle. The possibility of legal recognition and accountability can provide a lifeline. But legislative limbo is difficult. That is why transparency is crucial. Our goal is not to suggest that passage is imminent, but to provide clear, accurate updates as they occur.

Why HB 75 Matters Even Before Passage

Even in its pending state, HB 75 matters. It signals that Delaware lawmakers are actively reconsidering how the state treats survivors of childhood sexual abuse. It reflects an understanding that justice delayed should not be justice denied. The bill’s existence already contributes to a broader public conversation that centers survivors’ experiences rather than institutional convenience.

It is also an opportunity for survivors to reflect on whether they might want to pursue a civil claim if the law changes. Many people who thought they had no legal options may now see a potential path forward. That does not mean every survivor must act, or even should. Civil cases are deeply personal and can be emotionally demanding. But having the choice is powerful. HB 75 attempts to restore that choice.

Additionally, institutional accountability remains a critical factor. Laws like HB 75 ensure that organizations cannot bury wrongdoing under decades of silence. The prospect of renewed civil exposure may encourage institutions to take long-overdue steps toward transparency and reform.

A Survivor-Centered Perspective on What Comes Next

While we cannot predict when, or if, the Senate Judiciary Committee will take up HB 75, we can say this: we are continuing to monitor every development and will update survivors as soon as there is movement. Our commitment is to accuracy, compassion, and clarity. No promises. No speculation. Just the truth, delivered in a way that honors what survivors have already lived through.

For survivors considering what HB 75 could mean for them, it is normal to feel a range of emotions, from hope to fear to uncertainty. That spectrum of emotion is part of the healing process. If this legislation moves forward, there will be time to evaluate options, understand legal rights, and make decisions with the support you deserve.

If you have questions about how HB 75 might affect your ability to pursue a civil claim in the future, you can call or text our legal team at any time. You do not need to wait for the bill to pass to start getting information. Understanding your rights early can make the process less overwhelming later.

Staying Informed and Supporting Survivors

HB 75 is not the law yet. It is an active bill with real potential and real challenges. But it represents an essential moment for survivors in Delaware. As the bill awaits further action, we will remain watchful, engaged, and committed to keeping survivors informed.

If and when the Senate Judiciary Committee schedules a hearing, proposes amendments, or takes a vote, we will provide an immediate update. Until then, survivors should know they are not forgotten. Their stories matter. Their rights matter. And the state’s legal system is still evolving toward a more just and compassionate future.

For a free and confidential consultation with a compassionate sexual abuse survivor attorney, call or text The Yost Legal Group today. Our team is experienced and focused on survivor advocacy. If you are ready to tell your story, we are here to listen. You are not alone. Call us at 1-800-967-8529.

Child Sexual Abuse Lawyer – Institutional Sexual Abuse Lawsuit – Child Victims Act Maryland

Learn About Ozempic Vision Loss Side Effects

Posted on December 6, 2025 by Loni Liss

Over the past few years, drugs like Ozempic and Wegovy have exploded in popularity. Marketed for blood sugar control and dramatic weight loss, respectively, these medications have been prescribed to millions of people across the United States. Alarming research has linked Wegovy and Ozempic to vision loss side effects and blindness.

Reports suggest that some patients who took either Ozempic or Wegovy have experienced sudden vision problems.

Partial vision loss
Blindness

Lawsuits are being filed by individuals who claim they were not adequately warned about these potential risks.

If you or a loved one experienced vision loss after using Ozempic or Wegovy, you may qualify to file an Ozempic Lawsuit. The Yost Legal Group is actively investigating these cases and assisting patients in pursuing claims against the drug manufacturers.

What are Ozempic and Wegovy?

Both Ozempic and Wegovy contain the same active ingredient: semaglutide. Semaglutide belongs to a class of medications known as GLP-1 receptor agonists. GLP 1 drugs mimic a natural hormone in the body that helps regulate blood sugar and appetite.

Although they share the same ingredient, Ozempic and Wegovy are approved for different uses:

Ozempic is FDA‑approved for adults with type 2 diabetes. It is used to improve blood sugar control and reduce the risk of major cardiovascular events such as heart attack and stroke.

Wegovy is FDA‑approved for chronic weight management in adults and adolescents aged 12 and older with obesity, or in overweight adults who have at least one weight‑related condition. It is also approved to reduce the risk of cardiovascular death, heart attack, and stroke in certain adults.

Wegovy is not specifically approved to treat diabetes. Still, some healthcare providers prescribe it as an “off‑label” use for patients with type 2 diabetes who could benefit from its weight‑loss effects.

As prescriptions for these weight loss drugs have surged, so have reports of unexpected and serious side effects – including vision problems.

Ozempic and Wegovy Linked to “Non-Arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy” (NAION)

Recent medical research has raised concerns about a possible connection between semaglutide and a serious eye condition called non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION).

NAION occurs when blood flow to the optic nerve is suddenly reduced, damaging the nerve and causing rapid loss of vision. This damage can be permanent.

A 2024 study published in JAMA Ophthalmology examined patients who were prescribed semaglutide. The study found an increased risk of NAION compared with patients taking other medications for diabetes or weight loss without semaglutide.

The authors reported that the use of semaglutide was associated with a higher incidence of this vision‑threatening condition (NAION) in certain groups of patients.

In addition, a 2025 safety review by European regulators concluded that NAION should be listed as a “very rare” side effect of semaglutide‑containing medicines, including Ozempic and Wegovy.

Regulators advised that patients who experience sudden vision loss or rapidly worsening eyesight while taking semaglutide should seek urgent medical attention.

