Loni Liss, Author at Injury Lawyers

Perry Hall Gym Teacher Arrested for Child Sex Abuse Charges

Posted on October 18, 2025October 18, 2025 by Loni Liss

The Baltimore community has been shaken by a series of disturbing arrests involving local educators and youth leaders accused of child sexual abuse. The most recent case centers on Perry Hall High School, where a gym teacher was arrested and charged with multiple counts of sexual abuse against minors.

This arrest is part of a troubling pattern, with several Baltimore County school employees and youth leaders facing similar allegations this past summer.

As the community grapples with these revelations, it’s vital to examine the facts, understand the broader context, and discuss what can be done to protect children in our schools and youth organizations.

Perry Hall High School Gym Teacher Arrested

Authorities arrested Michael J. Pusateri, a gym teacher at Perry Hall High School and a coach for the Parkville Recreation Council and Kenwood High School softball team.

According to online court documents, Pusateri faces charges of rape, assault, and sex abuse of a minor, among other related offenses.

The arrest has sent shockwaves through the Perry Hall and Parkville communities, where Pusateri was a well-known figure in youth sports.

Parents and students alike are struggling to process the allegations, which highlight the need for vigilance and accountability in all settings where adults are entrusted with the care of children.

A Pattern of Abuse: Other Recent Arrests in Baltimore County

Unfortunately, Pusateri’s case is not an isolated incident. In early August, another former Baltimore County youth leader, Thomas Pinkerton, was extradited from Georgia and arrested on charges of sexually abusing six individuals between 2006 and 2010.

At the time of the alleged abuse, Pinkerton served as a youth pastor at Central Christian Church.

Pinkerton’s case underscores the long-lasting trauma that child sexual abuse can inflict, as well as the challenges of bringing perpetrators to justice years after the crimes have occurred.

The fact that law enforcement pursued Pinkerton across state lines demonstrates a commitment to holding abusers accountable, no matter how much time has passed.

This summer also saw the arrests of three Baltimore County school employees: Sean Brooks, Jordan Adams, and Donovan Michaud.

Each of these individuals faces charges related to child sex abuse, further highlighting a deeply concerning trend within the local education system.

The Impact of Institutional Child Sexual Abuse on the Community

These cases have understandably caused fear, anger, and heartbreak among Baltimore County families. Schools and youth organizations are meant to be safe havens where children can learn, grow, and build positive relationships with mentors.

When trusted adults abuse their positions of authority, the damage can be profound and lasting.

Parents are now questioning the safeguards in place at schools and youth programs. Many are calling for stronger background checks, more rigorous training for staff, and clearer reporting procedures for suspected abuse.

Some are also advocating for mental health support for students who may have been affected by these incidents.

The Importance of Predator Prevention and Education

Preventing child sexual abuse requires a multifaceted approach. First and foremost, schools and youth organizations must implement thorough background checks for all employees and volunteers.

Regular training on recognizing and responding to signs of abuse is also crucial.

Staff should be educated about appropriate boundaries, mandated reporting laws, and the importance of creating environments where children feel safe coming forward.

Parents can play a role by maintaining open lines of communication with their children and encouraging them to speak up if anything makes them uncomfortable.

It’s also important for parents to familiarize themselves with school policies and to advocate for transparency and accountability from administrators.

What To Do If You Suspect Child Sexual Abuse

If you suspect a child is being abused, it’s important to act quickly and appropriately. In Maryland, all adults are mandated reporters, which means they are legally required to report suspected child abuse to the authorities.

Reports can be made to local law enforcement or the Department of Social Services.

Victims and their families may also wish to seek support from organizations such as the Baltimore Child Abuse Center, which provides counseling, advocacy, and resources for survivors.

Moving Forward: Community Healing and Accountability

The recent arrests in Baltimore County serve as a painful reminder that child sexual abuse can occur in any community, even those we trust the most. As investigations continue and the accused face their day in court, it’s essential for the community to support survivors, demand accountability, and work together to create safer environments for all children.

Local leaders, educators, and parents must come together to:

– Review current policies and practices

– Identify gaps

– Implement changes that prioritize child safety

– Regular audits of hiring practices

– Ongoing staff education

– Fostering a culture where abuse is never tolerated or ignored.

The arrest of a Perry Hall High School gym teacher on child sex abuse charges, along with the other recent cases in Baltimore County, has left the community reeling.

While the legal process will determine the guilt or innocence of the accused, one thing is clear: more must be done to protect children from harm.

By remaining vigilant, advocating for strong safeguards, and supporting survivors, Baltimore can begin to heal and ensure that its schools and youth organizations are truly safe spaces for every child.

The Yost Legal Group: Advocates for Survivors of Child Sexual Abuse

For survivors of child sexual abuse, the path to healing and justice can be long and difficult. Many have carried the weight of their experiences for years—sometimes decades—before feeling ready or able to come forward.

The Yost Legal Group, based in Baltimore, is dedicated to helping survivors of child sexual abuse throughout Maryland find their voice and pursue justice.

With the passage of the Maryland Child Victims Act, the doors to justice are open wider than ever before. This important law allows survivors to seek justice and hold abusers—and the institutions that protected them—accountable, no matter how long ago the abuse occurred.

Whether the abuse took place in a school, foster care setting, camp, doctor’s office, religious institution, or any other environment where adults were entrusted with the care of children, survivors now have the legal right to come forward and demand accountability.

Compassionate Legal Support to File Institutional Child Abuse Claims

The Yost Legal Group understands the courage it takes to share your story. Their compassionate child sex abuse attorneys offer free, confidential consultations to help survivors understand their rights and options.

They are experienced in handling sensitive cases involving schools, churches, youth organizations, and other institutions. They’ll fight tirelessly to secure justice and compensation for those harmed.

If you or someone you love is a survivor of institutional child sexual abuse—regardless of when or where it happened—know that you are not alone.

For more information or to schedule a free confidential consultation, contact The Yost Legal Group at (800)-YOST-LAW or 1-800-967-8529.

Child Sexual Abuse Lawyer – Institutional Sexual Abuse Claims – Survivors of Sexual Abuse

Trucking Collisions and Inadequate Brake Maintenance

Posted on October 15, 2025 by Loni Liss

One of the most overlooked yet critical causes of trucking collisions is inadequate brake maintenance. Every time you share the road with a massive 18-wheeler, you’re relying on more than just the driver’s skill. You’re trusting that every part of that 80,000-pound machine is in top working order.

When something goes wrong—especially with the brakes—the results can be catastrophic.

According to the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), brake problems are a leading factor in large truck crashes. In fact, brake-related violations account for nearly 30% of all out-of-service violations during roadside inspections.

The Large Truck Crash Causation Study found that brake issues were present in nearly 29% of crashes involving commercial trucks. When a truck’s brakes aren’t properly maintained, stopping distances increase dramatically, sometimes by hundreds of feet.

This means that even a split-second delay or mechanical failure can turn an ordinary drive into a life-changing tragedy. Inadequate brake maintenance is not just a minor oversight; it’s a critical safety issue that puts everyone on the road at risk.

Why Brake Maintenance of Trucks Matters

Unlike passenger cars, big rigs require powerful braking systems to safely slow and stop their enormous weight. These systems often include complex air brakes designed to withstand the strain of long hauls and heavy loads. But they are not invincible.

Without proper inspection, repair, and upkeep, brakes can quickly become unsafe. Worn pads, leaking air lines, or poorly adjusted brakes can reduce stopping power, making it nearly impossible for a truck to stop in time to avoid a crash.

Even a small issue—like a minor air leak or uneven brake adjustment—can have major consequences when a fully loaded truck is barreling down the highway. In emergency situations, every foot of stopping distance counts.

