Author: Loni Liss

Major Developments in the Allergan Lawsuit Litigation

Posted on by Loni Liss

Following a request from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), in July 2019, Allergan initiated a breast implant recall of its textured breast implants and tissue expanders. This recall was issued due to the increased risk that Allergan’s textured implants cause BIA-ALCL (Breast Implant Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma). Do you qualify to file an Allergan Lawsuit?

A few months later, in December 2019, a Multi-District Litigation (MDL) was formed in New Jersey and is being overseen by Judge Brian Martinotti.

The Allergan implant recall MDL is a consolidation of all federally filed Allergan cases involving those Allergan implantees who have either been diagnosed with BIA-ALCL and/or had their Allergan implants removed out of fear of developing BIA-ALCL.

Allergen textured breast implants are linked to Breast Implant Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma

What is an MDL?

The Allergan MDL should not be confused with a class action lawsuit. These cases are NOT part of a class action but are separate individual claims for personal injuries.

This consolidation strategy allows these matters to be litigated more efficiently, as costs can be spread across all of the litigants, rather than having individuals shoulder the burdens of litigation independently.

Unlike a class action where the settlement or verdict is split among the members of the class, a settlement or verdict in the Allergan litigation will be individual, based on the facts and circumstances of each plaintiff’s case.

Despite having been formed in 2019, the Allergan MDL is moving incredibly slow; none of the cases have gone to trial and, until recently, no trial dates have been definitively scheduled.

Furthermore, Judge Martinotti has ordered a stay for all non-bellwether cases pending in the MDL. In other words, no work can be done in any non-bellwether case until Judge Martinotti has lifted the stay.

What is a Bellwether Case/Trial?

Federal courts have many tools at their disposal to help resolve mass tort litigations, like the Allergan MDL. One of these tools is known as a ‘bellwether trial.

When a judge elects to use bellwether trials, the judge and the parties generally select a small sample of representative cases that will be fully prepared and tried to a jury.

These selected cases, known as ‘bellwether cases, are typically representative of issues that will arise in every injured person’s case. The goal of the bellwether process is to give all interested parties a good indication of what is likely to happen in future trials and to advance the overall litigation towards resolution.

The first few jury verdicts during the bellwether process provide the judge and parties with enough information to determine whether cases should be settled, and if so, what a reasonable dollar range for such settlements might be.

Plaintiffs not chosen as bellwether cases, while not necessarily involved in the day-to-day aspects of the bellwether process, the work of the attorneys and judge applies to all cases in the litigation, not just those selected as bellwether cases.

Judge Martinotti also employed a bellwether process in the Allergan MDL.

As such, a group of 32 cases (16 cases picked by Plaintiffs and 16 cases picked by Allergan) have been selected as the initial Allergan bellwether cases.

Following their selection, the 32 bellwether cases began what is called the core discovery phase (an exchange of information and documents via written requests and depositions).

The deadline to complete discovery in the bellwether cases was set for January 31, 2025.

Allergen textured breast implant recall

What is the Current Status of the Allergan Litigation

After many long years, there seems to be significant movement in the Allergan litigation. The first subset of cases to go to trial will be the non-cancer cases.

In other words, cases where the plaintiffs had their Allergan implants removed out of fear of developing BIA-ALCL, also referred to as “surgical explant cases”.

The first surgical explant trial is scheduled for June 15, 2026. It has not yet been decided if this will be a multi- or single-plaintiff trial. This issue should be decided by the Court following the November 11, 2025, Case Management Conference.

On July 21, 2025, the parties selected the 12 surgical explant cases (8 plaintiff-picked and 4 Allergan-picked) to be prepared for trial.

In the meantime, the parties have been directed to continue working in good faith with each other to attempt to resolve all claims in this litigation.

Plaintiffs’ Settlement Committee and Allergan are directed to be fully prepared to participate in good faith, in-person mediation sessions scheduled before Judge Welsh on October 7 and October 10, 2025.

What are the signs of BIA-ALCL?

Cancer development with implants is a genuine concern for many women and deserves attention. BIA-ALCL is not breast cancer.

BIA-ALCL is a rare form of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, which is distinguishable from breast cancer as it develops in the scar tissue that surrounds the implant, not in the actual tissue of the breast, as is seen with breast cancer.

However, BIA-ALCL does have the ability to metastasize (spread) and can lead to death. Therefore, it is essential to identify the early signs of this condition to ensure quick and effective treatment.

Some of the symptoms to watch out for include:

–      persistent swelling

–      the presence of a mass/lump in the breast or armpit

–      pain around the breast implant.

BIA-ALCL symptoms may occur years after implant placement, so it is crucial to keep monitoring yourself.

Stay vigilant and don’t hesitate to seek medical advice if you spot any of the symptoms mentioned above. Early diagnosis always means a better chance of successful treatment.

If you have had surgery (or are about to have surgery) to remove your textured breast implants and/or tissue expanders out of fear of developing BIA-ALCL, or if you have already been diagnosed with BIA-ALCL, it is important to contact The Yost Legal Group.

Our team will talk with you about the importance of filing an Allergan implant lawsuit and preserving your legal rights.

Allergan textured breast implants removal due to causing BIA-ALCL

Allergan Textured Breast Implants and BIA-ALCL: File a Lawsuit and Pursue Compensation

The Yost Legal Group is dedicated to fighting for the rights of women. Did you suffer from BIA-ALCL due to Allergan-textured breast implants? The Allergan breast implant recall is due to the risk of developing BIA-ALCL.

Our team of experienced product liability attorneys will work tirelessly to hold Allergan accountable for its negligence. We will work to ensure you receive the justice and compensation you deserve. We can file an Allergan Breast Implant Lawsuit on your behalf.

When filing an Allergan Lawsuit, the Allergan implants compensation for will vary from case to case. Variables could depend on whether you removed the implants or the type of implants.

Contact The Yost Legal Group at 1-800-967-8529 for a free consultation with a caring and understanding Allergan breast implant attorney.

Have You Been Diagnosed with Large Cell Anaplastic Lymphoma?

One of our product liability lawyers will provide you with vital information to help you through this difficult time. We’re here to help you understand your rights and seek justice!

We handle these cases on a no-recovery, no-fee basis. We accept your case on a contingency basis. Which means you do not pay a fee or expense unless you recover.

We do not charge any fees upfront, and we only get paid after we successfully settle your claim. You never have to worry about paying legal fees while we represent you.

All attorneys’ fees and costs are paid when we settle your case. If there is no recovery, there are no legal fees.

Biocell Textured Breast Implant – Allergan Breast Implant Illness Symptoms – ALCL Lymphoma

Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma Symptoms – Early Stage BIA-ALCL Symptoms – FDA Recall Allergan

Hair Relaxer Litigation: What You Need to Know

Posted on by Loni Liss

The national hair relaxer litigation is making waves across the country, shining a spotlight on the potential health risks associated with over-the-counter hair straightening products.

As more women come forward with cancer diagnoses, lawsuits are mounting against major manufacturers.

If you or a loved one has used over-the-counter chemical hair relaxers and been diagnosed with uterine cancer, endometrial cancer, or non-serous ovarian cancer, call The Yost Legal Group.

You may have questions about your rights, eligibility to file a claim, and what to expect from this ongoing legal battle.

Here is a detailed update on the hair straightener litigation, including:

–             Who can file a hair relaxer claim

–             Which hair relaxer products are involved

–             The types of cancers linked

–             The latest on the legal process.

Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Update by The Yost Legal Group

What Is the National Hair Relaxer Litigation All About?

The litigation centers around allegations that long-term use of chemical hair relaxers and straighteners, commonly marketed to women of color, can increase the risk of developing certain types of cancer.

Plaintiffs claim that manufacturers failed to warn consumers about these risks, despite mounting scientific evidence.

As a result, many women who relied on these products for years are now facing serious health diagnoses and are seeking justice through the courts.

Dark and Lovely Relaxer Lawsuit filed by The Yost Legal Group

Who Can File a Hair Relaxer Claim?

If you have used chemical hair relaxers or straighteners and have been diagnosed with specific cancers, you may be eligible to file a claim. Generally, you may qualify if:

–             You regularly used over-the-counter hair relaxers or straightening products for at least two years.

–             You were diagnosed with uterine cancer, endometrial cancer, ovarian cancer, or other hormone-related cancers after using these products.

–             You are within the applicable statute of limitations for your state (this varies, so it’s important to consult with a legal professional as soon as possible).

–             You can provide medical records and proof of product use, such as receipts, product packaging, or testimony.

Even if you are unsure whether you qualify, reaching out to a legal team for a free evaluation can help clarify your options.

Many law firms, like The Yost Legal Group, offer confidential consultations at no cost to you. Call us at 1-800-967-8529 to speak with a specialist about a hair relaxer lawsuit.

Hair Straightener Lawsuit for black women diagnosed with cancer after using hair relaxer products

What Types of Cancer Are Linked to Hair Relaxers?

Recent scientific research has drawn a connection between frequent use of chemical hair relaxers and an increased risk of certain cancers. The most commonly reported types include:

1. Uterine Cancer:

A groundbreaking 2022 study published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute found that women who frequently used hair straightening products were more than twice as likely to develop uterine cancer compared to those who did not use them.