Other reviews and safety databases have also noted increased reports of visual impairment and optic nerve problems in patients using semaglutide compared with some other medications in the same class.

Researchers are still studying exactly how semaglutide might contribute to NAION or other eye conditions.

The pattern of reports is serious enough that many patients and doctors are now asking whether they were adequately warned about these risks.

What NAION Symptoms Should Patients Watch For?

Vision loss linked to NAION can happen suddenly and without pain. People taking Ozempic or Wegovy should be alert for any changes in their eyesight, including the following:

– Sudden blurring or dimming of vision in one or both eyes

– A dark or empty area in the center of vision

– Loss of vision on one side or in a specific field of view

– Difficulty seeing in low light or upon waking up

– Sudden changes in color vision

These symptoms may appear shortly after starting the medication, after a dose increase, or even months after starting. Because NAION damages the optic nerve, time is critical.

Anyone experiencing sudden vision changes should seek emergency medical care and tell the doctor about all medications they are taking, including Ozempic or Wegovy.

Why Are Ozempic Lawsuits Being Filed?

Patients filing lawsuits against the manufacturers of Ozempic and Wegovy allege the following:

– The companies failed to adequately warn patients and doctors about the risk of serious eye injuries, including NAION, vision loss, and potential blindness.

– Important safety information was not clearly communicated in the prescribing information, marketing materials, or patient education resources.

– If patients and their healthcare providers had been adequately warned, they might have chosen different treatments, monitored vision more closely, or stopped the medication sooner.

– Drug manufacturers have a legal duty to design reasonably safe products and to provide clear, complete warnings about known or reasonably foreseeable risks.

– When a company fails to do so, and patients are harmed as a result, those patients may be entitled to compensation through a lawsuit.

People who have suffered vision loss after taking Ozempic or Wegovy may face:

– Medical bills

– Loss of independence

– Inability to work

– Emotional distress

– Long‑term disability

A medication lawsuit can help hold the manufacturers accountable and provide financial support for ongoing care and future needs.

Do You Qualify to Join an Ozempic Vision Loss Lawsuit?

Learn if you qualify to pursue a claim against the manufacturers of Ozempic or Wegovy if:

– You used Ozempic or Wegovy (semaglutide) as prescribed by your healthcare provider; and

– You were later diagnosed with a serious eye condition, such as non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION), optic neuropathy, or other unexplained vision loss; and

– Your vision loss occurred after starting the medication, even if you also had diabetes, high blood pressure, or other risk factors.

Every case is unique. The timing of your symptoms, your medical history, and the specific drug you were prescribed all matter.

That is why it is essential to consult with an experienced law firm that understands both the medical and legal aspects involved.

How The Yost Legal Group Can Help

The Yost Legal Group has a long history of representing individuals and families harmed by dangerous drugs and medical products. Our defective drug attorneys can:

– Investigate complex medical evidence

– Work with leading experts

– Fight to hold large corporations accountable when their products cause serious harm

If you or someone you love experienced vision loss or blindness after taking Ozempic or Wegovy, The Yost Legal Group is here to help. We can:

– Review your medical and prescription history

– Consult with medical experts to evaluate whether your eye injury may be linked to semaglutide

– Explain your legal options, including the possibility of joining ongoing litigation against the drug manufacturers

– Pursue compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and other damages where appropriate

– You pay no fees or costs unless we recover compensation for you.

Contact The Yost Legal Group Today

If you have suffered vision loss or blindness after taking Ozempic or Wegovy, do not wait to get answers. Strict time limits may apply to your claim, and gathering evidence is easier when you act quickly.

Contact a product liability lawyer at The Yost Legal Group for a free, confidential consultation.

Call 800‑YOST‑LAW or (800) 967-8529.

You do not have to face this alone. Call us if you experience Ozempic side effects and develop (NAION) non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy.

Side Effects of Ozempic – Ozempic For Weight Loss – Ozempic and Eye Problems

Semaglutide Lawsuit – Ozempic News – Ozempic FDA Warning

Ozempic Warning – Ozempic Vision Changes – Risks of Ozempic

2025 Truck Crashes Reveal Rising Roadway Dangers

Posted on December 3, 2025December 3, 2025 by Loni Liss

Why Tractor-Trailer Accidents Surge in the Holiday Season, and What Drivers Should Know After the Latest 2025 Crashes

For over 36 years, The Yost Legal Group has stood by ordinary motorists, pedestrians, and families after devastating motor vehicle accidents. Over that time, we’ve seen how collisions with commercial trucks can turn lives upside down. Traffic collisions happen in an instant, yet the effects can last a lifetime.

We remain vigilant for victims and families we might help in the wake of a tragedy. We also like to take frequent opportunities to inform our readers proactively so that, in the unfortunate case you find yourself on the wrong side of a tractor-trailer, you or your loved one will already know what to do. Three recent truck crashes remind us that the danger remains all too real.

If you have been injured in a recent tractor-trailer accident, call the experienced truck accident lawyers at The Yost Legal Group today. Our personal injury law firm has decades of experience. We will pursue the justice you deserve. We believe no case is too big or too complicated when lives are at stake. Call or text us today at 410-659-6800.

Holiday Season Means More Commercial Vehicles on the Road

As we head deeper into the holiday season, there’s even more reason to be cautious: the roads fill with heavy commercial vehicles fulfilling massive shipping quotas. According to Commercial Truck Trader, a commercial trucking blog, “truck drivers move billions of parcels every holiday season.”

Historically, this time of year sees a surge in freight demand, especially cold-chain and last-mile shipments. These increases in freight volume mean greater exposure to tractor-trailer accidents, particularly in the final months of the year.