Faulty brakes can turn what might have been a minor incident into a devastating collision, endangering not only the truck driver but everyone sharing the road.

Routine brake maintenance is more than just a regulatory requirement—it’s a critical safety measure that protects lives. When trucking companies and drivers prioritize brake safety, they help prevent tragedies caused by mechanical failure.

When they don’t, the risks to the public are simply too great to ignore.

The Risks of Bad Brakes on the Road

Brake failures are a leading factor in trucking collisions. Studies by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) show that braking problems account for a significant share of large truck crashes. The consequences can include:

– Rear-end collisions occur when a truck can’t stop quickly enough in traffic.

– Jackknife accidents where the trailer swings uncontrollably.

– Runaway trucks on downhill grades, turning highways into deadly hazards.

– Pileups involving multiple vehicles due to a truck’s inability to brake in emergencies.

Despite strict federal regulations requiring regular inspections and repairs, some trucking companies and drivers cut corners to save time or money, gambling with the safety of others.

The consequences of these shortcuts can be devastating—not just for the truck driver, but for families and communities affected by preventable accidents.

Faulty brakes are a leading cause of serious truck accidents, and proving where the breakdown in responsibility occurred can be complex.

That’s why it’s crucial for accident victims to have a legal team with the experience and resources to investigate every link in the chain of responsibility and hold all negligent parties accountable.

Who’s Responsible for Truck Brake Maintenance?

Ensuring that a commercial truck’s brakes are in top working condition is a shared responsibility among several parties. Truck drivers, motor carriers, and maintenance companies all share responsibility for keeping commercial vehicles safe.

Federal regulations require regular brake inspections and maintenance, but when companies cut corners to save time or money, it puts everyone on the road at risk.

In some cases, drivers may not even know their brakes are compromised until it’s too late. A missed inspection or rushed repair can lead to tragedy in a matter of seconds.

Truck Drivers: Drivers are required to perform pre-trip inspections, including checking the brake system before hitting the road. If they notice any warning signs—such as unusual noises, reduced braking power, or dashboard alerts—they must report these issues immediately and refrain from driving until repairs are made.

Motor Carriers (Trucking Companies): Trucking companies are legally obligated under federal law to schedule and document regular brake inspections and maintenance. This includes following the standards set by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), which mandates routine checks and prompt repairs. Companies must also ensure that their drivers are properly trained to recognize brake problems and empowered to report them without fear of retaliation.

Maintenance Companies and Mechanics: Many trucking companies rely on third-party maintenance providers to service their fleets. These professionals are responsible for performing thorough inspections, using quality parts, and following manufacturer guidelines when repairing or replacing brake components. Skipping steps, using substandard parts, or rushing through the process can lead to catastrophic brake failure.

When any of these parties neglect their duties—whether by skipping inspections, delaying repairs, or cutting costs with inferior parts—the risks are enormous.

Protecting Yourself on the Road

While you can’t control how well trucking companies maintain their vehicles, you can take steps to stay safe:

– Keep your distance when driving behind or alongside large trucks.

– Be cautious downhill, where brake failures are more likely to occur.

– Stay alert for signs of mechanical issues, such as smoke or odd noises from a truck.

Trucking collisions caused by brake failure are preventable. Proper maintenance, regular inspections, and strict compliance with safety regulations can make the difference between a safe journey and a devastating accident.

Unfortunately, when companies fail to prioritize safety, it’s other drivers who pay the price.

Level the Playing Field Against Powerful Trucking Companies

Trucking companies and their drivers are backed by large insurance providers and aggressive law firms whose primary goal is to protect their own interests—not yours.

These companies have teams of adjusters, investigators, and attorneys working quickly to minimize their liability and reduce the compensation you deserve.

They may use complex legal tactics and vast resources to challenge your claim or even shift blame onto you.

That’s why it’s critical to have experienced, dedicated legal advocates on your side. At The Yost Legal Group, we know how to stand up to these powerful opponents.

Our team will conduct a thorough investigation, gather crucial evidence, and work with top experts to prove exactly why the accident happened and who is truly responsible.

We’re committed to making sure your voice is heard and your rights are fully protected—so you get the justice and compensation you need to move forward.

Why Choose The Yost Legal Group for Your Trucking Accident Case?

If you or a loved one has been injured in a trucking collision, it’s important to understand your rights. Holding negligent companies accountable not only provides justice for victims but also helps make our roads safer for everyone.

The Yost Legal Group’s truck accident lawyers are dedicated to standing up for accident victims. We will protect your rights and fight for the justice and compensation you deserve.

With decades of experience handling complex trucking accident cases, our truck wreck attorneys understand the unique challenges individuals face.

We offer free, no-obligation consultations and work on a contingency fee basis. This means you pay nothing unless we recover compensation for you.

Let our experienced truck accident attorneys handle your injury claim so you can focus on healing. Reach out today at 1-800-YOST-LAW or 1-800-967-8529.

Baltimore Truck Accident Lawyer – Trucking Accident Injuries – Personal Injury Attorney

18 Wheeler Injury Lawyers – Best Truck Accident Attorney – Best Injury Lawyers

Personal Injury Cases – Pain and Suffering – Traumatic Brain Injuries

Nuchal Cord Birth Injury: A Cause of HIE

Posted on October 14, 2025 by Loni Liss

Birth injuries caused by a lack of oxygen during labor and delivery can be devastating, with lifelong consequences for both infants and their families. A nuchal cord birth injury can cause newborn HIE.

Hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) stands as one of the most serious conditions, often resulting from preventable complications during delivery. One such example is failing to timely diagnose and treat a nuchal cord injury.

What Is a Nuchal Cord?

A nuchal cord occurs when the umbilical cord wraps around the fetal neck during pregnancy or delivery. While many nuchal cords are loose and cause no complications, tight or multiple loops can lead to significant injury during labor and delivery.

The tightened loops squeeze the umbilical cord walls essentially flat. This flattening, or compression, cuts off the blood and oxygen supply that flows to the baby through the umbilical cord.

What are the Common Causes of a Nuchal Cord?

Nuchal cords may form in a number of different situations. Known risk factors and causes for nuchal cords include the following:

– Abnormal neonatal presentation during birth (e.g., breech presentation, face presentation, shoulder presentation, etc.)

– Length of the umbilical cord

– Moniamniotic twins (i.e., twins sharing one amniotic sac)

– Mother is having three or more babies

– Polyhydramnios (i.e., excessive amniotic fluid)

– Significant fetal movement

When a nuchal cord is identified, medical professionals need to take swift action and ensure the birth is handled with great care. For example, medical professionals should take appropriate steps to identify a nuchal cord and avoid compression of the umbilical cord during delivery.

If they fail to take action to treat a nuchal cord, by manually loosening or, in some instances, performing an emergency C-section to clamp and cut the tight nuchal cord, it raises important questions about medical standards of care and potential medical malpractice.

If you or your child suffered permanent harm due to a preventable birth injury, now is the time to take action. Contact an experienced birth injury attorney to discuss your legal options and a path forward.

What is the Connection Between Nuchal Cords and HIE?

While nuchal cords are common and often benign, they can contribute to the development of HIE when they cause significant compression of the umbilical cord.

The relationship between these conditions is complex and depends on multiple factors, including the:

– degree of cord compression

– duration of oxygen deprivation

– fetal impact of the hypoxia

Tight nuchal cords can cause intermittent or continuous reduction in blood flow through the umbilical vessels, leading to fetal hypoxemia and acidosis.

During uterine contractions, the compression may worsen, creating periods of more severe oxygen deprivation. If this process continues without appropriate intervention, it can progress to the level of oxygen deprivation necessary to cause HIE.

The key to preventing HIE in cases of nuchal cord lies in early recognition and appropriate management. Continuous fetal monitoring during labor can detect heart rate patterns that suggest cord compression.