This risk was especially pronounced among Black women, who are more likely to use these products at an earlier age and with greater frequency.

2. Endometrial Cancer:

Endometrial cancer, which affects the lining of the uterus, has also been linked to the use of chemical hair relaxers. The chemicals in these products can disrupt hormone function, potentially leading to the development of hormone-driven cancers.

3. Ovarian Cancer:

Some studies suggest a possible link between hair relaxer use and ovarian cancer, though more research is ongoing. The concern is that certain chemicals in relaxers may be absorbed through the scalp and affect the reproductive system.

Which Hair Relaxer Products Are Involved?

A wide range of over-the-counter and salon hair straightening products is under scrutiny in the litigation. Some of the most commonly named brands and products include:

Dark & Lovely Hair Relaxer (L’Oréal)

Just for Me (Strength of Nature)

Optimum Care (SoftSheen-Carson)

Motions

ORS Olive Oil

Soft & Beautiful

African Pride

TCB Naturals

Revlon Realistic

Namaste

Silken Child

Ultra Sheen Supreme

Precise

Pink Oil Moisturizer

Beautiful Beginnings

These products often contain chemicals such as formaldehyde, parabens, phthalates, and diethanolamine (DEA), which have been linked to hormone disruption and cancer in scientific studies.

It’s important to note that the list of potentially harmful products continues to grow as more information becomes available and as lawsuits are filed.

Who Qualifies to File a Hair Relaxer Claim?

You may qualify to file a hair relaxer claim if you:

–             Used chemical hair relaxers or straighteners (including the brands listed above) for at least two years.

–             Diagnosed with uterine, endometrial, or ovarian cancer after using these products.

–             Are within the legal time frame to file a claim in your state.

–             You can provide documentation of your diagnosis and product use.

It’s also possible for family members of women who have passed away from these cancers to file claims on their behalf.

If you have questions about your eligibility, it’s best to consult with an experienced product liability law firm.

The Yost Legal Group works on a contingency fee basis, meaning you pay nothing unless your case is successful.

How Soon Will the Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Litigation Be Over?

National product liability litigation, especially cases involving thousands of plaintiffs and major corporations, can take several years to resolve.

The hair relaxer litigation is still in its early to middle stages, with lawsuits being consolidated into multidistrict litigation (MDL) in federal court. Here’s what to expect:

Case Consolidation:

Most hair relaxer lawsuits have been consolidated in the Northern District of Illinois under MDL 3060. This means pretrial proceedings, discovery, and bellwether trials will be coordinated to streamline the process.

Discovery Phase:

Both sides are currently exchanging evidence, including internal company documents, scientific studies, and expert testimony. This phase can take months or even years, depending on the complexity and number of cases.

Bellwether Trials:

A few representative cases (bellwether trials) will be selected to go to trial first. The outcomes of these cases often influence settlement discussions for the remaining plaintiffs.

Potential Settlements:

If the bellwether trials result in verdicts favoring plaintiffs, manufacturers may be more likely to offer settlements. However, if the companies win these early trials, litigation may continue for years to come.

Timeline:

As of mid-2025, there is no definitive end date for the litigation. Plaintiffs should be prepared for a lengthy process, but ongoing legal pressure and media attention may encourage companies to settle sooner rather than later.

What Should You Do If You Think You Have a Claim?

If you believe you qualify for a hair relaxer claim, it’s essential to act quickly:

Gather Documentation:

Collect any receipts, product packaging, or photos showing your use of hair relaxers. Obtain your medical records related to your cancer diagnosis.

Contact a Law Firm:

Contact a reputable law firm with experience in product liability and toxic exposure cases. Firms like The Yost Legal Group offer free consultations and can help you navigate the process.

File Your Hair Relaxer Cancer Claim:

Your attorney will handle the filing process, gather evidence, and represent your interests in court or settlement negotiations.

Contact The Yost Legal Group for help today.

The national hair relaxer litigation is a significant step toward holding manufacturers accountable for the health and safety of consumers, particularly women of color who have been disproportionately affected.

If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with uterine cancer or endometrial cancer after using these products, you have legal options and support available.

For more information on cancer hair relaxer claims or a free case evaluation, contact The Yost Legal Group at 800-YOST-LAW (1-800-967-8529).

Your health and your rights matter—don’t wait to seek the justice you deserve.

Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Update – Hair Straightener Lawsuit – Dark and Lovely Relaxer Lawsuit

Dangerous Hair Care Products – Hair Relaxer MDL – File a Lawsuit

MD Teacher Acquitted of Child Sex Abuse Charges Reassigned

Posted on by Loni Liss

Former Severna Park Teacher Matthew Schlegel Reassigned to Student-Free Location

In Maryland, a case involving former Severna Park Elementary teacher Matthew Schlegel has drawn widespread attention and deep concern among families. In June 2025, Schlegel was acquitted of 18 counts of sexual abuse and related offenses.

The jury deadlocked on three remaining assault charges, which prosecutors later dismissed.

Now, just two months later, Schlegel has been reassigned to a district job location with no students while Anne Arundel County Public Schools conducts its own internal review.

The Child Victims Act of 2023: A Lifeline for Maryland Survivors

For survivors, parents, and community members, the outcome raises painful questions. How could so many charges result in so few legal consequences?

What role does the school system play in protecting children even after a criminal acquittal? And what avenues remain open for survivors who feel the system failed them?

If you or someone you know is the survivor of childhood sexual abuse committed by an employee of a Maryland school district, the new Child Victims Act of 2023 has expanded your statute of limitations. This means you may have a case, which could entitle you to justice in the form of monetary compensation.

Unfortunately, we cannot take back or undo the trauma you have experienced. Still, the experienced teacher sex abuse lawyers at The Yost Legal Group can help you seek the justice you deserve. Call or text us today at 410-659-6800.

Please remember: It was not your fault. You are not alone. Contact our legal team today for a free and confidential consultation and for an explanation of your rights. We are here to help.

The Trial and Acquittal of Severna Park Teacher Matthew Schlegel

In June 2025, after weeks of testimony, a jury found Schlegel not guilty on 18 counts that alleged sexual abuse and related sex offenses involving students at Severna Park Elementary.

Jurors later spoke to local media, explaining that the state had not proven its case beyond a reasonable doubt.

This legal standard is critical to understand. In criminal court, the burden on prosecutors is deliberately high, requiring jurors to find guilt “beyond a reasonable doubt.”

In cases involving child victims, this expectation can be especially challenging.

Children may struggle to testify consistently, recall events clearly, or withstand aggressive cross-examination. As Anne Arundel County State’s Attorney Anne Colt Leitess explained after the verdict:

“This is certainly not the outcome that we had hoped for in this case. One thing that strikes me is the criminal justice system expects a lot from child victims, and this case is no exception. While our office cannot guarantee verdicts in difficult cases, what we can guarantee is that we will always stand up for children and sexual assault victims, which we did in this case.”

Though the jury acquitted Schlegel on 18 counts, they could not reach an agreement on the three remaining second-degree assault charges.

Days later, prosecutors announced they would not retry the case, effectively ending the criminal proceedings.

Release and Conditions of Severna Park Teacher Matthew Schlegel

After 13 months in prison, the judge ordered Schlegel’s immediate release on his own recognizance following the acquittal. However, conditions were imposed:

  • No unsupervised contact with minors, except his own children.
  • No contact with alleged victims or their families.

These restrictions reflect a reality survivors know well. The legal system may not convict, yet courts still acknowledge the need for limits on behavior to protect children.

As for the school district, Anne Arundel County Public Schools had placed Schlegel on administrative leave during the criminal trial.

After the acquittal and dismissal of charges, the district restored him to paid employment.

However, he has not been reassigned to a classroom. Instead, as of August 2025, he is working in a district facility where no students are present, pending the outcome of the district’s internal review.

After the Verdict: What Survivors and Communities Can Do Next

For many parents, the decision to reinstate Schlegel—even in a non-teaching role—feels like a betrayal. Families argue that schools carry responsibilities separate from criminal courts.

A “not guilty” verdict does not automatically mean an individual is fit to return to the classroom. Internal reviews, guided by state education law, may apply different standards focused on safety and professional conduct.

The school district has stated that its investigation is ongoing and that it will determine final employment status based on its policies and findings.

If you or a loved one experienced childhood sexual abuse in a Maryland public school, facility, or school-sanctioned event, you may have a case and be entitled to significant compensation.

Contact the compassionate sexual abuse survivor lawyers at The Yost Legal Group today for a free and confidential consultation: 410-659-6800.

Looking Out for Survivors of Childhood Sexual Abuse

For survivors and family members, the Schlegel verdict is not just about one teacher. It represents the broader challenge of speaking truth in a system built around high burdens of proof. When jurors say, “The case was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt,” survivors may hear, “We don’t believe you.”

But legal outcomes do not erase survivor experiences. Survivors deserve to be heard, believed, and supported.

Civil cases, community advocacy, and trauma-informed legal support all provide ways to reclaim voice and agency when the criminal system falls short.

Cases like Schlegel’s reveal gaps in the system. While prosecutors must meet the criminal burden of proof, schools and communities can act under broader principles of child protection.