Recently, several serious tractor-trailer collisions have made headlines. And they each highlight just how fragile safety can be when massive trucks are involved:

November 11, 2025: Two fully loaded tractor-trailers collided head-on in what became a fatal, fiery accident in Arkansas.
November 19, 2025: In Putnam, Connecticut, a semi-truck collided with a car and caused a fuel spill and fire, fortunately without deadly consequences.
November 23, 2025: In Altavista, Virginia, an overturned tractor-trailer struck a sedan, leaving the driver hurt and their vehicle destroyed.

If you or a loved one was the victim of a crash caused by a semi-trailer or tractor-trailer truck, you may be entitled to significant compensation. When a big truck is involved, a collision is three times as likely to result in a fatality. This is a staggering number that highlights just how dangerous these vehicles are on the road. Call today for a free consultation: 1-800-967-8529. Our truck accident attorneys are here to listen. We are here to help.

A Closer Look at the Three Recent Crashes

November 11, 2025, Two-Truck Collision (Arkansas): Two commercial tractor-trailers crashed head-on, triggering a fire so intense that both drivers perished. Although The Yost Legal Group typically does not represent commercial drivers, in this rare case, the at-fault driver was a truck driver. That means we would absolutely consider handling a case for the family of the victim truck driver.
November 19, 2025, Truck Hits Car on I-395 (Putnam, CT): This crash resulted in a fiery vehicle collision and diesel spill. Thankfully, there were no reported fatalities, and initial reports do not suggest serious injuries. We are deeply relieved that no lives were lost. Still, collisions with tractor-trailers can cause delayed symptoms, especially concussions. Their effects don’t always show up right away. According to news reports, the semi-truck driver was at fault in this incident. For the person in the car, that means a viable legal case could exist, especially if medical symptoms appear later.
November 23, 2025, Overturned Truck (Altavista, VA): In this incident, a tractor-trailer overturned and struck a sedan. The innocent driver of that car was injured, and their vehicle sustained significant damage. Whether the trailer overturned due to operator error, mechanical failure, or excessive speed, the outcome is the same: an innocent person was hurt through no fault of their own.

Why These Crashes Are So Concerning

Collisions with tractor-trailers are dangerous. According to a 2022 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration report, there are nearly 6,000 tractor-trailer accidents each year. We have written about the NHTSA and its report before.

Here’s why these types of accidents carry extraordinary risk:

Sheer Size & Force: A loaded tractor-trailer can weigh up to 80,000 pounds. When a collision occurs, that mass delivers devastating energy, causing severe damage and life-threatening injuries.
Lack of Stopping Power: These big rigs need far more time and distance to stop than smaller cars, especially in emergency situations, turns, or on slick roads.
Unstable Dynamics: Overturns or jackknifing are very common and extremely dangerous. Once a trailer swings out or flips, control is lost.
Delayed Injuries: Even when there is no immediate fatality, victims may suffer internal trauma, brain injury, or concussions that worsen if not treated.
Complex Liability: Multiple parties (drivers, trucking companies, maintenance firms) are often involved, making fault hard to untangle without skilled legal help.

What to Do If You or a Loved One Is Involved in a Big-Truck Crash

Being in a tractor-trailer accident is traumatic. Taking the proper steps immediately afterward can make a critical difference for both your health and your legal claim:

Seek Medical Attention Right Away: Even if you feel fine, get evaluated by a medical professional. Concussion symptoms and internal injuries may not appear until hours or even days later.
Preserve Evidence: Take photos of the scene, all vehicles, and damage. Write down or record what you remember. Ask witnesses for contact info. Keep medical records and bills.
Report the Crash: Make sure a police report is filed and obtain a copy.
Talk to an Experienced Attorney: Not all lawyers know how to handle truck accident cases. You need an experienced truck collision attorney who understands the complexities of commercial vehicle litigation.
Act Quickly: Evidence disappears quickly, especially if another party wants it to disappear. Furthermore, legal deadlines (such as statutes of limitations) are strict.

Don’t Go Through This Alone. The Yost Legal Group Can Help

Tractor-trailer accidents may look like “just another crash,” but the consequences are often anything but typical. For more than three decades, The Yost Legal Group has helped people navigate the physical, emotional, and legal fallout of severe motor vehicle accidents.

If you are ever injured in a truck accident that was not your fault, our truck crash lawyers are here to help. One of our knowledgeable personal injury attorneys will guide you through filing a truck accident claim.

We will review your medical treatment, lost wages, pain and suffering, and gather evidence to support a strong claim. For the best outcome, you will require the help of an attorney for truck accidents.

If you or a loved one has been in a crash involving a semi-truck, big rig, or tractor-trailer, please call the compassionate and experienced lawyers at The Yost Legal Group today. We provide free consultations and never charge you a penny unless we win your case. Reach us at 1-800-YOST-LAW, or text us at 410-659-6800. Let us put our experience, compassion, and resources to work for you.

Truck Wreck Attorneys – Lawyer Truck Accident – Best Car Accident Lawyers

Top Rated Auto Accident Attorneys – Best Lawyers For Personal Injury – Best Injury Lawyer

Distracted Driving – File a Lawsuit – Legal Team

HB 462 and HB 464 Bills Stalled in PA Senate Again

Posted on November 25, 2025 by Loni Liss

A Detailed Update on Pennsylvania’s Stalled Lookback Window Legislation

Survivors of childhood sexual abuse in Pennsylvania have been fighting for something important. Many other states already recognize its significance. A chance to seek justice regardless of how long it took them to come forward. The Senate has stalled HB 462 and HB 464 bills again, and no vote has been scheduled.