When these patterns are identified, healthcare providers must make timely decisions about interventions, which may include changing maternal position, oxygen administration, or expedited delivery. Unfortunately, there are instances when these recognizable patterns are not identified, and a child is severely injured as a result.

Overview of HIE and Its Devastating Impact on Newborn Babies

Hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy is a type of brain injury that occurs when an infant’s brain is deprived of adequate oxygen and blood flow during the perinatal period. The cause of HIE involves a complex cascade of pathophysiological events triggered by oxygen deprivation.

When brain tissue lacks sufficient oxygen, cellular metabolism shifts from aerobic to anaerobic processes, leading to the accumulation of toxic byproducts.

This initial hypoxic injury is often followed by a reperfusion injury when oxygen delivery is restored, causing additional cellular damage through the release of free radicals and inflammatory mediators.

HIE is classified into three grades of severity based on clinical presentation and neurological findings:

Mild HIE
Moderate HIE
Severe HIE

Let’s take a look at each:

Mild HIE typically presents with hyperalertness, mild hypotonia, and feeding difficulties, with most infants recovering completely.
Moderate HIE involves more pronounced symptoms, including seizures, abnormal reflexes, and altered consciousness, with variable long-term outcomes.
Severe HIE is characterized by coma, absent reflexes, and multiple organ dysfunction, often resulting in death or severe permanent disability.

The long-term consequences of HIE can be profound and may include cerebral palsy, intellectual disabilities, epilepsy, learning difficulties, and behavioral problems. The severity and extent of these complications depend on the degree of oxygen deprivation, the duration of the hypoxic event, and the promptness of medical intervention.

Should I contact a birth injury law firm if my baby had a nuchal cord?

You should consider contacting a birth injury attorney as soon as possible if:

– Your baby’s nuchal cord was accompanied by other signs of distress or injury (like seizures, difficulty breathing, or the need for intensive medical intervention).

– You suspect that something went wrong during labor or delivery, or you have concerns about the medical care you or your baby received.

– Your baby has been diagnosed with a condition like hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), cerebral palsy, or another birth-related injury.

How The Yost Legal Group Birth Injury Lawyers Can Help.

Free Consultation: We offer a complimentary case review to discuss your concerns, review your potential case, and address any questions you may have about your baby’s injury at the time of birth.

Medical Record Review: Our team will carefully review the medical records, including Apgar scores, and help determine whether a medical mistake occurred during labor and delivery

Expert Insights: We collaborate with medical experts to assess whether the care provided met accepted standards of care and if any preventable factors were involved.

No Upfront Fees: The Yost Legal Group works on a contingency fee basis, so you pay nothing unless they recover compensation for you.

If a medical mistake was made, our HIE lawyers will work to secure the financial compensation your child needs to cover medical expenses and a lifetime of care.

You can reach The Yost Legal Group by calling (800)-YOST-LAW or by text at 1-410-659-6800 for more information. If we file a medical malpractice claim on your behalf, we will fight to seek the compensation you deserve.

If your infant was diagnosed with HIE or cerebral palsy and you want answers, contact The Yost Legal Group at (800)-YOST-LAW.

Medical Negligence – Best Birth Injury Law Firm – Cerebral Palsy CP

Birth Asphyxia – Spastic Cerebral Palsy – Developmental Delay

Why Matthew Schlegel’s “Not Guilty” Doesn’t Mean No Accountability

Posted on October 7, 2025October 7, 2025 by Loni Liss

When we hear the words “not guilty,” some may assume that means the criminal case is closed and nothing further can be done. But in the context of alleged child sex abuse by former third-grade math teacher Matthew Schlegel, “not guilty” in a courtroom doesn’t necessarily mean he can walk away without accountability.

One way he can be held accountable is through Title IX—a system built not on criminal punishment, but on protecting survivors and ensuring safe educational environments.

In fact, he was initially found responsible for violating Anne Arundel County Public School’s Nondiscrimination Policy for Sexual Assault for sexual abuse allegations, as a preponderance of the evidence supported this determination. Schlegel is appealing this decision.

According to news reports from August 2025, Schlegel is not assigned to a classroom for the 2025-2026 school year but has been assigned to a location with no students.

Title IX Isn’t About Jail Time—It’s About Safety

Unlike a criminal trial, Title IX proceedings are not about proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Instead, schools use the preponderance of the evidence standard—meaning investigators ask: is it more likely than not that misconduct or abuse occurred?

This lower standard exists for a reason: school sexual abuse and assault are often underreported, difficult to prove in a criminal setting, and deeply disruptive to a survivor’s ability to learn.

A teacher’s harmful actions, even if not rising to the level of a criminal conviction, can create a hostile and disrupted environment for a child.

Title IX requires schools to act before that harm silences survivors or pushes them out of their education.

Why Survivors of Child Sexual Abuse Need a Different System

Criminal courts fail many survivors. The overwhelming majority of sexual assaults never lead to a conviction. High evidentiary standards and systemic biases often leave survivors with no legal recognition of what they endured.
Education is the priority. Survivors have a right to education in an environment free from intimidation, retaliation, or trauma triggers. Title IX ensures that their ability to learn isn’t treated as collateral damage.
Patterns of harm matter. Title IX can examine broader behaviors—unwanted touching, verbal harassment, coercion—that might not be “criminal” but still undermine a survivor’s safety and dignity.

Accountability Isn’t Always a Courtroom Verdict

For survivors, “not guilty” in a criminal matter doesn’t erase the harm done. Title IX provides another path—one that acknowledges that safety and equality in education matter more than whether something can be prosecuted as a crime.

Accountability under Title IX can lead to a wide range of accommodations for a child, ensuring they have access to education.

These aren’t punishments in the criminal sense—they’re safeguards. They ensure that survivors aren’t forced to share classrooms with someone who has caused them harm.

Centering Survivors in the Process

Shifting the focus back to survivors reminds us of the core truth: survivors should not have to carry the burden of leaving school, changing classes, or living in fear while pursuing their education.

Title IX exists to rebalance that scale.

Unreported and Unaddressed: Child Sexual Abuse in Maryland’s School System

Child sexual abuse in schools is a deeply troubling issue that affects communities across Maryland, with both national and local data highlighting its prevalence.

According to the Maryland Coalition Against Sexual Assault (MCASA), while comprehensive data on K-12 schools is limited, research shows that more than 1 in 8 students experience sexual assault during their college years.

The rates in K-12 settings are harder to quantify, but national statistics suggest that 1 in 9 girls and 1 in 53 boys under the age of 18 experience sexual abuse or assault at the hands of an adult.

In Maryland, the issue is significant enough that the state regularly updates its policies and reporting requirements for schools and youth-serving organizations.

A 2021 MCASA fact sheet notes that the vast majority of child sexual abuse goes unreported, with only about 38% of child victims disclosing the abuse, and even fewer cases leading to criminal charges or convictions.

Addressing Sexual Abuse in Maryland’s Educational Institutions

The impacts of Child Sex Abuse are devastating and long-lasting. It contributes to mental health challenges such as depression, PTSD, and anxiety.

Recent testimony to the Maryland General Assembly recounted the experience of a survivor abused at The Heights School. The survivor developed severe depression and PTSD as a result of the abuse and institutional neglect.

Maryland has seen several high-profile cases in recent years, including lawsuits against private schools where administrators failed to act on reports of abuse.

In one case, the Key School in Annapolis faced allegations of a “wider pattern of serialized child abuse” that went unaddressed for years. This further underscores the urgent need for transparency and reform in school environments.