Moving forward, Maryland families are asking hard questions:

  • Should school employees acquitted of abuse ever be reassigned to teaching roles?
  • How can districts strengthen their internal investigative processes?
  • What reforms are needed to support children who testify in abuse trials?

These are not abstract questions. They shape how safe children feel walking into classrooms every day. Survivor stories should drive policy reform, ensuring that schools prioritize child safety over employment technicalities.

Protecting Our Children: The Legal Realities Every Parent Should Know

Matthew Schlegel’s acquittal does not end the conversation. It challenges us to examine how we protect children, how we hold institutions accountable, and how we stand with survivors when the legal system cannot deliver the closure they deserve.

It also raises questions about whether school districts need to re-evaluate their teachers’ union contracts that currently stipulate the reassignment of teachers within their incumbent districts should they beat charges brought against them.

The Yost Legal Group, A Lifeline for Maryland Survivors

The strength of the children who testified and the strength of the community to come together in support of the little girls are deserving of commendation and recognition.

The Yost Legal Group stands with survivors. Your experiences are to be believed, and your voices should be heard. You are not alone.

If you are a survivor of sexual abuse or know someone who is a survivor, please contact The Yost Legal Group today for a free and confidential consultation.

If you are ready to talk, we are ready to listen. Our experienced and compassionate sexual abuse survivor attorneys are here to help you and provide the legal guidance you deserve. When you are ready, call or text us a 410-659-6800.

Survivors Rights – School Molestation Claims – Teacher Abuse Claims

Child Sex Abuse Lawyer – Institutional Sexual Abuse Claims – Daycare Abuse Lawyer

Teacher Christopher Bendann Found Guilty of Child Sex Abuse

Posted on by Loni Liss

,Under Project Safe Childhood, a federal jury returned a guilty verdict against Christopher Kenji Bendann, age 40, of Baltimore. He was found guilty of child sex abuse on:

–      five counts of sexual exploitation of a minor to produce child pornography

–      one count of cyberstalking

–      three counts of possession of child pornography, all relating to his sexual exploitation of a minor male victim.

Project Safe Childhood

Project Safe Childhood (PSC) is a nationwide initiative to combat the growing epidemic of child sexual exploitation and abuse launched in May 2006 by the Department of Justice. [2]

The goal of this project is to reduce the number of children who face childhood sexual exploitation. Prosecution of childhood sexual exploitation has increased every year since the launch of Project Safe Childhood.

For more information on Project Safe Childhood, please visit the U.S. Department of Justice website.

Bendann Forced Boys to Exercise Naked While Recording for his Own Benefit

Bendann was a teacher at Gilman School, an all-boys private independent school in Roland Park, from 2007 to 2023.

Between September 2017 and February 2019, Bendann produced multiple sexually explicit videos of a child aged 16 and 17. Bendann met the child when he was in eighth grade. That year, Bendann served as the child’s teacher, coach, and adviser.

He was placed in a position of trust, a sacred trust that teachers will not sexually abuse their students.

Bendann broke this trust when he drove the child and his friends to Meadowood Regional Park or nearby to a hill at the St. Paul’s Schools campus to run laps naked as repayment for trips to McDonald’s or rides home.[3]

These perverse exercises were recorded, and Bendann can even be heard and seen in some of the video footage recovered by the FBI.

The abuse did not stop once the child became an adult and moved on from Gilman School. Teacher Christopher Bendann continued to harass the child online and demanded contact and explicit images.

Bendann Threatened to Release Sexually Explicit Images

Bendann threatened to publicly release the sexually explicit images of the minor if he did not submit to Bendann’s demands.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Colleen McGuinn said that Bendann “used his image as a pillar of the Gilman community to access these children.”[4] In 2023, Bendann was fired by Gillman School and two weeks later was arrested by Baltimore County Police.

U.S. Senior District Judge James K. Bredar sentenced Bendann to serve 35 years in federal prison in addition to a lifetime of supervised release.[5] Bendann earned this lengthy prison sentence due to his lack of remorse and refusal to admit his guilt.

After being found guilty by a jury of his peers, Bendann turned around and mouthed the words “I forgive you.”[6]

The student’s parents spoke about how Bendann’s abuse has permanently affected their son and shamed Bendann for his refusal to accept responsibility for his actions.[7]

Maryland Legislative Strips the Statute of Limitations for Civil Claims of Child Sex Abuse

In October of 2023, the Maryland Legislature significantly expanded the civil remedies for survivors of child sexual abuse. The prior law allowed survivors to come forward up to twenty years after they reached the age of majority.

However, the average age of disclosure for survivors of childhood sexual abuse is 52. The current law allows for claims to proceed no matter how long ago the abuse occurred.

This allows survivors a greater opportunity to get justice for crimes committed against them, as well as holding abusers accountable by not allowing their repercussions to disappear by hiding behind a statute of limitations.

Civil Remedies Offer Justice for Survivors of Institutional Childhood Sexual Abuse

Criminal prosecution is not the only avenue to seek justice. The Yost Legal Group is a Maryland law firm that represents survivors of childhood sexual abuse.

Institutional childhood sexual abuse occurs when a minor is sexually abused by someone who has a duty to supervise and care for the minor.

Legally, no minor can have a consensual sexual relationship with an adult. Survivors are encouraged to come forward because their voice matters. The Yost Legal Group is dedicated to seeking justice and financial compensation for survivors.

Seeking Justice for Survivors of Child Sex Abuse

If you are a survivor of child sexual abuse in a Maryland school system or state-run facility, contact our childhood sexual abuse lawyers for help. We will file a child abuse lawsuit on your behalf.

The Yost Legal Group is committed to ending childhood sexual abuse in Maryland. We are a committed team of child abuse lawyers dedicated to protecting the rights of survivors.

To learn about your rights or discuss the possibility of legal action, please contact the Yost Legal Group at 1-800-967-8529 for a free and confidential consultation.

All teacher sexual abuse claims are handled on a contingent fee basis. You never have to pay anything up front. After we settle your case, that’s when we get paid. If there is no recovery, there are no fees or expenses due.

[2] Project Safe Childhood | Project Safe Childhood

[3] https://www.thebaltimorebanner.com/community/criminal-justice/chris-bendann-gilman-school-sentencing-sex-abuse-TR2JVYRL2VE6FGD4BLT4IB4KW4/

[4] Chris Bendann, ex-Gilman School teacher, sentenced to 35 years in prison – The Baltimore Banner

[5] https://www.thebaltimorebanner.com/community/criminal-justice/chris-bendann-gilman-school-sentencing-sex-abuse-TR2JVYRL2VE6FGD4BLT4IB4KW4/

[6] Chris Bendann, ex-Gilman School teacher, sentenced to 35 years in prison – The Baltimore Banner

[7] Chris Bendann, ex-Gilman School teacher, sentenced to 35 years in prison – The Baltimore Banner

Sexual Assault Attorneys – Lawyers for Sexual Abuse – Maryland Abuse Lawyers

Know Your Rights About Filing a Clonazepam Lawsuit

Posted on by Loni Liss

In November 2024, thousands of patients and families across the United States were shocked to learn about a significant recall involving a widely prescribed anxiety medication: Clonazepam, also known by its brand name, Klonopin. Individuals across the country are filing clonazepam lawsuits.

The recall, announced by Endo, Inc.—the drug manufacturer of the orally disintegrating Clonazepam tablets—was prompted by a dangerous mislabeling issue that put patients at risk of accidental overdose.

If you or a loved one has experienced severe side effects or adverse reactions after taking recalled Clonazepam Orally Disintegrating Tablets, you may be eligible to file a Clonazepam lawsuit and pursue compensation for your injuries.

At The Yost Legal Group, our experienced product liability attorneys are dedicated to holding pharmaceutical companies accountable and ensuring that victims receive the justice and support they deserve.

In this blog, we’ll break down what happened with the Clonazepam recall, the potential dangers, how to file a product liability claim, and how The Yost Legal Group can help.

Know Your Rights About Filing a Clonazepam Lawsuit

What Is Clonazepam (Klonopin)?

Clonazepam is a prescription medication commonly used to treat anxiety disorders, panic attacks, and certain types of seizures.

As a benzodiazepine, Clonazepam works by calming the brain and nerves, making it a trusted option for millions of patients who rely on it for daily symptom management.

Klonopin, the brand name version, is well-known for its efficacy and is often prescribed in both standard and orally disintegrating tablet (ODT) forms.

Details of the 2024 FDA Clonazepam Recall

In November 2024, Endo, Inc. announced a voluntary recall of specific lots of Clonazepam Orally Disintegrating Tablets (ODT) after discovering a serious labeling error.

According to the FDA’s official recall notice, the outer packaging of certain Clonazepam ODT products listed a lower dosage than what was actually contained in the blister packs.

In other words, patients who believed they were taking a lower, doctor-recommended dose may have inadvertently ingested a much higher amount of the drug.

Example of the Mislabeling Issue

Imagine receiving a prescription labeled as 0.5 mg tablets, only to discover the actual blister packs inside contain 2 mg tablets—a fourfold increase in dosage.

For patients with anxiety or seizure disorders, this discrepancy can have life-threatening consequences.

Why Is the Mislabeling of Clonazepam so Dangerous?