More than 20 states have changed their civil statutes of limitations (SOLs) in the last decade. Many have set up “lookback windows.” These allow sexual assault survivors to file civil lawsuits, even if their claims expired years ago. Others, like our home state of Maryland in 2023, have removed their civil statute of limitations altogether.

Pennsylvania has not.

The 2018 grand jury report revealed years of sexual abuse in the Catholic Church. Despite this, the Pennsylvania Senate has not passed reform for the statute of limitations (SOL). Survivors who were molested watched as the same bills passed the House. They stalled in the Senate, expired, and then started over again.

Today, that cycle continues.

As of November 2025, House Bills 462 (HB 462) and 464 (HB 464) remain stalled. They both passed the Pennsylvania House of Representatives in June 2025. Both bills are now stuck in a Senate Committee. There is no scheduled vote, no public timeline, and no sign of progress.

Here at The Yost Legal Group, we believe CSA survivors deserve transparency. There is no new progress on the law to share. We want to make sure that child rape survivors and their families stay informed and supported.

Our sexual assault lawyers are actively monitoring these bills. We will continue to do so without making promises lawmakers have not earned.

Survivors of childhood sexual abuse in Pennsylvania have until their 55th birthday under the current law to file a civil lawsuit against their abuser. The experienced sexual abuse attorneys at The Yost Legal Group will help you understand your rights.

As a survivor, it is important to seek the justice you deserve. Call for a free consultation today. We will answer any questions you have.

What the Two Pennsylvania Bills Would Do

House Bill 462: A Lookback Window Through Statutory Law

HB 462 would create a civil “lookback window.” This would allow survivors whose claims are currently blocked by the statute of limitations to file lawsuits. They could sue their abusers and the institutions that helped them. This is the same type of legislation survivors’ groups have championed for years.

When HB 462 passed the House, it did so with a vote of 122–80.

House Bill 464: Moving a Constitutional Amendment Toward a Future Ballot Vote

HB 464 passed with even wider support at 138 to 64. It would advance the process of placing a constitutional amendment before Pennsylvania voters. This option requires three additional legislative votes before any proposal could actually appear on a statewide ballot.

Both bills take different paths to reach the same goal. They aim to give survivors a fair chance to seek justice, no matter when they decide to come forward.

This distinction matters because one route, statutory change, can be accomplished quickly if lawmakers agree. It is also less ironclad as it is open to constitutional challenges. That is why it is important for lawmakers to amend the Constitution itself. That route, however, can take years.

Why These Bills Stalled: A Pattern of Inaction in the Pennsylvania Senate

This is not the first time these proposals have passed the House only to die in the Senate.

Over two years ago, the same combination passed with strong support from both parties. This included a statutory lookback window and a constitutional amendment. Still, the amendments did not make it to the ballot in 2023.

Today, we are watching history repeat itself. The Senate Judiciary Committee has not scheduled hearings or votes. There is no public commitment to debate. There is no timeline, and no indication that action is coming soon.

Meanwhile, Governor Josh Shapiro, who served as Attorney General during the 2018 grand jury investigation, has been publicly critical of the Senate’s repeated refusal to act. As he said recently:

“It’s shameful … that the Senate of Pennsylvania has failed to act, has been unwilling to look these survivors in the eye and pass a statute of limitations window to allow those who’ve been abused to confront their abusers in a court of law.”

Survivors of sexual abuse deserve far better than political stalemates. That said, our child abuse lawyers will continue to monitor both bills.

If you are a victim of sexual abuse in Pennsylvania or Maryland, contact an experienced sexual assault attorney. The Yost Legal Group provides a free and confidential consultation. Call 1-800-967-8529 for guidance.

Why SOL Reform Matters: The 2018 Grand Jury Report Still Echoes Today

The push for SOL reform in Pennsylvania did not come out of nowhere. Its momentum grew directly from the 2018 statewide grand jury report. That exposed one of the largest institutional cover-ups of child sexual abuse in American history.

The grand jury found:

More than 1,000 children were abused by over 300 Catholic priests across six dioceses.
The “real number” was likely in the thousands, due to lost records and survivors who feared coming forward.
Senior church officials, including individuals who later rose to national leadership, covered up the abuse.
Police and prosecutors, at times, deferred to church leaders instead of investigating abuse.

The grand jury’s message was unflinching: “We are sick over all the crimes that will go unpunished and uncompensated.”

Because most of these cases were decades old, the criminal and civil statutes of limitations had expired. The church’s cover-up worked. Sexually exploited survivors could not sue. And the public outcry that followed led to the renewed push for SOL reform.

That movement continues to this day. The state needs its lawmakers to meet the moment.

Understanding Why Survivors Need More Time: The Reality of Delayed Disclosure

Some Pennsylvanians still argue that giving survivors until age 55 is “long enough.” But research shows this belief is deeply disconnected from the lived experience of surviving childhood sexual abuse.

According to Child USA, the national think tank for child protection:

The average age at which a survivor first reports childhood sexual abuse is 52 years old.
51% of survivors first disclose between ages 50 and 69.
Nearly half of sexual victimization survivors need more time than Pennsylvania currently provides.

Trauma, shame, fear, grooming, institutional pressure, and decades of silence can delay disclosure for a lifetime. When survivors are finally ready to speak, the law should meet them with dignity. Instead, they have been met with a figurative locked courthouse door.

This is why lookback windows have been enacted across the country. This is why survivors continue advocating. And this is why Pennsylvania’s ongoing inaction remains deeply painful for so many families.