For more detailed statistics and survivor stories:

MCASA Fact Sheet: Incidence of Child Sexual Abuse in Maryland
National Statistics on Child Abuse (National Children’s Alliance)
Maryland Child Victims Act

Final Thoughts from The Yost Legal Group in Baltimore

A “not guilty” verdict in court may end a legal battle, but it doesn’t mean there was no harm—or that survivors should have to navigate unsafe environments alone.

Title IX steps in where the criminal system falls short. It ensures that schools uphold their responsibility to:

protect students
safeguard education
provide survivors with the right to continue learning without fear.

The Yost Legal Group assists victims of sexual abuse in many ways. Our sexual abuse attorneys work hard to protect children. We help seek compensation through the civil justice system and Title IX proceedings.

Just as The Yost Legal Group helped children navigate the Title IX process related to Matthew Schlegel, we can help you, too.

Child Sexual Abuse Lawyers – Molestation Claims – Baltimore Abuse Attorneys – Child Sex Abuse

Baltimore Abuse Claims – Teacher Sexual Abuse Claims – Survivors of Sexual Abuse

Former Dundalk Pastor Arrested on Child Sex Abuse Charges

Posted on September 22, 2025 by Loni Liss

Baltimore County officials just announced the arrest of former Dundalk pastor Walter Sevillano on charges related to child sex abuse. According to publicly available online court records cited in local reporting, Sevillano faces two counts of fourth-degree sex offense and one count of sex abuse of a minor.

Police say the alleged conduct occurred between 2023 and 2025 at both his Baltimore County residence and at the church where he previously served as pastor.

Baltimore County Police identified the congregation as Iglesia Cristiana Sanidad Divina — translated as Divine Healing Christian Church — a bilingual ministry that has offered services online and at a physical location in Dundalk.

As reports note, church representatives declined to comment, and Sevillano did not respond to requests for comment.

At the time of the article in the Baltimore Banner, no defense attorney was listed in the court docket. Records indicate he was being held at the Harford County Detention Center before posting a $10,000 bond and being released on Friday. The investigation remains ongoing.

Baltimore County Arrest Highlights Ongoing Institutional Abuse Risks

The arrest adds to a broader trend Baltimore County authorities have observed in recent years: allegations of child sexual abuse involving religious leaders, educators, and youth sports personnel.

While each case must be adjudicated on its own facts and the accused is presumed innocent unless proven guilty in a court of law, the pattern underscores a painful reality — institutional settings that serve children can be exploited by those who intend harm.

For survivors and families in Maryland, it is essential to understand the legal options available today, including the powerful protections afforded by the Maryland Child Victims Act.

Who is Walter Sevillano, and what do we know from public reports?

Role: Former pastor of Iglesia Cristiana Sanidad Divina in Dundalk, a bilingual Christian ministry with in-person and online services.

Allegations and charges: Online court records reflect charges of sex abuse of a minor and two counts of fourth-degree sex offense tied to incidents alleged to have taken place between 2023 and 2025, both at the church and at a Baltimore County home.

Current status: Records indicate Sevillano now lives in Abingdon, Maryland. He was held at the Harford County Detention Center before release on a $10,000 bond. At the time of the news report, no attorney was listed for him, and the church provided no comment.

As the case proceeds, additional information may become available about the timeline, any prior complaints, institutional responses, and investigative findings.

For now, what is clear is that Maryland law recognizes the unique dynamics of sexual abuse, including the complex, often delayed process of disclosure.

A troubling trend: Religious, academic, and youth sports child molestation cases surface across Baltimore County

Delayed disclosure is common and a big reason why the laws changed. Survivors of child sexual abuse frequently delay disclosure well into adulthood.

Shame, fear of not being believed, grooming by a trusted authority figure, religious or cultural pressure, and trauma-related memory processes can prevent a survivor from coming forward for years or even decades.

Recognizing these realities, Maryland enacted the Child Victims Act, removing the civil statute of limitations for survivors of childhood sexual abuse.

Put simply, adults of any age who were abused as children in Maryland can bring civil claims against the institutions that enabled or failed to prevent the abuse, and where appropriate, their abusers.

How prevalent is institutional child sexual abuse in the Catholic Church?

Investigations across the United States and in Maryland have documented widespread abuse. There have been systemic institutional failures in the Catholic Church for many decades.

Public reporting in Maryland has identified thousands of victims and numerous credibly accused clergy associated with church institutions.

Multiple newsrooms and governmental bodies have published databases and reports that detail the scope and patterns of abuse, transfers of clergy, and institutional responses.

While the present arrest involves a pastor of a Christian congregation not identified as part of the Catholic Church, the broader discussion of institutional abuse is relevant.

Survivors from many faith traditions and institutional settings — Catholic, Protestant, non-denominational, schools, camps, and youth sports — have reported similar grooming tactics, breaches of trust, and long-term trauma.

This is not an issue confined to a single denomination. It is a public safety and public health crisis that demands transparency, accountability, and survivor-centered justice.

What the Maryland Child Victims Act means for survivors of Child Sex Abuse

No civil time limit: The law allows adults of any age to file civil lawsuits for child sexual abuse that occurred in Maryland. Claims that were previously “time-barred” may now proceed.

Institutional accountability: In addition to claims against the individual perpetrator, survivors may have claims against institutions that employed or supervised the abuser, or that failed to take reasonable steps to protect children once they knew or should have known about risks.

Your voice matters, regardless of criminal charges: Civil cases can proceed even if criminal charges are never filed or cannot be brought due to different standards of proof or prosecutorial discretion.

Trauma-informed process: The civil system can provide monetary compensation for harms as well as the discovery process that may uncover how and why institutional failures occurred. For many survivors, accountability and validation are as important as compensation.

Next steps for Maryland survivors considering legal action

Document your memories and evidence.

Write down what you recall: Names, locations, approximate dates, people you told at the time. Any details about the environment or grooming tactics. Keep any journals, emails, letters, photographs, yearbooks, or program rosters that may corroborate access and opportunity.

Consider counseling. A trauma-informed therapist can offer support during disclosure and during the legal decision-making process.

Speak with an experienced legal team. A law firm that regularly handles institutional child sexual abuse cases in Maryland can assess the facts. They can explain legal options under the Child Victims Act and protect your privacy.

You are in control. Talking to a lawyer does not obligate you to file a case. You decide if, when, and how to proceed. Your safety and well-being come first.

A note on presumption of innocence and survivor support

In any criminal matter, the accused is presumed innocent unless proven guilty. That legal principle coexists with a survivor-centered approach that treats those who report abuse with dignity, seriousness, and support.

The courts resolve criminal guilt, while civil law and trauma-informed care give survivors avenues to seek justice and healing.

The Yost Legal Group’s commitment to Maryland survivors of Child Sex Abuse

The Yost Legal Group has long represented survivors of institutional child sexual abuse in Maryland. Our team understands the courage it takes to come forward and the need for privacy, respect, and steady guidance.

We conduct sensitive investigations, collaborate with trauma-informed professionals, and pursue accountability from both individuals and institutions responsible for harm.

We offer free, confidential consultations and work on a contingency fee basis. There are no fees unless we recover compensation for you.

Were you abused as a child in Maryland? You can come forward at any age under the Maryland Child Victims Act. You have options, and you have support. Whether the abuse occurred in a church, school, youth program, or other setting, you can seek justice.

Contact The Yost Legal Group today for a confidential consultation:

Phone: (800)-YOST-LAW or (800-967-8529)

Text: 1-410-659-6800

Website: https://www.yostlaw.com/

You are not alone. Your story matters. In Maryland, the law now provides a path for you to be heard and seek justice.

Child Sex Abuse – Maryland Child Victims Act – Institutional Child Sexual Abuse

Choosing the Right Legal Advocate After a TBI Accident

Posted on September 18, 2025September 18, 2025 by Loni Liss

The most common types of personal injury lawsuits include motor vehicle accident cases, product liability cases, dog bite cases, and medical malpractice cases, among others. A TBI accident can happen in many types of accidents involving negligence.