Benzodiazepines like Clonazepam are potent medications. Even small increases in dosage can cause:

–             Severe drowsiness or sedation

–             Confusion and impaired coordination

–             Respiratory depression (slow or shallow breathing)

–             Risk of overdose, especially in elderly patients or those with other health conditions

For some, accidental overdose can lead to hospitalization, long-term health complications, or even death.

Who Is Affected by the Clonazepam Recall?

The recall specifically involves certain lots of Clonazepam Orally Disintegrating Tablets manufactured by Endo, Inc.

If you or your loved one filled a prescription for Clonazepam ODT in late 2024, it’s critical to check whether your medication is part of the recall.

How to Check Your Medication:

Visit the FDA’s recall page here for a complete list of affected lot numbers and photos of the recalled packaging.

–             Compare the lot number on your medication’s blister pack to those listed by the FDA.

–             If you find a match, stop taking the medication immediately and contact your healthcare provider for guidance.

Risks and Injuries from Taking a Higher-Than-Recommended Dose of Clonazepam

The mislabeling of Clonazepam Orally Disintegrating Tablets is not just a paperwork error—it’s a potentially life-altering or life-threatening mistake.

When patients unknowingly take a much higher dose of Clonazepam than their doctor intended, the risks go far beyond mild side effects. The consequences can be severe and sometimes catastrophic.

Severe Drowsiness and Sedation

Clonazepam is a powerful sedative, and even at prescribed doses, it can cause drowsiness. But when the dose is accidentally multiplied, the sedative effects can become overwhelming. Patients may experience:

–             Extreme fatigue

–             Inability to stay awake

–             Difficulty responding to their environment

Real-World Impact:

Severe drowsiness and sedation dramatically increase the risk of motor vehicle accidents.

A person who takes a higher dose than intended may feel too tired to drive safely, react slowly to hazards, or even fall asleep at the wheel.

This can result in putting not only the patient but also passengers, other drivers, and pedestrians at risk.

–             Rear-end collisions

–             Running off the road

–             Causing multi-vehicle accidents

Falls, Traumatic Brain Injuries, and Broken Bones from Clonazepam Overdose

The sedative effects of Clonazepam can also lead to loss of balance and falls, especially in older adults or those with existing mobility issues. A sudden, unexplained fall can cause:

–             Traumatic brain injuries (TBI)

–             Concussions

–             Broken hips, wrists, or other bones

–             Internal bleeding

These injuries often require emergency medical care, surgery, and long-term rehabilitation. In some cases, the consequences can be permanent or even fatal.

Confusion and Impaired Coordination

A higher-than-recommended dose of Clonazepam can cause profound confusion, memory problems, and impaired coordination. Patients may become disoriented, unable to follow instructions, or struggle to perform everyday tasks.

Who Is Affected by the Clonazepam Recall

Workplace Dangers from Clozazapan Overdose

For individuals who operate vehicles, heavy equipment, or machinery as part of their job, these symptoms can be especially hazardous. Confusion and poor coordination can lead to:

–             Driving errors, causing serious or fatal crashes

–             Mishandling of industrial equipment, resulting in workplace accidents

–             Dropping heavy objects or tools, risking injury to themselves or coworkers

–             Respiratory Depression and Life-Threatening Overdose

In the most severe cases, taking too much Clonazepam can slow breathing to dangerously low levels—a condition known as respiratory depression. Without prompt medical intervention, this can lead to loss of consciousness, brain damage, or death.

Steps to Take if You Took The Mislabeled Clonazepam

Seek Medical Attention: If you are experiencing symptoms of overdose or any unusual side effects, seek medical help immediately.

Preserve Your Medication: Do not throw away the recalled tablets or packaging. These can serve as critical evidence in a potential lawsuit.

Document Everything: Keep a record of your symptoms, medical visits, and any correspondence with your pharmacy or healthcare provider regarding the recall.

Contact a Product Liability Attorney: Legal professionals can help you understand your rights and the next steps for pursuing compensation.

Legal Rights: Can You File a Clonazepam Lawsuit?

Pharmaceutical companies have a legal duty to ensure their products are safe and accurately labeled.

When a company fails to meet this obligation, and patients are harmed as a result, victims have the right to seek justice through a product liability lawsuit.

You may have a valid Clonazepam Overdose claim if:

–             You or a loved one took the recalled Clonazepam ODT and experienced adverse effects

–             The medication you received was part of the recalled lots

–             You suffered physical, emotional, or financial harm as a result

–             Potential compensation in these cases can cover:

–             Medical expenses (hospitalization, doctor visits, medications)

–             Lost wages due to missed work

–             Pain and suffering

–             Long-term health impacts

–             Wrongful death (in tragic cases involving fatal overdoses)

How The Yost Legal Group Can Help

At The Yost Legal Group, our mission is to advocate for individuals and families harmed by dangerous or defective medications. We understand the fear and frustration that come with medication recalls and unexpected health crises.

Our experienced attorneys for defective products have successfully represented clients in complex pharmaceutical litigation nationwide.

What We Offer:

Free, Confidential Consultation: We’ll review your case, answer your questions, and explain your legal options at no cost.

Contingency Fee Representation: You pay nothing unless we win compensation for you.

Compassionate Support: Our team is dedicated to providing personalized, respectful service every step of the way.

If you believe you have a Clonazepam lawsuit, don’t wait. Evidence can disappear, and strict legal deadlines may apply.

Contact our Defective Drug Lawyers Today

If the Clonazepam recall has negatively impacted you or a loved one, you deserve answers, accountability, and compensation for your suffering. The Yost Legal Group is here to help.

Contact our product liability lawyers today to schedule your free consultation:

Phone: (800)-YOST-LAW or (866)-841-4597

Text: 1-410-659-6800

Website: www.yostlaw.com

Let us help you protect your rights and pursue the justice you deserve.

Resources:

FDA Recall Notice: Endo Expands Voluntary Recall of Clonazepam Orally Disintegrating Tablets

Final Thoughts

Medication errors can have devastating consequences, but you are not alone. With an experienced pharmaceutical liability lawyer, you can hold negligent manufacturers accountable.

This will help secure a safer future for yourself and your loved ones. If you have questions or need help navigating your next steps, The Yost Legal Group is just a call or text away. Please continue to check our website for Clonazepam overdose updates.

Clonazepam Lawyer – Product Injury Attorney – Drug Recall Lawyers

Clonazepam Recall Law Firm – Clonazepam Injuries – Defective Product Lawyers

Recognizing the Signs of Childhood Sexual Abuse

Posted on by Loni Liss

It is difficult to determine the prevalence of childhood sexual abuse because it is not often reported. Current statistics show that one in four girls and one in six boys are survivors of childhood sexual abuse.[1]

Maryland has defined childhood sexual abuse as an act that involves the sexual molestation or exploitation of a minor, whether physical injuries are sustained or not.

This includes incest, rape, sexual offenses in any degree, and any other sexual conduct that is a crime.[2]

Maryland has expanded the legal options for survivors of childhood sexual abuse. They did so by passing the Maryland Child Victims Act of 2023, which gives survivors the right to file lawsuits related to the abuse, no matter how long ago the abuse occurred.[3]

Recognizing the Signs of Childhood Sexual Abuse

When Children ‘Act Out’ or ‘Act In’: Understanding Behavioral Changes After Abuse

It can be challenging for survivors to come forward, and difficult for parents or guardians to recognize the signs of sexual abuse in girls and boys. Some children may begin to “act out” after their sexual abuse. This may include behavior problems, such as running away or cruelty towards others.

Some children may begin to “act in” after their sexual abuse. This may include becoming depressed and withdrawing from friends and family.

Some children may show signs of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), including agitated behavior, nightmares, and repetitive play. PTSD from sexual assault is very common in survivors.

Some children may also lose developmental skills and show regressive behavior. This can include bed-wetting and thumb-sucking.[4]

Without proper intervention, long-term symptoms may persist in adulthood. It is crucial for parents and guardians to offer non-judgmental support.

Breaking the Silence: Helping Children Heal After Sexual Abuse

The first step in offering a supportive healing process after childhood sexual abuse is to believe a survivor when they disclose that something happened to them. Not everyone processes trauma in the same way.

Some survivors may be calm when they disclose what happened to them, while some survivors may be highly emotional. Neither response is an indication of the severity of sexual abuse or how sexual abuse affected the survivor.

It is important for parents and guardians to support the survivor and not attempt to interpret the survivor’s emotional response when they disclose.

Saying things such as “I believe you” or “It took a lot of courage to tell me about this”[5] can show a survivor of childhood sexual assault that you are there to assist in their healing journey.

The Power of Reassurance_ Supporting Survivors Through Their Journey

The Power of Reassurance: Supporting Survivors Through Their Journey

Another important step is to assure the survivor that the sexual abuse was not their fault. Many survivors report feeling a surreal feeling after the sexual abuse. This can cause a survivor to feel separate or isolated from their peers.[6]

This isolation can cause a survivor to blame themselves, or fear that they may be in trouble if the sexual abuse is uncovered.

Parents and guardians can assure a survivor that they are not at fault by reminding the survivor that they did not do anything to deserve what happened to them.[7]

This may have to be reiterated multiple times, as the healing process is not linear.

Additionally, it is key to remind the survivor that they are not alone. This can be done by being there for them and reminding them that you are willing to listen to their story.