Where Things Stand Now and Why We Are Still Watching Closely

As of today:

HB 462 and HB 464 have passed the Pennsylvania House.
Both bills are now in a Senate Committee, stalled without action.
There is no vote scheduled.
The Senate leadership has not announced debate or hearings.
There is no certainty that the legislature will move forward.

We are watching. We are waiting. And we are prepared to do our job to help survivors the moment lawmakers do theirs.

Your Rights Today And How We Can Help

Under current Pennsylvania law, survivors of childhood sexual abuse may file civil lawsuits until age 55. That remains true today. If these laws change in the future, we will move immediately to help survivors understand their expanded rights.

But you do not need to wait for a lookback window to explore your legal options now. Our trauma-informed team is here to:

Listen to your story safely.
Explain your current legal rights.
Help you understand potential claims against institutions like the church, schools, hospitals, and government agencies that are supposed to protect children in their care.
Guide you through each step at your own pace.

Call The Yost Legal Group at 1-800-967-8529 for a free, confidential consultation with a compassionate survivor-advocacy attorney.

Our sexual abuse lawyers will explain the legal process. This is for cases involving sexual offenses that occurred when you were a minor.

Sexual Abuse Definition – Child Sexual Coercion Claims

Statutory Rape Claims – Lawyers For Sexual Abuse

Roblox Lawsuit Update: Online Grooming Put Children at Risk

Posted on November 23, 2025November 23, 2025 by Loni Liss

A Detailed Look at the Roblox Litigation for Negligence, Grooming, and Online Child Predation

Roblox Corporation, the company behind one of the world’s most popular online gaming platforms, is facing a wave of lawsuits over its alleged failure to protect children from sexual predators on its platform.

Roblox claims to be child-friendly and family-oriented. However, legal actions show that this may not be true for the millions of young users who log in every day.

Furthermore, some recently announced safety measures indicate that the company has felt pressure from the growing number of lawsuits filed against it.

The reactive measure also indicates that the company is capable of implementing measures to protect its young users. This has left many wondering why it took reports of grooming and sexual assaults to get the company to act.

If you or a loved one has been the victim of childhood sexual abuse, The Yost Legal Group wants you to remember two things:

You are not at fault.
You are not alone.

The experienced sexual abuse lawyers at The Yost Legal Group are working diligently for all of our survivor clients around the country. Our compassionate team is here to listen if you are ready to talk. We will help you understand your rights and seek the justice you deserve.

About the Roblox Gaming Platform

Roblox allows users to create, share, and play content with others in a vast, open digital space. Nearly 80 million people use the platform every day, and roughly half of them are children.

Its popularity among minors has drawn attention from both parents and regulators. The platform’s open design can inadvertently expose children to grooming, sexual manipulation, and abuse.

Predators have exploited Roblox’s interactive features, initiating contact with children under the guise of friendship or romance.

This manipulative attention can erode a child’s natural defenses, creating opportunities for predators to escalate their behavior. In some tragic cases, this has led to offline meetings and sexual abuse.

Forms of Abuse on Roblox

Legal claims against Roblox highlight the serious and varied types of abuse that have occurred on the platform, including:

Sexual assault
Sex trafficking and abduction
Exposure to sexually explicit images
Grooming and manipulation
Attempted exploitation and sextortion

The lawsuits reveal how Roblox’s social connectivity, while innovative for gaming, has inadvertently created a pathway for predators to exploit minors.

Roblox’s Responsibility and Alleged Failures

Plaintiffs allege that Roblox failed in its duty of care to protect young users. These lawsuits focus on several key areas of liability:

Negligence: Roblox allegedly knew or should have known that its platform exposed children to predatory behavior but failed to implement adequate safeguards.
Product Design Defects: The platform’s design allows unrestricted communication between users, including minors and adults, which plaintiffs claim is inherently unsafe.
Failure to Warn: Roblox promoted the platform as safe and family-friendly, but critics argue its warnings were insufficient and failed to communicate the real risk of harm.
Fraudulent Misrepresentation: The platform’s marketing is alleged to have misled parents about its safety, while predators easily bypassed the limited protections in place.

Impact on Victims

The children affected by these incidents have experienced devastating physical, psychological, and emotional trauma. Reported effects include:

Sexual assault and physical harm
Sexually transmitted infections
Depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)
Behavioral changes, including self-harm and substance abuse
Suicidal ideation

These profound impacts underscore the need for accountability and legal intervention. The platform recently announced new safety measures, including disallowing minors from talking to adult strangers (among other new features). So many children have faced traumatic experiences that could have been avoided with better safety features in Roblox.

Current Litigation and State Involvement

Recent federal lawsuits have been filed on behalf of minors who were groomed or coerced into sexual activity after meeting predators on Roblox. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has also filed a lawsuit against Roblox Corporation.

Some cases involve additional platforms, such as Discord, which predators use to escalate contact outside of Roblox. In some cases, plaintiffs say that predators gave in-game currency or gifts. They did this to trick children into sending explicit content.

In the past few months, state attorneys general from Kentucky and Louisiana have filed lawsuits against Roblox Corporation. They accuse the company of failing to enforce safety measures. They also claim Roblox misrepresents its platform as safe for children. Additionally, they say the platform creates conditions that facilitate predatory behavior.

These suits aim to hold the company accountable and push for enhanced protections.

Why Legal Action Matters for Survivors

For survivors, these lawsuits are not only about seeking compensation, but also about recognition and justice. Legal accountability could drive meaningful changes in Roblox’s design, moderation practices, and safety protocols.

It may also set a broader precedent for holding digital platforms accountable when children are harmed in their virtual spaces, thereby creating safer digital spaces for children in the future.