In any of these cases, a traumatic brain injury (TBI) can occur, which can have short-term or long-term effects on the brain and body as well as physical, neurological, and psychological complications or even death.

Thus, cases that involve traumatic brain injuries differ from other personal injury cases due to the complexity and potential permanency of the condition, for which an injured party may not be able to be made “whole” again. This type of harm factors into the overall value of a case.

In personal injury lawsuits, the injured party (plaintiff) files a civil action against the person or entity (defendant) responsible for his or her injuries to obtain financial compensation for the harm suffered.

To have a successful claim, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant’s action or inaction was negligent, or otherwise the fault and cause of the injury. Thus, the overall purpose of personal injury claims is to make the injured party “whole.”

The hope is that the compensation obtained can restore the injured party to their pre-injury condition.

What is a TBI?

A TBI is an injury that occurs in the brain caused by a sudden external force or a jostling to the head or body. The injury can cause mild to severe complications for an individual, affecting them physically, emotionally, cognitively, and neurologically. All of these can be either short-term, long-term, or permanent.

Thus, these cases require a special level of care and analytical representation unparalleled by other types of personal injury cases. This is due to the challenges of establishing liability and seeking large compensation for an often “invisible” or hard-to-detect injury.

TBIs are typically classified by severity (mild, moderate, severe) and by type, based on how the injury occurs and which brain structures are affected.

Even “mild” injuries can have serious consequences, so understanding the types helps patients and families recognize symptoms and seek appropriate care.

What are the Different Types of Traumatic Brain Injury?

Concussion (Mild TBI): The most common form of TBI, a concussion, is caused by a sudden impact or shaking of the head that leads to temporary brain dysfunction. Symptoms may include headaches, dizziness, confusion, memory problems, sensitivity to light, sleep disturbances, and mood changes. Loss of consciousness may or may not occur. While most people recover, repeated concussions or inadequate rest can prolong symptoms and increase long-term risks.

Contusion (Brain Bruise): A contusion is a focal area of bleeding and swelling in the brain tissue, usually at the impact site (coup) or on the opposite side due to the brain rebounding within the skull (contrecoup). Larger contusions can increase pressure inside the skull and may require monitoring or surgery. Symptoms vary based on location but can involve cognitive, sensory, or motor changes.

Diffuse Axonal Injury (DAI): Often resulting from high-speed acceleration–deceleration (such as car crashes), DAI stretches and shears the brain’s nerve fibers (axons) throughout multiple regions. Because the damage is widespread and microscopic, it can be hard to detect on standard imaging. DAI is associated with loss of consciousness, prolonged coma in severe cases, and long-term cognitive and functional impairments.

Penetrating Injury (Open Head Injury): These injuries occur when an object breaks through the skull and enters the brain, such as shrapnel or a bullet. Damage is typically focal but severe, and there is a high risk of bleeding, infection, and seizures. Surgical intervention is common, followed by intensive rehabilitation.

Hematomas: Traumatic bleeding can collect in or around the brain and compress delicate tissue.

Epidural hematoma: bleeding between the skull and the dura (outer brain covering), often from arterial injury; may have a brief “lucid interval” followed by rapid decline—this is a surgical emergency.

Subdural hematoma: bleeding beneath the dura, often venous; can be acute (after major trauma) or chronic (developing over weeks, sometimes after minor head injury, especially in older adults or those on blood thinners).

Effective Attorney Advocacy in Traumatic Brain Injury Claims

Effective attorney advocacy for TBI cases requires a strong understanding of the catastrophic injury and its invisible nature. TBIs are often considered “invisible injuries” because it can take some time for the effects of the injury to appear.

Unlike bone injuries or bruises to the skin, an injury to the cranium is not visible to the naked eye. It can lead to many other subsequent impairments. This makes it easier to identify and treat them separately, rather than connecting them all to one brain injury.

Expert opinions, medical records, and witness testimonies are crucial to connect all the dots. An experienced personal injury lawyer will:

Identify the injury
Establish liability for the injury
Convey the full impact of the injury on the plaintiff’s quality of life.

Experienced TBI attorneys will properly assess their damages, and a strong case can be built.

Choose Our Highly Qualified Injury Lawyers Today

At The Yost Legal Group, we provide both compassion and results. Our skilled personal injury attorneys handle all types of TBI cases. While you receive the medical treatment you need, we will work towards securing the compensation you deserve.

We have an extensive network of supportive experts that collectively help navigate the complexities of these more complex cases.

Our TBI lawyers have a deep understanding of the profound impact a traumatic brain injury can have. It affects both the injured party and their loved ones.

Did you or a loved one suffer a TBI due to the negligence or misconduct of another person? Call us today at 1 (800) YOST-LAW (1-800-967-8529) or fill out the Free Consultation form on our website. We will be in touch shortly to conduct your complimentary case review. It is essential to know your legal options.

Traumatic Brain Injury Law Firm – Personal Injury Law Firm – Catastrophic Injury Lawyers

Understanding Spinal Cord Injuries: Legal Guidance Matters

Posted on September 15, 2025 by Loni Liss

Spinal cord injuries (SCI) are life-changing events that can have lasting physical, emotional, and financial impacts. When someone else’s negligence causes a spinal cord injury—whether in a car crash, workplace accident, medical event, or other traumatic incident—it’s critical to understand your rights and take immediate steps to protect your future.

A spinal cord injury (SCI) is one of the most devastating injuries a person can experience. Each year, an estimated 17,000 new spinal cord injuries occur in the United States alone, according to the National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center.

These injuries can instantly disrupt every aspect of a person’s life, leading to partial or complete paralysis, loss of sensation, and lifelong medical needs. Beyond the physical challenges, spinal cord injuries often bring emotional distress, changes in family dynamics, and significant financial burdens.

At The Yost Legal Group, we’re dedicated to helping spinal cord injury survivors get the justice and compensation they deserve.

What Is a Spinal Cord Injury?

A spinal cord injury involves damage to the spinal cord or nerves at the end of the spinal canal. These injuries can result in permanent loss of strength, sensation, and function below the site of the injury.

They often require extensive medical care, rehabilitation, and lifestyle adjustments.

What makes spinal cord injuries especially impactful is their long-term nature. Nearly 78% of new SCI cases are suffered by men, and the majority occur in individuals under the age of 30, meaning a lifetime of care and adaptation.

Survivors may face not only the immediate costs of hospitalization and surgery but also ongoing expenses for rehabilitation, assistive devices, home modifications, and personal care. The lifetime cost for a person with high tetraplegia (paralysis affecting all four limbs) can exceed $5 million.

Even less severe injuries can result in costs over $1 million. These numbers don’t even account for lost income or the emotional toll on victims and their loved ones.

Common Causes of Spinal Cord Injuries

Spinal cord injuries can happen in many ways, but some of the most common causes include:

– Motor Vehicle Accidents: Car, truck, and motorcycle crashes are leading causes of SCI.

– Falls: Slips, trips, and falls, especially from heights, can lead to serious spinal injuries.

– Violence: Assaults, gunshot wounds, and other violent acts can result in SCI.

– Medical or Surgical Errors: Mistakes during surgery or improper medical care may cause spinal damage.

Why You Need an Experienced Lawyer After a Spinal Cord Injury

Dealing with the aftermath of a spinal cord injury is overwhelming, and insurance companies may not have your best interests at heart. Here’s why hiring a skilled attorney is essential:

Maximizing Compensation: An experienced lawyer knows how to calculate the true cost of your injury—including ongoing care, lost wages, pain and suffering, and future needs.

Dealing with Insurance Companies: Insurers often try to minimize payouts. Your lawyer can negotiate aggressively and, if necessary, take your case to trial.