It is also helpful to introduce resources and service providers who may be able to help a survivor on a professional level.

This can include doctors, therapists, or social workers who are trained to assist survivors of childhood sexual abuse. Parents and guardians can also acknowledge that the experience has affected the life of the survivor. This communicates empathy and shows that you care about the survivor.

Supporting Survivors - Steps to Help Heal After Sexual Abuse

Supporting Survivors: Steps to Help Heal After Sexual Abuse

Lastly, it is important to remember that there is no timeline for healing. While going through the healing process, remember to avoid judgment.

Eliminate phrases or statements that might make the survivor feel as if they are behind on their healing journey, such as “you have been acting like this for a while” or “how much longer will you feel this way?”[8]

Parents and guardians can check in with the survivor periodically to remind them that they are not alone. Remember to know your resources. The healing journey is not one that is meant to be taken alone.

The Yost Legal Group: A Safe Place for Survivors Seeking Justice

At The Yost Legal Group, we know that coming forward about childhood sexual abuse is one of the bravest steps a survivor can take.

Our sexual abuse attorneys are dedicated to providing a safe, supportive space for survivors of institutional childhood sexual abuse across Maryland.

We listen with compassion, and we fight fiercely for justice on your behalf—holding abusers and the institutions that enabled them accountable.

Childhood sexual abuse can happen anywhere children should feel safe and protected. In Maryland, we have seen cases arise in a wide range of institutions, including:

–             Public and Private Schools: Abuse can occur in classrooms, locker rooms, or during extracurricular activities, often perpetrated by teachers, coaches, or staff.

–             After-School Programs and Youth Organizations: Trusted mentors or volunteers may take advantage of their positions to harm children in clubs, camps, or sports leagues.

–             Religious Schools and Programs: Faith-based settings, such as churches, synagogues, religious schools, or youth groups, can be manipulated by abusers who use authority and trust to silence victims.

–             Doctors’ Offices and Hospitals: Medical professionals are in positions of trust and authority, and unfortunately, some have exploited this to abuse children during exams or treatments.

–             Foster Care and Group Homes: Vulnerable children in foster care or group homes may be targeted by caregivers or older children in the system.

–             Other Community Institutions: Libraries, community centers, and even online educational platforms can be settings where abuse occurs.

Would You Like a Free and Confidential Consultation to Seek Justice?

If you or someone you love is a victim of sexual abuse in any of these settings, please know you are not alone. The Yost Legal Group is helping sexual assault victims understand their rights. And guide you through every step of the legal process.

We offer free, confidential consultations, and you can reach us anytime at (800)-YOST-LAW, (800)-967-8529, or by text at 1-410-659-6800.

We will file a sexual abuse claim against the institution that allowed the sexual trauma. Contact our sexual abuse lawyers for guidance.

Your voice matters. You deserve justice, and we are committed to helping you find it.

Let us be your advocates—together, we can hold abusers and negligent institutions accountable and help you move forward with strength and support.

Clergy Sexual Abuse – Sexual Assault Lawyers – Child Abuse Lawyer

Childhood sexual abuse Lawyer – Sexual Abuse Lawsuit – Statutory Rape

 

[1] Whealin, J., & Barnett, E. (2018, August 20). Va.gov: Veterans Affairs. Child Sexual Abuse. https://www.ptsd.va.gov/professional/treat/type/sexual_abuse_child.asp

[2] Md. Code Ann., Crim. Law § 3-602 (West)

[3] Maryland Child Victims Act: Removing time limitations. Maryland Child Victims Act: Removing Time Limitations. (2025, June 22). https://www.peoples-law.org/maryland-child-victims-act-removing-time-limitations

[4] Whealin, J., & Barnett, E. (2018, August 20). Va.gov: Veterans Affairs. Child Sexual Abuse. https://www.ptsd.va.gov/professional/treat/type/sexual_abuse_child.asp

[5] Tips for Talking with Survivors of Sexual Assault. RAINN. (n.d.). https://rainn.org/articles/tips-talking-survivors-sexual-assault

[6] Common Victim Behaviors of Survivors of Sexual Abuse. Pennsylvania Coalition to Advance Respect. (n.d.). https://pcar.org/blog/common-victim-behaviors-survivors-sexual-abuse

[7] Tips for Talking with Survivors of Sexual Assault. RAINN. (n.d.). https://rainn.org/articles/tips-talking-survivors-sexual-assault

[8] Tips for Talking with Survivors of Sexual Assault. RAINN. (n.d.). https://rainn.org/articles/tips-talking-survivors-sexual-assault

Neonatal Resuscitation and Birth Injuries: What Parents Need to Know

Posted on by Loni Liss

Most babies make the transition from being in utero to being able to breathe room air on their own as soon as they are born. However, about 10% of newborns require some assistance with breathing, and of that 10%, fewer than 1% require extensive neonatal resuscitation measures.

The equipment and the medical team members trained to resuscitate newborns are required in every hospital’s labor and delivery department.

Although only 10% of newborn babies require neonatal resuscitation, meaning only 10% of parents have this experience, it is worth describing here in some detail, because it is quite common that parents are not given an explanation of the medical procedures their baby has received if newborn resuscitation was performed.

Neonatal Resuscitation due to medical malpractice

When does a newborn need neonatal resuscitation?

If a newborn baby is having any difficulty breathing or has a heart rate that is too low, emergency steps are immediately taken. The intention is to stabilize the infant so that the baby receives enough oxygen and has a strong and regular heartbeat.

Medical professionals want to reduce the risk of hypoxic (oxygen deficiency) injury to the baby’s brain.

Resuscitation of a newborn occurs in several steps, from least to most invasive, and typically begins within the first minute of life. Less than 1% of babies who need resuscitation need the most invasive procedures.

What are the first steps taken to resuscitate a newborn?

The first steps taken to treat a baby who needs help breathing are focused on:

  • Keeping the baby warm
  • Opening the baby’s airway
  • If necessary, advancing to the equivalent of CPR by providing positive pressure ventilation (PPV) to help the baby breathe and performing chest compressions if the heart rate remains too low (under 60 beats per minute).

Warmth: The baby is placed on a heated surface or under a radiant warmer to prevent an uncontrolled drop in body temperature (hypothermia) that might further slow the baby’s heart rate and breathing.

Positioning: Once on a warm surface, the baby’s head and neck are positioned to open the baby’s airway to optimize full respiration.

Suctioning: Clearing the baby’s mouth and nose with a bulb syringe or a suction catheter may be needed to remove fluid blocking the baby’s airway.

Breathing: Providing positive pressure ventilation (PPV) – with a bag and mask or CPAP device, for example – inflates the lungs to help with breathing if the baby is still struggling to breathe after suctioning.

Chest compressions: If the heart rate remains below 60 beats per minute after PPV ventilation is established, chest compressions are administered.

Newborn low heart rate in NICU from a medical mistake

What are the advanced steps taken to resuscitate a newborn?

In less than 1% of newborns who do not respond to the initial resuscitation procedures, advanced interventions are undertaken:

Intubation: An endotracheal tube may be inserted to establish a secure and reliable airway.

Epinephrine: If the heart rate remains low despite ventilation and chest compressions, epinephrine or a similar medication may be administered through an IV.

What care does a baby receive after neonatal resuscitation?

  • Monitoring – A baby who has been resuscitated at the time of birth will have their heart rate, breathing, and oxygen saturation rate closely monitored, once they are transferred from the delivery room to the nursery or the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).
  • Body temperature control – The baby will be regularly checked to confirm that their body temperature is normal and that they are not experiencing any trouble maintaining a normal body temperature. Any baby having trouble regulating their body temperature will need immediate additional medical care to stabilize their temperature.
  • Further evaluation – After resuscitation, it may be necessary for the baby to undergo additional observation, testing, and monitoring to find the primary cause of the baby’s breathing difficulty and any other complications at the time of birth.

Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy and Newborn Resuscitation

Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy is not diagnosed because the baby required resuscitation at the time of birth. Still, neonatal resuscitation can be an early indication that a baby suffered a hypoxic brain injury from a lack of oxygen during labor and delivery.

HIE newborns may experience difficulty breathing, a slow heart rate, and a dusky, bluish color, all of which can result in the need for immediate resuscitation.

A need for newborn resuscitation does not mean that a baby has suffered brain damage or that medical malpractice has occurred.

But neonatal resuscitation, followed by an HIE or cerebral palsy diagnosis, does mean the baby’s labor and delivery history should be examined to determine whether medical mistakes were made.

If your child was diagnosed with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, let our birth injury attorneys help you find answers.

We invite you to reach out for a Free Consultation to discuss your unique situation in a caring, confidential environment. Call The Yost Legal Group at 1-800-YOST-LAW (1-800-967-8529) today.

Should I contact a birth injury law firm if my child needed to be resuscitated at birth?

You should consider contacting a birth injury attorney as soon as possible if:

  • Your baby had signs of distress or injury (like seizures, difficulty breathing, or needed to be resuscitated in the delivery room).
  • Your baby had low Apgar scores.
  • You suspect that something went wrong during labor or delivery, or you have concerns about the medical care you or your baby received.
  • Your baby has been diagnosed with a condition like hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), cerebral palsy, or another birth-related injury.