This is an important goal as the Internet will not be going away any time soon. Kids will be online. They should be online. It is the responsibility of adults to keep them safe.

Steps Parents and Guardians Can Take

Parents and guardians should be aware of the risks and take proactive steps to protect children online. Key recommendations include:

Monitoring chat and friends lists
Discussing online safety and the dangers of external messaging apps
Collecting evidence if abuse occurs, such as screenshots or messages
Consulting with experienced attorneys who handle child sexual abuse and exploitation claims

How The Yost Legal Group Can Help

The Yost Legal Group is actively seeking justice for exploited children impacted by sexual abuse and grooming on Roblox. Our Roblox lawyers file claims for minors through their parents or legal guardians, advocating for compensation and accountability. Our trauma-informed team is prepared to:

Listen carefully to survivors and families
Explain current legal rights and potential claims
Guide families through the legal process at a pace that prioritizes the survivor’s well-being

Roblox remains a widely used platform, but lawsuits and state actions reveal a troubling reality. Predators can exploit its features to harm children. Roblox Corporation allowed those safety gaps to persist for quite some time without being proactive to protect its large user base of minors.

Survivors deserve justice, protection, and recognition. Legal action not only seeks compensation but also forces platforms like Roblox to strengthen safeguards, protecting future users from similar harm.

Our child sexual abuse lawyers advocate for exploited children and guide families through the complex legal landscape.

If your child was sexually assaulted, experienced extreme grooming, or was exposed to explicit content on Roblox, legal action may be possible. We are filing Roblox child sexual abuse claims.

Contact our experienced sexual abuse survivor attorneys today: 1-800-YOST-LAW (1-800-967-8529). You can also use the free consultation form on our website for a confidential case review.

Rob Lox – Roblox Online – Free Roblox – Roblox Website

Roblox Parental Controls – Roblox Inappropriate Games – Roblox Safety Settings

Child Suicide From Roblox – Roblox Gaming Child Suicide – Roblox Child Predator Lawsuit

Learn About HIE and Medical Malpractice Lawsuits

Posted on November 13, 2025 by Loni Liss

Understanding Who Can Be Held Accountable for Your Child’s HIE Birth Injury

If your child suffered an HIE brain injury at birth, then you may be looking to take legal action against the responsible party. In such cases, identifying liable parties is crucial. There may be multiple parties that should be the subject of legal action.

Proving that hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy was caused by a healthcare provider’s negligence is required to file a successful medical malpractice lawsuit. You and your attorney must prove the following elements:

Duty of Care. Proving a Doctor-Patient Relationship

Medical malpractice law requires you to show that the healthcare provider owed your child a duty of care. This is easily met by proving a relationship existed between the doctor and the patient, such as being admitted to a hospital or clinic for your pregnancy or delivery.

Some of the most common parties that are held accountable in HIE birth injury lawsuits include the:

● Nurse and doctor, monitoring the pregnancy

● Doctor tasked with monitoring labor and delivering the baby

● Medical practice of the doctors involved with the pregnancy and delivery

● Hospital where the birth took place

Breached Duty of Care

The next step in a medical malpractice claim is to demonstrate that the healthcare provider failed to act as a reasonably careful medical professional would in the same situation.

This might include:

Delays in responding to signs of distress
Improper use of delivery tools
Not ordering a needed C-section

An in-depth analysis of medical records, scans, reports, and other relevant documents is necessary. This will assess which parties were negligent and may be held accountable for your baby’s birth injuries.

Causation

In a medical malpractice claim, it’s essential to connect the healthcare provider’s actions or lack of appropriate medical treatment directly to your child’s HIE. Many factors can cause a child’s birth injury.

Medical records, expert testimony, and test results often help trace how the medical providers’ negligent care led to a lack of oxygen and resulted in injury.

An experienced medical malpractice attorney and medical experts can uncover why the birth trauma occurred.

Damages

Lastly, medical malpractice law requires you to demonstrate the actual, measurable consequences of the alleged medical negligence.

These could include physical or brain injuries, medical expenses, lost wages, occupational therapy for injured patients, loss of opportunities for your child, emotional distress, and any other future medical care.

If you’re able to prove these elements, you could recover compensation from the responsible party.

Evidence Used to Prove Medical Malpractice Claims Related to HIE

Proving a medical malpractice claim for a child’s HIE diagnosis relies on collecting strong evidence from a variety of sources. Here’s what this often includes:

Medical Records and Fetal Monitoring Strips

Every entry and vital sign in a hospital chart can offer important clues into medical negligence. Fetal heart monitor strips might reveal increased stress or missed warning signs that were not quickly addressed. This can indicate a healthcare provider error, potentially leading to medical malpractice liability.

Witness Testimony About Medical Errors

Witness statements from family members, nurses, doctors, or any other healthcare professionals present during labor and delivery can fill in gaps about possible negligent conduct by healthcare providers.

Personal accounts sometimes highlight problems, such as communication breakdowns, slow response times, or unusual conduct, during medical treatment.

Expert Opinions About The Level of Medical Attention Received

Outside doctors can compare the care you or your baby received with national guidelines or published protocols. An expert’s analysis can underline points where healthcare staff may have mishandled a complication or misread warning signs, amounting to medical negligence.

Blood Tests and Imaging From the Hospital or Emergency Room

Blood gases, pH levels, MRIs, and other scans support a timeline and clarify how severe the oxygen loss was, alongside whether it lines up with whatever else you’re claiming in your medical malpractice lawsuit – like whether permanent brain damage is present.