Navigating Complex Laws: Personal injury law is complex, particularly when it involves catastrophic injuries. A legal team ensures all deadlines are met and paperwork is handled correctly.

Building a Strong Case: Your attorney will gather evidence, consult experts, and develop a strategy tailored to your circumstances.

The Cost of Care for Spinal Cord Injury Survivors

Living with a SCI can be extremely expensive. Costs may include:

– Emergency Medical Care: Hospitalization, surgeries, and intensive care.

– Rehabilitation: Physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling.

– Adaptive Equipment: Wheelchairs, home modifications, and vehicle adaptations.

– Long-Term Care: In-home nursing, personal care attendants, and ongoing medical needs.

– Lost Income: Many SCI survivors are unable to return to their previous jobs.

The lifetime cost of care can reach millions of dollars, making it vital to secure the maximum possible compensation.

Key Evidence to Build a Strong Personal Injury Case

To secure a fair settlement or verdict, your legal team will collect and present evidence such as:

Accident Reports: Police, workplace, or incident reports.

Medical Records: Documentation of diagnoses, treatments, and prognosis.

Expert Testimony: Medical, vocational, and economic experts can explain the injury’s impact.

Photographs/Videos: Visual evidence of the accident scene, injuries, or unsafe conditions.

Witness Statements: Accounts from people who saw the accident or can testify to your condition.

Financial Records: Proof of lost income, medical bills, and future care needs.

Know Your Rights and Protect Your Future

If you or a loved one has suffered a spinal cord injury due to someone else’s negligence, you have the right to seek compensation for your losses. Acting quickly is critical, as evidence can disappear, and there are strict deadlines for filing claims.

Why Choosing the Right Spinal Cord Injury Lawyer Matters

When searching for the best personal injury lawyer for spinal cord injury claims, it’s crucial to find a team with a proven track record, deep experience in catastrophic injury cases, and a genuine commitment to your recovery.

The Yost Legal Group stands out among top-rated spinal cord injury attorneys because we understand the unique medical, financial, and emotional challenges you face.

Our approach is straightforward: we prioritize your needs. From your free initial consultation to the final settlement or verdict, our attorneys will:

– Listen to your story with compassion and respect

– Explain your legal rights and options in clear, simple terms

– Gather the strongest evidence to support your claim

– Work with leading medical and financial experts to accurately value your case

– Negotiate fiercely with insurance companies to secure the maximum compensation for our clients

– Only get paid if we win your case—so you never have to worry about upfront legal fees

Take the First Step Toward Justice and Recovery

If you’re searching for the best spinal cord injury lawyer near you or want to know how to get the highest settlement for a spinal cord injury claim, don’t wait.

Our serious personal injury lawyers handle complex cases involving spinal cord injuries. From car accidents, truck accidents, falls, and medical malpractice, we recover significant compensation for our clients.

The sooner you reach out, the sooner we can start protecting your rights by filing a personal injury claim on your behalf. We will explain the legal process and advise on any potential statute of limitations issues.

Contact The Yost Legal Group today for a free, confidential consultation.

You deserve answers, support, and the best lawyers for personal injury that will fight relentlessly for your future. Let The Yost Legal Group be your advocate on the road to recovery.

(800)-YOST-LAW (800)-967-8529 Text: 1-410-659-6800 yostlaw.com

Paralysis Injury Lawyer – Catastrophic Injury Lawyer – Serious Truck Accident Lawyer

Best Personal Injury Law Firm – Serious Injury Lawyer – Paralysis in Accident

Major Developments in the Allergan Lawsuit Litigation

Posted on September 12, 2025 by Loni Liss

Following a request from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), in July 2019, Allergan initiated a breast implant recall of its textured breast implants and tissue expanders. This recall was issued due to the increased risk that Allergan’s textured implants cause BIA-ALCL (Breast Implant Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma). Do you qualify to file an Allergan Lawsuit?

A few months later, in December 2019, a Multi-District Litigation (MDL) was formed in New Jersey and is being overseen by Judge Brian Martinotti.

The Allergan implant recall MDL is a consolidation of all federally filed Allergan cases involving those Allergan implantees who have either been diagnosed with BIA-ALCL and/or had their Allergan implants removed out of fear of developing BIA-ALCL.

What is an MDL?

The Allergan MDL should not be confused with a class action lawsuit. These cases are NOT part of a class action but are separate individual claims for personal injuries.

This consolidation strategy allows these matters to be litigated more efficiently, as costs can be spread across all of the litigants, rather than having individuals shoulder the burdens of litigation independently.

Unlike a class action where the settlement or verdict is split among the members of the class, a settlement or verdict in the Allergan litigation will be individual, based on the facts and circumstances of each plaintiff’s case.

Despite having been formed in 2019, the Allergan MDL is moving incredibly slow; none of the cases have gone to trial and, until recently, no trial dates have been definitively scheduled.

Furthermore, Judge Martinotti has ordered a stay for all non-bellwether cases pending in the MDL. In other words, no work can be done in any non-bellwether case until Judge Martinotti has lifted the stay.

What is a Bellwether Case/Trial?

Federal courts have many tools at their disposal to help resolve mass tort litigations, like the Allergan MDL. One of these tools is known as a ‘bellwether trial.

When a judge elects to use bellwether trials, the judge and the parties generally select a small sample of representative cases that will be fully prepared and tried to a jury.

These selected cases, known as ‘bellwether cases, are typically representative of issues that will arise in every injured person’s case. The goal of the bellwether process is to give all interested parties a good indication of what is likely to happen in future trials and to advance the overall litigation towards resolution.

The first few jury verdicts during the bellwether process provide the judge and parties with enough information to determine whether cases should be settled, and if so, what a reasonable dollar range for such settlements might be.

Plaintiffs not chosen as bellwether cases, while not necessarily involved in the day-to-day aspects of the bellwether process, the work of the attorneys and judge applies to all cases in the litigation, not just those selected as bellwether cases.

Judge Martinotti also employed a bellwether process in the Allergan MDL.

As such, a group of 32 cases (16 cases picked by Plaintiffs and 16 cases picked by Allergan) have been selected as the initial Allergan bellwether cases.

Following their selection, the 32 bellwether cases began what is called the core discovery phase (an exchange of information and documents via written requests and depositions).

The deadline to complete discovery in the bellwether cases was set for January 31, 2025.

What is the Current Status of the Allergan Litigation

After many long years, there seems to be significant movement in the Allergan litigation. The first subset of cases to go to trial will be the non-cancer cases.

In other words, cases where the plaintiffs had their Allergan implants removed out of fear of developing BIA-ALCL, also referred to as “surgical explant cases”.

The first surgical explant trial is scheduled for June 15, 2026. It has not yet been decided if this will be a multi- or single-plaintiff trial. This issue should be decided by the Court following the November 11, 2025, Case Management Conference.

On July 21, 2025, the parties selected the 12 surgical explant cases (8 plaintiff-picked and 4 Allergan-picked) to be prepared for trial.

In the meantime, the parties have been directed to continue working in good faith with each other to attempt to resolve all claims in this litigation.

Plaintiffs’ Settlement Committee and Allergan are directed to be fully prepared to participate in good faith, in-person mediation sessions scheduled before Judge Welsh on October 7 and October 10, 2025.

What are the signs of BIA-ALCL?

Cancer development with implants is a genuine concern for many women and deserves attention. BIA-ALCL is not breast cancer.

BIA-ALCL is a rare form of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, which is distinguishable from breast cancer as it develops in the scar tissue that surrounds the implant, not in the actual tissue of the breast, as is seen with breast cancer.

However, BIA-ALCL does have the ability to metastasize (spread) and can lead to death. Therefore, it is essential to identify the early signs of this condition to ensure quick and effective treatment.