How The Yost Legal Group Birth Injury Lawyers Can Help.

  • Free Consultation: We offer a complimentary case review to discuss your concerns, review your potential case, and address any questions you may have about your baby’s resuscitation at the time of birth.
  • Medical Record Review: Our team will carefully review the medical records and help determine whether a medical mistake occurred during labor and delivery.
  • Expert Insights: We collaborate with medical experts to assess whether the care provided met accepted standards of care and if any preventable factors were involved.
  • No Upfront Fees: The Yost Legal Group works on a contingency fee basis, so you pay nothing unless they recover compensation for you.

If a medical mistake was made, our HIE lawyers will work to secure a lifetime of care for your child.

You can reach The Yost Legal Group by calling (800)-YOST-LAW for more information. If we file a birth injury claim on your behalf, we will fight to seek the justice and compensation you deserve.

If your infant was diagnosed with HIE or cerebral palsy and you want answers, contact The Yost Legal Group at (800)-YOST-LAW. 

Birth Injury Lawsuit – HIE Injury – Neonatal Brain Injury

Understanding the Impact of Traumatic Brain Injuries

Posted on by Loni Liss

Traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) are among the most devastating injuries an individual can endure—especially when they happen suddenly in a car accident, pedestrian accident, truck accident, or motorcycle accident.

In Maryland, the impact of a TBI can change your life forever, affecting your health, your family, and your future.

If you or a loved one has suffered a traumatic brain injury in Maryland due to someone else’s negligence, understanding your rights and the long-term effects of TBI is crucial.

As a leading Maryland traumatic brain injury law firm, The Yost Legal Group is dedicated to helping accident victims get the care, compensation, and justice they deserve.

Best TBI Lawyer Maryland

What Is a Traumatic Brain Injury?

A traumatic brain injury occurs when a sudden trauma—such as a blow or jolt to the head—disrupts normal brain function.

TBIs can result from a wide range of accidents; the most common causes are:

–             motor vehicle collisions

–             pedestrian accidents

–             truck accidents

–             motorcycle crashes

–             Fall accidents

–             Construction and work accidents

Even a so-called “mild” concussion can have lasting effects, while moderate and severe TBIs can lead to permanent disability or death.

Best Brain Injury Lawyer Maryland

TBI Statistics: The Scope of the Problem

TBIs are a significant health concern across the United States, including right here in Maryland. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC):

–             2.8 million Americans sustain a TBI each year

–             Over 214,000 people are hospitalized for TBI each year in the U.S.

–             Nearly 70,000 die annually from traumatic brain injuries.

–             Blunt force trauma and motor vehicle accidents are common causes

–             CSF leak, impaired vision, and loss of consciousness are common side effects

Car accidents, pedestrian accidents, truck accidents, and motorcycle accidents are among the leading causes of brain injuries in Maryland.

Falls and being struck by/against objects are also significant contributors.

For more information, visit the CDC’s TBI statistics page.

Truck Accident Traumatic Brain Injury in Maryland

Top Causes of Traumatic Brain Injuries in Maryland

Car Accidents

Car accidents are a leading cause of traumatic brain injury in Maryland. The force of a collision—even at low speeds—can cause the brain to move violently within the skull, resulting in bruising, bleeding, or other types of damage.

Pedestrian Accidents

Pedestrians are especially vulnerable. When struck by a vehicle, the impact often results in a traumatic brain injury. Maryland pedestrian accident victims with TBI may face long-term cognitive and physical challenges.

Truck Accidents

Truck accidents can cause catastrophic injuries, including severe TBIs. The sheer size and weight of commercial trucks mean that victims often suffer more serious injuries, requiring extensive medical care and rehabilitation.

Motorcycle Accidents

Motorcycle riders have little protection in a crash, making them more susceptible to head injuries. Even with a helmet, a motorcycle accident in Maryland can result in a life-changing traumatic brain injury.

Common Symptoms of Traumatic Brain Injury

Recognizing the symptoms of a traumatic brain injury is critical for seeking prompt treatment. Symptoms may appear immediately or develop over hours or days.

If you’ve been in a car accident, pedestrian accident, truck accident, or motorcycle accident in Maryland, watch for these signs:

Physical Symptoms:

–             Headache or pressure in the head

–             Loss of consciousness (even briefly)

–             Nausea, vomiting

–             Dizziness or loss of balance

–             Fatigue or drowsiness

–             Sensitivity to light or sound

–             Blurred vision

Cognitive and Emotional Symptoms:

–             Confusion, feeling “foggy”

–             Memory loss, especially regarding the accident

–             Difficulty concentrating

–             Mood swings, irritability

–             Anxiety, depression

–             Sleep disturbances

Severe Symptoms:

–             Persistent or worsening headache

–             Repeated vomiting or nausea

–             Seizures

–             Slurred speech

–             Weakness or numbness in limbs

–             Loss of coordination

–             Profound confusion or agitation

If you notice any of these symptoms after an accident in Maryland, seek immediate medical attention.

What are the Long-Term Effects of Traumatic Brain Injuries?

The long-term impact of a TBI can be life-altering. Many Maryland TBI victims face:

–             Chronic headaches or migraines

–             Motor function problems (paralysis, spasticity, balance issues)

–             Sensory issues (vision, hearing, taste, smell)

–             Seizures or epilepsy

–             Memory loss (short- or long-term)

–             Difficulty with concentration and processing information

–             Speech and language problems

–             Emotional changes (depression, anxiety, mood swings)

–             Behavioral changes (impulsivity, personality shifts)

–             Increased risk of Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, or CTE

These long-term effects can make it difficult to work, maintain relationships, or enjoy daily life. For many, ongoing rehabilitation and support are necessary.

Why Immediate Medical Attention Matters After a Head Injury

After any accident—whether it’s a car, pedestrian, truck, or motorcycle accident in Maryland—getting checked by a doctor is essential. A blow to the head could cause a skull fracture, a mild TBI or a serious type of brain injury.

Some brain injuries don’t show symptoms right away, but early diagnosis and treatment can prevent complications and improve recovery. Never ignore a head injury or try to “tough it out.” Seek the help of a medical professional right away to evaluate if you have suffered a brain injury.

Legal Rights: Why You Need a Maryland Traumatic Brain Injury Lawyer

If someone else’s negligence caused your traumatic brain injury, you have the right to pursue compensation for your losses.

Medical bills, lost wages, pain and suffering, and future care costs can be overwhelming. That’s where The Yost Legal Group comes in. The compassionate attorneys at The Yost Legal Group will provide a free consultation and provide you with the information you need to pursue a claim.

Why Choose The Yost Legal Group?

Maryland TBI Experience: Our attorneys have decades of experience representing TBI victims in Maryland, including those injured in car accidents, pedestrian accidents, truck accidents, and motorcycle accidents.

Proven Results: We’ve recovered hundreds of millions for our clients, helping them rebuild their lives after catastrophic injuries.

Compassionate Support: We understand the challenges TBI victims and families face. Our client-focused approach means you’re never just a case number.

No Fee Unless We Win: Your initial consultation is free, and you pay nothing unless we recover compensation on your behalf.

What Compensation Can You Recover for a TBI Claim?

  • Medical expenses (past and future)
  • Lost income and reduced earning capacity
  • Pain and suffering
  • Emotional distress
  • Rehabilitation and long-term care costs
  • Loss of enjoyment of life

How our Traumatic Brain Injury Lawyers Can Help

When you contact The Yost Legal Group, you get a team that listens, cares, and fights for you. We work with medical experts to document your injuries, calculate the true cost of your losses, and build a strong case for maximum compensation.

Don’t wait. The sooner you contact a Maryland traumatic brain injury lawyer, the better your chance of a successful outcome.

If you or a loved one has suffered a traumatic brain injury in a car accident, pedestrian accident, truck accident, or motorcycle accident in Maryland, don’t face the future alone.

The Yost Legal Group traumatic brain injury attorneys are here to help you understand your rights and secure the compensation you deserve.

Call us at (800)-YOST-LAW, (800)-967-8529, or text 1-410-659-6800 for a free consultation.

Visit our website at www.yostlaw.com to learn more about our experience with traumatic brain injury cases in Maryland.

Remember: The decisions you make after a traumatic brain injury can affect your health, your family, and your future. Get the medical and legal support you need from a trusted Maryland TBI attorney.

Brain Injury from Pedestrian Accident – Truck Accident Traumatic Brain Injury – Best Injury Law Firm

Motorcycle Accident TBI – Best Brain Injury Law Firm Maryland – TBI Lawyer

DC Cardinal Accused of Sexual Abuse Passes Away

Posted on by Loni Liss

Theodore McCarrick, Removed in 2019, Never Faced a Criminal Trial

Ex-cardinal Theodore McCarrick faced serious sexual abuse claims from at least 12 minors. This information comes from sources before the Vatican removed him from the clergy.

Before Pope Francis removed McCarrick from the ministry in 2019, he was one of America’s most powerful Catholic cardinals. He led the Archdiocese of Washington from 2000 to 2006, during which time multiple survivors came forward.

His fame and status hid a long history of sexual abuse against minors that started in the 1970s.

The Yost Legal Group believes survivors. Our compassionate sexual assault lawyers and legal team are here to listen.