Gathering as much information as possible from different sources gives your legal team a stronger chance of understanding your family’s story and fighting for the support your child needs through medical malpractice law.

Limited Period of Time to File an HIE Lawsuit

If you are considering taking legal action against a doctor, nurse, hospital, or other healthcare provider, it is essential to initiate the legal process as soon as possible. Why? Because each state has its own statutory deadline for filing a birth injury medical malpractice lawsuit.

This deadline is also known as the statute of limitations. In effect, claimants only have until the applicable statutory deadline to file a lawsuit. Once the deadline passes, your birth injury lawsuit will likely be barred from going forward.

Initiating the legal process sooner rather than later is also beneficial, as many states have imposed additional requirements and procedural hurdles for medical malpractice lawsuits to proceed in court.

For example, some states have passed laws requiring advanced notification to the doctor or medical facility that they are the subject of a lawsuit.

Contact The Yost Legal Group To Discuss a Possible HIE Birth Injury Lawsuit

If you have questions about what happened during childbirth, contact an experienced medical mistake lawyer. If you suspect medical negligence led to your child’s injuries, you never have to handle it on your own.

An HIE lawyer can help make this difficult situation more manageable by helping you with a medical malpractice case. Call 1-800-Yost-Law to speak directly with a medical malpractice lawyer. Your first consultation is free, and there are no upfront fees.

If you choose to move forward with a birth injury lawyer, you won’t pay anything unless we win compensation on your behalf. Filing a birth injury lawsuit will help provide a lifetime of care for your HIE newborn.

We always work on a contingency fee basis, which means you never incur any out-of-pocket expenses up front.

Reach out today to The Yost Legal Group to schedule your free consultation and discuss a possible medical malpractice lawsuit if you believe that negligence resulted in serious injury to your child.

Birth Injury Claims – Lawyer for Doctor Negligence – Hypoxia Birth – HIE Infant

HIE Neonate – HIE Brain Damage – Hypoxic Ischaemic Encephalopathy

The Legal Basis for the Wegovy & Ozempic NAION Lawsuits

Posted on November 7, 2025November 7, 2025 by Loni Liss

Novo Nordisk (Novo) is currently embroiled in a highly publicized and significant legal battle regarding the adequacy of its warning labels for its medications, Ozempic and Wegovy.

Over 1,500 product liability lawsuits against Novo Nordisk allege that the company failed to sufficiently warn of the potentially dangerous risks associated with Ozempic and Wegovy—specifically, vision loss or blindness from Non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION).

This litigation is likely to gain momentum over time. It could become one of the costliest litigations in the history of product liability and pharmaceutical litigation.

About Ozempic and Wegovy

Ozempic and Wegovy are incretin mimetic medications that contain the active ingredient semaglutide. Incretin mimetics stimulate the pancreas to increase the production of insulin by imitating the incretin hormone that is naturally produced in the human body, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1).

Thus, they are part of a class of drugs called GLP-1. The increase in insulin lowers glucose levels in patients with type 2 diabetes, effectively controlling their metabolic condition.

The use of incretin mimetics has also been found to suppress appetite by increasing feelings of satiety, resulting in weight loss among its users.

Ozempic and Wegovy are once-weekly injectable medications approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in December 2017 to lower blood glucose levels in adults with type 2 diabetes and to aid in weight loss, respectively.

A licensed medical clinician must prescribe them to ensure that the patient receives the correct therapeutic dose.

After receiving the proper dose, the medication can be self-administered. Along with a balanced diet and regular exercise, Ozempic and Wegovy are intended for long-term use.

Novo Failed to Warn Patients of Risk of Vision Loss and Blindness

A “failure to warn” product liability lawsuit is based on the premise that a manufacturer or other company in the chain of distribution knew that its product could be harmful to consumers and failed to provide timely or adequate warnings to the public of these potential risks, causing harm to consumers.

In a failure to warn lawsuit based on strict liability, Plaintiffs must allege the following:

The manufacturer knew of the danger posed by the product
The manufacturer had a duty to warn its consumers of this product-related danger
The manufacturer failed to warn
The manufacturer’s failure to warn caused the plaintiff’s injury

What is NAION?

Non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) is a rare condition of the eye that can cause irreversible vision loss or complete blindness due to injury to the optic nerve.

NAION is a medical condition where there is a sudden loss of blood flow to the optic nerve, which connects your eyes to your brain. This lack of blood flow can damage the optic nerve, resulting in sudden vision loss, typically in one eye.

NAION is not caused by inflammation or blocked arteries (that’s what “non-arteritic” means), but rather by poor circulation or other risk factors like high blood pressure, diabetes, or sleep apnea.

The vision loss from NAION often happens quickly and can be permanent. There is currently no proven treatment to restore vision once it has been lost due to this condition. That is why it is so vital for people to be aware of any possible risks, especially when taking medications that may increase the chance of developing NAION.

What are NAION Symptoms?

The main symptoms of NAION (Non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy) usually include:

– Sudden, painless vision loss in one eye—often noticed upon waking up

– Blurry or dim vision, sometimes described as a shadow or dark area in the upper or lower part of the visual field

– Colors may appear less bright or washed out

– Some people notice trouble seeing out of the corner of their eye or a loss of side vision

NAION does not usually cause pain or redness in the eye. If you notice any sudden changes in your vision, it’s important to contact an eye doctor right away.

Failure to Warn Patients of NAION Risk.

Novo knew or should have known of the elevated risk of this condition for consumers of its product based on emerging scientific evidence indicating the connection.

Manufacturers have a corporate responsibility and legal duty to provide clear and comprehensive warnings about the risks associated with their products. Then, consumers can make an informed decision with their healthcare provider about whether a medication is best suited for their needs.