Some of the symptoms to watch out for include:

– persistent swelling

– the presence of a mass/lump in the breast or armpit

– pain around the breast implant.

BIA-ALCL symptoms may occur years after implant placement, so it is crucial to keep monitoring yourself.

Stay vigilant and don’t hesitate to seek medical advice if you spot any of the symptoms mentioned above. Early diagnosis always means a better chance of successful treatment.

If you have had surgery (or are about to have surgery) to remove your textured breast implants and/or tissue expanders out of fear of developing BIA-ALCL, or if you have already been diagnosed with BIA-ALCL, it is important to contact The Yost Legal Group.

Our team will talk with you about the importance of filing an Allergan implant lawsuit and preserving your legal rights.

Allergan Textured Breast Implants and BIA-ALCL: File a Lawsuit and Pursue Compensation

The Yost Legal Group is dedicated to fighting for the rights of women. Did you suffer from BIA-ALCL due to Allergan-textured breast implants? The Allergan breast implant recall is due to the risk of developing BIA-ALCL.

Our team of experienced product liability attorneys will work tirelessly to hold Allergan accountable for its negligence. We will work to ensure you receive the justice and compensation you deserve. We can file an Allergan Breast Implant Lawsuit on your behalf.

When filing an Allergan Lawsuit, the Allergan implants compensation for will vary from case to case. Variables could depend on whether you removed the implants or the type of implants.

Contact The Yost Legal Group at 1-800-967-8529 for a free consultation with a caring and understanding Allergan breast implant attorney.

Have You Been Diagnosed with Large Cell Anaplastic Lymphoma?

One of our product liability lawyers will provide you with vital information to help you through this difficult time. We’re here to help you understand your rights and seek justice!

We handle these cases on a no-recovery, no-fee basis. We accept your case on a contingency basis. Which means you do not pay a fee or expense unless you recover.

We do not charge any fees upfront, and we only get paid after we successfully settle your claim. You never have to worry about paying legal fees while we represent you.

All attorneys’ fees and costs are paid when we settle your case. If there is no recovery, there are no legal fees.

Biocell Textured Breast Implant – Allergan Breast Implant Illness Symptoms – ALCL Lymphoma

Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma Symptoms – Early Stage BIA-ALCL Symptoms – FDA Recall Allergan

Hair Relaxer Litigation: What You Need to Know

Posted on September 9, 2025 by Loni Liss

The national hair relaxer litigation is making waves across the country, shining a spotlight on the potential health risks associated with over-the-counter hair straightening products.

As more women come forward with cancer diagnoses, lawsuits are mounting against major manufacturers.

If you or a loved one has used over-the-counter chemical hair relaxers and been diagnosed with uterine cancer, endometrial cancer, or non-serous ovarian cancer, call The Yost Legal Group.

You may have questions about your rights, eligibility to file a claim, and what to expect from this ongoing legal battle.

Here is a detailed update on the hair straightener litigation, including:

– Who can file a hair relaxer claim

– Which hair relaxer products are involved

– The types of cancers linked

– The latest on the legal process.

What Is the National Hair Relaxer Litigation All About?

The litigation centers around allegations that long-term use of chemical hair relaxers and straighteners, commonly marketed to women of color, can increase the risk of developing certain types of cancer.

Plaintiffs claim that manufacturers failed to warn consumers about these risks, despite mounting scientific evidence.

As a result, many women who relied on these products for years are now facing serious health diagnoses and are seeking justice through the courts.

Who Can File a Hair Relaxer Claim?

If you have used chemical hair relaxers or straighteners and have been diagnosed with specific cancers, you may be eligible to file a claim. Generally, you may qualify if:

– You regularly used over-the-counter hair relaxers or straightening products for at least two years.

– You were diagnosed with uterine cancer, endometrial cancer, ovarian cancer, or other hormone-related cancers after using these products.

– You are within the applicable statute of limitations for your state (this varies, so it’s important to consult with a legal professional as soon as possible).

– You can provide medical records and proof of product use, such as receipts, product packaging, or testimony.

Even if you are unsure whether you qualify, reaching out to a legal team for a free evaluation can help clarify your options.

Many law firms, like The Yost Legal Group, offer confidential consultations at no cost to you. Call us at 1-800-967-8529 to speak with a specialist about a hair relaxer lawsuit.

What Types of Cancer Are Linked to Hair Relaxers?

Recent scientific research has drawn a connection between frequent use of chemical hair relaxers and an increased risk of certain cancers. The most commonly reported types include:

1. Uterine Cancer:

A groundbreaking 2022 study published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute found that women who frequently used hair straightening products were more than twice as likely to develop uterine cancer compared to those who did not use them.

This risk was especially pronounced among Black women, who are more likely to use these products at an earlier age and with greater frequency.

2. Endometrial Cancer:

Endometrial cancer, which affects the lining of the uterus, has also been linked to the use of chemical hair relaxers. The chemicals in these products can disrupt hormone function, potentially leading to the development of hormone-driven cancers.

3. Ovarian Cancer:

Some studies suggest a possible link between hair relaxer use and ovarian cancer, though more research is ongoing. The concern is that certain chemicals in relaxers may be absorbed through the scalp and affect the reproductive system.

Which Hair Relaxer Products Are Involved?

A wide range of over-the-counter and salon hair straightening products is under scrutiny in the litigation. Some of the most commonly named brands and products include:

Dark & Lovely Hair Relaxer (L’Oréal)

Just for Me (Strength of Nature)

Optimum Care (SoftSheen-Carson)

Motions

ORS Olive Oil

Soft & Beautiful

African Pride

TCB Naturals

Revlon Realistic

Namaste

Silken Child

Ultra Sheen Supreme

Precise

Pink Oil Moisturizer

Beautiful Beginnings

These products often contain chemicals such as formaldehyde, parabens, phthalates, and diethanolamine (DEA), which have been linked to hormone disruption and cancer in scientific studies.

It’s important to note that the list of potentially harmful products continues to grow as more information becomes available and as lawsuits are filed.

Who Qualifies to File a Hair Relaxer Claim?

You may qualify to file a hair relaxer claim if you:

– Used chemical hair relaxers or straighteners (including the brands listed above) for at least two years.

– Diagnosed with uterine, endometrial, or ovarian cancer after using these products.

– Are within the legal time frame to file a claim in your state.

– You can provide documentation of your diagnosis and product use.

It’s also possible for family members of women who have passed away from these cancers to file claims on their behalf.

If you have questions about your eligibility, it’s best to consult with an experienced product liability law firm.

The Yost Legal Group works on a contingency fee basis, meaning you pay nothing unless your case is successful.

How Soon Will the Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Litigation Be Over?

National product liability litigation, especially cases involving thousands of plaintiffs and major corporations, can take several years to resolve.

The hair relaxer litigation is still in its early to middle stages, with lawsuits being consolidated into multidistrict litigation (MDL) in federal court. Here’s what to expect:

Case Consolidation:

Most hair relaxer lawsuits have been consolidated in the Northern District of Illinois under MDL 3060. This means pretrial proceedings, discovery, and bellwether trials will be coordinated to streamline the process.

Discovery Phase:

Both sides are currently exchanging evidence, including internal company documents, scientific studies, and expert testimony. This phase can take months or even years, depending on the complexity and number of cases.

Bellwether Trials:

A few representative cases (bellwether trials) will be selected to go to trial first. The outcomes of these cases often influence settlement discussions for the remaining plaintiffs.

Potential Settlements:

If the bellwether trials result in verdicts favoring plaintiffs, manufacturers may be more likely to offer settlements. However, if the companies win these early trials, litigation may continue for years to come.