If you are a sexual abuse survivor and were sexually molested by a priest in Maryland, contact our clergy abuse lawyers.

Maryland church sexual abuse claims

Standing Up For Survivors of Church Sexual Abuse Against Minors

In February 2025, the Maryland Supreme Court upheld the Child Victims Act. The Yost Legal Group continues to fight for justice for those who have faced institutional sexual abuse.

We are currently representing hundreds of survivors. They all have credible claims against various institutions, including the Archdiocese of Washington.

Call us for a free and confidential consultation with a sexual abuse lawyer. Call or text The Yost Legal Group at 410-659-6800 today.

We will listen to you and provide support. An attorney for sexual abuse will hold the Archdiocese of Washington accountable. You may seek justice for the harm caused by the clergy.

sexual abuse in a church requires an attorney for sexual abuse like The Yost Legal Group

Maryland vs. DC: How Child Victims Laws Differ for Abuse Survivors

The District of Columbia does not have a Maryland Child Victims Act. This act removed the time limit for childhood sexual abuse survivors. The 2018 amendment to DC’s Sexual Abuse Statute of Limitations changed the rules. Now, victims can file civil claims until they are 40 years old.

DC Law 22-311, § 12–301. Limitation of time for bringing actions, [(a)]: “(11) for the recovery of damages arising out of sexual abuse that occurred when the victim was less than 35 years of age— the date the victim attains the age of 40 years…”

Survivors of childhood sexual abuse in the District of Columbia have a deadline. They must file their claims before they turn 40. This is important to avoid losing their right to sue.

The Archdiocese of Washington operates 144 parishes across six territories. Five of those territories are within southern Maryland counties: Calvert, Charles, Montgomery, Prince George’s, and St. Mary’s.

Anyone harmed by a member of the Archdiocese of Washington as a minor, within Maryland, qualifies under Maryland’s laws and statutes.

If you were sexually abused as a minor in Maryland by a member of the Archdiocese of Washington, it does not matter how old you are now. You still have time to bring a civil case against the Church. You are not alone.

According to the most recent data from Catholic-Hierarchy.org, the Archdiocese of Washington oversees more than 680,000 worshipers. As such, given the position of power and trust, the archdiocese has a duty to protect every one of its parishioners. Especially from its own abusive clergy members.

Unfortunately, the sad reality is that the Archdiocese of Washington was negligent in its duty. They have exhibited a pattern of child sex abuse, not just with this archdiocese but with the Catholic Church in general.

sexual assault of a minor requires an experienced sexual assault lawyer

Late Ex-Cardinal Theodore “Uncle Ted” McCarrick

James became a victim of sexual abuse by Father Theodore McCarrick. The sexual assault of a minor causes post-traumatic stress disorder. As a victim of sexual assault, James took legal action and filed an abuse case. Priest molestation is sexual violence and child sexual abuse.

According to James, he called himself “Uncle Ted.” His family had been close friends with Father McCarrick before James was even born.

In the spring of 1958, Father McCarrick, nearly 28 years old and just two weeks ordained, baptized James at Our Lady of Mount Carmel in Tenafly, NJ.

Eleven years later, after James had moved to California with his family, the grooming began. Father McCarrick visited often. James was struggling in school and with the move. The family thought McCarrick could help.

James said the physical sexual abuse began when he was 13 years old, when the priest first touched his penis.

James would not tell anyone of his abuse by Father Theodore McCarrick until decades later. At one point, he did tell his biological uncle, who, according to James, told him “to take the secret to his grave.” His uncle and “Uncle Ted” were friends. Both are now deceased.

James may have been the first, but he was not the last. Sexual abuse in the church causes sexual assault survivors years of PTSD.

He Told His Young Victims to Call Him Uncle Ted

1969 New York Appointment. In 1969, Cardinal Terence Cooke recalled McCarrick to New York after a multi-year stint in Puerto Rico.

In the winter of 1971, John Doe was 16 years old. At that time, McCarrick was a priest in the Archdiocese of New York. Doe was a student at Cathedral Prep Seminary, wanting to become a priest.

In the sacristy at the Manhattan seminary’s cathedral, McCarrick sexually abused Doe for the first time. According to Doe’s lawyer, whenever McCarrick saw the teen, he would tell him how good-looking he was.

Then, in the winter of 1972, McCarrick cornered the boy in a bathroom: “He just came in, grabbed him, shoved his hand into his pants, and tried to get his hand into his underwear. The kid had to struggle and push him away,’ the lawyer said.”

1981 New Jersey Appointment: From there, McCarrick continued to rise through the ranks of the Catholic Church quickly. In the winter of 1981, the Church made him the first bishop of the new Diocese of Metuchen in New Jersey.

Those who knew him and observed his behavior said he was friendly with all of the seminarians he was in charge of. Still, he did play favorites:

From Newark to New York: The Dark Legacy of Archbishop McCarrick

Beach House Visits: “[McCarrick] would invite a few he especially favored to overnight stays at a beach house in Sea Girt, NJ”

Mr. Ciolek, a young seminarian who got those beach house invites, told The New York Times in 2018. He explained how McCarrick would “assign sleeping arrangements.” He would choose one guest each night to share his room, which had one large bed.

Ciolek also detailed how McCarrick would initiate contact with the young men’s lower backs or thighs, much to some people’s disgust.

Another seminarian from the Sea Girt trips shared more details about McCarrick’s abuses in the 1980s. This person asked to remain unnamed. This was during his rapid rise to power.

1986 Newark NJ: In the spring of 1986, Pope John Paul II made Bishop McCarrick the Archbishop of Newark. This diocese was one of the largest in the country, with over one million Catholic parishioners.

The “Beach House Doe,” however, would be sexually abused by McCarrick in 1987 in a small New York City apartment above a hospital, according to reporting by The Times in 2018:

“There, Archbishop McCarrick asked the seminarian to change into a striped sailor shirt and a pair of shorts he had on hand, and joined him in bed, according to the seminarian’s written account. ‘He put his arms around me and wrapped his legs between mine,.”

“He also wrote that he once saw Archbishop McCarrick having sex with a young priest in a cabin … and that the archbishop invited him to be ‘next.'”

The “Beach House Doe’s” former priest’s file also included handwritten notes from McCarrick, which he signed “Uncle Ted” or “Uncle T.”

With Warnings Ignored, McCarrick Continues Ascent

Mr. Ciolek was a young seminarian. McCarrick made him share a bed during beach house visits. Ciolek “trusted … confided in … [and] admired” McCarrick. McCarrick used his power to take advantage of young, impressionable, and vulnerable boys and young men like Ciolek.

McCarrick also used the intimate knowledge he had gained from Ciolek to keep him further under his thumb. Ciolek revealed to McCarrick that he was a survivor of sexual abuse by a teacher in his Catholic high school.

Instead of giving the vulnerable young person advice and guidance, McCarrick retraumatized him repeatedly.

The handwritten letters in Ciolek’s former priest’s file also revealed that “Uncle Ted” referred to the members of his young beach house overnight trips as “nephew.” Per one letter, McCarrick wrote to Ciolek in the late ’80s:

“I just wanted to tell you how glad I am that we had the chance to get together this summer. It wasn’t as often as I would have liked, but I know how ‘social’ my nephew is!”

It is not illogical to surmise that even if Ciolek had come forward back then, the Church would have ignored him.

Your Voice Matters: Confidential Support for Survivors of Abuse

“Beach House Doe” filed the first documented complaint against McCarrick, giving his confession in the process.

He wrote a letter to the new bishop at Metuchen, the one who succeeded McCarrick, revealing that the archbishop had “inappropriately touched him and other seminarians in the 1980s.”

“Beach House Doe” went on to reveal that the instances of sexual abuse he survived and the trauma they caused “triggered him to touch two 15-year-old boys inappropriately.” He did something wrong. He needed to confess.

For his troubles, the Church put the then-priest in therapy and transferred him to a new parish—standard practice. There is little evidence to suggest they spoke with McCarrick after receiving “Beach House Doe’s” complaint.

Empowering Survivors to Seek Justice, One Story at a Time

In this case, there was no accountability. Instead, in 1995, the Church gave McCarrick the honor of hosting Pope John Paul II during his visit to Newark. The archbishop was also responsible for leading a large public mass for the pope’s visit.

A few years later, Mr. Ciolek received a surprise call. It was from the office of the Metuchen diocese. McCarrick’s former secretary from Metuchen wanted to meet with Ciolek.

At this meeting, the former secretary asked Ciolek directly if he had any plans to sue the diocese. He even mentioned McCarrick by name.

“‘ And I literally laughed, and I said, no,’ Mr. Ciolek said, adding that the monsignor responded with a sigh of relief.”

Within a year, Pope John Paul II promoted Archbishop McCarrick. He left his station in Newark to lead the Archdiocese of Washington. Three months after that, they appointed McCarrick as a cardinal.

All of this happened despite a warning from a priest in New Jersey. The NJ priest had heard several first-hand accounts from seminarians about the sexual abuses by McCarrick. Many committed against underage boys at his beach house.

Despite a direct phone call with the pope’s representative and a written letter submitted to the Vatican, the priest never received a response.