Novo failed to fulfill its duty to warn of this risk factor in a timely manner. Based on the failure to warn, the blindness lawsuits allege that the lack of adequate warnings created a lack of informed consent and ultimately caused harm to consumers.

Call The Yost Legal Group to file your Ozempic & Wegovy Blindness Lawsuit.

The Yost Legal Group product liability attorneys are filing Ozempic lawsuits and Wegovy lawsuits. We are pursuing cases of individuals who developed non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) after using either Ozempic or Wegovy.

Have you been diagnosed with NAION vision loss? Have you experienced partial or total blindness after using Ozempic or Wegovy? (whose active ingredient is also semaglutide), You may be entitled to compensation.

Call experienced attorneys for defective products today at 1 (800) YOST-LAW (1-800-967-8529). You can also fill out the Free Consultation form on our website.

We will contact you shortly to conduct a free case review. And discuss whether you qualify to file an Ozempic Lawsuit or a Wegovy Lawsuit.

Product Liability Lawyers – Novo Nordisk Lawsuit – Defective Product Lawyers

Naion Eye – Semaglutide Lawsuit – Causes of Naion – Naion Treatment

Recent Allegations Against John McAleer of Frederick County Highlight a Modern Sexual Abuse Crisis

The Negative Impact of Childhood Sexual Assault

Who Is John McAleer—and Why His Role Matters

The Allegations Against McAleer Are Deeply Disturbing

Institutional Responsibility Does Not End with an Arrest

Why Special Education Students Face Heightened Risk

Civil Lawsuits Are About Accountability, Not Just Compensation

Speak with a Law Firm That Understands These Cases

When does a newborn need neonatal resuscitation?

What are the first steps taken to resuscitate a newborn?

What are the advanced steps taken to resuscitate a newborn?

What care does a baby receive after neonatal resuscitation?

Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy and Newborn Resuscitation

Should I contact a birth injury law firm if my child needed to be resuscitated at birth?

How The Yost Legal Group Birth Injury Lawyers Can Help.

Talk to Experienced Birth Injury Lawyers at The Yost Legal Group

A Deep Look at the History, Patterns, and Institutional Failures Tied to St. Mary’s Seminary

A Legacy Shaped by Silence at St. Mary’s Seminary

A Disturbing Pattern of Abuse Emerges at St. Mary’s Seminary

Church Leaders Knew About The Child Sexual Abuse and Did Nothing

The Human Cost of Survivors of Childhood Sexual Abuse

St. Mary’s Role Within the Archdiocese of Baltimore

Filing a Sexual Abuse Claim in Maryland

Seek Guidance From The Yost Legal Group Today

Update on Delaware’s SOL Reform and What HB 75 Could Mean for Survivors Seeking Civil Claims

What HB 75 Would Change for Survivors

Delaware’s History of Statute of Limitations Reform

Where HB 75 Stands Now in the Legislative Process

Why HB 75 Matters Even Before Passage

A Survivor-Centered Perspective on What Comes Next

Staying Informed and Supporting Survivors

What are Ozempic and Wegovy?

Ozempic and Wegovy Linked to “Non-Arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy” (NAION)

What NAION Symptoms Should Patients Watch For?

Why Are Ozempic Lawsuits Being Filed?

Do You Qualify to Join an Ozempic Vision Loss Lawsuit?

How The Yost Legal Group Can Help

Contact The Yost Legal Group Today

Why Tractor-Trailer Accidents Surge in the Holiday Season, and What Drivers Should Know After the Latest 2025 Crashes

Holiday Season Means More Commercial Vehicles on the Road

A Closer Look at the Three Recent Crashes

Why These Crashes Are So Concerning

What to Do If You or a Loved One Is Involved in a Big-Truck Crash

Don’t Go Through This Alone. The Yost Legal Group Can Help

A Detailed Update on Pennsylvania’s Stalled Lookback Window Legislation

What the Two Pennsylvania Bills Would Do

Why These Bills Stalled: A Pattern of Inaction in the Pennsylvania Senate

Why SOL Reform Matters: The 2018 Grand Jury Report Still Echoes Today

Understanding Why Survivors Need More Time: The Reality of Delayed Disclosure

Where Things Stand Now and Why We Are Still Watching Closely

Your Rights Today And How We Can Help

A Detailed Look at the Roblox Litigation for Negligence, Grooming, and Online Child Predation

About the Roblox Gaming Platform

Forms of Abuse on Roblox

Roblox’s Responsibility and Alleged Failures

Current Litigation and State Involvement

Why Legal Action Matters for Survivors

Steps Parents and Guardians Can Take

How The Yost Legal Group Can Help

Understanding Who Can Be Held Accountable for Your Child’s HIE Birth Injury

Duty of Care. Proving a Doctor-Patient Relationship

Breached Duty of Care

Causation

Damages

Evidence Used to Prove Medical Malpractice Claims Related to HIE

Medical Records and Fetal Monitoring Strips

Witness Testimony About Medical Errors

Expert Opinions About The Level of Medical Attention Received

Blood Tests and Imaging From the Hospital or Emergency Room

Limited Period of Time to File an HIE Lawsuit

Contact The Yost Legal Group To Discuss a Possible HIE Birth Injury Lawsuit

About Ozempic and Wegovy

Novo Failed to Warn Patients of Risk of Vision Loss and Blindness

What is NAION?

What are NAION Symptoms?

Failure to Warn Patients of NAION Risk.

Call The Yost Legal Group to file your Ozempic & Wegovy Blindness Lawsuit.

DO I HAVE A CASE?