Timeline:

As of mid-2025, there is no definitive end date for the litigation. Plaintiffs should be prepared for a lengthy process, but ongoing legal pressure and media attention may encourage companies to settle sooner rather than later.

What Should You Do If You Think You Have a Claim?

If you believe you qualify for a hair relaxer claim, it’s essential to act quickly:

Gather Documentation:

Collect any receipts, product packaging, or photos showing your use of hair relaxers. Obtain your medical records related to your cancer diagnosis.

Contact a Law Firm:

Contact a reputable law firm with experience in product liability and toxic exposure cases. Firms like The Yost Legal Group offer free consultations and can help you navigate the process.

File Your Hair Relaxer Cancer Claim:

Your attorney will handle the filing process, gather evidence, and represent your interests in court or settlement negotiations.

Contact The Yost Legal Group for help today.

The national hair relaxer litigation is a significant step toward holding manufacturers accountable for the health and safety of consumers, particularly women of color who have been disproportionately affected.

If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with uterine cancer or endometrial cancer after using these products, you have legal options and support available.

For more information on cancer hair relaxer claims or a free case evaluation, contact The Yost Legal Group at 800-YOST-LAW (1-800-967-8529).

Your health and your rights matter—don’t wait to seek the justice you deserve.

Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Update – Hair Straightener Lawsuit – Dark and Lovely Relaxer Lawsuit

Dangerous Hair Care Products – Hair Relaxer MDL – File a Lawsuit

MD Teacher Acquitted of Child Sex Abuse Charges Reassigned

Posted on August 22, 2025August 29, 2025 by Loni Liss

Former Severna Park Teacher Matthew Schlegel Reassigned to Student-Free Location

In Maryland, a case involving former Severna Park Elementary teacher Matthew Schlegel has drawn widespread attention and deep concern among families. In June 2025, Schlegel was acquitted of 18 counts of sexual abuse and related offenses.

The jury deadlocked on three remaining assault charges, which prosecutors later dismissed.

Now, just two months later, Schlegel has been reassigned to a district job location with no students while Anne Arundel County Public Schools conducts its own internal review.

The Child Victims Act of 2023: A Lifeline for Maryland Survivors

For survivors, parents, and community members, the outcome raises painful questions. How could so many charges result in so few legal consequences?

What role does the school system play in protecting children even after a criminal acquittal? And what avenues remain open for survivors who feel the system failed them?

If you or someone you know is the survivor of childhood sexual abuse committed by an employee of a Maryland school district, the new Child Victims Act of 2023 has expanded your statute of limitations. This means you may have a case, which could entitle you to justice in the form of monetary compensation.

Unfortunately, we cannot take back or undo the trauma you have experienced. Still, the experienced teacher sex abuse lawyers at The Yost Legal Group can help you seek the justice you deserve. Call or text us today at 410-659-6800.

Please remember: It was not your fault. You are not alone. Contact our legal team today for a free and confidential consultation and for an explanation of your rights. We are here to help.

The Trial and Acquittal of Severna Park Teacher Matthew Schlegel

In June 2025, after weeks of testimony, a jury found Schlegel not guilty on 18 counts that alleged sexual abuse and related sex offenses involving students at Severna Park Elementary.

Jurors later spoke to local media, explaining that the state had not proven its case beyond a reasonable doubt.

This legal standard is critical to understand. In criminal court, the burden on prosecutors is deliberately high, requiring jurors to find guilt “beyond a reasonable doubt.”

In cases involving child victims, this expectation can be especially challenging.

Children may struggle to testify consistently, recall events clearly, or withstand aggressive cross-examination. As Anne Arundel County State’s Attorney Anne Colt Leitess explained after the verdict:

“This is certainly not the outcome that we had hoped for in this case. One thing that strikes me is the criminal justice system expects a lot from child victims, and this case is no exception. While our office cannot guarantee verdicts in difficult cases, what we can guarantee is that we will always stand up for children and sexual assault victims, which we did in this case.”

Though the jury acquitted Schlegel on 18 counts, they could not reach an agreement on the three remaining second-degree assault charges.

Days later, prosecutors announced they would not retry the case, effectively ending the criminal proceedings.

Release and Conditions of Severna Park Teacher Matthew Schlegel

After 13 months in prison, the judge ordered Schlegel’s immediate release on his own recognizance following the acquittal. However, conditions were imposed:

No unsupervised contact with minors, except his own children.
No contact with alleged victims or their families.

These restrictions reflect a reality survivors know well. The legal system may not convict, yet courts still acknowledge the need for limits on behavior to protect children.

As for the school district, Anne Arundel County Public Schools had placed Schlegel on administrative leave during the criminal trial.

After the acquittal and dismissal of charges, the district restored him to paid employment.

However, he has not been reassigned to a classroom. Instead, as of August 2025, he is working in a district facility where no students are present, pending the outcome of the district’s internal review.

After the Verdict: What Survivors and Communities Can Do Next

For many parents, the decision to reinstate Schlegel—even in a non-teaching role—feels like a betrayal. Families argue that schools carry responsibilities separate from criminal courts.

A “not guilty” verdict does not automatically mean an individual is fit to return to the classroom. Internal reviews, guided by state education law, may apply different standards focused on safety and professional conduct.

The school district has stated that its investigation is ongoing and that it will determine final employment status based on its policies and findings.

If you or a loved one experienced childhood sexual abuse in a Maryland public school, facility, or school-sanctioned event, you may have a case and be entitled to significant compensation.

Contact the compassionate sexual abuse survivor lawyers at The Yost Legal Group today for a free and confidential consultation: 410-659-6800.

Looking Out for Survivors of Childhood Sexual Abuse

For survivors and family members, the Schlegel verdict is not just about one teacher. It represents the broader challenge of speaking truth in a system built around high burdens of proof. When jurors say, “The case was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt,” survivors may hear, “We don’t believe you.”

But legal outcomes do not erase survivor experiences. Survivors deserve to be heard, believed, and supported.

Civil cases, community advocacy, and trauma-informed legal support all provide ways to reclaim voice and agency when the criminal system falls short.

Cases like Schlegel’s reveal gaps in the system. While prosecutors must meet the criminal burden of proof, schools and communities can act under broader principles of child protection.

Moving forward, Maryland families are asking hard questions:

Should school employees acquitted of abuse ever be reassigned to teaching roles?
How can districts strengthen their internal investigative processes?
What reforms are needed to support children who testify in abuse trials?

These are not abstract questions. They shape how safe children feel walking into classrooms every day. Survivor stories should drive policy reform, ensuring that schools prioritize child safety over employment technicalities.

Protecting Our Children: The Legal Realities Every Parent Should Know

Matthew Schlegel’s acquittal does not end the conversation. It challenges us to examine how we protect children, how we hold institutions accountable, and how we stand with survivors when the legal system cannot deliver the closure they deserve.

It also raises questions about whether school districts need to re-evaluate their teachers’ union contracts that currently stipulate the reassignment of teachers within their incumbent districts should they beat charges brought against them.

The Yost Legal Group, A Lifeline for Maryland Survivors

The strength of the children who testified and the strength of the community to come together in support of the little girls are deserving of commendation and recognition.

The Yost Legal Group stands with survivors. Your experiences are to be believed, and your voices should be heard. You are not alone.

If you are a survivor of sexual abuse or know someone who is a survivor, please contact The Yost Legal Group today for a free and confidential consultation.

If you are ready to talk, we are ready to listen. Our experienced and compassionate sexual abuse survivor attorneys are here to help you and provide the legal guidance you deserve. When you are ready, call or text us a 410-659-6800.

Survivors Rights – School Molestation Claims – Teacher Abuse Claims

Child Sex Abuse Lawyer – Institutional Sexual Abuse Claims – Daycare Abuse Lawyer