If you or a loved one is the survivor of sexual abuse by a member of the Archdiocese of Washington, you may have a case. The experienced clergy sexual abuse lawyers at The Yost Legal Group are here to help you seek the justice you deserve. Contact us today for a free and confidential consultation: 1-800-YOST-LAW.

Warnings Dismissed: McCarrick’s Presence at the Heart of the Vatican

In 2002, the pope, who would pass away just three years later, summoned McCarrick and other cardinals to help manage the Church’s PR crisis as reports of sexual abuse within the Church reached a fever pitch.

He was a voting member of the papal conclave that elected Pope Benedict XVI after John Paul II’s passing in 2005.

In 2006, McCarrick retired as the archbishop of Washington. He was 75, the traditional retirement age for bishops. He remained a highly regarded cardinal.

In 2013, he participated in the cardinals’ meetings held before the conclave that elected Pope Francis.

Though he was active in major Vatican events and served as a leader in many high-profile funerals in DC, McCarrick seemed to have receded from the public eye.

As an “unofficial ambassador,” the Vatican sent him around the world to East Asian and the Middle East, regions where the Church couldn’t necessarily send “official ambassadors.”

A quiet life of travel and meetings could not last forever for McCarrick. His past and the renewed focus on the Catholic Church’s crimes in the 2010s made that impossible.

The Price of Silence: McCarrick’s Influence in the Catholic Church

In the spring of 2018, McCarrick (then 87) released a statement announcing his retirement from the College of Cardinals after advice from the Church.

Months prior, the Church had received another credible claim from a John Doe. The claim stated that McCarrick committed sexual abuse. John Doe said he was 16 in 1971 at Cathedral Prep Seminary in New York.

In July 2018, the pope accepted McCarrick’s resignation. He ordered him to commit to “a life of prayer and penance in seclusion.”

Seven months later, in February 2019, the Vatican defrocked McCarrick. To date, he is still the highest-ranking member of the Catholic Church expelled for sexual abuse.

McCarrick was found guilty by a church tribunal. The Vatican’s official statement read that the former cardinal was guilty of the following:

“solicitation in the Sacrament of Confession and sins against the Sixth Commandment with minors and with adults, with the aggravating factor of the abuse of power.”

The Catholic Church made its full 461-page report on ex-Cardinal Theodore McCarrick public in November 2020. This occurred nearly two years after they removed him from the ministry.

Somehow, despite over 30 years of allegations, rumors, and whispers, the Church found the pervasiveness of McCarrick’s abuses surprising.

“I have blown the whistle for 30 years and got nowhere,” said the New Jersey priest. He contacted the Vatican before McCarrick became a cardinal. The justice system failed so many young boys against sexual harassment and physical injury.

Confidential Support for Survivors of Clergy Abuse—We’re Here for You

Theodor McCarrick died on April 3, 2025. He was 94 years old. McCarrick has a long history of sexually abusing minors and adults for over 30 years in the Catholic Church. Yet, he never faced any criminal charges.

We know this is a sensitive and challenging matter. Our sexual assault attorneys understand that many survivors may never want to come forward. However, at The Yost Legal Group, we want you to know that we are here for you.

Our sexual abuse attorneys are here to listen whenever you are ready to share your story. All consultations with our experienced lawyers for sexual abuse are free and confidential. Your traumatic experiences have caused significant pain and suffering in your life.

If you have allegations of sexual abuse and are ready to talk, we are here to listen. Call or text The Yost Legal Group at 410-659-6800.

The caring legal team at The Yost Legal Group has successfully sued the Archdiocese of Baltimore. They are helping survivors get settlements. If you or a loved one is a survivor, it is important to speak with a legal professional soon. Call or text The Yost Legal Group today at 410-659-6800.

Priest Sexual Abuse – Maryland Church Sexual Abuse – Catholic Church Abuse Claims

Sexual Trauma Therapy – Sexual Abuse Therapy – Lawyers for Survivors

What Is The Depo-Provera Multidistrict Litigation?

Posted on by Loni Liss

Earlier this year (February 2025), the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) issued an order forming the Depo-Provera Multidistrict Litigation (MDL).

The Depo-Provera MDL is a consolidation of all federally filed Depo-Provera cases involving women who have taken Depo-Provera birth control shot and have been diagnosed with a meningioma (brain tumor). The MDL is located in Florida and is being overseen by Judge M. Casey Rodgers.

If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with a meningioma after taking the depo shot birth control medication, you might be entitled to compensation.

The experienced Depo lawyers at The Yost Legal Group are here to help you. Please contact us today to schedule a free consultation to discuss filing a Depo Lawsuit.

woman diagnosed with meningioma brain tumor while on the depo shot

Is My Depo-Provera Claim Part Of a Class Action?

It is essential not to confuse the Depo-Provera MDL with a Depo class-action lawsuit. A lawsuit filed in the Depo-Provera MDL is NOT the same as a class action, but is a separate individual claim for personal injuries.

This strategy allows these cases to be handled more efficiently. The costs can be shared among all parties, instead of each person facing the expenses alone.

Unlike a class action, where the settlement or verdict is split among the members of the class, a settlement or verdict in an MDL case will be individual, based on the facts and circumstances of each person’s individual claim.

Because a claimant’s case is filed in the Depo-Provera MDL in Florida, it does not mean that she will necessarily be required to travel to Florida for any of the legal proceedings. Her drug injury attorney would do all of the traveling and make the necessary court appearances on her behalf.

Should her case go to trial, there is a chance that it would be tried in Florida. However, her attorneys would discuss that decision with her, if necessary, well in advance of her trial date and address any concerns she may have.

Meningioma brain tumor from the Depo Provera birth control shot

What Is The Current Status Of The Depo-Provera Litigation?

The Depo-Provera MDL is still only in the early stages of litigation. Consequently, none of the Depo-Provera cases have gone to trial, no trial dates have been definitively scheduled, and to the best of our knowledge, no Depo Provera Lawsuit Settlements have been reached.

Additionally, should a Depo Birth Control lawsuit be filed on a claimant’s behalf, she should expect that, once filed, it will take at least four years, possibly more, to resolve her case.

While this may seem like a long time to prosecute a case, it is not an unusual timeframe for pharmaceutical litigation.

Federal courts have numerous tools at their disposal to help resolve mass tort litigations, such as the Depo-Provera MDL.

Understanding Bellwether Trials: A Key Step in Mass Litigation

A ‘bellwether trial’ is a legal tool used when there are a large number of similar cases. In this process, the judge and attorneys select a small group of representative cases—called bellwether cases—to be fully prepared and tried before a jury.

These cases are chosen because they reflect the common issues found in all the related lawsuits. The purpose is to provide everyone involved with a clearer understanding of how future cases might be decided and to help move the overall litigation closer to resolution.

The outcomes of these initial trials help the judge and parties assess whether to settle the remaining cases, and what fair settlement amounts might be.

Even if someone’s case isn’t selected as a bellwether, the legal work and decisions made during these trials impact all the cases involved.

Plaintiffs who are not selected as bellwether cases may not be directly involved in the daily proceedings of the bellwether process. However, the efforts of the attorneys and the judge impact all cases within the litigation, not just the ones chosen as bellwether cases.

Depo Provera lawsuit, The Yost Legal Group

Meningioma Brain Tumors Linked to Depo-Provera Birth Control Injections

Recent medical research has raised serious concerns about the safety of Depo-Provera, a commonly used birth control injection. Studies show a link between the use of Depo-Provera and the development of meningioma brain tumors. Meningioma is a type of tumor that forms on the membranes covering the brain and spinal cord.

Meningiomas are usually benign, but they can cause significant health issues, including headaches, vision problems, memory loss, and neurological complications. Women who have used Depo-Provera for extended periods may be at a greater risk of developing these tumors.

If you or a loved one has received Depo-Provera injections and later been diagnosed with a meningioma brain tumor, you are not alone.

The Yost Legal Group is filing Depo Provera lawsuits against the drug manufacturer. Our Depo Provera lawyers are helping affected individuals understand their rights and options.

Early detection and legal advice are both crucial steps in protecting your health and pursuing any compensation to which you may be entitled.

If you have questions about this issue or believe you may have a Depo Provera case, contact us for a free consultation. Your health and well-being matter, and you deserve answers and support.

Diagnosed with Meningioma After Depo-Provera? You May Have a Claim.

You may have a claim if you or a loved one has been diagnosed with a meningioma after taking Depo-Provera. Our experienced drug injury lawyers will review your medical condition and file a depo shot lawsuit on your behalf.

The experienced Depo lawyers at The Yost Legal Group are here to help you hold the manufacturer accountable for their negligence. Dangerous side effects from prescription drugs by drug companies cause significant health risks.

Our personal injury law attorneys are filing lawsuits against the Depo shot side effects. We are available to answer any questions you have, so please get in touch.

Call or text us at 1-410-659-6800 today for a free case evaluation. There is no charge or fee unless a recovery is made on your behalf. Contact us today to help you obtain the justice you deserve.

Pharmaceutical Injury Attorney – Medication Injury Lawyer – Lawsuit Depo Provera

Contact Form

DO I HAVE A CASE?

Contact us at the Yost Legal Group for a free initial consultation. We can help to provide information about ongoing litigation or discuss the circumstances of your individual case. There is no fee or expense unless you recover.